Is a stock market crash imminent?

Carl said:
There are so many people expecting a crash now that it may even do the opposite, only to actually have the plug pulled when we all least expect it.

I noticed that every year, market crashes are predicted for the fall on the northern hemisphere. Not sure what to make of this. But I tend to think that it would be rather unexpected.
 
Cryptocurrency exchanges shut down amid heavy trading, rollercoaster Bitcoin
Published time: 13 Jun, 2017 03:13
https://www.rt.com/usa/392019-bitcoin-3k-coinbase-outages/
Snip:
The company cited high customer traffic and trading volume for being “down for maintenance.” Coinbase claimed that the issue was resolved by 7:44pm EST.

As the site experienced such high traffic, the entire market for Bitcoin was in a state of wild fluctuation. On Sunday, Bitcoin climbed to a record high of $3,041.36, according to CNBC.

Then, on Monday, Bitcoin experienced its largest crash since January 2015, falling more than 16 percent to $2,532.87. Those looking to sell their Bitcoin on Monday as the price plummeted by more than $500 were unable to do so through Coinbase.

Coinbase also experienced an outage due to increased traffic on May 25, less than three weeks ago.

Many customers voiced their concern with the exchanges, which they say are not capable of handling the traffic that accompanies large fluctuations in the price of Bitcoin.

@CoinbaseSupport @coinbase, you literally are scamming people! Only allowing purchases on your site when the price is high! Useless
7:38 PM - 12 Jun 2017
DCI_vG6UQAEgkal.jpg

_https://twitter.com/adamludwin/status/874331410064039936/photo/1?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rt.com%2Fusa%2F392019-bitcoin-3k-coinbase-outages%2F
Bitcoin, Crypto Currencies & The blockchain
Vid with article:
May 30, 2017
 
Data said:
Carl said:
There are so many people expecting a crash now that it may even do the opposite, only to actually have the plug pulled when we all least expect it.

I noticed that every year, market crashes are predicted for the fall on the northern hemisphere. Not sure what to make of this. But I tend to think that it would be rather unexpected.

I think that there are patterns and indicators which fit the model of past collapses that we are seeing occurring right now. And these patterns, unmistakable and critical, are to the minds of many financial analysts justification for the warnings.

Keeping in mind the following...

Q: (L) One of the most popular ways to make money by investing is in the stock market. But, it seems to me that the stock market is also part of the Antichrist system and investing there would also amount to only getting “crumbs.”

A: Yes and no. Not all stocks traded publicly are under direct control of the Illuminati.

Q: (L) You said we should multiply our money and that storing it is not making it work for you....

A: If you notice, all successful business people do this. They multiply their money, expand their horizons, continuously. They multiply their money by multiplying their output, thus their intake likewise. And the process is never ending, because they understand instinctively that it is part of a cycle. For the intake to continue, it must not be only retained, but must increase in order to keep pace with the ever spiraling cycle of increase and expansion. And, for this to happen, the output must be expanded accordingly. When it stops, it collapses. And this is how the Illuminati AKA The Brotherhood AKA The Antichrist creates a “Panic,” by stemming the flow, even only slightly, and then broadcasting the created impression aggressively.

Now read this:

So why is an inverted yield curve such a big event? Here is how CNBC recently explained it...

An inverted yield curve, which has correctly predicted the last seven recessions going back to the late 1960's, occurs when short-term interest rates yield more than longer-term rates. Why is an inverted yield curve so crucial in determining the direction of markets and the economy? Because when bank assets (longer-duration loans) generate less income than bank liabilities (short-term deposits), the incentive to make new loans dries up along with the money supply. And when asset bubbles are starved of that monetary fuel they burst. The severity of the recession depends on the intensity of the asset bubbles in existence prior to the inversion.

What is truly alarming is that the Federal Reserve can see what is happening to the yield curve, and they can see all of the other indications that the economy is slowing down, but they decided to raise rates anyway.

Raising rates in a slowing economy is a recipe for disaster, but the Fed has gone beyond that and has declared that it intends to start unwinding the 4.5 trillion dollars of assets that have accumulated on the Fed's balance sheet.

Janet Yellen is trying to tell us that this will be a smooth process, but many analysts are far from convinced. For instance, just consider what Peter Boockvar recently told CNBC...

"They desperately want this to be an easy, smooth, paint-drying type of process, but there's no chance," said Peter Boockvar, chief market analyst at The Lindsey Group. "The whole purpose of quantitative easing was to inflame the markets higher. Why shouldn't the reverse happen when we do quantitative tightening?"

and this:

Global credit crunch WARNING issued on debt bubble as current trends mirror 2008 crash

WARNING signals have been felt today after a key credit indicator mirrored the same pattern experienced ahead of the financial crisis of 2008, in a eerie sign that the global economy is heading for another downturn.

A key UBS credit impulse which monitors the changes in credit volume has tumbled by six per cent of GDP since last year.

It mirrors the same movement seen before the financial crisis 10 years ago, raising fears the global bubble could be about to burst and another credit crunch.

China and the US are the biggest drivers in the credit changes, with the measure turning negative to hit -0.53 per cent for America in March.

Both superpowers are struggling with credit saturation and in the US, Donald Trump's tax and economy plans have put businesses plans on hold, stalling economic growth.

At the same time, China's credit impulse has tumbled by 12 per cent of GDP.

Britain has also reached its highest level on the credit indicator, suggesting debt is now underpinning the UK economy, before falling, according to the Telegraph.

British consumer debt has been on fire since last year, said UBS.

But warned that the UK is highly dependent on the global economy and is hit hard by slowdowns in the US, China and emerging markets.

Although the impulse is higher than it was after Lehman Brothers collapsed in 2008, the signs are still worrying.

Arend Kapteyn from UBS said there is a high 0.73 correlation out of one between the credit impulse and demand in the US.

The credit figures are more worrying because the US Federal Reserve is steadily raising interest rates.

It comes as bond investor Bill Gross warned that monetary policy has worsened the gap between the real economy and financial markets.

He said the risk to investors was now at an all time high.

Speaking to CNBC, the portfolio manager at Janus Henderson said: "Don't be mesmerized by the blue skies created by central bank QE and near perpetually low interest rates. All markets are increasingly at risk."

Central banks are currently buying trillions in assets in a process known as quantative easing and as a result have kept rates at near zero or just below in an effort to regulate economies.

But there are fears that low rates have pushed financial markets to unsustainably high levels while real economic growth remains flat or sluggish.

The World Bank has forecast that global growth will stay well below 3 per cent through 2019 and is encouraging banks to inject cash into economies to pick up growth.

Gross added: "Strategies involving risk reduction should ultimately outperform 'faux' surefire winners generated by central bank printing of money."

"It's the real economy that counts and global real economic growth is and should continue to be below par," he said.
 
Thanks Ennio for the posts - and I think too that the PTB will decide to hit the "economic button" soon. Key point for me was the Fed increasing interest rates, and stating that all is fine, and they will also reduce the balance sheets. A surefire recipe for global economic pain.

I also think that this has been on the cards for a while; hence Russia & China's aggressive gold buying for some time now. I think (and I could be very wrong) this option was held back because of Putin's actions over the last 2 years. They tried everything to thwart Russia, but its not working as "the irresistible force has met the immovable object". With Russia and China forging the multipolar world, the damage from the "economic collapse" plan could be ameliorated, hence that's a possibility it was held back.

Now, I think things have changed - to their chagrin the multipolar world is taking shape quite fast and against all their plans and machinations - plus they have Trump as a scapegoat to blame it on as well. I imagine their immediate plan will be global economic chaos; with ISIS running rampage in the Middle East, North Africa and Eurasia trying to reshape a new world in their image. fwiw
 
Ennio said:
I think that there are patterns and indicators which fit the model of past collapses that we are seeing occurring right now. And these patterns, unmistakable and critical, are to the minds of many financial analysts justification for the warnings.

I came across an article that describes the US Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF), an American secret (CIA) Treasury Department slush fund that basically manipulates the American dollar.

Update: America’s Secret Multi-Trillion Dollar Black Ops Slush Fund
https://vidrebel.wordpress.com/2017/06/10/update-americas-secret-multi-trillion-dollar-black-ops-slush-fund/

Kirby thinks assassinating Trump is more likely than World War III.

Rob Kirby has made another video in a series. The first part of the series is below the video. It concerns an American secret Treasury Department slush fund where the CIA stashes its profits from the heroin market. The title of this video says as Mr. Kirby implies is that the New World Order crowd is about to fail miserably. It is well worth the effort to watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nAmNc6u4fwc (50:03 min.)

A month ago two billionaires began a public dialogue that can enlighten us all about the Dark Corners of the American government. It began earlier this month when Hugo Salinas Price noticed that the reserves of Central Banks around the world had declined by a trillion dollars. Central Banks had dumped a trillion dollars in US government bonds in the 17 months ending January 8, 2016. Normally that kind of fire sale of assets would have taken down the US and global economies.

Another billionaire had an answer. Rob Kirby said the US Exchange Stabilization Fund bought that trillion dollars in bonds. The Exchange Stabilization Fund was created in 1934. It is above the law and any Congressional oversight. The CIA has been subject to Congressional investigation but never the ESF. It was initially funded when FDR asked Americans to turn in their gold coins that were valued at $20.67 per ounce. The dollar was devalued to $35 which gave the ESF a paper profit of $2.8 billion. The Treasury Secretary appointed a manger for the ESF. The first man to run the ESF was Harry Dexter White who worked closely with Secretary Henry Morgenthau Jr. Soviet documents proved that White was a Soviet spy. White served on 18 government boards including the one that ran OSS Black Ops financing. He sent $50 million to China in 1940 to fund the war against Japan.

White also helped create the IMF and the World Bank. He won the battle with John Maynard Keynes to make the US Dollar the world’s reserve currency at Bretton Woods in 1944. This had severe ramifications for the Dollar and later might have became one of the reasons why President Kennedy was assassinated.

The ESF took over Black Ops financing for the CIA when it replaced the OSS. In 1948 the ESF delivered $10 million in cash which CIA handed out to politicians in Italy to make sure the ‘Good Guys’ won the elections. The ESF funded regime change all over the world. And when it came time to import heroin from the Golden Triangle to the US during the Vietnam war, the ESF was there along side Air America.

In the 1960s the American Dollar was experiencing problems. Wall Street had decided to over populate the country so America had to run deficits to pay for the importing of raw materials that were not needed when the population was only 150 million people. The US was also supporting hundreds of military bases overseas and funding regime change. The ESF developed a work around through the IMF to pay for military coups and counter revolutions. The ESF would front the coup leaders cash which was subsequently written up as an IMF loan. The ESF would ask that these loans be paid back in foreign currencies so the US Treasury through the New York Federal Reserve Bank and its 21 primary dealers could manipulate currencies to make the dollar look good.

Other sources of income for the ESF’s market manipulations of gold and currencies were the illegal drug and weapons trade. It was the ESF through the CIA that set up the infrastructure for the major Drug Cartels. My regular readers know that the Big Banks launder a trillion dollars a year in illegal drugs and weapons sales. They also launder $500 billion a year in political bribes.

In the summer of 1963 President Kennedy had decided to change the way international monetary policy was conducted to cure our continual trade deficits. He wanted to bring in foreign countries and to make the operations of the ESF, the Federal Reserve and the Treasury Department transparent and open to public inspection. This decision died with JFK’s assassination. President Kennedy was killed on the 53rd anniversary of the first meeting held in 1910 to draft the legislation that became the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. Other reasons given for the assassination of JFK were his opposition to Israel’s acquisition of nuclear weapons. And some wanted the US to go into the Vietnam war and lose it so we could hook the younger generation on drugs and make trillions of dollars from the addicts and the systematic destruction of our cities.

The decision to keep ESF’s operations a Dark Secret had disastrous consequences for the Dollar. Robert Roosa was Undersecretary of the Treasury for Monetary Affairs under Kennedy and then Johnson. As head of the ESF, he decided to issue US Treasury bonds which were payable in Swiss Francs. They were called Roosa bonds. They were a disaster as the Swiss franc went up in value. The ESF also bet against the German mark which proved to be another losing proposition. They also participated in the London Gold Pool which tried to keep the price of gold down by dumping US gold onto the markets. This also was a disaster as gold kept going up while the Dollar kept going down.

Please note that Roosa was a former NY FED VP and later became a trustee of the Rockefeller Foundation and a member of David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission. Roosa’s boss was Douglas Dillon who was a boyhood friend of the Rockefeller brothers. His father was Jewish and had changed the family name to Dillon. Dillon went on to serve as President of the Rockefeller Foundation.

There were some Dark Days for the Dollar in the late 1960s through the 90s. The ESF did make a lot of money from the Drug trade. In 2001 the Bush administration had decided to invade Afghanistan even before Israel did 911 to blame it on the Muslims so we could spend $6 trillion on wars for Israel. That decision to invade Afghanistan was made because the Taliban had eradicated most of the opium crop which threatened the Narco Dollar.

The Narco Dollar allows the US to print money by the trillions and to send them overseas to finance drug shipments and pay ten billion dollars in bribes every week. Keeping that money overseas lowers inflation in the US. The invasion of Afghanistan was good for the US Banks.

The Bankers started printing Super Notes which were authentic looking counterfeit $100 bills. They were updated dozens of times to keep them looking good. The US propaganda machine blamed Russia and then Iran. The Super Notes were not made good enough to be accepted by the Federal Reserve or any major Central Bank. That was so holders of Narco Dollars would be too frightened to try to redeem them at a Central Bank thus keeping all that money overseas. Bringing Narco Dollars home would destroy the American economy overnight through inflation.

There are other sources of money for the ESF. $8.35 trillion went missing from the Pentagon since Clinton was President. We should expect some of that money to have made its way into that ESF slush fund to cover bad Wall Street investments and a weakening Dollar. Other federal agencies have seen money walk out the door but not to the level of the DOD.

There are $225 trillion plus dollars in speculative bets made against a rise in US interest rates. The ESF and the Federal Reserve are likely behind this wild speculation. The premiums from the sale of more than $225 trillion in CDS was split up amongst the ESF and the major banks. These premiums gave the banks and the ESF tremendous assets which they could use to buy that trillion dollars in US Treasury bonds.

A couple of years ago the Federal Reserve told the major banks to write living wills. This meant that banks were to separate their assets into several different corporations. Depositors’ money and all of those risky Credit Default Swaps (CDS) and those fraudulent Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS) were put in the same section of the sinking ship as the FDIC taxpayer guarantees. The Central Banks including the Federal Reserve have decided that when the next crash comes depositors will be treated like investors. Deposits will be taken to cover losses. Of course the losses are far greater than the deposits in a fractional reserve system. That means the Central Banks will have to Hyperinflate currencies to protect the Uber Rich. A Bank Holiday will rob everyone of what little money they have. After 90 days of unbelievable price increases, money from that savings account will be nearly worthless.

Bankers changed US law. It is now the law that the banks obligation to pay for a CDS loss is greater than your demand as a depositor. This means speculators are to be paid before you get your deposit back.

Dr. Jim Willie has noticed some rather strange events in the Treasury bond market at the level of the New York Fed and the 21 primary dealers.
I think the ESF is involved as well. It seems that $3.5 trillion in US Treasury bonds were sold that were not issued by the Treasury. He compared the US budget deficit to the sales of Treasury bonds and found a discrepancy. Maybe that was the ESF acting through the NY FED to fund Black Ops and market manipulations.

The ESF is the most likely candidate as the source of the funds to purchase a trillion dollars in dumped Treasury bonds. But how much longer can this continue? Nobody knows how many more trillions the ESF still has. The Dollar is the only strong currency but that is all due to manipulation and fraud.
When the Dollar Dies, we will see an overnight devaluation and the beginning of Hyperinflation. There will be Nationwide Food Riots.

The alternative is that we let the Bankers starve a few billion people to death and issue a cashless digital currency that would give them the Divine Right of Kings to rule over us. Let me close with something I have not said for awhile.

The Fundamental Fact of Your Existence as a modern man or woman is that the bankers of New York and London want to reduce you to Debt Slavery.

What I have been afraid to blog about: THE ESF AND ITS HISTORY (Part 1-5)
http://www.marketskeptics.com/2011/06/the-esf-and-its-history.html

Back-dated June 3, 2011 - After months of work, the video series on the Treasury's Exchange Stabilization Fund is finally finished!

Why you should watch these five videos:

It is impossible to understand the world today without knowing what the ESF is and what it has been doing. Officially in charge of defending the dollar, the ESF is the government agency which controls the New York Fed, runs the CIA's black budget, and is the architect of the world's monetary system (IMF, World Bank, etc). ESF financing (through the OSS and then the CIA) built up the worldwide propaganda network which has so badly distorted history today (including erasing awareness of its existence from popular consciousness). It has been directly involved in virtually every major US fraud/scandal since its creation in 1934: the London gold pool, the Kennedy assassinations, Iran-Contra, CIA drug trafficking, HIV, and worse...

These five videos are the "answer" I have arrived at after three years of blogging on MarketSkeptics.com. They took me a month and a half to make (and months of research). The Links to all the material covered can be found below the videos. I recommend following them and confirming the facts for yourself.
 
This sums up what I have been thinking regarding if/when such a crash would occur. I still have a very amateurish view but seeing it through the lens of our knowledge about the wider world helps.

The bears seem to be out in force at the moment warning that it is overbought. And they are right, and lots of fundamental indicators lean that way, and now with the fed winding down their perpetual propping up of the US markets. However if we see the market for what I think it is - basically a tool to trick and deceive and take people's money - then why would we have a crash when so many are expecting a crash?

This guy nails one possible scenario anyway:

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-06-26/stock-market-crash-scenario

The one thing we can know with certainty is it won't be easy to profit from the crash.

After 8+ years of phenomenal gains, it's pretty obvious the global stock market rally is overdue for a credit-cycle downturn, and many research services of Wall Street heavyweights are sounding the alarm about the auto industry's slump, the slowing of new credit and other fundamental indicators that a recession is becoming more likely.

Few have taken the risk of projecting a date for the crash, this gent being a gutsy outlier: Hedge Fund CIO Sets The Day When The Next Crash Begins.

Next February is a good guess, as recessions and market downturns tend to lag the credit market by about 9 months.

My own scenario is based not on cycles or technicals or fundamentals, but on the psychology of the topping process, which tends to follow this basic script:

crash-scenario6-17.png



When there are too many bearish reports of gloomy data, and too many calls to go long volatility or go to cash, the market perversely goes up, not down.

Why? This negativity creates a classic Wall of Worry that markets can continue climbing. (Central banks buying $300 billion of assets a month helps power this gradual ascent most admirably.) The Bears betting on a decline based on deteriorating fundamentals are crushed by the steady advance.

As Bears give up, the window for a Spot of Bother decline creaks open, however grudgingly, as central banks make noises about ending their extraordinary monetary policies by raising interest rates a bit (so they can lower them when the next recession grabs the global economy by the throat).

As bearish short interest and bets on higher volatility fade, insiders go short.

A sudden air pocket takes the market down, triggered by some bit of "news." (Nothing like a well-engineered bout of panic selling to set up a profitable Buy the Dip opportunity.)

And since traders have been well-trained to Buy the Dips, the Spot of Bother is quickly retraced.

Nonetheless, doubts remain and fundamental data is still weak; this overhang of negativity rebuilds the wall of Worry.

Some Bears will reckon the weakened market will double-top, i.e. be unable to break out to new highs given the poor fundamentals, and as a result we can anticipate a nominal new high after the Wall of Worry has been rebuilt, just to destroy all those who reckoned a double-top would mark The Top.

Mr. Market (and the central banks) won't make it that easy to reap a fortune by going short.

As the market lofts to new nominal highs, the remaining Bears will be hesitant to go short, and Bulls will note that despite the dire warnings of analysts and the gloomy data on auto sales, credit expansion, productivity, wages, etc., the market keeps chugging higher.

This will infuse participants with complacency and a general sense that the market has weathered the worst than could be thrown at it.

When the surviving Bears have become wary, and the market's resilience in the tide of negative news seems to point to further gains--at that point, the market finally rolls over and "surprises" everyone.

Nice, but when will this happen? Nobody knows, but the key is there can't be a crowd of analysts predicting a decline and begging everyone to go to cash. There can't be huge short interest and massive bets on higher volatility. Everyone betting the farm on a decline and a spike in volatility must first be destroyed before the market can possibly fall.

The crash has to catch almost everyone off guard--those who lost their shirts betting on the market responding rationally to deteriorating data (i.e. those who bet on rising volatility and a market decline), those steeped in complacency and those secure in their quasi-religious faith that the central banks "have our backs and will never let the market drop."

When these conditions are met, the Crash-o-Meter pegs the upper limit of vulnerability.

Pavlovian training is deeply embedded, so the first drop will trigger a Buy the Dip frenzy. This reverses the downturn and creates the last exit point. But so well-trained are traders, few take the last exit; most feel assured that further gains are just ahead.

Central banks are presumed to be all-powerful, and the past 8 years support the conventional belief that a new central bank policy announcement will always reverse any downturn.

But contrary to expectations, selling momentum builds and the trading bots start selling in earnest, the goal being to liquidate the position entirely to escape risk. Central bank pronouncements steady the market and trigger wild spikes higher--but only for a few hours. Things have changed. Central banks cannot reverse the tide of fear, and spikes higher are seen as selling opportunities.

Alas, every bot has the same goal, and the bid disappears. That's one crash scenario; there are many others. The one thing we can know with certainty is it won't be easy to profit from the crash.

Some of the comments are good too.
 
The bears seem to be out in force at the moment warning that it is overbought. And they are right, and lots of fundamental indicators lean that way, and now with the fed winding down their perpetual propping up of the US markets.

For years I've been wondering about the following. There are tons of evidence that the financial markets are totally rigged. Ok, that's the way it is. If it is so, the next crash will be one more bubble busted by the ones who created it and the sheeps (us) will be sheared one more time.

Very few had foreseen the two last crashes (high tech 2000, subprime 2008) and their analysis were not covered by the media at the time (it's only after the crash that they got some coverage).

Meanwhile you have websites like Zero Hedge that publish, almost daily, articles that announce an imminent crash. Those articles are very sound and they point out at some fundamentals (debt level, PE ratios, bond VS stocks, exposure...) that scream 'imminent major crash'. Those tons of articles drown the signal (true predictions) into noise (daily false predictions).

There would be an imminent crash if the fundamentals were driving the market. I think those analysts underestimate to what extent the financier can create the financial reality.

One new factor is as follow: until recently 'financiers' had tried overall (despite some obvious bubbles) to maintain the illusion of 'fundamentals', so there was a relative correlation between economic data and financial valuations. This time is gone, and this lead to very puzzling situation with total de-correlations between the 'fundamentals' and the market levels. That's probably why there are so many articles announcing an imminent crash.

This blatant de-correlation suggests that the elites don't bother to pretend anymore. A lot of people know that the markets are rigged, the elites know that people know but they don't care. At this point the market is so artificial that I'm not even sure that they need people to believe in the financial system.

