Fruit of the Psychopath: 9/11 and the Triple Cross Revisited, by Laurent Guyenot
http://www.sott.net/article/285042-Fruit-of-the-psychopath-9-11-and-the-triple-cross-revisited
My response to the above Laurent Guyenot article consists of the following four parts:
1) Regarding the choice of September 11 as the date of the attacks:
If you're going to stage some attacks and frame Muslims for these attacks, then September 11 is a perfect date for staging these attacks. On September 11 and 12, 1683, various European powers defeated the Islamic Ottoman Empire in Vienna, Austria. This defeat marked the end of the Ottoman Empire's expansion into Europe. Thus, September 11 is a very bad day in Islamic history. Muslims may want to somehow avenge that day.
Also, in the years preceding the attacks, some American films and tv shows referenced the number "911" in various ways. This is believed to have been "predictive programming", an effort to get Americans "psychologically ready" for the attacks. One example of this programming is the 1991 film "Terminator 2", in which there is an overpass that is "9 feet, 11 inches" above the ground. Thus, it appears that the planners of the attacks knew as early as 1991 that the attacks would be staged on a September 11. Unless these planners knew in 1991 that the Carlyle Group was someday going to have a meeting on a September 11, I doubt that the planners had the Carlyle Group in mind when they planned the attacks. More likely, the planners had September 11, 1683, in mind.
Also, September 11, 2001, was part of the Selichot period on the Jewish calendar. The Selichot period occurs around the holidays of Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur. On 9/11/2001, as part of Selichot, observant Jews would have been required to attend religious services in the morning and would have been late for work. So, any obervant Jew who worked at the WTC Twin Towers or at the Pentagon would not have been at work in the morning, when the attacks occurred. However, some reports state that there were Selichot prayer groups in the WTC Twin Towers, and that Jewish workers could get to work on time and still observe Selichot. So, if the Israelis planned the attacks, the Israelis were most likely hoping that Selichot would keep Jewish workers away from the Twin Towers and the Pentagon.
2) Regarding the "hijacked plot":
On the message board "Let's Roll Community Forums", it was stated that someone had done a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on the tenants of the WTC Twin Towers. That request produced some startling information. For most of their history, from the time they were built until a few years before 9/11/2001, the Twin Towers were largely unoccupied. Most of the companies that were at the Twin Towers on 9/11/2001, had moved into the Twin Towers in the few years before 9/11/2001.
Conclusion: The Twin Towers were built in the 1970s for the sole purpose of being demolished in a staged terrorist attack. Before the Towers were needed, they were largely vacant. When the Towers were needed, tenants were brought in.
Also, shortly after the attacks, George W. Bush stated a few times that he had seen AA Flight 11 fly into the North Tower LIVE, as it happened. But that's impossible. That event was not televised live. So, what's going on?
Well, one conspiracy website reported that, prior to the attacks, Bush, Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc. were running simulations and drills to prepare for staging the attacks. That website theorized that Bush saw the North Tower get hit during the simulations. Bush then slipped up and said that he saw the North Tower get hit live.
So, given the FOIA request and the simulation report, it is doubtful that any plan to bring down the WTC Twin Towers would be known only to Israelis and Zionists, and NOT to Bush, Rice, Rumsfeld, the Pentagon, CIA, FBI, etc.
As for Rumsfeld's announcement about the Pentagon's missing funds, I would think that the perfect time to announce something like that, is the day before a major terrorist attack. After the attack, people forget about your announcement.
3) Regarding the "no planes" theory:
The 2006 Paul Greengrass film "United 93" is largely considered to be a propaganda piece for the official story of 9/11. However, this film does provide some evidence for the "no planes" theory.
In one scene, the air-traffic controllers at Newark International Airport's control tower, which is directly west of the Twin Towers, are sitting down, looking at their radar screens. At one point, one controller simply looks out the window at the Twin Towers. He does this for no particular reason. And the controller is surprised to see that the North Tower is on fire.
But why is this guy surprised? Shouldn't he have seen AA Flight 11 flying southward into the Tower, on his radar screen? Perhaps the controller did not see a plane because there was no plane. Perhaps there was only an explosion.
4) Since we are talking about Israel's involvement in 9/11, I think it would be appropriate to revisit some threads that I initiated on the SOTT forums way back in 2006. These threads discuss the connections between Israel and some of the 9/11 passengers (especially Todd Beamer of United 93).
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=3675
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,3747
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,4043
Also, I started the following Todd Beamer-related thread on the "Let's Roll Community Forums" in 2009:
http://letsrollforums.com/9-11-conspiracy-strange-t19015.html?s=0ce3365209ad9adb71f8bec259176904&
Note: Some of the links I mentioned in these threads may no longer be valid.
