Солдаты НАТО плакали! — стали известны «жуткие» детали удара Ирана по базе США (ВИДЕО)The Danish Sergeant spoke in an interview with local media about how much fear he and his fellow soldiers suffered when Iran bombed the American base of ain al-Assad.
According to a soldier named John, six hours before the attack, the Danish government and defense Forces knew about the impending missile strike. John and other soldiers were notified of the impending attack, they went down to the bunker in advance, where they waited out the attacks of the forces of the Islamic revolutionary guard Corps (IRGC).
"The first blow was a surprise. Hit 9 missiles with a capacity of a ton each. It was indescribable."
"I've never experienced anything like this, and I hope I never experience it again. It was a brutal attack.
The attack was so strong that the bunker was shaking, and a lot of dust got inside, "the Danish Sergeant shared the" horrors " of the experience.
We will emphasize once again: everyone knew about the attack, the military personnel were warned in advance. The command gave the order to all personnel to take shelter in the equipped bunker. At the same time, the Iranian missile strike still became a "terrifying experience"for the soldiers from Western countries.
"We had to sit with scarves on our faces to breathe. Worst of all was the ignorance and impotence of the Danish soldiers in the face of the expectation of new attacks. We didn't know where or when the next rocket would fall," John complained to reporters.
"We could just sit and wait. We couldn't do what we were prepared for. We could have just waited, " John lamented.
According to him, the Danish soldiers reacted differently. Someone tried to keep up their spirits, make jokes, and tell jokes to "protect" themselves.
"Some clung to each other, and some cried," admitted the Danish Sergeant.
After the Iranian attack on American bases, Sergeant John and 133 of his faint-hearted comrades-in-arms were sent from Iraq to Kuwait. Military psychologists were sent to them to help Danish soldiers recover from their experiences.
"We really need them. It was a situation for which we were not prepared, " John complained to reporters.
"It is a little alarming for the Danish army if a well-known blow, which they waited out in advance in a protected bunker, became a terrifying experience for them, after which they needed a psychologist.
It is terrible to imagine what would have happened to them if Iran had struck without warning, " Boris Rozhin, an expert at the center for military and political journalism, commented on the ridiculous situation in his telegram channel Solonelcassad.
In addition to the details of the missile attack on American bases in Iraq, the Danish Sergeant said that several helicopters were destroyed at the base, the loss of which the Pentagon did not say.
"I would say that the nearest missile fell 300 feet (91 meters) away from us, and when we passed (there) afterwards, there were helicopters torn in half, and the holes are so large that you could Park a van in them," said the Danish Sergeant.
Note that Denmark is not the only country that has decided to evacuate its contingent from Iraq. Earlier, Russian Spring reported that for security reasons, Germany decided to move some of its troops from Iraq to Jordan and Kuwait.
Slovakia can also recall its military to its homeland. Even earlier, the US began to withdraw its military contingent from Iraq.
Singh, who was head of the Iran desk in the Indian foreign ministry as well as an ambassador to Israel, also said the 2015 Iran nuclear deal was as good as dead, with fresh talks required to resurrect it. Though India has been careful not to side with Iran or the US, its deep interlinkages with the US economy and financial systems compel India to circumscribe its ties with Iran.
Edited excerpts:
1) Is the present confrontation over, you think, or is there potential for a new flare up any time soon?
Both Iran and US have signaled that they want to walk back from the current escalatory phase. After the US drone strike that killed the Iranian evolutionary Guards’ Al- Quds force leader Qasem Suleimani, US President (Donald) Trump and Secretary of State (Mike) Pompeo had spoken of de-escalation. Iranian leaders first spoke of a proportionate response, and then of de-escalation after their missile strikes. The Iranian response was carefully calibrated. It showed technological capability, precision, took place within Iraq where the US attack had been, and was directly attributable to Iran. US was able to claim that it suffered no casualties, and thus could avoid a response. Reports also suggest that the Iranians had informed Iraq’s Prime Minister in advance, signaling a sensitivity to Iraqi sovereignty, and differentiating itself from US which had not given Iraqis advance notice. There is some speculation that the Iraqis had forewarned the US of the impending attack, and that US intelligence had also picked up signs of preparation of such an attack. However, this does not mean that tension, maneuvering, and proxy or cyber attacks by US and Iran against each other’s interests have come to an end. US continues with its stringent economic sanctions depriving Iran of billions of dollars of oil and other revenue, designating as terrorists many of its leaders and government entities, and the two countries have adversarial interests in Iraq, Syria, Afghanistan and Israel- Palestine.
