Inside Scientology

As far as documentation is concerned, in my own sleuthing many years ago I came across the Fishman Affidavit, which contained many criticisms of CoS and especially their Operating Thetan (OT) course materials.

From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fishman_Affidavit

The documents were brought as exhibits attached to a declaration by Steven Fishman on 9 April 1993 as part of Church of Scientology International v. Fishman and Geertz. Along with Kendrick Moxon and Laurie Bartilson, Timothy Bowles was one of the lead attorneys for the Church of Scientology in the case. Fishman told the court that he had committed crimes on behalf of the Church. He also attested that he was assigned to murder his psychologist, Dr. Uwe Geertz, and then commit suicide.

As evidence, Fishman submitted course materials he said that he purchased from Ellie Bolger, a fellow Scientologist, and Richard Ofshe, an expert witness for his defense. The Church says the documents were stolen and considers them to be copyrighted and a trade secret. Among other materials, the affidavit contains 61 pages of the allegedly trade-secret and copyrighted story of Xenu. The Fishman Affidavit contains much text from the old versions of the Operating Thetan levels. The versions of OT I to OT VII in the Fishman Affidavit are considered authentic as the church's Religious Technology Center (RTC) brought copyright lawsuits over their release on the Internet. Fishman's description of OT VIII contains the accusation that Jesus was a pedophile. After initially asserting copyright to all the OT level descriptions in the affidavit, RTC amended its claim to remove the OT VIII description, calling it a forgery. Fishman stated that he had obtained his copy of OT VIII from Ofshe, a different source than his copies of the other OT Levels, purchased from a fellow Scientologist.
The Church of Scientology dropped its libel case against Fishman and Geertz in 1994.

An important side aspect of the case was the fact that several high ranking Scientology officials and lead attorneys for the organization and former high ranking Scientologists submitted declarations on their activities for the Church of Scientology, giving thereby insight into the internal ongoings of the Scientology management.

The affidavit was posted online, along with all the information about each of the OT levels, 1-8, here - http://www.spaink.net/fishman/index2.html - unfortunately it does not delve into the personal life of Hubbard or his #2 Miscavige but it does give some insight into the inner machinations of the church and especially the process of auditing.
 
Laura said:
Wow! That's INSANE! If that is true (any documentation?) then those people are as bad as the Catholics and MIVILUDES who have the absolute gall to accuse US of being a "cult"!!!

From what I've read on the internet, it seems to be true.

Quote from Operation Clambake
Hidden Practices
In its hidden beliefs and practices, Scientology differentiates itself from all religious belief systems. Hidden from public view are certain social-control practices such as:
Disconnection. Shunning. If the Scientologist chooses to leave the group, all other Scientologists who have social or business contacts effectively exile the departing Scientologist. In a xenuphobic, high-control group such as Scientology, the effect can be devastating. For example, a businessman who employs and sells to Scientologists loses both employees and customers, as well as many of their friends.

Suppressive Person Declarations [SP]. According to Hubbard, 2.5% of the population is completely insane and bent on the destruction of other people, as well as Scientology. If Scientology is able to "Clear the Planet", SPs will "be disposed of quietly and without sorrow".

Fair Game. Enemies of Scientology may be "lied to, tricked, injured, or destroyed." by other Scientologists. Ex-Scientologists may be declared SP, as well as Disconnected.

Potential Trouble Source [PTS]. A Scientologist who may be trouble for Scientology. A step on the road to SP. A PTS may not receive Scientology services, which prevent advancement on The Bridge (salvation), so finding the source of the trouble becomes a priority.

Rehabilitation Project Force [RPF]. The RPF is Scientology's Gulag for staff members who don't measure up to management's expectations. Human rights abuses are common.

Vilification of Psychiatry . Hubbard's "Science of Mind" was spurned by the medical community, but Hubbard imagined a conspiracy of evil reincarnating psychiatrists from other planets that have imprisoned Mankind for millenia. See www.cchr.org, the Scientology front group that will destroy psychiatry.

Introspection Rundown (IR). When a member suffers a psychotic episode (which can occur during auditing), the member is kept in isolation and forcibly restrained if necessary. The IR is the practice of psychiatry without a license. Lisa McPherson needlessly died while on the Introspection Rundown.