And speaking of Todd Beamer, in one of the above threads, 9/11 researcher Lisa Guliani stated that people were having trouble locating Todd and Lisa Beamer's marriage certificate.
http://www.sott.net/article/285042-Fruit-of-the-psychopath-9-11-and-the-triple-cross-revisited
My response to the above Laurent Guyenot article consists of the following four parts:
1) Regarding the choice of September 11 as the date of the attacks:
If you're going to stage some attacks and frame Muslims for these attacks, then September 11 is a perfect date for staging these attacks. On September 11 and 12, 1683, various European powers defeated the Islamic Ottoman Empire in Vienna, Austria. This defeat marked the end of the Ottoman Empire's expansion into Europe. Thus, September 11 is a very bad day in Islamic history. Muslims may want to somehow avenge that day.
Also, in the years preceding the attacks, some American films and tv shows referenced the number "911" in various ways. This is believed to have been "predictive programming", an effort to get Americans "psychologically ready" for the attacks. One example of this programming is the 1991 film "Terminator 2", in which there is an overpass that is "9 feet, 11 inches" above the ground. Thus, it appears that the planners of the attacks knew as early as 1991 that the attacks would be staged on a September 11. Unless these planners knew in 1991 that the Carlyle Group was someday going to have a meeting on a September 11, I doubt that the planners had the Carlyle Group in mind when they planned the attacks. More likely, the planners had September 11, 1683, in mind.
Also, September 11, 2001, was part of the Selichot period on the Jewish calendar. The Selichot period occurs around the holidays of Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur. On 9/11/2001, as part of Selichot, observant Jews would have been required to attend religious services in the morning and would have been late for work. So, any obervant Jew who worked at the WTC Twin Towers or at the Pentagon would not have been at work in the morning, when the attacks occurred. However, some reports state that there were Selichot prayer groups in the WTC Twin Towers, and that Jewish workers could get to work on time and still observe Selichot. So, if the Israelis planned the attacks, the Israelis were most likely hoping that Selichot would keep Jewish workers away from the Twin Towers and the Pentagon.
2) Regarding the "hijacked plot":
On the message board "Let's Roll Community Forums", it was stated that someone had done a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request on the tenants of the WTC Twin Towers. That request produced some startling information. For most of their history, from the time they were built until a few years before 9/11/2001, the Twin Towers were largely unoccupied. Most of the companies that were at the Twin Towers on 9/11/2001, had moved into the Twin Towers in the few years before 9/11/2001.
Conclusion: The Twin Towers were built in the 1970s for the sole purpose of being demolished in a staged terrorist attack. Before the Towers were needed, they were largely vacant. When the Towers were needed, tenants were brought in.
Also, shortly after the attacks, George W. Bush stated a few times that he had seen AA Flight 11 fly into the North Tower LIVE, as it happened. But that's impossible. That event was not televised live. So, what's going on?
Well, one conspiracy website reported that, prior to the attacks, Bush, Rice, Cheney, Rumsfeld, etc. were running simulations and drills to prepare for staging the attacks. That website theorized that Bush saw the North Tower get hit during the simulations. Bush then slipped up and said that he saw the North Tower get hit live.
So, given the FOIA request and the simulation report, it is doubtful that any plan to bring down the WTC Twin Towers would be known only to Israelis and Zionists, and NOT to Bush, Rice, Rumsfeld, the Pentagon, CIA, FBI, etc.
As for Rumsfeld's announcement about the Pentagon's missing funds, I would think that the perfect time to announce something like that, is the day before a major terrorist attack. After the attack, people forget about your announcement.
3) Regarding the "no planes" theory:
The 2006 Paul Greengrass film "United 93" is largely considered to be a propaganda piece for the official story of 9/11. However, this film does provide some evidence for the "no planes" theory.
In one scene, the air-traffic controllers at Newark International Airport's control tower, which is directly west of the Twin Towers, are sitting down, looking at their radar screens. At one point, one controller simply looks out the window at the Twin Towers. He does this for no particular reason. And the controller is surprised to see that the North Tower is on fire.
But why is this guy surprised? Shouldn't he have seen AA Flight 11 flying southward into the Tower, on his radar screen? Perhaps the controller did not see a plane because there was no plane. Perhaps there was only an explosion.
4) Since we are talking about Israel's involvement in 9/11, I think it would be appropriate to revisit some threads that I initiated on the SOTT forums way back in 2006. These threads discuss the connections between Israel and some of the 9/11 passengers (especially Todd Beamer of United 93).
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php?topic=3675
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,3747
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,4043
Also, I started the following Todd Beamer-related thread on the "Let's Roll Community Forums" in 2009:
http://letsrollforums.com/9-11-conspiracy-strange-t19015.html?s=0ce3365209ad9adb71f8bec259176904&
Note: Some of the links I mentioned in these threads may no longer be valid.
And speaking of Todd Beamer, in one of the above threads, 9/11 researcher Lisa Guliani stated that people were having trouble locating Todd and Lisa Beamer's marriage certificate.
