Greenland - a geopolitical space on the global chess board?

Can I check something - does the US president have the constitutional power to add a new state to the US?
No, the president needs the congress for that. Also, Greenland would most likely be a territory like Puerto Rico, not a state.

I had a similar thought recently, why now? Why the US is meddling with the internal politics in Venezuela, why are they looking at Greenland as the future 51st US state? Is it for geopolitical reasons only, due to the inevitable uprising of a multipolar world?
It seems to be mostly that, as well as probably Trump's ego. In some ways it is better that the US accepts the multipolar world and focuses on being mostly a regional power in the Americas. Though it may not be that great of a deal for Latin America, depending on how the US will manage its sphere of influence.
 
Flashback 2021: 'How Denmark became the NSA's listening post in Europe'

Denmark served as an outpost for NSA agents spying on German Chancellor Angela Merkel and other politicians across the Rhine, as well as French, Norwegian and Swedish personalities between 2012 and 2014, if not longer. [...]

If the NSA appears to be able to use Denmark as a base for spying on Europe with impunity, it is thanks to a long tradition of collaboration between the two countries' intelligence services. "Denmark has become a sort of de facto and unofficial member of the 'Five Eyes' club..." [...]

Denmark has been engaged in a policy of military support for Washington that almost makes the United Kingdom look like a second-class ally. "We fought alongside the Americans in Libya, Syria, and Afghanistan. You could say that we are a warring country, and that has been the case for almost 30 years," [...]

What does Denmark get in return?

Washington values its northern European ally all the more because of its strategic location in the North Sea not far from the Arctic Ocean, which is likely to become even more important in the years to come.
:lol:
 
Maybe the elites have already decided Greenland needs to be given to the US and Denmark is OK with that, and what we are seeing is just theatre for the masses? 🤷

I think so. Denmark needs to allocate significant financial resources to this sparsely populated and vast geographical area, and this amount will have to increase considerably in the short term. Europe is increasingly having to use its financial resources more efficiently, and considering the outcome, I think Denmark will sell this region at a good price.
 
I came across this article published in 2016

could be a spanner in the works or leverage for those involved ..

Greenland's Glaciers Uncover Secret Cold War US Base With Tons of Toxic Waste​

11:01 GMT 26.09.2016

 
Hard to say if the following is actually part of the real motivation for wanting to "buy" Greenland - as opposed to it being an intended distraction, for more geopolitical control, or the other reasons mentioned here - but its an interesting angle on it nonetheless:







_Greenland ‘Freedom City’? Rich donors push Trump for a tech hub up north
This got me thinking, but in a different direction.
It is well known that the surface layers of ice are a great ‘trap’ for radioactivity.


In case a nuclear confrontation is being prepared, perhaps it would be better to build shelters deep within the ice (more than 1 km in Greenland) for the elite, protected by a large ice cushion?.
Perhaps ice is more efficient for this (and easier to drill/melt) than bedrock.
 
Actual letter sent by Donny today to Norway's PM:

Trump_Norway_letter.jpg
 
Crazy times. . . Is this Trumps idea, or is he just a "talking head" speaking for the deep state? Had Kamala won the elections, would the situation be the same now? This is quite interesting and unseen developement. I guess we'll have to wait and see.
 
Denmark's dirty laundry makes a timely headline.

Native Greenlanders Reveal Horrors Under Danish Rule Including Years of Forced Sterilization and Removal of Children

”As Greenland comes under the international spotlight, native Greenlanders are speaking out about the realities of living under Danish rule, saying their future has been ‘stolen.’

In an exclusive report, The New York Post spoke with native Greenlanders about some of the disturbing abuse under Danish rule, including hundreds of Greenlandic women and girls who were forcibly given contraception between 1960 and 1991. Between 1966 and 1970, over 4,500 women and girls, some as young as twelve, had an intra-uterine device (IUD) implanted.

The forced contraception was part of centuries of Danish policies that dehumanized Greenlanders and their families and included policies that removed young Inuit children from their parents.

The 1951 “Little Danes” experiment removed Inuit children from the country and sent them to live with Danish foster families for reeducation and controversial parental competency tests, which “resulted in the forced separation of Greenlandic families.”


From The New York Post:

Amarok Petersen was 27 years old when she learned the gut-wrenching truth about why she couldn’t have children — and that Denmark was to blame.

Suffering from severe uterine problems, a medical doctor discovered an IUD birth control device in her body that she didn’t know she had.

Danish doctors had implanted it when she was just 13 as part of a population control program for thousands of native Greenlandic girls and women.

“I will never have children,” Petersen told The Post, with tears of anger and sorrow welling in her eyes. “That choice was taken from me.”
Following a two-year investigation, independent researchers have released a report on the forced sterilization. Denmark’s prime minister, Mette Frederiksen, issued an apology to Greenland.

In an August 2025 written statement, Frederiksen wrote, “We cannot change what has happened. But we can take responsibility. Therefore, on behalf of Denmark, I would like to say: I apologise.”

She also acknowledged the case had caused “anger and sadness for many Greenlanders and many families” and damaged perceptions of Denmark. Even without the full picture (pending ongoing investigation), it made a “serious impression” that so many women reported abuse by the Danish healthcare system.

During a ceremony in Nuuk on September 24, 2025, Frederiksen stated, “On behalf of Denmark, I apologise.”

“It had been a betrayal that had major consequences for Greenlandic girls.”

“I don’t believe we can achieve the more equal and proper relationship that many of us desire unless we dare opening even the darkest chapters. Therefore, the apology I offer today is not only about the past. [It is] about the mutual trust that must exist between us.”

“But I hope it can stand as recognition that what you went through was wrong, that it was a betrayal, and that the responsibility no longer lies on you but on us.”

I didn't know this thinking the people in Greenland where all Danish. Considering all these variables, the Greenlanders may be open for changes if they see benifits,

The average Greenlander has about 75% Inuit ancestry and 25% European ancestry, with a significant proportion of paternal lineage tracing back to Danish ancestors.
The Inuit people of Greenland, known as Kalaallit in their own language, are the Indigenous population of the island and constitute approximately 89% of Greenland's total population. They are part of the broader Inuit cultural and linguistic group that spans the Arctic regions of North America and Greenland. The Greenlandic Inuit are ethnographically divided into three main groups based on region: the Kalaallit of west Greenland, who speak Kalaallisut; the Tunumiit of east Greenland (Tunu), who speak Tunumiit oraasiat; and the Inughuit of north Greenland, who speak Inuktun. They are descendants of the Thule people, who migrated to Greenland between AD 1200 and 1400, replacing earlier cultures such as the Dorset and Saqqaq. The Greenlandic Inuit have a strong cultural identity rooted in shared ancestry, language, and traditions, including hunting, skin-sewing, and spiritual beliefs involving spirits in natural elements. The official language of Greenland, Kalaallisut, is a dialect of the Greenlandic language, which belongs to the Eskaleut language family
Most Greenlanders are bilingual, speaking both Kalaallisut and Danish, and the average Greenlander has about 75% Inuit ancestry and 25% European ancestry, with a significant proportion of paternal lineage tracing back to Danish ancestors. The population of Greenlandic Inuit has fluctuated historically due to disease, such as smallpox and tuberculosis, but has grown steadily since the 20th century, reaching around 51,349 in 2012. Today, the majority of ethnic Greenlanders live in Greenland or in Denmark, with smaller communities in other Nordic countries and North America.
AI-generated answer. Please verify critical facts.





 
Denmark's dirty laundry makes a timely headline.

Native Greenlanders Reveal Horrors Under Danish Rule Including Years of Forced Sterilization and Removal of Children


I didn't know this thinking the people in Greenland where all Danish. Considering all these variables, the Greenlanders may be open for changes if they see benifits,

The average Greenlander has about 75% Inuit ancestry and 25% European ancestry, with a significant proportion of paternal lineage tracing back to Danish ancestors.

1) While I’m not going to dispute off hand the claims about how Greenlanders were treated over the years by the Danes, this piece is obviously designed to help demonise the Danes before any transition takes place.

2) Just because Greenlanders might not want to be under Danish rule doesn’t mean they should have to be under US, or anyone else’s rule either.
 
Back
Top