Is Green Energy REALLY green?

This fire was more likely caused by the recent floods in Korea. EV batteries and water don't mix.

In the evening of July 29 at 7:16 PM, a man in his 40s, parked his Mercedes-Benz electric car in the underground parking lot of the B apartment complex in Cheongna-dong, Seo-gu, Incheon. Just 59 hours later, on the morning of August 1 at around 6:15 AM, the vehicle began emitting smoke and subsequently exploded into flames. The fire resulted in over 140 vehicles being burned and 23 people being hospitalized due to smoke inhalation.

The aftermath of the incident was starkly visible on the morning of August 2, with a vehicle completely burned out in the underground parking lot of the apartment complex. According to the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport and the battery industry, the battery cell of the Mercedes-Benz EQE sedan that caught fire was a product of China's Farasis. This battery is of the Nickel-Cobalt-Manganese (NCM) type, though the exact model name has not been disclosed.

Founded in 2009, Farasis achieved sales of $2.32 billion last year, ranking 10th globally in terms of sales and shipment volume. In 2018, Farasis signed a 10-year battery supply contract with Daimler, the parent company of Mercedes-Benz, and in 2020, Mercedes-Benz acquired about a 3% stake in Farasis to jointly develop batteries. However, Farasis' battery products have previously been subject to recalls in China due to fire risks. In March 2021, China's state-owned Beijing Automotive Group (BAIC) recalled 31,963 electric vehicles equipped with Farasis batteries, citing "the possibility of battery fires under certain conditions."

The recent fire in Incheon has reignited concerns about the safety of Chinese batteries, particularly those of the NCM type. An industry insider commented, "Chinese lithium iron phosphate (LFP) batteries have proven their quality to some extent in the market, but NCM batteries are still newcomers." Another insider added, "Unlike Korea, which spends astronomical amounts to improve battery yield, there are many doubts within the industry about China's (NCM battery) technology and safety." The incident has also caught the attention of global OEMs (original equipment manufacturers) that receive battery supplies, with one insider noting, "Global OEMs will inevitably pay attention to this fire incident."

The fire has not only caused significant material damage but has also raised questions about the quality and safety of Chinese-manufactured batteries. While China has rapidly dominated the market with low-priced batteries, there are still doubts about their technology and quality, which require large-scale investment and long-term research and development (R&D). The incident underscores the chronic safety issues that some analysts suggest are inherent in Chinese batteries.

As the investigation continues, the focus will likely be on the regulatory environment for electric vehicles and batteries, including safety standards and recall procedures. The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport in South Korea will play a crucial role in determining the next steps to prevent such incidents in the future.

출처 : Businesskorea(Businesskorea)
 
California's I-80 closed in Sierra foothills due to wildfire started by Tesla semitruck
Updated Aug 19, 2024 5:09 p.m.
Toxic fumes wafted from a Tesla commercial semitruck that caught fire on Interstate 80 near Colfax on Monday afternoon, with flames spreading to nearby vegetation and officials fully closing the highway for hours. At 5 p.m., Caltrans reopened just the westbound lanes to all traffic.

Caltrans reported a complete closure of Interstate 80, between Colfax and state Route 20, shortly before 2 p.m. Westbound I-80 reopened at 4:30 p.m. while eastbound lanes remained closed, the California Highway Patrol said.

The earliest the highway is expected to fully reopen is 6 p.m., said Yvette Norman, a CHP spokesperson. “As soon as we hear any updates we’ll be sure to post it to our social media,” Norman said.

Mary Eldridge, a spokesperson for Cal Fire, said the fire was started by hazardous materials within the vehicle’s lithium ion batteries and fumes from the chemicals are dangerous to anyone within a third of a mile of the fire.

“As long as the vehicle has vapor coming off it, that is extremely toxic,” Eldridge said over the phone. “We don’t want anyone driving by with open windows. We don’t want any of that getting into vehicles, so this fire has to be done before the road can reopen.”

Eldridge said the semitruck, which is an 18-wheeler and can carry up to 80,000 pounds, went off the road. She said an investigation will look into why the vehicle veered and whether the fire started before it went off the road or after.


The vegetation fire has been named the Blue Fire because it’s located near the Blue Canyon exit on I-80. The fire is small with minimal spread as aircraft were quick to dump fire retardant over the area, Eldridge said.
 
With the increasing threat of lithium battery fires, I am wondering what fire suppression technologies are being developed to better address this problem? It seems necessary to carry/store better extinguishers, to more quickly attack these fast, incredibly hot fires. Are home and car insurance policies addressing this increased risk?
 
Well, I have started answering my own question, above, added here in case of interest.

In June 2024, researchers from the Fire Safety Research Institute (FSRI), part of UL Research Institutes, participated in the Society of Fire Protection Engineers (SFPE) symposium, Progress with Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Safety: Engineering Solutions to Mobility and Storage Hazards. The three-day event marked the first symposium for the fire protection engineering community focused on lithium-ion battery hazards...

Full article here: Learn how FSRI supported SFPE’s lithium-ion battery symposium.

So, it looks like solutions will be coming. It is tragic how often a new technology proliferates before its dangers become apparent and only then be addressed.
 
Poor Al Gore!
:halo:
:lol:

New movie on Gore, well on [AI] Al Gore anyway.

Trailer:

Film Description: In his film An Inconvenient Truth, former Vice President Al Gore proclaimed a “climate emergency,” and became the godfather of today’s worldwide climate change movement. Al Gore, who is no scientist, repeatedly claimed his Harvard professor Roger Revelle was the source of his “climate science”. Director Joel Gilbert, who worked for then US Senator Al Gore, digs deep and discovers that Revelle had in fact rejected Gore’s climate alarmism, in spite of his claims. Through his investigation, Gilbert finds that the real origin of Al Gore’s climate apocalypse came from his time at Vanderbilt Divinity School. Gilbert also demonstrates that Gore plagiarized a radical environmental book from the 1940s to produce his 1992 manifesto, Earth in the Balance.

In The Climate According to AI Al Gore, Gilbert confronts an AI generated “Al Gore” about his entire life history, his struggle to fulfill the political ambitions laid out for him by his parents, and his exploitation of climate politics to offset his personal insecurity. This film exposes the climate scare as nothing more than a political tool used by groups who wish to undermine free-market capitalism and impose big government socialist ideals upon unsuspecting voters.


Here is the late John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel on both Gore and Revelle:

 
A lot of interesting news about "green energy" lately. It seems that many plans are falling apart.

Motor company Ford is to cut its workforce by 4,000 in Europe by the end of 2027, with the bulk of employees going in Germany, as it blames the decision on pressure from increased competition and weaker than expected sales of electric cars, as well as economic headwinds.

The job reductions, which will account for around 14% of the company's total European workforce, are expected to happen by the end of 2027. They will include 3,000 jobs in Germany, as well as 800 jobs in the UK.

The company said that "the global auto industry continues to be in a period of significant disruption as it shifts to electrified mobility".

The statement went on: "The transformation is particularly intense in Europe where automakers face significant competitive and economic headwinds while also tackling a misalignment between CO2 regulations and consumer demand for electrified vehicles."

Several other car makers have already slashed jobs and shut down plants. Competitors such as General Motors recently announced 1,000 global job cuts, whereas Nissan will also be axing 9,000 jobs, while reducing its global production capacity by 20%.

Other companies such as Volkswagen have also revealed that they could be closing down about three plants in Germany, with a potential loss of thousands of jobs.


How Europe’s battery champion descended into crisis

Northvolt has been plagued by problems from incompetent management and poor safety standards to over-reliance on Chinese machinery, according to current and former workers at the cash-strapped Swedish battery maker.

Ten past and present workers of Europe’s best-funded start-up told the Financial Times its crisis had been caused by a litany of issues as it sought to do too much, too fast.

“Making batteries is hard, really hard. We tried to do almost everything at once,” said one former senior executive. “And the problems just kept piling up. I just don’t know if they can make it now.”

Founded in 2017 by two former Tesla executives and with backers including Volkswagen, Goldman Sachs, BlackRock and Siemens, Northvolt grew rapidly as it sought to become a European battery champion, with its workforce reaching 7,000 this year.

The project was meant to symbolise Europe’s comeback in a crucial technology but instead it is fighting for survival as it seeks fresh capital to continue operating, from investors reluctant to plough in much more.

The company is now at risk of turning into a tale of hubris, and of how Europe is failing to compete with big Chinese, American and other Asian rivals.

“The Chinese are being so fast on this,” said one former Northvolt chemical engineer. “They are established and they have already done it. So they’re just better. We are late to the party.”

Northvolt hired top battery-making talent from Japan and South Korea as it aimed to reduce European dependence on China by developing its own active material and finding new sources of raw materials.

Instead, employees describe a company reliant on machines — and the workers who operate them — from China and South Korea at its only factory in the northern Swedish town of Skellefteå.

One construction worker said there were hundreds of Chinese and Koreans in Skellefteå. “They stay in their own separate camp and come in every day to install and run the machines.”

All past and present Northvolt employees who spoke to the FT asked to remain anonymous, saying the company had told workers not to speak to the press.

Northvolt has pursued ambitious expansion projects despite its struggles in Skellefteå. It planned to nearly quadruple the size of the Skellefteå factory even as production languished at less than 1 per cent of capacity, and to build new gigafactories in Sweden, Germany and Canada, an active material plant and a recycling facility in Sweden, an energy storage business in Poland and an aircraft battery research unit in the US.

It has abandoned or suspended many of these projects in recent months, while executives hint that the new gigafactories are likely to be delayed. About a quarter of its Swedish workforce is to be fired.

“Even when we only had one or two projects in [Skellefteå] we could not meet output,” said the former R&D engineer. “Then they were talking about opening new factories. Shouldn’t we focus on getting the first one right? They bit off more than they could chew.”

Northvolt grew so fast in terms of employees and projects that processes were chaotic and management often incompetent, most of the workers said.

“I have never seen so many managers and directors unprepared to deal with the situation in public, and how to properly address their employees,” said a quality control worker. They added that Northvolt had “a lot of inexperienced workers in all areas — managers, engineers, production, technicians, even directors”.

A former data engineer said that despite joining “as an intern with no experience”, they had been given “massive responsibility because there was nobody else to do it . . . I was learning on the go, messing things up.”

They added that frequent restructurings meant “it felt very chaotic”, with “the goal . . . changing all the time”.

Northvolt became a darling of green investors, raking in ever larger amounts of capital including via a $2.8bn private placement in 2021, a $2.7bn convertible note in 2022 and a $5bn debt round this year backed by banks including JPMorgan, Citigroup, Deutsche Bank and BNP Paribas.

Several employees said the strong financial support had led to questionable decisions.

“Managers didn’t listen carefully to engineers,” said the construction worker. “They only had one goal: deliver the project within a fixed timeframe. They didn’t care about the budget.”

Top managers “build a model, change it and demolish it”, they said. “It does not make sense to me. It makes sense to management because they think they have a lot of money.”

A former material handler said there was a sense of creating products quickly to help raise money, describing the process as “this is going to get sent back but if we deliver it we will reach our goal and get the funding”.

BMW, a Northvolt shareholder, was the first customer to sound the alarm, pulling a $2bn contract this year and giving it to South Korea’s Samsung.

“I see a lot of defective products,” said the quality control worker. “For that reason, our average yield is low.”

Northvolt said it had “always underlined that building up a European battery cell landscape is one of the most complex tasks in industry today”.

It stressed that as “the most advanced European battery manufacturer” it was “pioneering in all different fields at the same time”. It said a recent strategic review would “further increase focus on cell production”, and that it had strengthened its management team. “We clearly see positive developments, and will continue to improve,” it added.

Northvolt is now fighting for its life. After struggling to raise billions in fresh equity it has scaled back its demand in recent weeks to about €200mn, according to Swedish and other news reports, in a push that has taken on added urgency as it deals with jittery investors. A subsidiary that was meant to build out the Skellefteå factory, Northvolt Ett Expansion, declared bankruptcy last week.

The business backdrop is also bleak. Electric vehicle sales in Europe have slowed and manufacturers including Volvo Cars and VW have scaled back their ambitions, something insiders say is not helping it convince investors.

You had these Swedes . . . selling what they called the greenest batteries on earth, using this fact they had cheap hydropower as a massive selling point,” said one large European automotive shareholder, who is not invested in Northvolt. “But it never made sense to build it in Sweden. They don’t have the people, the skills, and they got too much money, too fast, and wanted to do everything at once. It was always going to be a disaster.

A person close to Northvolt said the problems at Skellefteå were typical for a new factory, but that unlike large industrial groups the Swedish start-up lacked a wider organisation to fall back on for experience and revenues.

“The biggest challenge in industry,” the person added, “is a new plant, new people, new processes, new product . . . And we had all four together.”

 
Just as excepted, eh?

I would say even more than expected. The Chinese are at least making some things that really work. But in the West it is total disaster.

And there have been many reports about entire "fields" of solar panels being destroyed by hail, for example, here:

Tornado would also have fun time in solar panels field. The green mind is really divorced from reality.
 
The whole thing of German companies investing in Chinese companies to buy carbon credits is ridiculous, and this scam is just a natural progression of such lunacy.


DW uncovered that dozens of Chinese climate projects, certified by the German authorities as carbon credits under the upstream emission reduction scheme, failed to deliver on promises to save millions of tons of carbon emissions. A joint investigation by DW and ZDF reveals how Germany was deceived – and exposes the shadowy company Beijing Karbon behind the alleged fraud.
 
The whole thing of German companies investing in Chinese companies to buy carbon credits is ridiculous, and this scam is just a natural progression of such lunacy.

well, the chinese are clever, and the germs are utterly, but really utterly hysterical AND stupid. i can say this because i have a german passport... the whole eu climate activism is completly useless and destroys europe. isn't the head of the eu a german???
 
Wyoming ditches the Green Agenda with the new logo “Make Carbon Dioxide Great Again🌳

"Wyoming is the leading coal producing state in the United States, producing about 40% of the nation's coal. The state's coal is mostly subbituminous, which means it has less sulfur. The majority of Wyoming's coal is used to generate electricity in the United States, but some is also exported to Canada and Spain".

State Sen. Cheri Steinmetz’s “Make Carbon Dioxide Great Again” bill would force Wyoming to no longer recognize carbon dioxide as a “pollutant.” It also would repeal low requirements that coal plants retrofit with carbon capture technology by 2030.

Legislation proposed by state Sen. Cheri Steinmetz, R-Lingle, may turn out to be more than a message about the political debate over climate change, it also could mark a substantial change in Wyoming’s environmental policy moving forward.

Her “Make Carbon Dioxide Great Again” bill shared exclusively with Cowboy State Daily would cut out low-carbon energy standards in Wyoming and repeal legislation passed by the Legislature in 2020 that requires coal power plant owners to retrofit their facilities with carbon capture, use and storage technologies as an alternative to help prevent them from having to shut down.

It also would specify that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant or contaminant and cannot be designated as such in Wyoming.

“It requires a clear-eyed look at how policies aimed at eliminating CO2 emissions, such as decarbonizing the West, making Wyoming carbon negative or popular ‘net-zero’ mandates,” Steinmetz writes in an op-ed. “They may sound good on paper but often come with high economic costs and questionable environmental benefits, and clearly negative effects on our people and our industries.

“Wyoming must refuse to jeopardize our economy and energy security for initiatives that will yield — at best — questionable results.”

Gov. Mark Gordon has been a major proponent of Wyoming becoming carbon negative, which he views as the best approach to saving the state’s fossil fuels industries. He declined to comment on Steinmetz’s legislation.

What It Does

The 2020 bill passed with a solid majority in both chambers and was signed into law by Gov. Mark Gordon. Last year, the Legislature passed new legislation easing some of the requirements on the 2020 mandate and bumped the deadline that operators need to comply with these standards from 2030 to 2033.

The 2020 legislation was brought as an attempt to insulate coal plants from changing market demands and help stem off the closure of these facilities because of a larger shift away from coal by bringing more carbon capture projects to Wyoming.

Sen. Brian Boner, R-Douglas, was a co-sponsor on the 2020 bill and doesn’t support Steinmetz’s new effort as he believes it has been effective in helping save Wyoming’s coal industry.

“I’d be hesitant to move away from strategies that are clearly working to preserve our baseload, coal-fired power plants that we’re going to need,” Boner said.

Rep. Mike Yin, D-Jackson, agrees, calling the new effort “another bill that does nothing to make everyday Wyomingites’ lives better, but just a continuation of the in-fighting within the majority party.”

Who It Effects

This law impacts five coal plants in Wyoming.

Boner believes the 2020 legislation has been “demonstrably effective” in protecting Wyoming’s coal industry and economy.

He pointed out how Rocky Mountain Power said in its biennial Integrated Resources Plan released last week that it will delay closure of Dave Johnston Power Plant Units 1 and 2 in Glenrock by one year to 2029, and will continue to evaluate carbon capture and sequestration options for Jim Bridger Units 3 and 4 in Rock Springs for completion by 2030. The closure of Units 1 and 2 had originally been proposed for 2027.

“In terms of saving jobs, for Converse County this is a success,” Boner said. “It demonstrates the current strategy is working. It’s a huge deal for Glenrock.”

The mandated retrofits are a costly measure for these facilities however, which the 2020 legislation also attempted to address at the time. Under the law, each utility company is allowed to initiate a cost recovery mechanism that allows them to charge up to 2% of each customer's total electric bill to help shoulder the cost of the low‑carbon energy standard passed by the Legislature.

“The people of Wyoming have always believed in the value of questioning conventional wisdom, looking at the bigger picture and finding solutions that are possible and actually work,” Steinmetz wrote. “This legislation is not about denying science, it is about applying science, thoroughly reevaluating the ‘climate change’ scientific assumptions and advocating for policies grounded in practicality, reality, and achievability — common sense.”

Steinmetz’s bill would repeal these requirements and require utility companies to refund any rate taxes that customers paid to help install the carbon capture technology, but only for unspent money. How these refunds would be delivered would be up to the Public Service Commission.

Travis Deti, executive director of the Wyoming Mining Association, said his organization is neutral on Steinmetz’s bill and sees both pros and cons to mandating carbon sequestration efforts at coal plants.

“I certainly understand the concern, but there’s pretty good support for viable carbon capture at coal facilities,” he said. “Unless there’s a dramatic shift in the market, using carbon capture utilization for emissions is going to be needed to keep the coal fleet going.”

Outgoing Rep. Dan Zwonitzer, R-Cheyenne, said that when his bill passed in 2020, solar energy was much less prevalent than it is today, which served as an impetus to bridge a connection to carbon capture. He said the recent growth of solar, which he expects solar energy to be cheaper than coal in about five years, takes away some of the gusto from the bill’s original purpose, with the future of coal production worldwide in serious doubt when compared to the growth of that alternative energy.

“Here in the next decade, it (worldwide demand) could easily switch to solar, and Wyoming could be left in the dark,” Zwoniter said.

But he still opposes Steinmetz’s bill as he believes it is the wrong approach to try and keep coal alive in Wyoming and believes if passed, will kill the industry more quickly.

“The difficulty with passing the bill is Wyoming ultimately needs to focus on technology, research and development for our coal industry, to keep coal viable and sustainable,” Zwonitzer said. “The bill takes a step back from us trying to invest in coal as a long-term source of power for Wyoming.”

CO2 A Good Thing?

Steinmetz’s bill also would make a formal state policy statement against addressing carbon dioxide as a negative by declaring that carbon dioxide is not a pollutant.

This stance flies in the face of the widespread scientific conclusion that it is a pollutant despite the gas occurring naturally in the air.

Steinmetz said the bill would directly contradict Environmental Protection Agency mandates.

She also said it would have no impact on oil recovery efforts in Wyoming but would affect carbon capture injection wells and underground facilities.

She also argues in her bill that carbon dioxide serves a valuable role in agricultural production as “a foundational nutrient necessary for all life on Earth,” and that the carbon cycle “is a biological necessity for life on Earth.”

“Wyoming is uniquely positioned to lead this conversation,” Steinmetz writes in her op-ed. “Our state is vital to energy production, agriculture and food industries, transportation and energy reliability and stability. We understand the real-world importance of CO2.”

Her stance aligns with the views presented in a hearing denying the effects of climate change held at the Capitol during the Legislature last year. The scientists featured in this hearing either expressed disbelief that climate change is happening, or a belief that it could not only be inconsequential, but even beneficial.

Although rising temperatures could indeed help agricultural production in some parts of the world, it also could further exacerbate decades of drought already seen in the Colorado River Basin and other areas and further elevate sea levels, which will lead to more flooding and property damage on the coasts.

Leo Wolfson can be reached at leo@cowboystatedaily.com.

 
Back
Top Bottom