Gravity and the Natural Frequency, a discarded logic

[Inquorate]

As this is a fairly technical series of questions, I am including the following links to give Laura et al an idea of what is going on, so they have the concepts in place for the Cassiopeaens to 'hone-in' on;

_https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6FOq7-WsL5c
How to measure srf or Spatial Resonant Frequency of a Coil

_https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JIIhgHTEoM0
Driving LED, No Battery and No Transistor

_https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8eAQ2gpbWWI
3-Coil srf Demo Part1 - YouTube

_https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jv-Q-_IszCg
3-Coil srf Demo Part2 - YouTube

_https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PAezDm2jvbA
More On Coil Spatial Resonance - YouTube


Here are my questions;

There is all over the world a natural frequency group of roughly 13.75 Mhz which can be observed on a good quality spectrum analyser [_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spectrum_analyzer]. This frequency is resolved by the equation; natural frequency = 4 x Pi x speed of quantum transition (1.094 million meters per second), and has it's foundation in the geometry of the universe.

//Is this related to the interaction (absorption and dispersal) of gravity with mass?
//Is the 4 in 4.Pi.1.095E6 related to the theoretical spin of the graviton?

//This natural frequency varies with diurnal cycles and, since 2010, has been increasing with day/night-time cycles; is this night-time change due to the approaching gravity wave?

We can build an electronic circuit;

_http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/96/hg8q.jpg/

http://www.hereticalbuilders.com/showthread.php?t=913
Amplifying a Background frequency using 3 tuned coils

with the special arrangement of coils and their resonance with themselves and their resonance with the space they occupy to

a) build the initial electrical current
b)use that current to stimulate another coil at twice it's spatially resonant frequency (parametric pumping)
c) Using a diode to change the base frequency, excite another coil such that it can, whilst also stimulating the first coil, power a small LED.

//assuming that this concept can be scaled up, (to my knowledge it has been) will it still work in 4D?

//What is the best way to remain alive while investigating advancing this technology / discarded logic, to hopefully bring it to the world? :D

I am waiting for a workcover/insurance settlement due to incapacitating injury to afford the equipment required to successfully tune the coils and investigate the coil relationships, then to investigate how to upscale the device.

Any C help would be greatly appreciated!

 

[Inquorate]

Crikey, I can hear the crickets chirping :)

I referred the inventor to some of the Cassiopeaen transcripts regarding gravity et al and this was his response;

"No to Gravity. Gravity does not affect the Quantum World and Gravity is
not exclusive of the Energy Lattice.

I think I made reference to this a few years back on some forum, think
of a very weak vibration device (random oscillations) placed in a secure
attachment to the wall of a giant skyscraper. Keeping track of the input
to the vibrator (oscillator) and using integration will easily show that
this tiny device could in no way bring down the building to which it is
attached, yet it indeed will. A sympathetic set of oscillations will
begin over time and the building will self destruct. Now we have indeed
an over-unity condition
The energy lattice can be set into motion in the same way and the
return will be far greater than the input."

But the questions I have asked in my previous post remain important to me, and potentially to the world if i can manage to get it out there. It is my understanding that the inventor is under restrictions from tptb that I would like to avoid. Luckily, he ensured that he released the information in such a way as to remain alive - so at least we have that.

Warm regards to all,
Ben

 

[Mikey]

Indeed a fascinating circuit that this guy has built.

//What is the best way to remain alive while investigating advancing this technology / discarded logic, to hopefully bring it to the world? :D

The best way I guess is having knowledge about psychopathology so that one is not bought by parties that have a vested interest in keeping such technologies hidden. Obviously none of the inventors of such unusual technologies have succeeded in that, otherwise we would have some good open documentation about how to replicate those little machines.

There are many videos about alleged free energy machines/circuits available (and I personally believe that some of them actually are extracting energy from the environment), but what you find is: closed comments, no documentation, lots of ignorant people confusing the issues, etc.

I am waiting for a workcover/insurance settlement due to incapacitating injury to afford the equipment required to successfully tune the coils and investigate the coil relationships, then to investigate how to upscale the device.

