Imminent Alien Disclosure?

watched a 2019 documentary called "Extraordinary: The Seeding" featuring R. Dolan and a few others I don't know, including at least two hypnotists. The subject is mostly alien abduction with a focus on strange pregnancies and the "hybridization program".
It is a ctually available on youtube, but one needs to be registered to watch.
Watched it yesterday, and I couldn't help but observe that there is something suspect about this character. She looks like quite different from before, something other than just aging or otherwise plastic surgery. Her face shape is different, her hair is different... it could be two different persons. Also, she express almost no expression during the interview, or express them in a 'strange' way, for lack of a better term, imo.
Of course, we don't have their situational background from when recording the itw + how one may react to trauma, and how PTSD may be expressed, can sure vary on a wide range of behaviors according to individuals, but still, isn't there something of another kind with her ?
Moreover, she kind of strangely corresponds to the hybrid description from the very documentary, let unnoticed. Quite curious : long blond thin hair; pale skin tone; big forehead; BIG eyes; no face expression...
For those of you who've watched it, what's your perspective about it ?
 

Attachments

  • Sans titre.jpg
    Sans titre.jpg
    114.8 KB · Views: 46
  • Sans titre1.jpg
    Sans titre1.jpg
    123.5 KB · Views: 44
  • Sans titre2.jpg
    Sans titre2.jpg
    146.1 KB · Views: 40
  • Sans titre3.jpg
    Sans titre3.jpg
    210.9 KB · Views: 41
  • Sans titre6.jpg
    Sans titre6.jpg
    136.4 KB · Views: 44
  • Sans titre7.jpg
    Sans titre7.jpg
    79.8 KB · Views: 46
A recent analysis by Scientific Reports details that the United States of America has substantially taken over as the league leader of UAP and UFO reports from all over the world. By sighting the National UFO Reporting Center with its data base of over 170,000 + UFO Sighting Reports for over forty nine years.

Notice that the included maps within the article shows all the significant cities of dysfunction by the provocateurs of the DNC.

Also California tops the list for UFO sightings since 2022

TOP 10 UFO SIGHTINGS OF 2023
Dec 16, 2023

Published: 14 December 2023

Abstract

Sightings of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) or unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP) have been reported throughout history. Given the potential security and safety risks they pose, as well as scientific curiosity, there is increasing interest in understanding what these sighting reports represent. We approach this problem as an important one of the human experience and that can be examined through a geographical lens: what local factors may increase or decrease the number of sighting reports? Using a Bayesian regression method, we test hypotheses based on variables representing sky view potential (light pollution, tree canopy, and cloud cover) and the potential for objects to be present in the sky (aircraft and military installations). The dependent variable includes over 98,000 publicly reported UAP sightings in the conterminous United States during the 20-year period from 2001 to 2020. The model results find credible correlations between variables that suggest people see more “phenomena” when they have more opportunity to. This analysis is one of few investigations of UAP sighting reports at a national scale providing context to help examine individual reports. Given that these objects are labeled unidentifiable in the personal sense, there are many natural and/or human based explanations worth exploring.

Introduction

There has been growing interest by the United States government in Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP). Given the new focus on this potential security threat and the operational safety risks posed by these objects, the UAP Task Force was initiated on August 4, 2020 1. This task force had a limited scope, authority, and resources to address the issue and was temporary in its duration. The Deputy Secretary of Defense gave direction to transition the UAP task force into the Airborne Object Identification and Management Synchronization Group (AOIMSG) on November 23, 2021 2. Congressional legislation, however, overtook that direction and today’s All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) was established on July 20, 2022, as the single authoritative UAP Office with the DoD and tasked with leading and synchronizing a whole of government approach to the issue 3. The mission of the AARO is to: “synchronize efforts across the Department of Defense, and with other U.S. federal departments and agencies, to detect, identify and attribute objects of interest in, on or near military installations, operating areas, training areas, special use airspace and other areas of interest, and, as necessary, to mitigate any associated threats to safety of operations and national security. This includes anomalous, unidentified space, airborne, submerged and transmedium objects” 3. Supporting these efforts, this research team explores spatial patterns of publicly reported UAP sightings (analogous to UFO sighting reports in this research) from an open-source online dataset.

