Health & Wellness Show OCT. 16, 2015: A conversation with Dr. Jack Kruse

Thank you very, very much for this program and the transcription of it. What a man! Incredible. I will follow his instructions about the light. So now when I go outside, in the mornings with my dogs for the walks, I will leave my glasses ( I have myopia) at home. Listening and reading this Doctor is something that gives you so much energy. Thanks, thanks, thanks!
 
It's been raining, foggy, and dark every day since I last posted in this thread. So, I haven't been able to get much benefit from the sunbathing. I'm looking forward to some sunny days to get maximum exposure.

Also started the Lyme and co-infections protocols today. I had a particularly bad night last night (so did my mom, but not quite as bad as me). I went to bed around 8 PM fell asleep probably by 8:30. Woke up at 10:30 PM and couldn't go back to sleep. I finally got up at 11:30 PM and read - also had three cups of organic tea (two black and one green that was sent as a sample pack in the herbal/tincture orders that arrived yesterday - both green and black tea are good for the co-infections). I went to bed at 6 AM and woke up at 8:30 AM. At around 4:30 AM I had taken the first course of tinctures, then at 5AM or so 2000mg of NAC. I've taken the tinctures couple of more times in about a quarter cup of pomegranate juice that's also part of the protocol - supposed to be really good for mycoplasma and bartonella.

So, I'm feeling as good as that sunny day I got plenty of sun starting 9AM. Not sure if it could already be the results of the herbal/supplement program or just a coincidence. Will have to wait and see....
 
I'm gonna listen to the podcast a coupla more times as a lot of it went over my head.But do you guys think that getting an ultraviolet lamp would be more beneficial than a regular one?I mean the kind of uv lamps you find in reptile tanks. :huh:
 
I enjoyed the podcast very much myself, and as some of you I also started doing the things he recommended such as the AM sunlight and the fish consumption. The sunlight in the morning had an unexpectedly stimulating effect, though I had to consciously keep fighting with my eyelids as they kept trying to shut out the light. It also gave me the yawns. Talk about filling up your accumulators! I'm theorising that, similar to what Gurdjieff called "impressions", light is another type of food for humans and the eyes are the primary receptacle for this "food". I was also eyeing that magnetico sleep pad that he mentions, it provides a boosted magnetic field to enhance regenerative processes during sleep, to counteract the effects of the dampened earth magnetic field (from 5 gauss 5000 years ago to the current 0.5 g). I guess I am just pretty desperate for a restful night of sleep. :headbash:

I also found this wiki with some recommendations on optimising DHA intake:
_http://qhwiki.com/opinion:dha-highest said:
Raw vs Cooked
This paper shows that pan frying salmon to 70C / 158F reduced the DHA content by 40% — http://www.researchgate.net/publica..._EPA_and_DHA_loss/file/9fcfd50046720d9a70.pdf

Specifically, the DHA concentration dropped from 581mg/100g when raw, to 351mg/100g when pan fried to this high temperature.

The C-O covalent bond between the glycerol backbone an the fatty acid is pretty strong, and is not likely to dissociate by cooking your fish to 70C. This just means that DHA that is in the sn-2 position stays in that position despite cooking.

Good night people :zzz:
 
Hindsight Man said:
I'm gonna listen to the podcast a coupla more times as a lot of it went over my head.But do you guys think that getting an ultraviolet lamp would be more beneficial than a regular one?I mean the kind of uv lamps you find in reptile tanks. :huh:

I would be cautious experimenting with alternate light sources. If you browse around the JK forum some people are experimenting with them but you really have to know what you're doing. Light can be very powerful medicine and the wrong kind of light can be harmful. If you do know what your're doing it's a different story, of course. For me, I'll just stick with the sun for now (if it ever stops raining around these parts, that is.)

Here's the transcript if you ever get sick of listening.
 
All this talk of light and sunshine got me thinking of this C's session:

A: Are you ready? DNA core is as yet undiscovered enzyme relating to carbon. Light waves were used to cancel the first ten factors of DNA by burning them off. At that point, a number of physical changes took place including knot at top of spine. Each of these is equally reflected in the ethereal.