That would be very interesting. Maybe you can set an example for other researchers how to go about those things correctly, i.e. in an open, scientific way.

I think I made reference to this a few years back on some forum, think
of a very weak vibration device (random oscillations) placed in a secure
attachment to the wall of a giant skyscraper. Keeping track of the input
to the vibrator (oscillator) and using integration will easily show that
this tiny device could in no way bring down the building to which it is
attached, yet it indeed will. A sympathetic set of oscillations will
begin over time and the building will self destruct. Now we have indeed
an over-unity condition

I don't agree with this particular example. You are talking about classical resonance in a mechanical system. The vibration device has to be powered from some external energy source, so that would not be free energy or "over-unity". Plus, a skyscraper would have enough damping (conversion of the mechanical energy into heat) that you probably would not be able to bring the skyscraper down, unless you invest a lot of energy.

It seems electrical/magnetical circuits/machines are more suitable for extracting energy from the environment since you can design them for little damping.

Luckily, he ensured that he released the information in such a way as to remain alive - so at least we have that.

Well, I guess there is not much danger to him while he is only powering a little LED (I could be mistaken though). I guess the situation would change if he would manage to scale his circuits in such a way that one can power a household, and then document everything clearly and share it with others.

 

[Cosmos]

What I found is that you can very easily get lost in this "free energy community/world" out there.
In short you can end up investing so much time and energy into it and most often nothing or almost nothing comes out of it.

So I would think twice if you want to continue this road and if it is really worth it...

 

[Inquorate]

It works; I invested in a pc USB based oscilloscope and signal generator, and with the help of some other dedicated researchers at

_http://www.hereticalbuilders.com/forumdisplay.php?f=22

we have observed many of the anomalous artifacts of this technology; it definately isn't RF as it can be easily blocked by an open metal tin (not a faraday cage) and causes some metals to cool below ambient within the field. etc. I won't elucidate here, as there is a lot of information presented in the above link for the committed researcher to replicate the phenomena.

Here he is running the 'toy version' without batteries;

_https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5qUUiMPex8

which he only did after enough of us had his boards and could replicate a wide variety of the artifacts. Smart, that.

Here's his latest video, also running overunity from the looks of things;

_https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_YRmQpBMlqg

Thankyou for the replies

 

[James Henry]

"I think I made reference to this a few years back on some forum, think
of a very weak vibration device (random oscillations) placed in a secure
attachment to the wall of a giant skyscraper. Keeping track of the input
to the vibrator (oscillator) and using integration will easily show that
this tiny device could in no way bring down the building to which it is
attached, yet it indeed will. A sympathetic set of oscillations will
begin over time and the building will self destruct. Now we have indeed
an over-unity condition "

Its kind of off putting and a little suspicious that Dr Stiffler? does not give proper attribution to Tesla and makes it sound like he created a device like this.
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla%27s_oscillator

Even Tesla's small device is only rumored to have worked (something may have shaken his lab but Tesla did like to play with BIG toys too and no building ever came down), no one else has ever witnessed a working device as described.

Not that they are the be all end all authorities, but the Mythbuster team tried to recreate it with no real success.
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters_%282006_season%29#Episode_60_.E2.80.93_.22Earthquake_Machine.22

He seems pretty sure of himself (above in my bold emphasis) with no proof to his claim.

As Data states it takes a lot of energy to bring a building down, but it is possible.
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mechanical_resonance

 

[John G]

I referred the inventor to some of the Cassiopeaen transcripts regarding gravity et al and this was his response;

"No to Gravity. Gravity does not affect the Quantum World and Gravity is
not exclusive of the Energy Lattice."

"Gravity" as the Cs are using it would be more than what is conventionally thought of as gravity. It would include the math for the "aether" too which would relate to the quantum world and zpf (zero point force). In my favorite models, you can think of gravity as lattice links between the spacetime vertices where fermions/antifermions sit. Aether would relate to extra spacetime dimensions and conformal transformations. At very high energy, gravity might be just information.

 

[Inquorate]

Its kind of off putting and a little suspicious that Dr Stiffler? does not give proper attribution to Tesla and makes it sound like he created a device like this.
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tesla%27s_oscillator

Even Tesla's small device is only rumored to have worked (something may have shaken his lab but Tesla did like to play with BIG toys too and no building ever came down), no one else has ever witnessed a working device as described.

Not that they are the be all end all authorities, but the Mythbuster team tried to recreate it with no real success.
_http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MythBusters_%282006_season%29#Episode_60_.E2.80.93_.22Earthquake_Machine.22

I'd hardly take anything the Mythbuster team said as gospel; They're all 'half fool.'

And in communication to me via email, I doubt he felt it necessary to make the point of Tesla's device; knowing full well that I knew. Please view the videos linked. The device works in ways you would always suspect unless you built one or thoroughly researched via the first link given.

I have even collected all his relevant comments from two forums (and posted them to aforementioned link), and although he has made many private (unpublishable) comments to me, his public comments will suffice for all but the dedicated researcher.

Sorry, but I didn't intend to defend a technology here, just ask questions. For any other concerns relating to the SEC phenomena, please join me here;

_http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,31789.0.html

After reviewing the links.

Warm regards

 

[Inquorate]

"Gravity" as the Cs are using it would be more than what is conventionally thought of as gravity. It would include the math for the "aether" too which would relate to the quantum world and zpf (zero point force). In my favorite models, you can think of gravity as lattice links between the spacetime vertices where fermions/antifermions sit. Aether would relate to extra spacetime dimensions and conformal transformations. At very high energy, gravity might be just information.

That's a good way of putting it. I was wondering if perhaps spin was changing, that would explain the shifting of the natural frequency group. Otherwise, is the speed of quantum transition changing, or is Pi?

I'm no physicist, but i find the answer intriguing and perhaps a little bit important.

 

[James Henry]

I'd hardly take anything the Mythbuster team said as gospel; They're all 'half fool.'

Agreed, that's why I said:

Not that they are the be all end all authorities, but the Mythbuster team tried to recreate it with no real success.

The example was given as a modern attempt to recreate the device. It shook but there was no "self destruction" as Dr Stiffler states.

I find it funny you then use a quote about a Mythbuster experiment to refute my quoted post in this thread:
http://cassiopaea.org/forum/index.php/topic,31789.msg432174.html#msg432174

"In a Mythbusters episode they reproduced one of Tesla's experiments with resonance by determining the natural frequency of an unused truss bridge, and then created a device which would "ping" the bridge with a pneumatically actuated rod that struck the bridge at exactly that same frequency, thereby causing the bridge to resonate. The tiny vibrations caused by the air-powered pinger were timed at exactly the right frequency to cause the pings to add up. Eventually they got the whole bridge to shake just by hitting it with a tiny metal rod, over and over, at exactly the right time."
_http://everything2.com/title/Tesla+coil

Why are you using this quote? It shook, nowhere does it state destruction. How does this refute what I stated?

And in communication to me via email, I doubt he felt it necessary to make the point of Tesla's device; knowing full well that I knew.

I understand. Unfortunately in the context of your post some may view it as if he was the developer. No big deal and not the major point I was trying to convey.

The point of this Forum is the Work and to see objective reality. So when an "expert" makes a claim it is questioned. Dr Stiffler's claim in the quote you provided is currently false with no evidence to back it up; and has an err of self-importance. That is why I question his character.

One man's obsession can be another man's downfall. We are all here to learn our lessons.

My post had nothing to do with the tech he is developing. It would be great if he can make a practical device that will benefit mankind.

Warm regards to you also.

 

[Inquorate]

Please look at the videos i posted in the other thread, it clearly shows that a small vibration can be amplified using spatial energy.

Dr Stiffler is indeed the inventor. I perhaps did not make it clear that he was communicating to me alone in that quote, and I should have made mention of the Tesla vibrator when I made his statement public. In the context that it was made, there was no reason for him to do so.