In the public 2021 Director of National Intelligence (DNI) report, research on UAP sighting reports between 2004 and 2021 leaves most of its 144 government-based reports unexplained, due to limited data. Only one sighting report was explained with high confidence and was found to be a deflating balloon 4. The follow-up 2022 DNI report indicates the number of governmental sourced reports rose to 510, with nearly half still unexplained. The DNI states that there is no single explanation for these UAP, with potential sources including clutter, commercial drones, national security threats, and other unexplained phenomena. Other early incarnations of government-based UFO research efforts (e.g., Project Sign in 1948, Project Grudge, then the most popular, Project Blue Book led by Dr. Allen Hynek in the 1950-1960s 5, and the following Condon Report funded by the U.S. Air Force and conducted at the University of Colorado) ended with about 5% of unidentified sightings 6. UAP research is often inconclusive, and our ability to explain these events seems to have become less easily resolved as our sensor technology has advanced and our air activity has increased.

Here, we ask three foundational research questions: (1) What is the viability of publicly offered data on UAP sighting reports? (2) Are there credible spatial patterns to these reports? and (3) If so, can these patterns be explained by physical and/or built environment factors? To answer these questions, we use UFO sighting report data from the National UFO Research Center 7. We model the total count of these reports over a 20-year period from 2001 to 2020, using environmental explanatory variables—light pollution, cloud cover, tree canopy cover, airports, and military installations. This model is intended to represent both the available view of the sky as well as the potential for airborne objects. We hypothesize that (a) factors limiting visibility will be negatively correlated with sighting reports, and (b) factors related to air traffic will be positively correlated, or simply that people will report sightings of UAPs where they have the most opportunity to see them. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to understand how spatial variation in reports is linked to environmental variables. This analysis represents one of few attempts to examine this phenomenon at the national level and offers a starting point for a similar approach to be applied to U.S. Government data on UAP activity to help identify possible sources.

History of UAP sighting research and Environmental Explanations

Materials and methods

Explanatory variables

Results

The results from a hotspot analysis (Fig. 3) show a strong trend with many more population standardized sightings (i.e., county reports per 10,000 people) reported in the Western U.S. and in the very Northeast, along with some isolated areas including the tri-state border region of Illinois, Indiana, and Kentucky, surrounding Evansville, Indiana, and the area surrounding Washington D.C. Clusters of low sighting reports are found through the central plains and in the southeast.
Screenshot 2023-12-29 at 16-41-00 Figure 3 Scientific Reports.png

Discussion and conclusions

We recall here our initial research questions: (1) What is the viability of publicly offered data on reported UAP sightings? (2) Are there credible spatial patterns to these sighting reports? and (3) If so, can these patterns be explained by physical and/or built environment factors? For question 1, the publicly available data from NUFORC online are useable data; however, they require substantial processing for spatial analysis. These data could be used for finer resolution (city level) research, rather than county level used here.

The main concern of these findings is, are these volunteered data valid? The short answer is that it is likely that some are and some aren’t. However, we suggest that if the data were entirely invalid (assuming homogeneous psychological and sociological distribution of submissions), the sighting reports would exhibit little to no spatial pattern and are unlikely to follow a pattern that can be explained by first-order visibility indicators. Another data question is, are there any temporal and/or geographic errors? Likely, because some entries into this dataset are reported retrospectively, not always in the first person. We attempt to limit this by using data from 2001-present, but that does not completely resolve the issue. Geographic errors were limited by upscaling the data to the county level. A final issue we consider is that these reported cases require knowledge of NUFORC and access to communications. The authors found the website and organization while searching for data. Some may find the website while searching for an organization to report to. Still, there is likely bias in who has knowledge of this resource since it is not widely advertised. In all, we posit that this dataset has value in understanding these sighting reports; that either this indicates people are seeing things they can’t explain (or that they don’t want to explain with more logical explanations), or this indicates where people are thinking more about UAPs. Both are important and have physical/social implications.

For questions 2 and 3, there are credibly identifiable patterns to these sighting reports, and these patterns relate to environmental characteristics. The explanatory variables are intended to represent both (1) the opportunity to see something and (2) the potential for something human constructed to be in the field of view. We have not considered satellites or drones, which are likely important factors, nor the fact that airplanes (and helicopters, etc.) do not only fly around their takeoff and landing locations. However, around the locations we use, aircraft are likely to be closer to the ground, more visible, and more frequently present. Using the military installation data, we hope to capture, not only aircraft, but also nighttime training activities that might use, for example, tracer rounds, drones, and other forms of illumination in relatively desolate areas.

