Internal and external considering

ScarletBegonias

Dagobah Resident
http://www.cassiopedia.org/glossary/External_and_Internal_Considering
The key concept is to be aware of and to adapt oneself to the level of being and knowledge of others. Thus, external considering involves for example not talking about things which would simply offend others' beliefs or simply not be understood. External considering relates to an idea of general good will towards the environment, then in the sense of letting the environment be as it wishes and responding to its requests in a manner that honors its right to be as it will.
In some cases, external considering may involve withholding information that is seen as inappropriate, dangerous or simply unlikely to be well received.

According my understanding of External Considering, refraining from discussing information that in some cases, might offend or confuse someone is away of honoring their free will. But if finding information offensive or confusing can provide "shocks" that spark the learning process then isn't it appropriate at times not to be externally considerate?

Also, how can it be possible to be externally considerate without sometimes lying by withholding information?

Just trying to learn here. Thanks in advance for the assistance! :)
 
Scarlet said:
http://www.cassiopedia.org/glossary/External_and_Internal_Considering
The key concept is to be aware of and to adapt oneself to the level of being and knowledge of others. Thus, external considering involves for example not talking about things which would simply offend others' beliefs or simply not be understood. External considering relates to an idea of general good will towards the environment, then in the sense of letting the environment be as it wishes and responding to its requests in a manner that honors its right to be as it will.
In some cases, external considering may involve withholding information that is seen as inappropriate, dangerous or simply unlikely to be well received.

According my understanding of External Considering, refraining from discussing information that in some cases, might offend or confuse someone is away of honoring their free will. But if finding information offensive or confusing can provide "shocks" that spark the learning process then isn't it appropriate at times not to be externally considerate?

Also, how can it be possible to be externally considerate without sometimes lying by withholding information?

Just trying to learn here. Thanks in advance for the assistance! :)


Scarlet,


It is one thing to provide shocks in a group such as this forum where the goal of those here is to " wake up" It is quite another thing all together to provide shocks to those not in a group that have not expressed interest or desire in receiving said shock Hope that helps.


Also, lying and withholding information also fall under the law of three. There is good, there is bad, and then there is the context that determines what is appropriate, based on one's ability to "see".
 
Scarlet said:
According my understanding of External Considering, refraining from discussing information that in some cases, might offend or confuse someone is away of honoring their free will. But if finding information offensive or confusing can provide "shocks" that spark the learning process then isn't it appropriate at times not to be externally considerate?

Nobody exactly gave us the mandate to go around shocking others to spark their learning process - kind of like "who died and made us king" :). Like EH wrote, the situation is different in a "school" but even there (or here), deliberate shocks or mirrors are dealt with very carefully. There is a very good reason for this. Shocks - like the name suggests - can be very powerful. If a person is not ready, it can cause very serious disturbances in the psyche which the recipient may not be able to handle.Only a person or more appropriately, a group of persons who have developed a high degree of Being through long and persistent Work on themselves can give deliberate shocks to those who have generally agreed to receive such shocks in a school environment. As you can see, in such cases external consideration is maintained as the recipient has agreed to receive such shocks and the teacher or network understands that the recipient is capable of taking it.




[quote author=Scarlet]
Also, how can it be possible to be externally considerate without sometimes lying by withholding information?
[/quote]

It is not. If a child created some artwork that is shoddy or below expected standard, would you tell him/her so in their face? Or would you find a way of communicating the idea that they could do better without breaking their confidence? The latter is external consideration - the former is not. Terminal patients who have little time in their hands are also often not told the exact truth about their condition even if they have a general idea so that they are not completely demoralized. One could come up with more examples of situations where lies are more likely to be externally considerate than the truth.

Hope this helps.
 
Thank you for this feedback, everyone!

Over the years I have bent over backwards to balance external consideration with the students in my classroom, but it is extremely difficult and has caused me great stress. There are some things I can tell one student but not another, yet they are both close enough to hear what I am saying. If I don't tell a student something when I think of it there will likely not be another time, because I work with about 200 teenagers a day and we operate under the direction of 17 bells.

The most stressful example I can recall off-hand is this last spring when one of my students asked me why I was always lying to the class. Immediately I became nervous, but remained cool on the outside and asked him what he meant by that, though I already knew. He said that I tell students their art is "good" when it's not.

We discussed this in front of other students for a few minutes and I felt I was just offering him more lies to cover the truth that sometimes I do say that their art is "good" when really I don't think it is. Inside I was embarrassed for being called a liar to my students by one of my students and in front of my other students. I was confused as to why I was being so inconsistent with my thoughts and acts towards them and ashamed of myself for lying them too.

