Imminent Alien Disclosure?

Little update on the 1933 Italian crash retrieval:

Soon to be released by Vallecchi of Florence, Pinotti's latest book 'Ufos and Aliens: the answers', "definitively rewrites the history of the UFO phenomenon as a timeless reality, persistent and alien to humanity. A reality now confirmed , accepted and finally officially cleared by the Pentagon itself on 25 June 2021. And which on a global level necessarily places Italian studies in this regard in the primary position they deserve".

"But now there is more. Today, after a quarter of a century and the positive forensic analyzes on the period documents acquired starting from 1996 which already proved their authenticity in 2000, Pinotti has completed a final report including new unpublished, independent and historical material transmitted to him by a politician of the First Republic of primary importance: documents on headed paper of various official state bodies, all dated, registered and signed with name, surname and rank by people who actually existed and whose activity was was perfectly documentable on a historical level. All these documents - they add from the National UFO Center - expressly mention the activities of the 'RS/33 Cabinet'", which took place "between 1939 and 1941 inside the underground structures of Monte Soratte, home of the 'protected workshops of the Duce' and then transformed into an anti-atomic shelter during the Cold War".
 
Alleged email from Grusch to Dark Journalist - unverified, but here it is:


I'll quote the bit I found most interesting:
I am very aware of how complex the UFO file issue is and the X-Protect faction that goes back to the late 19th Century (based on my independent knowledge). I have associated myself with certain individuals to understand the concerns of other factions and assess their objectives to get us to the true objective of transparency.
Always possible DJ is hoaxing, or getting played. (He also claims to have had a 3-hour conversation with Grusch). Guess we'll find out soon enough.
 
Hi everyone,

I did a quick search on this thread and I could not find any post mentioning this docuseries, it doesn't mean it hasn't been mentioned before, if so I apologize for the noise.

Anyway, I caught this on Netflix and I found it rather interesting, it's 4 episodes and it focuses on close encounters, it centers on 4 cases but it does a very nice investigation and it leaves the topic rather open, which was good. Diana Walsh Pasulka makes an appearance.

I would recommend it as it is a nice compendium of famous cases the world over, dealing with UFOs, MIB, Fairies, Aliens, etc.

 
Here's an interesting recent statement from Rep. Luna in reference to things said by David Grusch:

Caucus co-chair Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) says she thinks "it's incredibly important to listen to the specific words" that the UFO whistleblower that Congress is investigating. Rep Paulina specified that he has been stressing that we are dealing with "Inter dimensional" entities not "Aliens" during the recent closed door Congressional Hearings. More details on this 'new accepted understanding' of what we could be dealing with could be coming soon.


Below is a clip of Grusch speaking in an open door session last July on the potential of UAPS being interdimensional - which, however brief, sounds like he's headed in the right direction. The news segment is then followed up by Harvard physicist Dr. Avi Loeb who, almost predictably, proceeds to poo poo Grusch's statement opting for a more materialist hypotheses it seems:


 
Ok, this is creepy: flying humanoid figure (kinda like the jellyfish) morphs into a metallic sphere:

This one moves very unusual for me. While I see the resemblance to other jellyfish type UAP, it almost looks like a lightweight object simply falling from the sky, swaying and twirling on itself due to wind resistance. A little too physical and floppy compared to the more “stiff” or controlled maneuvers of other footage I’ve seen.

This one is interesting to say the least. For one it’s casting a shadow. This contrasts with the other jellyfish type UAP shown in Jeremy Corbell‘s documentary series, UFO Revolution, which could only be seen through heat vision (was it?) cameras. Obviously these types of discrepancies are to be expected when dealing with interdimensional phenomena.

Assuming that’s what these are. Thanks for sharing!

On a slightly humorous note, these things must be eating good lately.
 
D. W. Pasulka was interviewed by Joe Rogan - I haven't watched the whole interview. In this clip below it can be inferred from Pasulka that the UFO culture in high-up military and intelligence agencies is akin to an oral tradition often found in religions. Their meetings are 'pencils-up' AKA no notes, it's all spoken word only. It's cool to see her getting some showtime and making the link between aliens and organized religions...

 
Am I the only one seeing a mylar balloon ?

perhaps a gorilla one ?
gorilla mylar balloon - Google Suche
When they have expended most of their gas this is how they float about.