If we assume that most sighting reports here are representative of true sightings that people determined to be unidentified, then our results have interesting implications. Our model shows that the majority of standardized sighting reports are in the western parts of the U.S. and in the very northeast. We hypothesize that the higher rate of western sightings could be due to (1) the physical geography of the West (i.e., the lack of vegetative canopies and wide-open spaces), (2) cultures of outdoor activity (e.g., recreation and other activities enjoyed in more temperate weather throughout the year), and (3) cultures of paranormal ideation (e.g., impacts of Area 51, Roswell, New Mexico). There are also some isolated counties throughout the rest of the country that warrant further investigation to identify what properties may generate relatively more UAP attention. In these results, however, cloud cover is not credible, possibly related to higher rates of sighting reports in both the coastal regions of the Pacific Northwest (relatively clouded) and desert regions of the Mountain West (relatively clear). We initially expected cloud cover to be credibly related to reports, as clouds can cause light to scatter and by doing so, obscure reflective or illuminated things that are moving within or above them and create patterns that some might consider unexplained. However, that was not the case. All other variable relationships are as expected and align with our initial hypotheses, that people report more sightings where they have a better view of the sky. The question now is why? This research begins to answer this question by considering how much human made airborne activity is occurring. The highly credible relationships with air traffic and with military activity suggest that people are seeing, but not recognizing, things that are human made. As an example, a hot air balloon seen from a far enough distance can look unexplainable, especially if it is seen by someone who has not seen one before. Drones, which we did not test specifically for, can seem to fly erratically in areas where people aren’t used to seeing things moving in the sky. It is unlikely that events, such as ball lightning, seismic based lights, insects, or other natural occurrences are responsible for more than a small portion of these reports, as they are rare events themselves.

While these results provide an initial assessment of factors linked to the reported sightings of unidentified or unexplained phenomenon, they also generate further questions. We find credible relationships and spatial patterns that require further investigation. Why, for example, are the rates of sighting reports low in California, when they are high in many of the surrounding states? Why do the rates of reports fluctuate across time? Our future research will include temporal considerations (e.g., variation over time) to hopefully address some of these questions. We further note that our covariates represent average conditions, and while these clearly explain much of the first-order pattern in sighting reports, additional factors may be identified by exploring the remaining pattern in the spatial errors (SI Fig. 1) or by considering changes over time or individual events.

Some patterns in the reported sightings might be explained by sociocultural factors. For example, are there spikes of reports after Hollywood attention is given to movies or TV shows on aliens? Are some cultures more likely to see UAPs, because of their belief systems? Have some U.S. regions/places been given more attention to historical UAP sighting reports? There is no question that geography and “place” influence people’s belief systems and behavior. In some places, the expectation of what you are supposed to see may influence what you actually see. In a process termed motivated perception, people may bias their perceptions to arrive at expected conclusions that meet their goals or offer rewards 48,49. If your goal is to see a UAP, you may very well see one given the opportunity. However, it is important to point out that there are many sighting experiences which people are reluctant to report. There are many who fear stigmatization and attacks from the public, and others who previously had no belief in UAPs, but had an experience that convinced them of the opposite.

We approach this problem with caution, because of both the complexity of the topic and the sensitivity of available data. The U.S. Government position is that “UAP clearly pose a safety of flight issue and may pose a challenge to U.S. national security” 4. For national security issues, uncertainties and unknowns are never good, and it is the job of intelligence efforts to minimize the unknowns. Regardless of what people are seeing, and whether they are military pilots, civilian pilots, or general bystanders, there is a potential threat. That threat grows as our uncertainties grow. Although based on a noisy, crowd sourced dataset, our results can provide a context for how sighting reports of unidentified objects vary in space, the factors linked to these, and may offer a step towards understanding these threats.

This problem is relevant on many fronts, including anthropological and sociological (i.e., understanding the human/social experience). The stigma given to this area of research, if it is explored scientifically, should be over. We make no hypotheses about what people are seeing, only that they will see more when and where they have opportunity to. The question remains, however, as to what these sighting reports are of. Further examination of regions where the model performs poorly, temporal trends, and reported details of each reported sighting may help further elucidate this.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available online from the National UFO Reporting Center (NUFORC) at National UFO Reporting Center; however, these data are not geocoded. Geocoded data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.
References (Within)
Comments

The rate of UAP distribution for each state has been done many times over. The rate of distribution for each county (there are 3143 of them) seems to have been calculated for the first time. However, the distribution of UAP closely follows the distribution of intraplate seismic activity and could be fairly well estimated from the distribution of intraplate seismicity. The five UAP in February 2023 ( 4 in North America and 1 in China) appeared near the centers of intraplate seismicity. A number of unexplained or poorly explained airplane crashes/explosions appear to be also related to seismicity. It looks like the vast majority of people writing about UAP are either believers in ETs or believers that UAP are an optical illusion.

 
Last edited:
There has been growing interest by the United States government in Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP)
There is the big lie here. Waay to much text saying nothing. Like those 6,000-page bills nobody reads, except the lawmakers, who are smuggling the legislations of their Trillionaire Sponsors into those, so the bought & paid for congressmen can vote for them without reading.. They are obfuscating, avoiding disclosure as they are tasked to cover up the crimes of aliens throughout the continental United States. Black helicopters terrorizing farmers, whose cattle was massacred by Alien Mutilators or US Government Army Butchers. Elite US Army soldiers protecting alien property on US bases tasked with shoot-to-kill orders against US civilians? This is NO US Government interested in any alien activity! This is not the government for The People, but all together a satanic government against The People.
 
Repost from the Tucker thread:

Tucker Carlson is nailing the Alien/UFO phenomenon again:


And today Jimmy Dore brings up that clip and asks Alex Jones about it:


While Alex Jones, as usual, goes widely and manically all over the place in his answer (while throwing bits and pieces in there that we are familiar with), he reveals something about what Tucker knows that almost sounds like Tucker has had personal experiences with the phenomena that he isn't willing to share publically at this point. Later Alex said that Tucker has had an awakening moment that good and evil exists, and that before that point, he wasn't sure about it. And Alex additionally says that Tucker has had experiences now, that have shown him, how real this is.
 
Last edited:
Tucker has had an awakening moment that good and evil exists,
Tucker will personally experience his awakening, when a (max.) 15 feet / 5 meter tall Nephilim alpha male soldier lands in his garden [in full battle armor as I foresaw] tasked with Pest Control & Removal. What do pests do, when the cleaning crew arrives? They scurry! Humans run from floods, from flowing magma, from hurricanes, from earthquakes. This ""civilization"" on the surface (I love to emphasize this on the RT forum) were unable to replicate large ancient fortresses [providing protection from deluges] or underground cities [providing protection from asteroid carpet bombardments = molten coal falling from the skies], the ancients were able to build all that.

Your government tasked to protect you? The government is against you in the West especially is your enemy! Bill of rights? Haha! You have no rights!:
Remember Grusch remarking that the constitution is very liberally applied to whistleblowers in the Dark Government circles, .. i.e. Martial Law applies, shooting traitors, probably, what he meant.

BTW: In the old timelines I'm coming from - IIRC - there was in the sessions 10 million Nephilim. Now in these new timelines the sessions say 38 million Nephilim is coming.

David has success with killing one [or more] with a stone. I don't think we'll be so lucky this time around. Them being in full-powered-body-armor [as I had an image flash about them, which is anti-grav as well, I think]
As we read from Lizzie mining efforts on Earth / Moon, etc.., it is possible to make-manufacture all they mine, but its a lots cheaper for them to actually mine the stuff.

So I think it is a lot more expensive for them to TDARM-copy bodies for everyone. "economy of effort" Also "94% will be used" (Session: September 29, 2015)
So the Nephil first may be commanded to primarily use only stun guns to [probably] preserve our body-parts to make re-animated human zombies from our bodies. But that is just the primary directive. I think all resistance will be stomped and shot, just as like we were pests / rats scurrying around.
What a shocker for Tucker that will be, when he encounters the entire dreadful alien "political-economics" of this situation. Applied globally.

This entire de-testicularizing the populace serves only one purpose. Easier to suppress a weakened pest species. This ridding everybody - citizens - to possess 'Testicular Fortitude'™© (by Stew Peters) to stand up to the governments coming up with the Transgender-Transformation Trap PSYOPS and food poisoning / sickening the animals to make them unconsumable to weaken the populace to prevent human male and female fighters to take up arms and form an Anti-Nephilim Opposition Alliance!
 
Last edited:
'This entire de-testicularizing the populace serves only one purpose, I think: Its easier to suppress a considerably weakened pest species. They don't want Connor McGregors - human alpha male types to be popular and running around self-policing society, when the police flees / has fled from / given up on neighborhoods.
 
From Simplicius The Thinker's last article (January 3 2024), swirling around Medvedev's "forecasts" for 2024, we find:

"
Interestingly enough, the alien prediction of #6 is already fulfilling, as on cue the US Congress is rolling out more of its diversionary fare, with secret briefings around “UAPs”—as they’re now being called—scheduled for the coming week:


https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fa8b4fd8f-06af-462b-be58-171272c2e241_568x283.jpeg

https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fb42ee195-3688-42f0-af8b-c4a3e81342a7_1280x750.jpeg

"

In regard of the following session-30-december-2023 excerpt, what a coincidence :

(L) All right. So, is the fact that this is coming out now indicative of the fact that there is some impending human-ultraterrestrial dynamic that's gonna play out?

A: Sooner than you might expect!
 

Attachments

Interestingly enough, the alien prediction of #6 is already fulfilling, as on cue the US Congress is rolling out more of its diversionary fare, with secret briefings around “UAPs”—as they’re now being called—scheduled for the coming week:
When it comes to UFOs, Simplicius is as simple-minded as most others in alternative media. It's this kind of lazy thinking and shoddy analysis that annoys me the most about people in the conspiracy "space". It's embarrassing.

First, "as on cue." This meeting has been planned for months, and the seeds of it go back to the UFO hearings that were spearheaded by Tim Burchett, where Grusch, Graves, and Fravor testified. That in itself was planned months in advance. This is not "diversionary fanfare", it is a (largely hopeless) effort on the part of congressmen with a real interest in the phenomenon trying to get access to information that the DOD and intel agencies have been blocking them from accessing. They will not allow Grusch to speak with them directly, so they are trying to get in through the back door by gaining access to the classified details of his ICIG complaint.

It's a total misrepresentation to say Congress is "rolling [this] out." Again, it's a largely hopeless effort (though IMO admirable) on the part of a very small group of junior congressmen.

As for "diversionary fanfare," that's rich. Barely any news media will cover it, and due to the classified nature of the material, even the congressmen will not be able to share any details of what they receive. And that's assuming they receive anything of substance. The last time they tried getting in a SCIF with an IG, they were simply told, "This information is classified, and you don't have the necessary clearances to hear the answers to your questions." With any luck, they WILL receive some details, thus confirming and expanding on Grusch's testimony. But it won't be news for the above reasons.
 
A screenshot of a Billy Meier contact prediction from the video linked above.
There is an film, Civil War, coming up in April 2024, that will subconsciously prepare the masses for total chaos! How timely, just like the movie Parasite released in May 2019, a few months before the plandemic!
In the near future, a team of journalists travel across the United States during a rapidly escalating civil war that has engulfed the entire nation, struggling to survive during a near-future civil war where the government becomes a dystopian dictatorship and partisan extremist militias regularly commit political violence.
It is scheduled to be released theatrically on April 26, 2024, by A24 in the United States and Entertainment Film Distributors in the United Kingdom.
 
Well, he's definitely pushing the "aliens are good guys" line. Meier is obviously being duped with a lot of great predictions that are being fulfilled so as to give credibility to his "aliens are good" schtick.

Adding to the above, I think Meier fits into the same category as Strieber and Bell in this context:

00-03-18
Q: Whitley Strieber and Art Bell have published a book about a "global superstorm." Is any of the information they have given in this book fairly accurate?
A: Derived from non-human sources known for stark accuracy, when convenient.
Q: What makes it convenient at the present time for them to be "starkly accurate?"
A: Fits into plans.
Q: Plans for what?
A: Do we not know already?
Q: In other words: world conquest and the takeover of humanity?
A: Not as simple.
Q: What would make my statement more accurate?
A: Call it amalgamation.
 
Well, he's definitely pushing the "aliens are good guys" line. Meier is obviously being duped with a lot of great predictions that are being fulfilled so as to give credibility to his "aliens are good" schtick.
Bit of background from the sessions on Meier:

94/10/23
Q: (L) We would like to know the source of information coming through Billy Meier?

A: Grays.

Q: (L) He is not channeling Pleiadians?

A: Was but not now.
98/10/3
Q: (L) Well, I know that. But, I would just like to know what is the energy behind the Billy Meier contacts?

A: As we have so stated, Meier had legitimate contact in the beginning, but has since become the Swiss version of J.Z. Knight.
 
Well, he's definitely pushing the "aliens are good guys" line. Meier is obviously being duped with a lot of great predictions that are being fulfilled so as to give credibility to his "aliens are good" schtick.
Yes, you can say that again. He says that the Undergrounders will come up and help us and later that there are no dark forces out there :scared:. That just sounds so naive and contrary to all the evidence.
I think it also appeals very much to materialists who want and seek proof. It sounded as if Clayton was taken in by it too. Perhaps Billy Meier is coming in from the cold in an attempt to spread this view that the aliens are the good guys and thus prepare humanity to be lunch.
 
Back
Top Bottom