So maybe I can feel okay about being called a liar in these situations when I am being externally considerate so long as I make great efforts to understand the individuals' levels of development, operate under the law of three and can explain my reasons for this behavior if I am questioned about it. I feel less critical of myself now that I know why I am this way in my classroom. Thank you!!
 
You could also just realize (and explain if necessary) that every student is different and what is 'good' for one student may not be 'good' for another student. You tell each student what is appropriate for them.

That's not lying - it's teaching.
 
Scarlet said:
We discussed this in front of other students for a few minutes and I felt I was just offering him more lies to cover the truth that sometimes I do say that their art is "good" when really I don't think it is. Inside I was embarrassed for being called a liar to my students by one of my students and in front of my other students. I was confused as to why I was being so inconsistent with my thoughts and acts towards them and ashamed of myself for lying them too.

I know from experience that being a teacher with many students is a very challenging job. At the same time it's a great opportunity to learn about yourself, and how to interact and offer help to the students - every student being unique with their unique personalities and ways of learning. As I see it, my job (and what makes it interesting) is to give guidance, tools and techniques and to listen to their needs, so that they can learn to help themselves and be good at what they are doing - if they want to. I can't see the product or result of any student as bad, as long as the student is motivated and making efforts.

For example, some of my singing students sing very poorly compared to a professional, but that is their current level of singing and the problems are almost always caused by excessive tensions and traumas stored in their body. So in no way, as I can see it, is their singing not good, they just have too much tension in their body and breathing, and we need to work on it. Some students need some form of pep talking in order to not "shut down" and give up. But as I see it, if you have a clear understanding why and when you should be doing it - there's no lying involved. It's just a tool to help the student see themselves from another perspective and to help them realize that whatever they are doing - if they are making an effort - there's always something unique and valuable in it. Taking singing again as an example: every sound you produce with your body and vocal chords, no matter how ugly it is, can be a great opportunity of self discovery.

It is true, that some teachers do too much pep talking ("good, good!"), without applying any thought of to who, when or why to say it. This is not constructive, and in many cases the student becomes disillusioned about their capabilities. This would be lying, IMO. In the end, I think that teaching requires a lot of emotional intelligence. I'm not saying that I can master this, but I try to keep these things in mind whenever I teach, hoping to become better at it.

It would be interesting to hear what you feel is your role and task as a teacher, why and in which cases do you think that the work of some students isn't good?
 
anart said:
You could also just realize (and explain if necessary) that every student is different and what is 'good' for one student may not be 'good' for another student. You tell each student what is appropriate for them.

That's not lying - it's teaching.

Thank you anart! Those are the EXACT words I remember one of my old teachers, Mr Pratt :D taught me and part of what I remember telling my student when I responded with my "lies" to him. I think I need to redefine what I think a lie is and I'm working on that. :)

Aragorn said:
Scarlet said:
We discussed this in front of other students for a few minutes and I felt I was just offering him more lies to cover the truth that sometimes I do say that their art is "good" when really I don't think it is. Inside I was embarrassed for being called a liar to my students by one of my students and in front of my other students. I was confused as to why I was being so inconsistent with my thoughts and acts towards them and ashamed of myself for lying them too.

I know from experience that being a teacher with many students is a very challenging job. At the same time it's a great opportunity to learn about yourself, and how to interact and offer help to the students - every student being unique with their unique personalities and ways of learning. As I see it, my job (and what makes it interesting) is to give guidance, tools and techniques and to listen to their needs, so that they can learn to help themselves and be good at what they are doing - if they want to. I can't see the product or result of any student as bad, as long as the student is motivated and making efforts.

For example, some of my singing students sing very poorly compared to a professional, but that is their current level of singing and the problems are almost always caused by excessive tensions and traumas stored in their body. So in no way, as I can see it, is their singing not good, they just have too much tension in their body and breathing, and we need to work on it. Some students need some form of pep talking in order to not "shut down" and give up. But as I see it, if you have a clear understanding why and when you should be doing it - there's no lying involved. It's just a tool to help the student see themselves from another perspective and to help them realize that whatever they are doing - if they are making an effort - there's always something unique and valuable in it. Taking singing again as an example: every sound you produce with your body and vocal chords, no matter how ugly it is, can be a great opportunity of self discovery.

It is true, that some teachers do too much pep talking ("good, good!"), without applying any thought of to who, when or why to say it. This is not constructive, and in many cases the student becomes disillusioned about their capabilities. This would be lying, IMO. In the end, I think that teaching requires a lot of emotional intelligence. I'm not saying that I can master this, but I try to keep these things in mind whenever I teach, hoping to become better at it.