Purification Rundown. The stated purpose of the PRD is to remove accumulated toxins from the body. In reality, it is a a toxic dose of niacin, calcium, and magnesium coupled with the dehydration of running and saunas. Due to excessive niacin consumption, liver damage is an all-to-common occurrence. Dehydration and excess minerals disrupt the body's electrolyte balance.

Treatment of Children and Families. Scientology is more important than families. Children do not produce income for Scientology, and are treated as parasites. Sea Org parents see their children for one hour per day or less. If a Scientologist leaves Scientology, their spouse and children disconnect. Fair Game occurs during the divorce and child support arrangements. Several fathers have been jailed through Scientology's manipulation of the legal system.

E-Meter. The E-meter measures galvanic skin response (changes in skin resistance). In contrast, the so-called "lie detector" measures GSR and five other responses, and is still inadmissible in court. The E-meter may appear to lend scientific respectability to auditing, but it is completely inadequate for the task.

As far as the "technology" is concerned:

A Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry at the University of Oklahoma calls it "pure unadulterated 'cow pies"'.

A Doctor of Internal Medicine in Ponca City says it is "filled with ...many false generalizations, internal inconsistencies, outright lies, and potentially dangerous treatments."

They are talking about the Purification part of the Narconon drug rehabilitation program that will be offered at Chilocco. According to a document called the Narconon Technical Line-Up copyrighted 1984 by Narconon, their rehabilitation program consists of several steps:

First, there is a Detoxification and Withdrawal program, followed by a Drug Education/Orientation lecture, Hard TR's (Training Routines), the Purification program, Objectives, the Drug Rundown, and the Way To Happiness Rundown.

Several area individuals have ask for and have been promised a copy of the Narconon "protocols" that will be used when Narconon is in operation, but after several weeks, nothing has been forthcoming from Narconon.

However, Narconon and Scientology documents have been provided by former Scientologists, Narconon volunteers, and Narconon patients which give a pretty clear idea of program contents.

One of those documents, a Hubbard Communications Bulletin called "The Purification Rundown Replaces The Sweat Program" is said to contain the core of L. Ron Hubbard's "technology" regarding the removal of toxic substances such as drugs from the body. It is a regimen which includes exercise, sauna sweat out, nutrition including vitamins, minerals, etc, as well as oil intake, and a properly ordered schedule of activity.

This and several related documents were offered for evaluation by a University of Oklahoma Professor of Chemistry and Biochemistry, and by a Ponca City Doctor who specializes in internal medicine. Their reports are being forwarded by city leaders to the State Health Department.

The OU Professor in his August 4, 1989 report, writes, "My overall comment on Mr. Hubbard' s literature is that there is an absolute lack of data to support his assertion that the Purification Program succeeds in doing what the presently adopted programs fall to do. The documents reviewed also contain many truths and half-truths."

"However," he continues, "there is no evidence that Mr. Hubbard's approach will cure these ills.

"(Hubbard' s statement that) "There is no such thing as a fat cell" is a meaningless statement," the professor says. " 'Fat tissue' should be adipose tissue which consists of many cell types and the major lipid storage cell is termed a 'brown cell".'

Where Hubbard suggests that in 1973 someone got a Nobel Prize for curing insanity with niacin, the OU report says it is "too absurd to comment on." As far as can be determined, the professor said by telephone, no such prize was ever given.

The OU report complains of a lack of scientific data within the documents to sup- port the statements made, and concludes that, "Overall the program proposed by Mr. Hubbard is pure unadulterated 'cow pies'. It is filled with some scientific truth but mainly is illogical and the conclusions drawn by Mr. Hubbard are without any basis in scientific fact."

A report received August 14 from a Ponca City doctor specializing in Internal Medicine says...

"As a previous Medical Director of two alcohol and drug rehabilitation units, I feel I am qualified by training, interest and experience to comment specifically on the proposed treatment center's so called Purification rundown.

The Purification Rundown is apparently either all or part of Narconon' s initial detoxification program. The ... document is in general a poorly written program. There is extremely poor organization. The material is full of generalizations that have no substantiation in fact. There are internal inconsistent statements. There is no documentation.

The Purification Rundown is somewhat patterned after many reputable detoxificalion programs in which diet, exercise, education and behavioral modification are used. But due to the above mentioned deficiencies as well as several outright untruths, I think that it is fair to say that the Purification Rundown is without merit."

Some specific points made in the report: "There is certainly no scientific documentation that exercise significantly speeds up the detoxification process."

"The author states throughout, that sweating increases the rate at which drugs in general leave the body. This is certainly untrue of many drugs, as most drugs of abuse are eliminated from the body by detoxification through the liver, or by passage through the kidney, or occasionally by passage through the lungs. Although minute quantities of some drugs may appear in the sweat it is such a small fraction of drug elimination that no matter how much a patient were made to sweat it could not significantly increase his clearing of most drugs."

"The author states 'There is no such thing as a fat cell.' This is absolutely false and can be disproven by any college student who has had a course in Histology."

"The author' s recommendation for taking Vegetable Oil to replace the oils in our fat tissue that are contaminated with drugs has no documentation or basis in fact."

"Perhaps the most blatantly false statement made in the entire document (is where the) author states, 'niacin's biochemical reaction is my own private personal discovery in the middle of the 1950's. Niacin was discovered several decades before the 1950's and its importance and multiple biochemical reactions have been studied from that time until present."

"The author further goes on to state 'Niacin runs out radiation' ... There is no scientific documentation that niacin in any way gets radiation out of the body. The symptoms of which the author talks are due to dilation of the blood vessels of the skin and is a known side-effect of niacin administration."

The report continues... "there are aspects ... which I find medically unsafe. (Parts of the program) suggest that the author expects that in many cases heat exhaustion will occur. Any treatment which leads to heat ex- haustion is unsound and unsafe."

Regarding suggested use of a medical officer, the report states, "It seems quite apparent that medical officer does not equate with medical doctor or physician as the author...goes on to say 'the medical officer gives a person an OK to go on to the program after insuring the person' s blood pressure is normal and he is not anemic. The medical officer does these checks himself where he is trained to do so'. Therefore, it seems medically unqualified persons are going to be supervising this program which I think is quite dangerous."

The report concludes, "While a drug free society is a worthwhile goal of any institution, when the initial entry into this program, i.e. the Purification Rundown is filled with so many false generalizations, internal in- consistencies, outright lies, and potentially dangerous treatments, I think it is without question that Narconon will be a detriment to the Newkirk area, Kay County, and the State of Oklahoma as a whole."

City leaders say they intend to forward complete, signed copies of the two reports to the same state and federal officials who previously received other packages of material concerning Narconon.
 
I first read Hubbard's works in the late 1960s and found his ideas intriguing. I checked out the local Church of Scientology and was turned off by the intense True Believer vibe. In the mid seventies I ran into a group of former scientology auditors who liked using dianetics and the original (pre-space opera) scientology levels as basic therapeutic tools and "growth" practices. Two of them, Roderick Taunton and Larry Dahlquist had been top auditors in the Church of Scientology. When I first met him, Roderick had spent several years living in safe houses, never spending more than three nights in the same place, as the Church had ordered his termination. Larry Dahlquist had been "tried and convicted" for the crime of associating with disreputable persons who practiced various forms of meditation the Church didn't approve of. At his trial, Larry pointed out that the stated goal of Scientology was to set us free, and yet one of the tenets of the Church was blind allegiance. His final defense was that "one could not therefore practice scientology and be a member of the Church of Scientology. The Church of Scientology is actively suppressing Scientology."
I would encourage anyone reading Hubbard's books to edit out the self promotion, the proselytizing, the One Way-isms, and focus on the actual principles presented. there is a great deal that is valuable there. (Hubbard was an awful writer IMO, and, except for his Science Of Survival did not let his works be edited. He punctuates the way one speaks, which means a lot of his punctuation doesn't make sense.) I have joked for decades that Hubbard is the most plagiarized writer of the 20th century. He was a truly seminal thinker, and a man who IMO did not understand many of his own ideas. He was "inspired beyond one's own intelligence." His ideas about the Suppressive Personality (his term for psychopaths) are excellent, and yet he strikes me as a classical suppressive himself. Clearly he was a megalomaniac. He created a very closed system, with only one conceivable source of understanding-himself. Total hierarchy.
Thirty years ago I met several people who knew L Ron Hubbard and had worked in the Church. Many of the claimed that underlings had hijacked the Church and ruined it. But that is an excuse I have heard in many groups when things go bad, "the guru is responsible,: it's those other jerks who did it!"
The claims of the Church for its various practices are grossly exaggerated, and yet those practices have all the merit they have.
I would argue that a basic exposure to the fundamental principles of dianetics and scientology is a great exercise.
There is the practice at hand, there is the motive for its use. I believe that the motive for a practice's use determines its outcome as much as whatever intrinsic merit may exist in the practice.
 