2) What do you see as the future for the West Asia region? Iran seems pretty clear that they want the US forces out of the region and the US seems keen on a withdrawal. President Trump mentioned an increased role for NATO there. How do you that playing out?
When US troops had initially moved into Afghanistan in 2001, after 9/11, Iran had seen some advantage to itself from the Taliban being driven out of power, and had not been hostile to the arrival of US forces. However, their attitude changed when US President George Bush, in his State of Union address in 2002, described Iran as one of the “Axis of Evil” along with Iraq and North Korea. Similarly, Iran gained from US displacing Saddam Hussain in Iraq in 2003 and paving the way for majority Shia dominance in that country. Both competed, in adversarial manner, for influence over the post Saddam political and security structures. They had convergence of interest in the fight against ISIS, but are arraigned on opposite sides in Syria. Given US economic and other pressure, Iran would clearly see a threat from a dominating US physical presence in its neighborhood. Trump had also waged his 2016 Presidential campaign on ending US involvement in “endless wars”, and would ideally like to showcase US draw down as the 2020 campaign picks up. But he cannot be seen to have retreated out of weakness. Drawdown in Afghanistan has stalled, as have negotiations with the Taliban. If NATO steps up involvement and number of troops in Iraq, it would provide Trump the fig leaf to reduce number of US troops. However, NATO was conceived largely for European operations, against the Soviet and later the Russian challenge. It did not perform well in its first “out of area operations”, in Afghanistan, and essentially remained dependent on US strategy, infrastructure and was confined to supporting roles such as in training and advising Afghan forces. Also, there is political opposition in the European NATO members to involvement outside Europe, although they may want to avoid giving Trump another reason for criticizing NATO as ineffective or wasteful, or NATO not doing enough and leaving the heavy lifting all to the US.
The Strait of Hormuz is once again a center of global tensions. The Middle East’s crude oil and natural gas flow through the narrow sea conduit to international markets, making it the world’s most critical transportation “chokepoint.” Incidents there — such as Iran’s seizure of a British tanker and attacks on ships in 2019 — can whipsaw energy prices and send shipping and insurance rates rocketing. Regional tensions flared again after the U.S. killed a top Iranian general in January 2020 and some shippers briefly avoided sending vessels through the strait. The Islamic Republic has periodically threatened to shut the vital waterway, prompting the U.S. and U.K. to step up their military presence amid calls to ensure it stays open.
1. Where is the Strait of Hormuz?
Shaped like an inverted V, the waterway connects the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean, with Iran to its north and the United Arab Emirates and Oman to the south. It’s about 96 miles (154 kilometers) long and 21 miles wide at its narrowest point, with the shipping lanes in each direction just two miles wide. Its shallow depth makes ships vulnerable to mines, and the proximity to land — Iran, in particular — leaves large tankers open to attack from shore-based missiles or interception by fast patrol boats and helicopters.
3. Why would Iran disrupt the strait?
4. Could Iran really close the waterway?
Strait of Hormuz - A Timeline of 2019 Events
5. Has the strait been closed to traffic before?
6. Can the strait be protected?
7. Who relies most on the strait?
The Reference Shelf
According to him, the Danish soldiers reacted differently. Someone tried to keep up their spirits, make jokes, and tell jokes to "protect" themselves.
"Some clung to each other, and some cried," admitted the Danish Sergeant.