Correct size, correct movement, correct gentle rotation... Sometimes it's just a duck

I think I agree with this assessment. It just looked too staged.
I think this one is most likely a balloon. If you read the comments under the video, here:


someone commented that it looks like an orca-whale shaped ballon, like these ones:



And indeed, there are some points in the video in which it does look like quite clearly like a whale with the tail facing down. For example, at 15 secs, or from minute 1:00 to 1:15 or so, the bottom certainly does look like a whale tail.
 
D. W. Pasulka was interviewed by Joe Rogan - I haven't watched the whole interview. In this clip below it can be inferred from Pasulka that the UFO culture in high-up military and intelligence agencies is akin to an oral tradition often found in religions. Their meetings are 'pencils-up' AKA no notes, it's all spoken word only. It's cool to see her getting some showtime and making the link between aliens and organized religions...

Thanks for sharing,

I didn't know that she had been to Rogan, I think I will be watching that next!
 



It's all ambiguous enough to not mean much, but also ambiguous enough to potentially mean a lot.

I don't know if any other recent disclosure stuff recently has spoken about any sort of space battle - have they?

It's unclear whether it's a battle with aliens, or with China. Both? Too bad he got interrupted.

Also, is he the first US gov't official to speak about monsters or cryptids like Nessie as being in a sort of similar military/intelligence category as aliens? I'm reading this right, both cryptids and aliens seem to be of national defense interest, perhaps at a similar threat level or something. This is speculation on my part, tho.

But he seems to be saying that cryptids like Nessie are not as easy to talk about as aliens, and hence may be more of an issue... why would that be the case? A little closer to home, maybe, and maybe too close for comfort?

Are the cryptids getting agitated or something? Is this part of this battle he's talking about? Or are the PTB witnessing more window fallers?

Anyhow, I didn't know much about the guy. He's figure who appears to be firmly in Trump's camp who looks to have done plenty of national defence and intelligence work:




Very curious.

More on this 'space battle with China' thing that first rang my bell in the interview with Kash Patel above. I just watched this clip with retired USAF General Kwast:

Transcript:
Energy - the seed corn of all development, all growth, all survival. Energy. So energy, information, transportation, manufacturing - these are the things that change humanity, that change world power, and they are descending upon us in ways that are very unique. The technology is on the engineering benches today. But most Americans and most in Congress have not had time to really look deeply at what's going on here. But I've had the benefit of 33 years of study, and becoming friends with these engineers and these scientists.

This technology can be built today - with technology that is not developmental - to deliver any human being on any place on planet earth to any other place in less than an hour - to deliver WiFi from space, where you never need a cell tower to connect - to deliver energy from space, where you never have to plug your phone in and it trickle charges and you can use that energy where it trickle charges and you can use that energy over time. It can be applied to cars, to houses.

The technology of Edison and Tesla that we live with in our energy environment, our paradigm today is expensive, it's dangerous, and it's wasteful. Plug it into the wall - and yet, that's what we all do, because we are used to paradigms. The power of space will change world power forever.

And it doesn't have to be a big country to do it. It can be a small island country - let's say New Zealand - because the technology, if optimized, can change world power, and there's nothing you can do if you don't have that power.

The nature of power - you either have it and your values rule, or you do not have it and you must submit. We see that play out again and again in history. And it's playing out now.

There's also an article going over the whole talk in detail. There are some interesting points alleging that the Chinese are building a space Navy, Mothership, etc.


Recently retired U.S. Air Force Lieutenant General Steven L. Kwast gave a lecture last month that seems to further signal that the next major battlefield will be outer space. While military leadership rattling the space sabers is nothing new, Kwast’s lecture included comments that heavily hint at the possibility that the United States military and its industry partners may have already developed next-generation technologies that have the potential to drastically change the aerospace field, and human civilization, forever. Is this mere posturing or could we actually be on the verge of making science fiction a reality?

Who Is Steven Kwast?


According to his official USAF biography, Lt. Gen. Kwast graduated from the United States Air Force Academy with a degree in astronautical engineering, and also holds a master’s degree in public policy from Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. Kwast previously served as Commander of the 47th Operations Group at Laughlin Air Force Base and the 4th Fighter Wing at Seymour Johnson AFB. Kwast boasts more than 3,300 flight hours in the F-15E, T-6, T-37, and T-38 and over 650 combat hours.

Lt. Gen. Kwast most recently served as Commander of the Air Education and Training Command (AETC) at Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA), but retired in August. According to some reports, Kwast was prematurely relieved of his duties at JBSA and blacklisted for promotion after speaking out on space-related issues despite a service-wide gag order. Kwast declined to comment on the reports and retired on September 1, 2019.

Despite the controversy surrounding his removal from his post at AETC, some defense analysts and Lt. Gen. Kwast’s own supporters within the Armed Forces were suggesting prior to his retirement that he should be appointed as Commander of the Pentagon's budding Space Force. Kwast has published several op-eds in recent years pushing for the U.S. military to take on a greater role in space in order to ensure American economic dominance and what he sees as the continued proliferation of American values.

Gaining The High Ground In Space

Kwast delivered a lecture at Hillsdale College in Washington, D.C. on November 20, 2019, titled “The Urgent Need for a U.S. Space Force.” Kwast’s wide-ranging speech described the power of new technologies to revolutionize humankind, referencing the competitive advantage the discovery of fire offered to early humans and the strategic value that nuclear weapons offered 20th-century superpowers. When it comes to current revolutionary technologies, Kwast says the “the power of space will change world power forever” and that it’s up to the United States military to leverage that power:

"As a historian, reflecting on the fact that throughout the history of mankind… technology has always changed world power. But the story of rejecting the new and holding and clinging to the paradigms of the past is why no civilization has ever lasted forever, and values are trumped by other values when another civilization figures out a way of finding a competitive advantage. The nature of power, you either have it and your values rule or you do not have it and you must submit. We see that play out again and again in history and it’s playing out now."

As has been common as of late, Lt. Gen Kwast cites rapidly growing Chinese military and technological advances as the reason why the United States must invest heavily in new space-based technologies. “We can say today we are dominant in space but the trend lines are what you have to look at and they will pass us in the next few years if we do not do something. They will win this race and then they will put roadblocks up to space,” Kwast argues, “because once you get the high ground, that strategic high ground, it’s curtains for anybody trying to get to that high ground behind them.”

Kwast claims China is already building a “Navy in space” complete with the space-based equivalents of "battleships and destroyers" which are “able to maneuver and kill and communicate with dominance, and we [the United States] are not.” Kwast’s speech centers on the thesis that the United States needs a Space Force in order to counter Chinese advances and win the competition over the economy of the future and, as an extension, who sets the values of the future:

"Space is the Navy for the 21st century economy, a networked economy that will dominate any linear terrestrial economy in the four engines of growth and dominance that change world power: transportation, information, energy, and manufacturing. [...] Whoever gets to the new market sets the values for that market. And we could either have the market with the values of our Constitution [...] or we could have the values we see manifest in China."

As we’ve reported previously, there have been hints of radical new technologies under development by the military and, just as in Kwast’s speech, Chinese advances have been cited as the reason why these technologies are needed. China has been rapidly expanding its presence in space in recent years, placing a lander on the far side of the moon in late 2018 in what some say was a push to scout natural resources with which to develop a permanent lunar manufacturing center. China has also been developing “mothership” aircraft from which to rapidly and unpredictably launch spaceplanes and other payloads into space. The country has also launched several eyebrow-raising satellites in recent years which some analysts claim could be used in anti-satellite warfare. Beyond all this, they have been investing heavily in a traditional space program that includes many facets of manned and unmanned space technologies that rivals, and in some ways, exceeds our own.

Setting the Stage for 21st Century Warfare​

Kwast argues that the scientists, engineers, historians, and strategists of today have been pushing the U.S. Congress to more heavily and more rapidly fund the Space Force and associated technologies, but there is still some pushback and confusion as to why these are presently needed. Kwast ultimately makes the case that the United States must be able to bring kinetic power, non-kinetic power, and informational power to the battlefield cheaper and faster than its adversaries in order to ensure strategic advantage in space.

Around the 12:00 mark in the speech, Kwast makes the somewhat bizarre claim that the U.S. currently possesses revolutionary technologies that could render current aerospace capabilities obsolete:

"The technology is on the engineering benches today. But most Americans and most members of Congress have not had time to really look deeply at what is going on here. But I’ve had the benefit of 33 years of studying and becoming friends with these scientists. This technology can be built today with technology that is not developmental to deliver any human being from any place on planet Earth to any other place in less than an hour."