It would be interesting to hear what you feel is your role and task as a teacher, why and in which cases do you think that the work of some students isn't good?
Thank you and I agree with all of the teaching philosophies you mentioned, Aragorn! I think my main focus of work with my students is in building their confidence levels, because most of the populations I teach have learning disabilities and/or are learning English. Plus many are in poor health, because of their lifestyles (diets, sleeping habits, home lives, etc).

When I responded to my student after he questioned me about lying to my students by saying their work was "good" when, while discussing it with him it didn't meet my standards for "good," was a complicated scenario. I teach a college level class to some students while teaching other students with various learning disabilities in an intermediate art class. The room always over-capacity during this hour, but very productive.

What is considered "not good" in terms of artistic development to the student in the AP (advanced placement/college level) class who questioned me in reality is great, because my autistic student in the other class also going on actually followed the directions, completed the project AND turned it in! It never bothered me that his art looked like the artwork a young child would create, because he was improving his drawing and shading abilities and gained confidence about it. He became more enthusiastic about art-making, had more ideas of what to make, and I was able to help him with shading techniques, etc, as the year went on. So the quality of art my AP student was referring to would not be considered "good" work to submit in a portfolio to the College Board for his class, but it WAS GREAT, because this student in the other class was able to follow the directions.

I am proud of my students when they try and I considerately question those who don't. Maybe the student needed some help brainstorming for ideas, or a little demonstration of how to make thumbnail sketches, blend colors, or start a complicated drawing by using basic shapes (all re-teaching on my part). Maybe they could use some images to reference in one of my books or certain materials that they didn't even know existed, but that I know of and have on-hand. Scaffolding lessons by requiring mini-assignments before projects is also an effective way of helping my students gain confidence about their art-making capabilities and methods for working with particular media.

Sometimes some of my students are apathetic (not from being physically ill, sleepy, hungry, etc) and I get urges to question them about their behavior. I like to ask them what they want to do, the things they like and don't, what their plans are, etc. I tell them I don't expect them to know the answers to my questions and that life is a great big journey, but it's good to think about these things, to have plans, IMO.

So, I think my role as a teacher is to help my students improve in their artistic confidence and abilities, but also to help guide them to see their personal vocations while providing a safety net so they can feel comfortable to about taking part in the learning process. I think it's my job to help unlock parts of them that they never knew existed, to teach them a bit about history and to help them grow by just being a constant adult figure in their lives.

I think my problem here lies in the fact that I took what my student told me "to heart" and accepted that I was a "liar" without processing that my feelings of inadequacy were due to my inability to understand the situation. These feelings were also magnified by the poor health I was experiencing at the time, (poor diet, insomnia, stress, etc.). Perhaps my ego got bruised and I know my "superior" side didn't like feeling "inferior." Perhaps I am too "hard on myself" as others often tell me and I do remember operating under a dissociative "mental fog" those last few months.

I see how I mechanically accept others' critiques of me without questioning them sometimes, (and I didn't have much time for that in my classroom, because I had to move on to other things), but when I reflect, my opinions of their critiques can change. I am glad to be able to see my mechanical responses more, though it is hard to deal with these students' questions as much as I would like to sometimes because of time constraints. In retrospect, I think this student who questioned me was not being externally considerate, likely due to his ignorance of the developmental levels of his peers.

Thanks again for the dialogue here!
 
I would like to ask if anyone can advise which would be the best book or books to read that cover this subject?
 
Good question. You could pick up a copy of P. D. Ouspensky’s In Search of the Miraculous, which as well as being a great introduction to Gurdjieff, has an excellent and very useful index which you could use to review individual subjects wherever they are mentioned throughout the book. If you already have it, look under C for ‘Considering’.

Others might have further suggestions. It would make for a good book in itself, I’d love to read it if there is one!
 
Thanks Alada,

In search of the miraculous is on my books to read list but It probably wouldn't off been next (though it is now). I have read tales of Beelzebub to his grandson but I am a newcomer through here to his work. Better get the journal ready as I expect this will be an interesting read for me. :shock:
 
Thanks Moonbird I read this on the esoteric glossary which initially sparked my interest. I was looking or hoping to delve a little deeper into the subject. I will also investigate what a web search throws up but may well take the plunge and purchase in search of the miraculous.
 
I agree that ISOTM is one of the "must reads" in terms of understanding the work and being able to learn the language we use here on the forum. It is a good starting point for all new members next to Laura's books. It's one to take your time over as well. I would read a page then spend a good amount of time thinking about it, take some notes then move on to the next page. Well worth the effort.
 
Thebull said:
Thanks Moonbird I read this on the esoteric glossary which initially sparked my interest. I was looking or hoping to delve a little deeper into the subject. I will also investigate what a web search throws up but may well take the plunge and purchase in search of the miraculous.

I have ISOTM in pdf format, is it against the rule's email book's
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom