How do humans change the cycle for 1D and 2D?

[T.C.]

I'm reading the phrase "short wave cycle recycling" as repeating the 'individual' short wave cycle, which leads to conclusion that one iteration or occurence of a short wave cycle is de facto one individual incarnation.

As a non-native English speaker, it is surely possible that my reading is limited in understanding or even completely misinterpreting what the C's said.

Could you please rectify my possible errors in understanding with an interpretation of a native English speaking person?

It's funny, because every time I think I see clearly in a session something that confirms my interpretation, I read your responses and see that it can also be your interpretation.

Here is my working definition, which has been helped by the discussion in this thread so far:

'A short wave cycle is one option of progression for an individual entity and/or group soul on their journey towards reunion with the one. It is distinct from a long wave cycle because a long wave cycle involves either only physical, or only ethereal existence. A short wave cycle involves multiple incarnations.'

Another clue that I will use to argue for the veracity of the last part of that statement is in this sentence from an above quote: "And, therefore, reincarnation of various types, is at various points on the short wave cycle always possible, and, in fact, quite probable."

I read this as to mean that the short wave cycle is a single thing in relation to the reincarnations that are involved in it. We could restructure the sentence in the following way, and I believe that it would retain the same meaning:

'On the short wave cycle, reincarnation of various types are always possible, and in fact quite probable'.

In both statements, the term 'short wave cycle' is singular in its relation to a plurality of incarnations. Therefore, one experiences multiple incarnations over the course of a single short wave cycle.

 

[Mari]

Not sure if I fully understand the conversation.

My idea is/was that 1D and 2D are part of a Grand Cycle and as such live and die - when in short wave cycle - as part of the experience/lesson.
With 3D souled beings, I imagined that 1D and 2D perhaps could have more so to say "accelerated" path of learning because of the interaction with souled beings.

I quite like this video where it says:

the 1D directive is to learn to combine in ways forming primitive biological organisms.

2D must master biological life survival and adaptation, competition and group organization.

The boundary between 2D and 3D are OPs that are designed to host 2D individual soul for a try-out period, but I always wondered if the boundary between 1D and 2D are crystals or viruses? Crystals are first to form organised structures, while viruses are on the edge of life and non-live - they can be dormant until activated.

In any case, as the Cs said that "The necessity to form the short wave cycle was brought about through nature through the natural bounds of the universe when the group mind of souls chose to experience physicality as opposed to a completely ethereal existence" and now writing this, I wonder if 1D might live on "forever" in a short wave cycle, as a sleeping matter.

I cannot imagine 2D creatures being only on a long cycle as they also have a role to play in the grand evolution of the soul, and also as per the quote above "2D must master biological life survival and adaptation, competition and group organization" which implies the necessity of being incarnated in a body, whether it is animal or a plant.

Or maybe I misunderstood the conversation completely.

 

[T.C.]

I have another theory, sparked by something Moine said. But I'm very frustrated because it relies on something else the C's said at one point as a foundation, and I've spent all morning looking for the quote and I can't find it.

But there's other considerations and intricacies of that little passage from the transcripts which are easily had. For one, if you're at the 3rd grade, have you forgotten the lessons of the 1st and 2nd grades? If not, then what are they?

Apparently, this isn't actually how the progress of the group soul happens. According to the C's, we don't progress through every density starting from 1D. Instead, what happened was that when the group soul decided to enter into physical existence, part of it went into 1D, part into 2D part into 3D, to experience all these levels simultaneously.

When I read the above quote from Moine, I remembered this. And now I'm wondering if I might have an answer to the question in the title of thread.

'Before the group soul came into physical existence on earth in order to experience a short wave cycle and accelerate it's overall progression towards the one, there were 1st and 2nd density entities here experiencing existence on a long wave cycle. However, when the group soul arrived, it entered into 1st, 2nd and 3rd density instantiations of existence - rocks and minerals, flora and fauna, human bodies. And so, due to this 'interaction', 1st and 2nd density entities changed from a long wave cycle, to a short wave one, because they too became inhabited by the group soul.'

As I said, this idea rests on me finding the quote I'm looking for.

I do like Moine's idea that the long wave cycle for 1D and 2D entities was disrupted by human manipulation of them. It's perfectly logical. I have an intuition though that the switch from long to short wave for them was instantaneous with the arrival of humans, not gradual over a period of time afterwards, which is why I'm considering this other idea.

 

[msasa79]

I do like Moine's idea that the long wave cycle for 1D and 2D entities was disrupted by human manipulation of them. It's perfectly logical. I have an intuition though that the switch from long to short wave for them was instantaneous with the arrival of humans, not gradual over a period of time afterwards, which is why I'm considering this other idea.

This does seem "perfectly logical", even when looking at it from very simplified kind of materialistic PoV.

Just by being here we modify the planet's e-m field, by imprinting our signature on it, which in its turn permeates every thing on the planet, living and non-living alike. Just by that 'act', the very instance we came here was felt all over the planet by all the denizens of this 'material' realm.

By being in the bodies, our souls take part in the consciousness of bodily 'ingredients', from electrons of electrical activity in our brains and nervous systems, over various individual living cells, to organs and tissues storing our sensational and emotional memories. Our skins 'emit' a bunch of our cells in the environment each moment, by perspiration we fill the atmosphere with our breaths, each carrying with itself a material stamped by the presence of the consciousness in the body it originated from. By digestion and secretion we leave our mark continously on newly ingested foods and waters we drink, while making our hard core presence known wherever we leave our footprints.
All that, and probably more, without even entering the area of impacts and changes in cognition on planetary scales that had likely happened when 3D human mind joined others on the Earth's stage.

In short, just by joining in marriage with our genetic physical bodies, our souls assumed their parts 'simultaneously' on 1D, 2D and 3D awareness levels on the planet Earth. Or at least it seems so to me.