Holy frijoles! No wonder those cops are asking us those weird questions! And nothing we do is even remotely like what is described above! We are on about getting healthy and we do use some supplements and FIR Saunas, but everything we do is based on mainstream scientific research, more or less. We also rely a LOT on mainstream psychological science. Yeah, we think Freud was a psychopath, but not Jung and a whole bunch of others!

Sounds like CoS was created for the express purpose of giving good practices a bad name by perverting them and use them for evil intentions.
 
Laura said:
Holy frijoles! No wonder those cops are asking us those weird questions! And nothing we do is even remotely like what is described above! We are on about getting healthy and we do use some supplements and FIR Saunas, but everything we do is based on mainstream scientific research, more or less. We also rely a LOT on mainstream psychological science. Yeah, we think Freud was a psychopath, but not Jung and a whole bunch of others!

Sounds like CoS was created for the express purpose of giving good practices a bad name by perverting them and use them for evil intentions.

Plus, their anti-psychiatry work has some major holes in it. Yeah, psychiatry can be a tool of totalitarianism, but as the story Jon Ronson tells in The Psychopath Test makes clear, if they had their way, no one would be diagnosed a psychopath and they'd all be running free!
 
denekin said:
I would argue that a basic exposure to the fundamental principles of dianetics and scientology is a great exercise.
There is the practice at hand, there is the motive for its use. I believe that the motive for a practice's use determines its outcome as much as whatever intrinsic merit may exist in the practice.

I would support that argument based on what I've learned. Seems to me, where a procedure, technique or "rundown" might be beneficial in a caring and supportive environment, the same technologies applied for other reasons can only defeat their original purpose, OSIT.

I've known a few people who've stated they would return to the CoS if certain people would leave or if certain practices were discontinued. Seems like somewhere along the line so much related to the CoS became twisted or ponerized and then destructive towards the very people who were supposed to be in it for the "help". Maybe it's that thing about "a point of diminishing returns". Applying any form of coercion against someone in order to "help" them can be a bit problematic to say the least.

And why there should be any issue with the E-Meter I'm not sure. Essentially, it's a simple electronic circuit with a simple wheatstone bridge whose two working inputs can be two lengths of wire connected to two soup cans - each of which can be held in a hand. Regardless of hype, fancy design or any controversy, all it can do is indicate enturbulation in the energy "field" of someone once it's calibrated to them while they're just sitting there in a relaxed state. When the person holding the cans is calm and relaxed, the needle "floats" slowly back and forth. Anything else indicates a "disturbance" in the person's state. That disturbance may occur from deliberate lying or withholding something or from some other possible reason of which the client may be consciously unaware. Regardless, the end goal of a session is to get a floating needle - even if the auditor never finds out exactly what the resistance was all about.
 
I've never paid much attention to Scientology before, but after scanning through some of these links ...it sure looks like Scientology is really just an MLM disguised as a religion to me? It's like they crossed Star Wars with Mary Kay, then mixed in a teaspoon of Mormon and a sprinkle of Pope.

I think this is just a bunch of gobbly gook designed to part ignorant, desperate people from their money. :rolleyes:
 
From everything I've read about Scientology, there are red flags and alarm bells all over the place. I also have the impression like Laura wrote:

Laura said:
Holy frijoles! No wonder those cops are asking us those weird questions! And nothing we do is even remotely like what is described above! We are on about getting healthy and we do use some supplements and FIR Saunas, but everything we do is based on mainstream scientific research, more or less. We also rely a LOT on mainstream psychological science. Yeah, we think Freud was a psychopath, but not Jung and a whole bunch of others!

Sounds like CoS was created for the express purpose of giving good practices a bad name by perverting them and use them for evil intentions.

Now, of course, that doesn't mean there aren't good people among Scientologists and ex-Scientologists, just like Catholics, different Protestant denominations, Buddhists or what have you. But these would be good, caring and responsible people DESPITE their "faith" and not because of it, osit. Nonetheless, CoS does sound like a controlling, militant, hierarchical cult. And a huge money-making operation giving them a lot of power.
 