Q: (L) Is that all?

A: No. But, do you need more?

Q: (L) Well, the question I do have is, how many people were there on the planet and did they have to take each one and do this individually?

A: Whoa.

Q: (L) How many people?

A: 6 billion.

Q: (T) That's 500 million more than there are now.

A: No, 200 million.

Q: (L) Okay, there were this many people on the planet, how did they effect this change on all of them?

A: Light wave alteration.

Q: (L) And light waves, actual light waves, affect DNA?

A: Yes.

Q: (T) What was the origin of the light waves?

A: Our center.

Q: (L) What is your center?

A: Our realm. STO.

Q: (L) So, how did the Lizzies use the light from the Service to Others realm...

A: They used sophisticated technology to interrupt light frequency waves.

What was the type or frequency of the light used and what was the sophisticated technology used to interrupt the light frequency waves? Was is something like EMF/electricity/wifi that is currently blanketing the earth? I dunno. It's just something that came to mind recently.
 
Odyssey said:
Hindsight Man said:
I'm gonna listen to the podcast a coupla more times as a lot of it went over my head.But do you guys think that getting an ultraviolet lamp would be more beneficial than a regular one?I mean the kind of uv lamps you find in reptile tanks. :huh:

I would be cautious experimenting with alternate light sources. If you browse around the JK forum some people are experimenting with them but you really have to know what you're doing. Light can be very powerful medicine and the wrong kind of light can be harmful. If you do know what your're doing it's a different story, of course. For me, I'll just stick with the sun for now (if it ever stops raining around these parts, that is.)

Here's the transcript if you ever get sick of listening.

Thanks
 
Here's an abstract of a study on ALAN (artificial light at night) _http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26374931

Abstract
Routine exposure to artificial light at night (ALAN) in work, home, and community settings is linked with increased risk of breast and prostate cancer (BC, PC) in normally sighted women and men, the hypothesized biological rhythm mechanisms being frequent nocturnal melatonin synthesis suppression, circadian time structure (CTS) desynchronization, and sleep/wake cycle disruption with sleep deprivation. ALAN-induced perturbation of the CTS melatonin synchronizer signal is communicated maternally at the very onset of life and after birth via breast or artificial formula feedings. Nighttime use of personal computers, mobile phones, electronic tablets, televisions, and the like - now epidemic in adolescents and adults and highly prevalent in pre-school and school-aged children - is a new source of ALAN. However, ALAN exposure occurs concomitantly with almost complete absence of daytime sunlight, whose blue-violet (446-484 nm λ) spectrum synchronizes the CTS and whose UV-B (290-315 nm λ) spectrum stimulates vitamin D synthesis. Under natural conditions and clear skies, day/night and annual cycles of UV-B irradiation drive corresponding periodicities in vitamin D synthesis and numerous bioprocesses regulated by active metabolites augment and strengthen the biological time structure. Vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency are widespread in children and adults in developed and developing countries as a consequence of inadequate sunlight exposure. Past epidemiologic studies have focused either on exposure to too little daytime UV-B or too much ALAN, respectively, on vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency or melatonin suppression in relation to risk of cancer and other, e.g., psychiatric, hypertensive, cardiac, and vascular, so-called, diseases of civilization. The observed elevated incidence of medical conditions the two are alleged to influence through many complementary bioprocesses of cells, tissues, and organs led us to examine effects of the totality of the artificial light environment in which humans reside today. Never have chronobiologic or epidemiologic investigations comprehensively researched the potentially deleterious consequences of the combination of suppressed vitamin D plus melatonin synthesis due to life in today's man-made artificial light environment, which in our opinion is long overdue.
KEYWORDS:
Artificial light at night; cancer; circadian time structure; development and disruption; melatonin; sleep/wake cycle disturbance; sunlight; vitamin D; vitamin D deficiency
 
Hi guys, thanks for a great show (well done to Tiffany for her interviewing skills). Jack does indeed have some valid points- some of which I had come across with my Holistic Optometry group. In natural vision therapy, it is recommended that you gaze at the sun through closed eyelids, and let the sunlight filter through to the retina, along with palming and various eye exercises. I am paraphrasing as I don't have the book right here (Natural Vision Improvement by Janet Goodrich), but I do recall reading that early morning was the best time for sun-bathe. Sunglasses were also a no-no as they was thought to interrupt biorhythms. He definitely has some interesting points, and it may be just be me, but I did find him a bit egotistical, a bit too... something :huh:

I remember reading the thread on him here, there's just something about him I can't quite put my finger on...
 
beetlemaniac said:
I enjoyed the podcast very much myself, and as some of you I also started doing the things he recommended such as the AM sunlight and the fish consumption. The sunlight in the morning had an unexpectedly stimulating effect, though I had to consciously keep fighting with my eyelids as they kept trying to shut out the light. It also gave me the yawns. Talk about filling up your accumulators! I'm theorising that, similar to what Gurdjieff called "impressions", light is another type of food for humans and the eyes are the primary receptacle for this "food".

I've started doing the am sunlight for the past few days, and same for me, it was harder than I expected as my eyes kept wanting to close even when it was slightly overcast! But I haven't been outside without lenses in years, so this is probably a big shock to my system.

However, I can say for sure that this seemed to lift my spirits and just gave me a feeling of well being. I think there is something to this, and your theory is a very interesting idea.
 
manitoban said:
However, I can say for sure that this seemed to lift my spirits and just gave me a feeling of well being. I think there is something to this, and your theory is a very interesting idea.

It definitely does the same for me. We had a long stretch of days where it was cloudy and rainy and it was incredibly depressing. Admittedly, looking at the cloudy sky, even though its purported to still be effective, is quite lame.

Here's a couple more article abstracts I found on light:

Dim Light at Night Disrupts Molecular Circadian Rhythms and Increases Body Weight
http://jbr.sagepub.com/content/28/4/262.abstract

With the exception of high latitudes, life has evolved under bright days and dark nights. Most organisms have developed endogenously driven circadian rhythms that are synchronized to this daily light/dark cycle. In recent years, humans have shifted away from the naturally occurring solar light cycle in favor of artificial and sometimes irregular light schedules produced by electric lighting. Exposure to unnatural light cycles is increasingly associated with obesity and metabolic syndrome; however, the means by which environmental lighting alters metabolism are poorly understood. Thus, we exposed mice to dim light at night and investigated changes in the circadian system and metabolism. Here we report that exposure to ecologically relevant levels of dim (5 lux) light at night altered core circadian clock rhythms in the hypothalamus at both the gene and protein level. Circadian rhythms in clock expression persisted during light at night; however, the amplitude of Per1 and Per2 rhythms was attenuated in the hypothalamus. Circadian oscillations were also altered in peripheral tissues critical for metabolic regulation. Exposure to dimly illuminated, as compared to dark, nights decreased the rhythmic expression in all but one of the core circadian clock genes assessed in the liver. Additionally, mice exposed to dim light at night attenuated Rev-Erb expression in the liver and adipose tissue. Changes in the circadian clock were associated with temporal alterations in feeding behavior and increased weight gain. These results are significant because they provide evidence that mild changes in environmental lighting can alter circadian and metabolic function. Detailed analysis of temporal changes induced by nighttime light exposure may provide insight into the onset and progression of obesity and metabolic syndrome, as well as other disorders involving sleep and circadian rhythm disruption.


and http://jbr.sagepub.com/content/30/4/351.abstract

Melatonin Suppression by Light in Humans Is More Sensitive Than Previously Reported

The retina drives various non-image-forming photoresponses, including circadian photoentrainment and pupil constriction. Previous investigators showed that in humans, photic suppression of the clock-controlled hormone melatonin is most sensitive to 460-nm blue light, with a threshold of ~12 log photons cm–2 s–1. This threshold is surprising because non-image-forming vision is mediated by intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells, which receive rod-driven synaptic input and can respond to light levels as low as ~7 log photons cm–2 s–1. Using a protocol that enhances data precision, we have found the threshold for human melatonin suppression to be ~10 log photons cm–2 s–1 at 460 nm. This finding has far-reaching implications since there is mounting evidence that nocturnal activation of the circadian system can be harmful.
 
Hi, all:
I have six years’ experience with Dr. Kruse’s recommendation to get more early morning light. It’s definitely good advice, but for me it hasn’t been the whole solution.

Six years ago I started taking a 15-20 minute walk every weekday morning as part of my daily routine, and I’ve kept it up ever since. Because I live where usually the only time it’s not unpleasantly hot outdoors is just after dawn— that’s when I walk my neighborhood.

Immediately I noticed that it gave me a psychological lift. I felt positively ebullient when I greeted coworkers at the beginning of my workday. That alone was enough to keep me walking.

Sometime later I also got religion about avoiding blue light in the evening, and eliminating all light from my bedroom. I learned that one of those endocrine glands in the middle of the brain requires the signal of sunlight in the eyes in order to regulate the whole hormonal system. So I began to make a point of looking toward the sun during my early morning walk.

It feels good, and it a good way to meditate on the light of the Cosmos, but it hasn’t cured all my complaints (“fibromyalgia,” and chronic bronchitis). I am paying close attention to the Cass Forum threads on diet, inflammation, and microbial infection, because I’d like to be healthier. Of course, I have to overcome the consequences of half a lifetime of clueless living according to the Western Lifestyle: low-fat diet, frankenfood, stress, polluted air and water, cooped up inside under artificial lighting in the midst of electro-smog for all the daylight hours.

So I continue to look into the morning sun, but I’m pursuing other remedies as well.
 
I'm currently halfway through reading Dr Kruse's book called "Epi-Paleo RX: The Prescription for Disease Reversal and Optimal Health and would just like to share an exerpt with you all on his perspective of Diabetes. His ideas on this are fascinating and his approach is focused mainly around optimizing the diet and most of all making sure nutrient intake is in sync with natural circadian rythms and seasonal cycles. His book seems to be relatively concise, straightforward and simple to understand, so I would definitely reccomend it to anyone interested in Kruse's work.

He doesn't actually go into too much detail in his book regarding the biochemistry and physics of it all, but there is a tonne of this information on his blog which, for those of you who really want to get to grips with the science, I think he does go much deeper into. Here is the section from the book. Warning : This post is quite long

WHAT DIABETES REALLY IS

I believe diabetes is caused by humans eating carbohydrates 24/7 and relying on modern conveniences instead of facing a true winter like mammals are supposed to. In fact, I think our brain rapidly evolved because of a sped-up epigenetic programme due to Factor X (speaks about this in the last chapter), and this allowed us to reduce normal hibernation down to two hours within our sleep cycle to control autophagy. This system has little room for error. When we eat outside out circadian rhythm it causes the entire system to misfire and diabetes is the result. Sound hard to believe?
Many scientists today believe the light ccle has the most important impact on our circadian biology and metabolism. Light cycles are important to all life, but most researchers are apparently unaware that mammals have an innate ability to change their internal clocks when their environment changes. When its cold, humans stop using light cycles to yoke metabolism to sleep. We have an epigenetic switch that stops the suprachiasmatic nucleus, the part of the brain that generates a 24-hour rhythm, from using light when it is cold. This is because light cycles are not important in the freezing cold because carbohydrates cannot grow in cold. Evolution alerts mammals to the changing seasons through temperature, not light.

However, this alert no longer happens for modern man, who eats carbs 24/7 and doesn't endure much of winters cold. We have warm clothes, energy efficient houses, heated cars, and exposure to LED computer and television screens at night. These things elevate inflammatory cytokines, causing leptin resistance. I explain the complex biochemistry in my cold thermogenesis series on my blog, with cites included. But for now, I want you to be aware of this metabolic trap. It's mere presence is shocking enough, but it's implications are far greater for modern humans with respect to diabetes.

