There's this, from the March 1st Session:In a previous session (June 10, 1995) the C's said that a 4th density being can directly enter a 3rd density body and become a "walk-in". Since 4th density beings already have physical bodies, do they then have two bodies at the same time, one in 3D and one in 4D?
In the context of "walk-ins" I think there's a distinction between "control" and "inhabit" (ie. "download into"). The discussion about "Men In Black" seems to indicate that 4D STS have great difficulty 'projecting' themselves into 3D for any sustained length of time. The "downloading" seems to be some sort of attempt to overcome that limitation. However, there must be some additional reason, as they can already control and manipulate 3D beings from 4D, so why do they even need to "download into" 3D bodies?Session 1st March 2025 said:Q: (thorbiorn) Can a 4D STS being download itself into more than one 3D body at the same time?
A: No.
Q: (L) But they can control more than one individual at the same time, if they're doing it from hyperdimensional realities?
A: Yes.
Laura asked this question to the C's in a roundabout way:
Session 20th October 1994 said:Q: Who do they [the Lizzies] worship? What do they call their god?
A: Physical universe.
Q: The physical universe is their god?
A: Yes.
This is congruent with what was mentioned about the genetic modification of nonverbal autistic children:Session 7th November 1994 said:Q: (L) What are the implications of the fact that the Lizzies worship the physical universe?
A: Self service.
Q: (L) What do they see in the physical universe that they feel is superior to the spiritual universe?
A: All who serve self yearn for physicality.
Q: (L) These bodies they are creating for themselves, are they creating some kind of super physical beings they can then move into and occupy which will have very advanced abilities that would enable them to serve self better, longer or more completely?
A: Yes.
It's like they want 4D power and knowledge, but to live in 3D. It's really quite bizarre, and makes me wonder if it's something equivalent to a corporate Wall Street type with a "furry" fetish who wants to go and live in a jungle somewhere in the most primitive way, only keeping his wealth and 'creature comforts' nearby so he can avoid getting caught in any really difficult situations.Session 25th January 2025 said:Q: (aragorn) Do most autistic non-speakers have these abilities?
A: A large number, yes. But genetic modification is problematic.
Q: (L) Why is the genetic modification problematic?
A: If ensouled that can modify the modifications.
Q: (L) Are you suggesting that not all of them are ensouled?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) So if they're not ensouled, if they're like OPs, then the genetic modification works. Is that it?
A: Yes.
Q: (Joe) Why are they modified in the womb by 4D STS to have these abilities? What's the point of modifying them?
A: Preparation for coming changes.
