Jacques said:
Here's the link for the vidéo:
The problem as I see it, is that Ehret tends to go neck deep into the rabbit hole of how the alien disclosure narrative has been weoponized, which is important and useful to know certainly -
but seems blocked about the validity of the very phemoneon itself. And this block of his effectively prevents him from getting to the point of understanding that our 4D friends are already here. Or further asking the question of
why they're here (and what they're doing). And all this after looking at a lot of ufo/ET-related material, according to him, and mentioned
in this video.
So Ehret, imo, appears to either have some thinking errors, and/or a program, and/or an overidentifaction with his 3D us vs Them research (which is his bread and butter) -
that leaves out a whole important part of the equation. And I don't think its a case of his being subject to normie disinformation around the subject given how willing he is to think outside the box and get it right in so many areas.
The co-creator is Cynthia Chung:
'The Hidden Hand Behind UFOs' Docu-Series
Finished the first episode.
It goes without saying that they had worked had on this, with the breadth and depth that people know of their work. It seemed to me that the discussed phenomenon gist, if even seeing it right and could be very wrong after the first episode, seemed to indicate that it is wrap-up phenomenon-UFO's et cetera into mythology. This is tied into somewhat coordinated old masonic cells through time, that then spun and embedded tales (although some old masonic practices were not associated, it was said) to help hoodwink humankind and then reanimate it again today with disclosure - drip drip, to a different unknown end. Many leading personalities in time, either discussed in this thread or elsewhere, such as Vallée, were backstopped to nefarious groups, which leaves off to Episode II.
With some characters they discussed, this may ring true, and some seemed more along the lines of innuendos by association. Not once, if remembered, did the film (thus far) look to the question of hyperdimensionality. Of course, hyper-D can't be measured so it can't exist, right, and so what is observed and theorized is brought down to our level (3d) and associated largely with said old masonic groups to help lay trails and mental traps. Now given what is being discussed being under our 3d feet -
undergrounders, they may have a point.
Can also see how the film could be attractive (again only at Ep.1 in 8 parts), trying to give answers to myriad of confusing questions - based partially on observations, writings, leaked heresy, and old archeology and technological accelerated advancements, just not from behind a 4d veil.
The film production was dramatic, even using music as a device to heighten the scene, and granted many will like this and yet what about just plain narrative speaking?
Will have to look for the next installment and see where it leads, and may have to revisit this episode to see what was missed, simply because, well it looked to being leaning to the usual masonic suspects and the gods. Might still be surprised, as Enno said, they do think outside the box...
Have not watched
On the Making of Episode 2 of The Hidden Hand Behind UFOs (a Superspreaders Special) other than a minute or two on Putin, which was good. Here is a brief commentary:
Mar 1 2024
Matt Ehret joins filmmaker and podcast host Jason Dahl, Rhain and the Holmes family to discuss the making of episode 2 of The Hidden Hand Behind UFOs (featuring 13 minutes of the film and lots of big ideas on the nature of evil, illusionist tricks, Harry Houdini's efforts to expose the British Society for Psychical Research scams, the dark side of Nicolai Tesla and much much more.
It's hard to stay positive these days.
rumble.com
