You're missing the simple, obvious explanation. A 3D being cannot or won't achieve 100% STO because they will immediately graduate to 4D as soon as they achieve 51%.
Who says?
You're missing the simple, obvious explanation. A 3D being cannot or won't achieve 100% STO because they will immediately graduate to 4D as soon as they achieve 51%.
Who says?
my point of view, which I intend to base on the Ra-Cassiopaean cosmology
You're missing the simple, obvious explanation. A 3D being cannot or won't achieve 100% STO because they will immediately graduate to 4D as soon as they achieve 51%.
This statement from the C’s suggests the existence of 3D STO. It is my suspicion that for a 3D being to qualify as STO aligned their polarity would have to be at least 51% STO.Q: (T) Is there a 3D race in this universe that is STO?
A: Yes. Already stated thus.
Q: (L) If there are planets with STO beings...
A: Some look like you.
T.C., why don't you specifically quote those of my assertions which you don't agree with most, or which you believe have no basis in the Ra-Cassiopaean cosmology? So that we can discuss?Sorry, but not good enough. Over the course of this whole thread, you’ve repeatedly made assertions which I have never, in 18yrs of familiarity with the C’s material, ever come across.
Then, with the same logic, do you think we are at least 95% STS because we live as STS beings in 3D? You see, 51% STO and 95% STS applies to graduation to 4D, not to 3D.This statement from the C’s suggests the existence of 3D STO. It is my suspicion that for a 3D being to qualify as STO aligned their polarity would have to be at least 51% STO.
Thus, the existence of 3D STO would imply achieving 51% STO as a 3D being does not result in instant 4D STO graduation in all circumstances. But may perhaps be specific to certain situations such as the wave in the short wave cycle.
Solved then.That's irrelevant.
Interesting! Thank you for that!
Why don't you share the picture as you get it in specific connection to the current discussion?Interesting! Thank you for that!
Now listen again what Laura said and read again - carefully - what I wrote in my previous post, to which you disagreed with.
And then search the forum for the discussion on 1000 years period and what it means (as it was discussed so many times; check out i.e. Joe´s posts here and here), then listen to Laura again, and then read my take on it again... You get the picture.
I did, but you don´t see it, because it took you less than 3mins to react to my post. You didn´t even think about it, you are just reacting.Why don't you share the picture as you get it in specific connection to the current discussion?
Oh, but I remember reading and answering your previous post, however quick it was?I did, but you don´t see it, because it took you less than 3mins to react to my post. You didn´t even think about it, you are just reacting.
We are all reaction machines until we are not. This could be a great opportunity for you to learn how to move from reacting into doing.
Maybe the confusion is caused by a resistance to see the simple, obvious fact.Yes and it is very confusing.
You're missing the simple, obvious explanation. A 3D being cannot or won't achieve 100% STO because they will immediately graduate to 4D as soon as they achieve 51%.In super-ultra-mega rare cases, where a 3D being reaches 100% - pure - STO that is when it gets a direct ticket to 4D STO.
In principle, you can't make somebody really see something on her/his own what s/he simply can not or is not able to see, for whatever reason it may be. Ultimately, it's their free will to choose or not choose so.Interesting! Thank you for that!
Now listen again what Laura said and read again - carefully - what I wrote in my previous post, to which you disagreed with.
And then search the forum for the discussion on 1000 years period and what it means (as it was discussed so many times; check out i.e. Joe´s posts here and here), then listen to Laura again, and then read my take on it again... You get the picture.