Why U.S.-Iran Feud Keeps Focus on Strait of Hormuz
January 10, 2020, 6:00 AM GMT+1 / 8-10 minutes Snip:
Iran’s Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif is also attending the conference in Delhi that comes just a day after Britain, France and Germany formally accused Iran of violating the terms of its 2015 agreement to curb its nuclear program, which eventually could lead to the reimposing of U.N. sanctions.
Iran’s Fars news agency quoted Zarif as saying overnight that the use of the dispute mechanism was legally baseless and a strategic mistake.
Lavrov said unilateral sanctions were a problem in today’s world.
“So the 21st century is the time when we must get rid of any methods of dealing in international relations which smack of colonial and neo-colonial times. And sanctions, unilaterally imposed sanctions, they are not going to work.”
After pulling out of the Iran deal, the United States slapped sanctions back on Iran and has gradually increased its “maximum pressure” campaign targeting the Islamic Republic’s revenues from oil, mining and other industries.
British Prime Minister Boris Johnson called on Tuesday for U.S. President Donald Trump to replace the Iranian nuclear deal with his own new pact to ensure the Islamic Republic does not get an atomic weapon.
Trump said in a tweet he agreed with Johnson for a “Trump deal”.
U.S. Deputy National Security Adviser Matthew Pottinger will also be addressing the Delhi meeting on Thursday.
This is actually a possible outcome, some of the conscientious voters and politicians might think about it. What the PM and the Government did was to move 100 of the 130 Danish soldiers temporarily to a military base in Kuwait. Perhaps it is even a way of saying to the US, yes we know we have to participate in this nonsense, but you create a lot of problems to make it worse than it needed to be.If this is true and they're not using this for Public Relations purposes and sympathy, maybe they now can realize, with just a small taste, how those who are being bombed in other countries (Palestine, Syria, Yemen etc.) feel on a continual basis.
Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif held talks with members of the European Council on Foreign Relations (ECFR) in Germany’s Munich about issues of mutual interest.
'This is the last warning': Iranian air defenses almost fired on U.S. F-18 fighter jet.
2020-03-22Iranian military nearly fired on US F-18 jet: video
BEIRUT, LEBANON (7:00 P.M.) - The Iranian military nearly opened fire on a U.S. F-18 Super Hornet jet three days ago after the latter did not obey thewww.almasdarnews.com
UN Resolution 2231 adopted back in 2015 alongside the Iran nuclear deal, prohibited the sale of conventional weapons to the Islamic Republic until 18 October 2020 and separately the sale of missiles until 2023. However, US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo stated yesterday that Washington is planning to do anything in its power to extend the ban beyond October 2020 and will apply to the UN to do that.
Pompeo mulled resorting to a mechanism that renews international sanctions against the Islamic Republic by declaring that it violated the nuclear deal inked in 2015, but was later abandoned by the US in 2018. The secretary of state claims the US is still formally a party to the deal and that Washington will seek help from its European allies, signatories to the deal, in this matter. UN inspections, however, revealed that Iran complied with the deal as it promised in 2015.
The report mentioned that it had one day earlier quoted a US veteran officer as warning of the harm expected to be inflicted on ‘Israel’ by Hezbollah missiles and describing them as a weapon of mass destruction.
The report added that the veteran Israeli officer, Zvika Haimovich, who served as an air defense commander, expressed his worries about the same threat but with a soft rhetoric, noting that he warned of a large number of Hezbollah precision-guided missiles.
Haimovich called on the Israelis to prepare themselves to encounter an unprecedented threat, according to the report which added that the number of Hezbollah missiles as confirmed by ‘Israel’ has reached 150 thousand.
The Israeli report blamed the army officers who hide all the dangers which threaten the entity during their service year and disclose them after they retire, wondering how they observe the professional integrity.
Netsif Net pointed out that Hezbollah TV Channel Al-Manar launches a psychological warfare against the Israelis based on the reports about Hezbollah augmenting military power, adding the Zionists themselves have started to recognize this threat.