If we are a Truth seeking enterprise here, and I think we are, then one of our actions is to find out what IS true, what does have value, in whatever it is we are looking at. Here, we can freely discuss the aberrations of the various Christian churches, and yet we also have to find whatever gems reside inside the refuse pile of ponerized Christian thought and theory. I can give you truckloads of horror stories about what has gone on in the Church of Scientology, the TM movement, the Siddha Yoga organization etc etc. However, there is a danger, in my opinion, of taking a self gratifying antagonistic stand towards (in this case) the Church of Scientology, which we have every right and maybe even obligation to do, and yet by so doing missing what is within that structure that has merit, and may even represent a treasure. In a sense, as truth seekers, we are Metaphysical and philosophical archaeologists, sifting through garbage to find diamonds.
I am of the persuasion that the dung pile of scientology is well worth digging through.
That said...
The e-meter, a simple galvanic skin response machine, is a fabulous tool, if used ethically. It is a stress geiger counter and as such can help pin point areas of psychological lock up ("enturbulation" is the term I like to use). It can help reveal objectively areas of charge, as opposed to the subjective and/or ideological interpretations which tend to dominate our speculations about our problems.
There are many groups on this planet, generally started by disgruntled former Scientologists, which try to use what is best in L Ron's legacy. It should also be mentioned that people like AE Van Vogt and Jack Horner who knew Hubbard when he started dianetics and later the COS broke with him because of his ambition and deceit and tried to use what they thought was most valid and valuable in his ideas.
I am grateful I was never subjected to COS group think. I got to study LRH's ideas and practices and discuss and experiment with them with former scientologists, doctors, Jungian analysts and transpersonal psychologists. (The Jungian's interpretations of "past lives" was most interesting.) Hubbard's ideas offer a grand starting point, not a finished teaching of any kind. He didn't know that. And assuming himself to be Source, he spun out and drowned on his own ideas.
 
denekin said:
If we are a Truth seeking enterprise here, and I think we are, then one of our actions is to find out what IS true, what does have value, in whatever it is we are looking at. Here, we can freely discuss the aberrations of the various Christian churches, and yet we also have to find whatever gems reside inside the refuse pile of ponerized Christian thought and theory. I can give you truckloads of horror stories about what has gone on in the Church of Scientology, the TM movement, the Siddha Yoga organization etc etc. However, there is a danger, in my opinion, of taking a self gratifying antagonistic stand towards (in this case) the Church of Scientology, which we have every right and maybe even obligation to do, and yet by so doing missing what is within that structure that has merit, and may even represent a treasure. In a sense, as truth seekers, we are Metaphysical and philosophical archaeologists, sifting through garbage to find diamonds.
I am of the persuasion that the dung pile of scientology is well worth digging through.

So true. As I said, I've known some very fine people in CoS as well as noticing that there are a lot of lost people that get an aim from CoS and are no longer on the streets doing drugs. Same is true about every other heirarchical, controlling religion. Of course the problem is what they all do to the people who need the "exoskeleton", so to say.

Lobaczewski's description of how groups get ponerized is really helpful here. The contents can change under the same words and labels, the people at the bottom understand the most basic meaning and believe in it, the ones at the top are corrupted.

denekin said:
That said...
The e-meter, a simple galvanic skin response machine, is a fabulous tool, if used ethically. It is a stress geiger counter and as such can help pin point areas of psychological lock up ("enturbulation" is the term I like to use). It can help reveal objectively areas of charge, as opposed to the subjective and/or ideological interpretations which tend to dominate our speculations about our problems.

Yeah, GSR is used in a lot of psychological testing and has proven its usefulness. I was just reading some studies by Robert Hare and he cites the use of GSR in testing done on psychopaths and some interesting observations about it.

denekin said:
There are many groups on this planet, generally started by disgruntled former Scientologists, which try to use what is best in L Ron's legacy. It should also be mentioned that people like AE Van Vogt and Jack Horner who knew Hubbard when he started dianetics and later the COS broke with him because of his ambition and deceit and tried to use what they thought was most valid and valuable in his ideas.