So, from this perspective, the answer to the question 'when will the next crash occur?' is probably 'when they decide to do so, it can be tomorrow, it can be in a while'

This being said, I'm wondering if they can indefinitely create the financial reality. If even people's belief doesn't even matter, maybe our only 'hope' is a major unexpected catastrophe that would re-correlate market levels and economic fundamentals (i.e. systemic crash)
 
Pierre said:
So, from this perspective, the answer to the question 'when will the next crash occur?' is probably 'when they decide to do so, it can be tomorrow, it can be in a while'

This being said, I'm wondering if they can indefinitely create the financial reality. If even people's belief doesn't even matter, maybe our only 'hope' is a major unexpected catastrophe that would re-correlate market levels and economic fundamentals (i.e. systemic crash)

The Federal Reserve adds to the confusion:

It's getting clearer that Fed officials are getting concerned about where asset markets are going.

*FISCHER: 'NOTABLE UPTICK IN RISK APPETITES' IN ASSET MARKETS
*FISCHER: EQUITY P/E RATIOS ARE NEAR TOP OF HISTORICAL LEVELS
*FISCHER SAYS IT WOULD BE FOOLISH TO THINK ALL RISKS ELIMINATED
*FISCHER CALLS FOR 'CLOSE MONITORING' OF RISING RISK APPETITES

Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco President John Williams just said in an interview on Australian TV that "there seems to be a priced-to-perfection attitude out there” and that the stock market rally "still seems to be running very much on fumes."

“We are seeing some reach for yield, and some, maybe, excess risk-taking in the financial system with very low rates. As we move interest rates back to more-normal, I think that that will, people will pull back on that," Williams says Tuesday in Australian Broadcasting Corporation television interview.

“I am somewhat concerned about the complacency in the market. If you look at these measures of uncertainty, like the VIX measure, or other indicators, there seems to be a priced-to-perfection attitude out there”

“The stock market still seems to be running very much on fumes, or is very strong in terms of that, so something that clearly is a risk to the U.S. economy, some correction there, is something that we have to be prepared for, and to respond to, if it does happen”

“The U.S. economy still is doing -- I think on fundamentals -- is doing quite well. So I’m not worried about some kind of late-’90s, dot-com bubble economy where a lot of the underpinnings were driven by the stock market”

And then later Yellen adds:

And finally, it was Yellen herself, who speaking in London acknowledged that some asset prices had become “somewhat rich" although like Fischer, she hedged that prices are fine... if only assumes record low rates in perpetuity:

“Asset valuations are somewhat rich if you use some traditional metrics like price earnings ratios, but I wouldn’t try to comment on appropriate valuations, and those ratios ought to depend on long-term interest rates,” she said.

It was not all doom and gloom.

Responding to a question on financial system stability, Yellen said post-crisis regulations (and $2.5 trillion in excess reserves which just happen to be fungible and give the banks the impression that they are safe) had made financial institutions much “safer and sounder.”

"Will I say there will never, ever be another financial crisis? No, probably that would be going too far. But I do think we’re much safer and I hope that it will not be in our lifetimes and I don’t believe it will."
 
June may have been the top in the stock market, though a crash usually takes some time after the top. The stock market weakness will show itself, first in staying under the 50 day moving average, and then confirming by staying under the 200 day moving average. Nasdaq with the technology leaders are just under the 50 day moving average, while S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrials are still above the 50 day moving average. They are all above the 200 day moving average. What do we mean by imminent? If imminent is this week or month or even next month, then I don't think a crash is imminent. If June wasn't the top, we may be headed towards yet another October top.
 
Ennio said:
This lady really connects a lot of dots. She talks about economic 'warning signs', the Fed's having nothing else they can do, hyperinflation, and other indicators which suggest to her how very tenuous the whole situation is.

Yes - excellent summary video about where we are at and the coming financial "reset". I have forwarded this on to many.
 
Back
Top Bottom