We cannot know what would have happened if the Mythbuster team had continued the experiment, but my understanding of resonance is that it (kinetic vibrations) would have continued to build until something happened to change the conditions, such as mechanical failure. Even without destruction, one can see a building of the energy level. This does not all come from the vibrator; it comes from the electromagnetic forces holding the metal of the bridge together.

Irregardless of that one situation which we have no data on, as an electrical phenomena using 3 coils and perhaps other means (plasma, metal?), once one knows about spatial self resonance and the speed of sound in the nucleus of an atom (the speed at which phonons travel), and the speed of longitudinal electrical pressure waves in the 'lattice' of space, one can devise circuits that can cause an increase of energy in the circuit, by drawing energy from 'space'.

I do believe this is the magic number that Tesla discovered, but I know for sure that Dr Stiffler has found it through years of research. The Number 1.094 keeps coming up in a SEC field, and all the coils have to be designed with the number in mind.

If you have the time, I recommend you read the documents i compiled of all the inventor's public posts;

_http://www.hereticalbuilders.com/showthread.php?t=920

For the benefit of users here, I have set up a username Cassiopaea password cass01 for that site so the attachments can be viewed.

Please don't post but feel free to access attachments for a short while until I disable the account. It would be better if those interested followed the directions in my signature there to create their own accounts.

Then if anyone still has questions, I will happily answer them as best I can.

Regards

 

[Inquorate]

I'm getting coded and circumspect warnings from people who have worked with me on this stuff to take it underground.

Public or private?

 

[Inquorate]

Back in business, my back surgery worked out really well. Coming off the morphine and methadone has been an epic three month process that near drove me crazy.

Anyway, I thought I'd take a look at two coils, one at 1 F and the other at 2 F, F being the spatially resonant frequency, and see if the amplitude on the oscilloscope increased near the second coil. The tuning appears to have persisted on the occasion of recording, as three harmonics can still be seen on the fft when coil 2 is removed. Initially with one coil, I could not see three peaks although that may be a limitation of the scope given the nearness of the probe.

However I am confident that the amplitude increased a distance from the first coil when the second was present and properly tuned.

The two coils were not connected in this instance. As the srf changes when they are connected, and I'm unsure yet by how much as a general rule. I'll be measuring the uf of the coil and adding a capacitor as well. As you can see the coil relationships are already becoming complex even before determining and using the self resonance of the coils as well.

Two coils, 1 F and 2 F, where F = srf of coil: _http://youtu.be/smRpJ2iJm0s

 

[Archaea]

Hey Inquorate,

Could you explain what a 3-coil is.

I've had a bit of a look at some of this stuff and it looks interesting, but I could never figure out what a 3-coil is, I Googled it and everything.

 

[Inquorate]

A 3 coil system is simply a system with three coils.

Consider a naturally existing frequency, at 13.6 mhz (although you could use any frequency) and call it Nf

Nf = 4.pi.Zc where Zc is the speed of quantum transition

Coil 1 has a naturaly resonant frequency with it's space and environment of 2.Nf, and a resonance with itself (SRF) at 1 or two Nf

Coil 1 is in series with a capacitor, which resonates at 2Nf with low losses (high Q)

The capacitor drives another coil, which has a spatially resonant frequency (srf) of 1Nf.

That coil drives another, through a high frequency diode (changing the phase) at 4.Nf, and that coil can drive a load or remain unloaded.

Either way, it stimulates the first coil, and the whole thing builds energy, shaking the "lattice" or quantum foam or atoms or whatever happens, leading to a slight cooling of the local area and high bandwidth radio frequencies) RF.

The RF can be absorbed by solar cells. In essence, it means that dead heat energy or the same thing that causes atoms to move for all purposes eternally (the wheelworks of nature) can be harvested.

It is possible to use the negister qualities of some transistors to lock in the quantum vibrations and increase the effectiveness of the unit.

There also exists the possibility that specific types of mass with specific measurements may also vibrate, and I'm looking into that as well.

It is all RIDICULOUSLY complicated; change just one thing, like the placement of a component, and you change the spatial resonance of every component. Everything is linked and interdependent with every part a part of and affecting the whole.