 

[Ricardo]

I do like Moine's idea that the long wave cycle for 1D and 2D entities was disrupted by human manipulation of them. It's perfectly logical. I have an intuition though that the switch from long to short wave for them was instantaneous with the arrival of humans, not gradual over a period of time afterwards, which is why I'm considering this other idea.

This goes inline to what the tradition ( ie gnosis )says of man being the ruler of earthly domain , all below 3rd density , the major diference with regards to 4th vis a vis 3rd is choice , since that is a lesson to be learned beforehand . ( i think)

 

[Wandering Star]

A litlle bit of Ra:

Session 13 January 29, 1981

QUESTIONER: Thank you. Can you say what is first known in creation?

RA: I am Ra. The first known in creation is infinity. Infinity is creation.

QUESTIONER: So from that infinity must come what we experience as creation. What was the next step, or further evolution?

RA: I am Ra. Infinity became conscious; that was the next step.

QUESTIONER: And then, what happened next?

RA: I am Ra. Consciousness led to the focusing of infinity into infinite energy. You have called this by various vibratory sound complexes, the most commonly used being "Logos," or "Love." The Creator is the focusing of infinity as a knowing or conscious principle, which we call, in the closest way we can find from understanding/learning your language, "intelligent infinity."

QUESTIONER: Can you explain the next step?

RA: I am Ra. The next step continues to achieve its progression in this space/time nexus of your illusion, as you can see it. It is an infinite reaction to the creative principle that follows the Law of One in one of its fundamental distortions: free will. Thus, many, many dimensions are possible, infinite in number. Energy advances from intelligent infinity, due first to the irruption of a random creative force, creating patterns that, in holographic style, appear as creation in its entirety, regardless of the direction or energy explored. These energy patterns then begin to regulate their own local rhythms and energy fields, so to speak, thus creating dimensions and universes.
QUESTIONER: So, can Session 13 January 29, 1981 say how galaxies and planetary systems formed?

RA: I am Ra. You must imagine a great leap in thought in asking this question, for in the realm of the answer to the previous question, the physical universes, as you call them, had not yet been born. The energies advanced in increasingly intelligent patterns, until the individualization of the diverse energies emanating from the creative principle of intelligent infinity became such that they became Cocreators. Thus began what is known as physical matter. The concept of light is crucial to understanding this great leap of thought, for this vibratory distortion of infinity is the cornerstone of what is known as matter. Light is intelligent and full of energy, thus being the first distortion of intelligent infinity ever summoned by the creative principle.
This light of love was created in such a way that it contains within its manifestations of being certain characteristics, among them infinite totality, paradoxically described by the straight line, as you would call it. This paradox is responsible for the form taken by the various entities of physical illusion that you call solar systems, galaxies, and planets of a rotating nature and lenticular tendency.
QUESTIONER: I believe I have made an error in advancing the process you were describing. Would it be helpful to remedy this great leap resulting from this error?

RA: I am Ra. I have tried to fill that void. However, you may ask in any way you see fit.

QUESTIONER: Returning to the question I asked just before the one regarding galaxies and planets, what step is next?

RA: I am Ra. The steps, as you say, are, at the time to which the question refers, simultaneous and infinite.

QUESTIONER: Can you say how intelligent infinity (I have difficulty expressing this), how intelligent infinity individualized from itself?

RA: I am Ra. Good question.
Intelligent infinity discerned a concept. That concept was discerned free of the will to become conscious. That concept was finitude. This has been the first or fundamental paradoxical distortion of the Law of One. Thus, intelligent infinity engaged in the exploration of multiplicity. Given the infinite possibilities of intelligent infinity, there is no end to multiplicity. Exploration, therefore, is free to continue infinitely in an eternal present.

QUESTIONER: Was the galaxy we are in created by infinite intelligence, or by a part of it?

RA: I am Ra. The galaxy and the rest of the material objects of which you are aware are products of individualized parts of intelligent infinity. Each exploration initiated in turn found its point of focus and became Co-Creator. By utilizing intelligent infinity, each portion created a universe, and by allowing the rhythms of free choice to flow, playing with the infinite spectrum of possibilities, each individualized portion channeled love/light into what you might call intelligent energy, thus creating the so-called Natural Laws of any given universe.
In turn, each universe has individualized into a point of focus, becoming, at the same time, a Co-creator and allowing diversity to continue, thus creating new intelligent energies that regulate or bring about the emergence of Natural Laws in the vibrational patterns of what you would call a solar system. Thus, each solar system has its own local coordinated system of illusory Natural Laws, so to speak. It must be understood that every portion, no matter how small, of any density or illusory pattern contains, as in a hologram, the One Creator, Who is Infinity. This is how everything begins and ends in mystery.

QUESTIONER: Can you explain how individualized Infinity created our galaxy, and if so, how this same portion created our planetary system?

RA: I am Ra. Perhaps we have misperceived your question.
We had the distortion/impression that we had answered that specific question. Can you rephrase it?

QUESTIONER: Was the planetary system we are in now created all at once, or was our sun created first and then the planets?

RA: I am Ra. The process unfolds from the largest, in your illusion, to the smallest. Thus, the Co-Creator, in individualizing the galaxy, created energy patterns that were focused on multiple sources of other awarenesses of intelligent infinity. Therefore, the solar system you inhabit has its own patterns, rhythms, and natural laws that are unique to it. However, the progression is from the spiral energy of the galaxy to the spiral energy of the sun, to the planetary spiral energy, to the circumstances of the spiral energy experience that initiates the first density of the awareness of planetary entities.

(...)

Add to this in my own words (I'm going to paraphrase) the C's response:

"If someone didn't dream about you, you wouldn't exist."