mareiki said:
I have a question:
As it is so important to investigate, verify, how can I possibly investigate if what the C's are saying is true?
The only thing I can do is to assume.
The C;s have no library's, no records. no internet.
And what if they did have libraries, records and internet? We know our libraries, records and internet are full of disinformation.
One of the things I find interesting with the C's material, which I do not see elsewhere, is the prevalence of a one word answer to many questions:
"Close". This observation led me to consider that not only there is no way to validate the authority of the words of the C's, but no way to know if I really have understood those words. I am inclined to think this is part of the lesson: to access the truth for yourself.
What the C's provide are hints. And that is all you can provide when you respect free will. In my personal view, the point of the C's is to teach the way of learning, not to teach a doctrine. If things were not often "close", but always defined to the letter, the material would be just another bible.
What the C's, I think, ask is to get your gears moving to solve the riddles they present. In moving those gears, you learn to see the unseen, to see beyond assumptions, where the truth really lies. What we need to learn is to digest the truth, not to be fed any version of it. If what we are offered is pre-chewed, and doesn't get our own gears moving, it is more often than not pre-chewed mush and disinformation.
In other words, the C's provide one reference frame for seeking, to assist in learning to see the unseen. The point is not to investigate them per se, but to ponder the hints and investigate ourselves, our lives, and the world around us.