Many say the say the introduction of artificial light altered our ability to sense light and dark. I think most people are aware of the degree to which circadian rhythms destroy metabolic function, laying the foundation for diseases.
A circadian mismatch causes the slow erosion of the autophagy process. The autophagy process repairs and recycles proteins while we sleep, which extends life.Reduces autophagy leads to heart failure. Diabetics usually has sleep apnea, which causes poor autophagy and a lowered DHEA level. Biologic mismatches are best measured in animals by looking at heart failure and poor sleep, which for humans the rates are both staggering. We got so smart so fast that we controlled the environment to the point of our genetic detriment by disrupting the autophagy process.

When one looks at the biochemistry of sleep and truly understands the power of autophagy for longevity, it becomes apparent that perhaps sleep is our primordial condition, not wakefullness. If I am correct we evolved consciousness over time. In extreme cold environments, the process of autophagy because "super sensitized" to save energy while increasing our metabolic capabilities. In a TED talk, sleep researcher Jessa Gamble said humans living in dark, deep, cold shafts for a study become much more energized and productive. In fact, they improved so much that most wanted to go back to living in chafts after the study. Why? Cold, dark environments sensitize the human autophagy process without us actually having to sleep at all!! This is something we can't do in long light cycles. Diabetics never enter this pathway, which is why they are always energy depleted and tired. To achieve sensitive autophagy in light, we have to sleep well. Diabetics can't. This is an example of how metabolism and biochemistry can rewire in cold and dark environmnets. Diabetics need winter more than they know. Infact, sleep is heavily selected for in cold, having influenced the design of mamallian nervous systems by evolution. This is why mammals can sleep so long underground in sub-zero temperatures and survive.

Radical Rule #1 A Radical Rule About Sleep

Sleep and cold environments were our ancestors' primordial condition, and hence the starting point for life on our planet. If we assume this to be true, it explains why epigenetics(outside influences on our gene expression) is the dominant player. I think evolution used epigenetics to pass environmental information to succeeding generations. In cold, our cell cycle slows down. To compensate, epigeneitcs speeds up. Life at it's genesis was likely static. To get the nutrients it needs, and organism used passive diffusion, which allows compounds in the surrounding environment to pass through the membrane. This manner of nutrient collection is highly inefficient, by the sensitivity of autophagy in cold made this process biologically plausible for much of the evolutionary history. However, in order to improve access to nutrients, it appears organisms evolved into wakefulsness to obtain them, using sleep for autophagic repair.

I believe this metabolism remains in every organism today. If you ask sleep researchers (I have), they have told me this is a correct assumption. Because of this, I believe that sleep and autophagic processes are highly conserved across all species on our planet.
[..]
Diabetics often have cognitive impairments and suffer from higher rates of Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders. I believe this is all tied to altered cell membrane signalling from carbohydrates and from poor autophagy. Reseachers currently assume that the only way a mammal can change its fatty acid concentraition is through diet. However, the PLoS ONE artivele "Changes in 'Good' Fatty Acid Concentration of Inner Organs might be largely Independent of Diet" shows that n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids in cell membranes increase dramatically before the start of hibernation in marmots. This is to prepare the body, and particularly the heart, to function at very low temperatures. The transition to a higher content of n-6 fatty acids in membranes takes place rapidly just before the animals enter hibernations. The changes are reversed, again very quickly, at the termination of hibernation in spring, when the animals return to higher body temperatures. During both of these periods the animals food is unavailable as it is buried under snow, so it is a mechanisms that happens INDEPENDENT OF IMMEDIATE DIET.
What suprised researchers was that the n-6 atty acids are transported preferentially over other fatty acids, and the mechanism remains a mystery. The research also suggests the changes come from an internal clock, as the animals are iisolated from environmental cues while hibernating deep underground.

Lets examine why evolution may have allowed mammals to do this.
The stimulus for hibernation in eutherian (placental) mammals is tied to high dietary carbohydrate intake (proven fact already in science and not controversial) and transfer of omega 6 into cell membranes prior to hibernation. This was not known until this article came out. The stimulus of plentiful dietary carbohydrates is a metabolic sign that they should soon den, fat and happy. This metabolic signal seems to change the fatty acid synthase (FAS) enzyme in the mammalian gut lining. FAS is crucial for the production of lipids and is regulated by insulin. People with diabetes or insulin resistance have defects in FAS. Also, studies show mice without the enzyme in their intestine develop chronic gut inflammation, which is a powerful predictor of insulin resistance.

Is Diabetes an Evolutionary Adaptation for Survival?

Why would evolution signal a mammal to replace its own cell membranes with Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids? Why should we pay attention to it? Because it has major implications for modern humans, who are direct descendants of these animals. Morover, this evolutionary design allows for the potential development of an interesting conundrum. It appears that the incorperation of PUFAs into cell membranes is a normal sign for mamallian hibernation. After all, mammals evolved in earth's polar environments. I also learned from organic chemistry that high concentrations of PUFAs in the cell membrane makes them very fluid in cold environments so they dont freeze. It's a cellular anti-freeze! I also learn from Canadian frog biology that high glucose levels also act as an antifreeze for animals in extreme environments. This is an important mechanism as all organ function depends on proper cell signalling.

These revelations led me to a shocking insight. Could diabetes be an ancient epigenetic programme for survival, and not a disease after all?
[..]
Diabetes is required in mammals, which are designed to adapt to cold environments. Maybe, just maybe, it has become thought of as a Neolithic disease in humans because our ability to control our environment has dismissed our need to hibernate. After all, we know evolution is moving today faster than our genome can adapt, as many researchers have pointed out many times. Remember, we still have our mammalian paleolithic genes, which cotnrol our use of carbohydrates and the upregulation of PUFAs in our cell membranes. What it not so obvious, however, is that our brains evolution has outpaced our biology, creating a mismatch in this system. As a result, we view Diabetes as a disease when it is actually an evolutionary novelty created by our own rapid evolution.

This is how I see diabetes today. The skeptics will jump down my throat and point out that type 1 diabetes is a genetic disease. I think type 1 and type 1.5 diabetes (slow onset type 1 diabetes) are decidedly epigenetic phenomena of this evolutionary mismatch. Epigenetics has sped up. This is why humans have no ability to stop diabetes once it starts, unless they get themselves into a cold environment. It is also why modern medicine has no cure, and why it remains a revolving-door disease, filled with wallet biopsies and an increasing number of ineffective medications.

Friends have asked "If this is not a disease, then how does nature cure diabetes on it's own?" Well, can you cure a disease that is not a disease to begin with?
Insulin resistance expands fat to store the carbohydrates we ate during the long light cycles of summer. The process to reverse this system is hybernation in freezing cold. But since we no longer hybernate you need to consider how you eat carbohydrates within the light cycles. Mabe what you thoght was safe really isn't.

Cold is what completely reverses insulin resistance in mammals and wakes them up when conditions are better for life. Humans abandoned this ability in our evolutionary history because we control our environoment regardless of the temperature, but we stll have the hibernation mechanisms within us, if we eat outside those mechanisms we get modern diabetes-we can eat all day year round, or we can eat a banana from Chile in the Arctic in the dead of winter. Do you think evolution has a plan for these circumstances yet? No, it doesn not, and diabetes is the answer

The result is we have created a world where we can eat carbohydrates and PUFAs 24/7 but cna no longer access evolution solution for insulin resistance it also makes sense why we have no hardwired metabolic pathways for fat removal but cold thermogenesis does it remarkably well
 
I have recently been listening to this program and wow, definitely groundbreaking and adds new informartion on DNA, light waves and cold therapy.

I started to put it into practice today

Thank you so much
 
beetlemaniac said:
I'm theorising that, similar to what Gurdjieff called "impressions", light is another type of food for humans and the eyes are the primary receptacle for this "food".

That reminds me of the following that I read when I was in my teens from Autobiography of a Yogi (Paramhansa Yogananda) about a woman who doesn't eat:

http://www.crystalclarity.com/yogananda/chap46.php

"But you do eat something!" My tone held a note of remonstrance.
"Of course!" She smiled in swift understanding.
"Your nourishment derives from the finer energies of the air and sunlight, and from the cosmic power which recharges your body through the medulla oblongata."

This story has always stuck with me.

On a different note, I did install the f.lux app and I feel like it does make a difference.
 
Back
Top Bottom