Kwast’s comment is only one of several curious comments made by military leadership lately and they do seem to claim that we could be on the precipice of a great leap in transportation technology. We also don't know exactly where he is coming from on all this as it is not necessarily the direct wheelhouse of someone who was running the Air Force's training portfolio, although it does have overlaps. Whether or not the revolutionary aerospace technologies Kwast mentions have actually been developed is one thing, but Kwast’s lecture, his recent op-eds, and his supporters make it clear that there are many within the U.S. military and analyst community who have felt that there is a great need to boost investment in American space technologies and the U.S. military’s presence in space. That vision is certainly taking root across the Defense Department.

Is all this setting the stage for a new space race that will benefit mankind by furthering scientific and technological development, or is it ushering in the conditions for the first great space war? Only time will tell, but according to Kwast, the technologies needed to win that war may be more science fact than fiction.

His first main point is that humanity is in the midst of a secret 4th industrial revolution of sorts - and not the Klaus Schwab version, with its focus on 'ze crisis of crises', social change, environment, and the planet earth as the domain of interest. To me looks like Kwast is talking about a different kind of 4th industrial revolution with technologies approaching the hyperdimensional, seeming to focus on freer energy, close to instantaneous travel, more robust communications networks, plus the whole 'join the space navy' and all that.

Maybe Schwab's vision fits into it, and is an integral part - who knows. Ze bugs for certain classes, and teleportation for good social credit scores.

Anyways, his second main point is that China is the main adversary in the race for the development of these technologies, and therefore dominance of the 'new sea' of space. So that's some corroboration with the Kash Patel interview above, which I found to be of interest.

We can infer from the recent C's session that the PTB's hatred of Russia and Iran may go beyond 3D geopolitics and include an esoteric reason of 4D STS seeking to destroy their gene pool as 'true Semites'. In the same way, perhaps the esoteric reason for the hatred of China may be because the PTB know that the Chinese are in fact farther ahead of the USA in secret space technologies of the kind mentioned in this talk, and already have an edge in space, and therefore a strategic advantage in any potential future space war.

It's clear to me that the US doesn't stand a chance against the civilizational poles of the Russkiy Mir, China, and the Islamic Middle East combined. It can't even handle Russia alone. It's commonly held that the PTB are too deep in wishful thinking at this point, and at some point will destroy themselves, or be taken out by the Triple Bad Day, or both. Before we get to that, though, they may employ Samson Option and try to destroy as much of the world as they can in a tantrum of losing their grip on global power.

This material above has me thinking of a different geopolitical possibility based on a kind of disclosure. The only way I can see the PTB maintaining the unipolar world order is by unveiling some of this kind of new highly-advanced tech, and using it to assert military dominance around the globe against its multiple civilizational adversaries at once. Hypersonic missiles don't mean a thing to a craft that can step outside of time. Imagine that boost for Team America World Police - suddenly they're back on top of the world, and with abilities to teleport troops and freer energy and military craft that makes an Su-35 look like a rubber duck. That would be one pretty crazy form of exposure, if not disclosure.

Anyways, I would guess that there may be some circles within the US PTB who want to roll out their new space guns and keep ruling the world, and maybe Kwast is one of those.

Either that or it's all just a marketing ploy to use China red-baiting to get more money for Space Force.

In general it's hard to believe I'm writing about the plausibility of a space war!
 
I'll leave it to the experts:


some comments:
"he's about the size of that three there"
"moves too strangely"
"is an anunaki, sasquatch/bigfoot?"
"walked down the hill in less than a minute"
I commented on this video on this thread. I wrote:

I watched that video a day or two ago and I didn't find it strange at all. There is no point of reference to tell how large the 'being' is. I mean, people may be thinking it's a huge mountain and therefore the guy is abnormally tall, but I think it's probably just a hill. The people taking the video were tourists, therefore not from the area and not familiar with the place nor how it looks when someone is walking up there.

Also, when zooming in, it might give the wrong impression in terms of perspective. At the 50:00 mark you can see the 'being' standing on top of the hill, and if you compare the bushes and grass around him, they seem about right to me for a human adult. If you were to conclude that was a giant, then you would need to accept also that the plants grow abnormally tall up there.

As for the other details, like he couldn't have walked down that way, and not so fast, I don't know why they say that since a path is clearly visible and the hill was not a mountain. That his hair was all white, it seems to me like he had something on the head, like a wrapped t-shirt or some sort of hat or cap.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom