Who says?
How do humans change the cycle for 1D and 2D?
- Thread starter T.C.
- Start date
Who says?
Sorry, but not good enough. Over the course of this whole thread, you’ve repeatedly made assertions which I have never, in 18yrs of familiarity with the C’s material, ever come across. Everyone’s been pretty tolerant of these assertions and engaged you in dialogue about them, but it’s getting out of hand now.
Differences of interpretation of specific quotes can be accepted, but they must be provided. But just saying, “Well, from what I’ve read in the sessions…” and then making something up out of your imagination cannot be accepted. Not on this forum, with the principles it’s based on.
Provide the quotes and sources for your assertions. That’s not an unreasonable request - it’s a minimum requirement when you’re challenging someone else’s ideas.
Differences of interpretation of specific quotes can be accepted, but they must be provided. But just saying, “Well, from what I’ve read in the sessions…” and then making something up out of your imagination cannot be accepted. Not on this forum, with the principles it’s based on.
Provide the quotes and sources for your assertions. That’s not an unreasonable request - it’s a minimum requirement when you’re challenging someone else’s ideas.
Seato
Jedi Master
This statement from the C’s suggests the existence of 3D STO. It is my suspicion that for a 3D being to qualify as STO aligned their polarity would have to be at least 51% STO.
Thus, the existence of 3D STO would imply achieving 51% STO as a 3D being does not result in instant 4D STO graduation in all circumstances. But may perhaps be specific to certain situations such as the wave in the short wave cycle.
T.C., why don't you specifically quote those of my assertions which you don't agree with most, or which you believe have no basis in the Ra-Cassiopaean cosmology? So that we can discuss?
Then, with the same logic, do you think we are at least 95% STS because we live as STS beings in 3D? You see, 51% STO and 95% STS applies to graduation to 4D, not to 3D.
So, if there really are 3D STO beings in the short wave cycle, this means their STO polarization percentage is below 51%.
Imagine this for a better comprehension: We are all 3D STS, right? But we know that there really are good people, like Laura and the crew, who take great efforts for the betterment and healing of people. We also know that Putin is a good guy. I believe all these people are actively increasing their STO polarity and decreasing their STS polarity. I believe this makes them good, STO-like within the standards of 3D. I believe the same applies to those 3D STO planets/people. I'd say their STO polarity is below 51% but they are actively "increasing" it, and this makes them STO for 3D.
Wandering Star
The Living Force
Interesting! Thank you for that!
Now listen again what Laura said and read again - carefully - what I wrote in my previous post, to which you disagreed with.
And then search the forum for the discussion on 1000 years period and what it means (as it was discussed so many times; check out i.e. Joe´s posts here and here), then listen to Laura again, and then read my take on it again... You get the picture.
Why don't you share the picture as you get it in specific connection to the current discussion?
I did, but you don´t see it, because it took you less than 3mins to react to my post. You didn´t even think about it, you are just reacting.
We are all reaction machines until we are not. This could be a great opportunity for you to learn how to move from reacting into doing.
Oh, but I remember reading and answering your previous post, however quick it was?
I thought you'd then like to respond to my objections specifically instead of sending me for a mission of approving your view?
Last edited:
I'll have to go out within half an hour and keep away from my PC for about 5 hours. When I return, I'd like to answer discussions / criticisms, if any, about my views. I'm aware that I'm a bit too assertive. I'm sorry, I'll try to moderate myself as much as possible. I don't intend ill. I just like to discuss certain subjects very much.
SasaM
Jedi Council Member
In principle, you can't make somebody really see something on her/his own what s/he simply can not or is not able to see, for whatever reason it may be. Ultimately, it's their free will to choose or not choose so.
It also might be related to what the C's called, IRC, receivership capability, and Ibn al-'Arabi referred to as preparedness (of the heart to receive knowledge).
Maybe it was mentioned already in the thread, apologies if it has, perhaps the 'confusion' about percentages and graduation has something to do with mixing things that do not necessarily belong in the same 'box'.
As I see it, to graduate from 3D to 4D sort of main condition is to learn the lessons of 3D, so that consciousness becomes 'densier' in awareness, so to speak. On the other hand, we are STS because that's where we are, our current environment. Maybe the reference about those who achieved 100% STO polarization or magnetization going poof out of our realm meant that they just 'switched' immediately to a STO realm of existence, without the necessity of graduating to 4D.
Edit:
I see that Joe's posts you linked, especially 2nd one, touched more or less on the similar issue, i.e. understanding of it in line with what I wrote above.
Last edited:
