davey72 said:
I have recently come to the realization that in the past rather than grieve i dissociate. For example when my father died i was under the strong belief that it really did not bother me. That he got what he deserved, etc, etc. I was thinking of this the other day, after a dream, and realized that it contradicted with the memories i have of this event. That of crying so hard that i could not even speak to him, or anyone else. Does anyone know of a way to start incorporating these opposing views?
I think the first step is to become intellectually aware of the fact that we hold such contradictory views. Then we can bring such opposing views that we have identified into conscious awareness, and attend to these views at the same time. When we do this, it can result in agitation, dissatisfaction or some other disturbing emotion.
This is where the urge to dissociate or distract ourselves is quite strong. Instead of accepting and facing what is coming up, we would rather indulge in a host of behaviors many of which are addictive in nature to avoid facing the discomfort. Sometimes, such avoidance behaviors may be more subtle - like getting lost in thought loops which are not directly relevant to the issue at hand, or rationalizing things by a "this is nothing but ......." or blanket statements like "this happens to everyone ..." etc.
If we can catch ourselves doing things to avoid the main issue, we need to come back to it and face the "heat". For me paying attention to breathing and posture helps in staying with the "heat" or tension. The idea is to contain the tension as much and as long as possible depending on the energy or emotional charge generated from the two opposing views. This process of building of a "container" to contain the energy is described in Peter Levine's "In An Unspoken Voice", specifically discussed
here .
Once the containment is achieved, we can use different ways to help the emergence of a resolution to the opposite views under consideration. We would like this to come immediately - like a "bingo" or "aha" moment and live happily ever after - but it usually does not work out that way. We can write down in a journal the thoughts and words that come up over a period of time - like suggested in the Pennebaker writing exercises described in the
Redirect thread . Those who are talented in art can use their art as a medium of expression as well. In many cases, it may take substantial time and periodic revisiting of the problem to make headway. It may seem that we are stuck and moving in circles, but if we put in sincere efforts to resolve the issue without forcing the solution, we move more in a spiral, revisiting the problem and doing the circle but with more insight in every pass. Sometimes significant dreams or events in our life can advance us towards the resolution we are seeking. The solution thus
emerges and we may not even be aware immediately that the conflict has been resolved - but one day we may suddenly realize that the problem does not bother us anymore.
That was a long answer and a more general one than pertaining to grief specifically - but this has been my experience so far in life along with what I have learnt from books and discussions. The question "how to incorporate opposing views" to me involves growth of being. The word "incorporate" means to "form a body" - corpus means body. The level of being is denoted by "togetherness of experience" which includes the resolution and integration of the tension of the opposites.
Hope this is useful - fwiw.