How do humans change the cycle for 1D and 2D?

Does this mean that you believe that there was a beginning of existence or being, as in "entire" existence/being?
I try not to form beliefs, as those limit objective perception. It seems better to acknowledge that I do not know and then maybe look at which theories seem most probable.

The C's have said that writing down the number of previous big bang iterations would take years, which does imply a finite number. Yet, in a more recent session they also said that the number of previous Grand Cycles has been indeed infinite:

Session 22nd October 2022:

(Aragorn) I believe you have said that the system of 7 densities, in other words all that is, has existed forever. That would mean that we have done an infinite number of Grand Cycles in the past and will do so also in the future. Is this correct?

A: Yes

Maybe the Big Bang iterations (finite number) are not the same as the Grand Cycles (infinite number)? It could mean that the big bang iterations started at some point, yet other types of Grand Cycles may have preceded those.
 
Session 16 November 1994 said:
Q: (L) So at the closing of this grand cycle everything will just start all over again?

A: Not exactly; you see, there is no start.

Session 17 June 1995 said:
(T) But it goes outward forever... cause there is no end to going out...

A: There isn't?

Q: (SV) Nope.

A: Well, then maybe there's no beginning.

Q: (T) Well, there wouldn't be a beginning, just a big, open void. An infinite void...

A: If there's no end and no beginning, then what do you have?

Q: (L) No point. (J) The here and now.

A: The here and now which is also the future and the past. Everything that was, is and will be, all at once. This is why only a very few of your third density persons have been able to understand space travel, because even though traveling into space in your third density is every bit as third density as lying on your bed at night in your comfortable home, the time reference is taken away. Something that you hold very close to your bosom as if it were your mother. And, it is the biggest illusion that you have. We have repeatedly told you over and over that there is no time, and yet, of course, you have been so brainwashed into this concept that you cannot get rid of it no matter what you do, now can you?

Session 19 December 1998 said:
Q: (L) Well, when you have a pulse, you have a wave, and if you have a wave, that implies time.

A: Therein lies the crux of your 3rd density illusion. Why assume that any given aspect of the pulse is not occurring simultaneously with any other. And if any are, all are. Until you once and for all break free from the illusion of time, you will not advance.
 
I try not to form beliefs, as those limit objective perception.
I don't think such negative generalization about beliefs is a good example of objectivity.

Session 28 October 1994 said:
Q: (L) According to shamanistic teachings, one can have animal spirits or guides. Is this correct?

A: Partly. You have them if you believe you have them.

Q: (L) If believing in them makes it so, is this belief beneficial?

A: All belief is beneficial at some level.

Sincere belief provides a willingness to try, to test. So, it helps learning. Maybe you should distinguish beliefs from prejudices.


Emotions can also be claimed to be limiting objective perception but that, again, would be a prejudiced generalization, apparently:

Session 9 September 1995 said:
A: Emotion that limits is an impediment to progress. Emotion is also necessary to make progress in 3rd density. It is natural. When you begin to separate limiting emotions based on assumptions from emotions that open one to unlimited possibilities, that means you are preparing for the next density.
 
Sincere belief provides a willingness to try, to test. So, it helps learning.
It depends on how you define 'belief'.

To me beliefs are basically unquestioned assumptions that we convinced ourselves are true - which limits or interferes with gaining knowledge through objective perception. Most beliefs come from social conditioning and they seem to be basically mental programs.

What you are talking about I would call faith or trust. Or I guess you can call it 'sincere belief' and the programs 'prejudices'.
 
Although I am not very sure, I think STO beings can exist in a short wave cycle, but STS beings cannot exist in a long wave cycle. So, short wave cycling is inevitable for all STS beings.
Well may be, as been mentioned by multiple sources, if one polarises to STO that they instantaneously poof off from our reality… where do they go? Why can’t they stay here and keep being STO? (That kinda debunks the Jesus as all loving theory too)
 
Back
Top Bottom