Great interview, @Approaching Infinity; thanks for posting it. Borland's message comes through loud and clear and his body language gives weight to his statements. His hypothesized approach is an interesting one: could giving priority to the coverup/criminal and technological aspects of the UAP/NHI phenomenon be the best way to 'break it to humanity gently'?
We probably favour a more radical approach here, as we know just how intertwined the phenomenon is with the spiritual and religious aspects of human life, but I think if Borland's approach gains traction in policy circles, that would have benefits in this area as well, as there would be many people who would want to "know more" as soon as the conversation expanded.
It's likely that 4D STS have contingencies for this possibility, as Pasulka's work seems to indicate, but those might not play out exactly 'as planned' either. Peter Thiel's recent tirade against Greta Thunberg and other 'technology skeptics' - to a Christian audience, nonetheless - is an interesting data point regarding this. Why would a 22-year-old environmental activist pose an "Antichrist"-level threat to the Consortium's tech agenda? Could it be that any "brake" on Western tech development might tip the balance in favour of Russia and China? Are the Consortium starting to lose faith in their Special Access Programs?
The complexities of how to handle the full transition of Earth's civilization into Fourth Density are likely Quorum-level pay grade. Depopulation seems to be the 3D elites' solution, but the deindustrialisation necessary for that to occur looks like a fairly remote possibility at this point (except perhaps in the West), given the BRICS' ascension. Of course, Earth Changes might accomplish the same thing, but the forces that modulate such changes could be above even the Quorum's level.
Perhaps we should take Greta's thoughts on environmentalism a little more seriously?
