Guardian said:
Everything you say is true...but then there's the child who might get a bit more food that night if s/he goes back to his/her "owner" with a few extra coins.
As harsh as this may sound, think about the lessons learned by that child who is fed that night...and the lessons learned by the children who watched him/her eat while they went hungry because they did not garner those few extra coins.
The one who is fed learns that he will be rewarded by pleasing his "owner" and decides that he will beg even more in order to have a full belly. The idea of sharing his food is not allowed due to the owner's power over him/her, so the child eventually becomes hardened to the fact that the other children he works with are starving. The child learns to survive in a negative paradigm and passes this dynamic on to others as an example of "success".
And what about the hungry children in that group who displeased their owner? They will either learn to survive as did the child who is fed that night or be abused for not meeting expectations. Perhaps one becomes so hungry, so abused that he/she finally decides to exercise some free will and look for an escape from the suffering. Depending on the path chosen, the escape can lead to more misery, an early death or, if the Universe is willing, the kindness of strangers and the finding of a sanctuary where the child can learn there is more to this life than looking out for number one.
And perhaps that child who found a refuge from his misery grows up and does something creative and hopeful for children in his former situation. It has happened. And will.
Yes, children will still suffer...horribly. Perhaps that is the lesson they must learn here in this life to eventually grow and become something greater. Just be on the look-out for the escapees - and use perspicacity when dealing with stories - not forgetting that there is always risk involved in helping others.
Guardian said:
Those same coins donated to a "third world humanitarian" org would only be a drop in the bucket ..IF the org officers don't loot donated funds outright.
That is a definite risk one takes when giving. A bit of knowledge about a reputable charitable organization goes a long way...and those few coins add up if enough people send them in.
Guardian said:
I guess what I feel like we might be giving them is "time" ...helping them, in some small way, to survive to the point that they can make their own choices.
That's where the Law of Three and making a decision on an individual basis comes in. We will do what we will do.
Love that big 'ole heart of yours, Guardian.
[Moderator's note: fixed broken quote]