He probably got a lot of his ideas from his alphabet soup agency experiences and some of them are probably very useful. But it seems obvious that his intent was not very benevolent. Or, if it was at the beginning, it changed drastically.

denekin said:
I am grateful I was never subjected to COS group think. I got to study LRH's ideas and practices and discuss and experiment with them with former scientologists, doctors, Jungian analysts and transpersonal psychologists. (The Jungian's interpretations of "past lives" was most interesting.) Hubbard's ideas offer a grand starting point, not a finished teaching of any kind. He didn't know that. And assuming himself to be Source, he spun out and drowned on his own ideas.

Sounds about right to me.

Interestingly, concering the Origins of Life and so forth, there's a great systems analysis that gives one pause: "The 5th Option". Well worth reading and keeping in mind when considering Hubbard's "history".
 
In a sense, as truth seekers, we are Metaphysical and philosophical archaeologists, sifting through garbage to find diamonds.
I am of the persuasion that the dung pile of Scientology is well worth digging through.


"Grab your shovel and Follow me.... and I will make you Miners of Diamonds..." :shock: :rotfl: :flowers:

Sorry all...it hit my Religious funny bone hard this morning...."Pick up your cross....I will make you fisher of men...yadda yadda yadda..." :rolleyes: :lol: :lol:
 
"Blessed are the Meta Archaeologists who shovel in the dung hill of history for they shall...uhm...they shall soon.....
wait...they had better....ah....I'm sure they would like to....Let me get back to you on this..."
 
denekin said:
"Blessed are the Meta Archaeologists who shovel in the dung hill of history for they shall...uhm...they shall soon.....
wait...they had better....ah....I'm sure they would like to....Let me get back to you on this..."
:lol2:
 
Laura said:
Lobaczewski's description of how groups get ponerized is really helpful here. The contents can change under the same words and labels, the people at the bottom understand the most basic meaning and believe in it, the ones at the top are corrupted.
[...]
He probably got a lot of his ideas from his alphabet soup agency experiences and some of them are probably very useful. But it seems obvious that his intent was not very benevolent. Or, if it was at the beginning, it changed drastically.

I agree with all the ideas expressed on this thread and have really enjoyed reading unbiased dialog. Last night I was reflecting on how various historical people have survived and "worked" in hostile environments. I had realized that said survival was mostly related to how certain simple 'truths' were implemented.

For instance, today the neuroscience reveals the connections between trauma and re-enacting/re-visiting trauma (or if it is preferred: our revenge/guilt/anger-based harm towards others). As I poked about in my old Clambake stuff I found this which seems to express the same or similar knowledge of the more recent neuroscience (Note: not for the timid):


"Show me any person who is critical of us and I'll show you crimes and intended crimes that would stand a magistrate's hair on end."

- L. Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Bulletin, 4 April 1965
-----------------------------
"Now, get this as a technical fact, not a hopeful idea. Every time we have investigated the background of a critic of Scientology, we have found crimes for which that person or group could be imprisoned under existing law. We do not find critics of Scientology who do not have criminal pasts."

- L. Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Bulletin, 5 November 1967, "Critics of Scientology"

******************************************************************************
"This is the correct procedure: Spot who is attacking us. Start investigating them promptly for felonies or worse using our own professionals, not outside agencies. Double curve our reply by saying we welcome an investigation of them. Start feeding lurid, blood sex crime actual evidence on the attackers to the press. Don't ever tamely submit to an investigation of us. Make it rough, rough on attackers all the way."

- L. Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letter, 25 February 1966
******************************************************************************

"So we listen. We add up associations of people with people. When a push against Scientology starts somewhere, we go over the people involved and weed them out. Push vanishes."

- L. Ron Hubbard, MANUAL OF JUSTICE, 1959
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Bud said:
...
"This is the correct procedure: Spot who is attacking us. Start investigating them promptly for felonies or worse using our own professionals, not outside agencies. Double curve our reply by saying we welcome an investigation of them. Start feeding lurid, blood sex crime actual evidence on the attackers to the press. Don't ever tamely submit to an investigation of us. Make it rough, rough on attackers all the way."

- L. Ron Hubbard, Hubbard Communications Office Policy Letter, 25 February 1966
******************************************************************************
I wonder if they initially tried the softer approach of helpful compliance, only to find playing nice offered no advantage, merely a drain on their energy. I'm no fan of the CoS, but there are probably a few things we could learn from them in their dealings with "preliminary investigations" and the like, e.g. strategies or methods.

Gonzo
 
Back
Top Bottom