Is WW3 inevitable?

[loreta]

Hello,

Here's a recent theory on a french website (my natural tongue)
_http://fawkes-news.blogspot.fr/2013/09/le-big-bang-des-illuminatis-se-rapproche.html

Use the automate traductor to have a good idea of what it talks about, I'm not going to summarize it.
It's one possible scenario, pretty credible, to add to this conversation about what's going to come.

I still think they won't use nuclear as they don't want the planet to be uninhabitable (at least in many areas ), but it's just my opinion.

Cheers everybody

Usually when we put an article that is not in English, for respect for the people who does not understand the language of this article, it is gentle to summarize to give an idea about the article. :)

 

[dredger]

Hello,

Sure, i'm gentle :), let's give a try :

He gave a name to what is going to happen : the illuminati big bang

He thinks, as I already read in this thread, that the recent current changes in syria is a setback for the elites, calm before storm. He links a more complete article, with eschatological "proofs" of his theory. (link here, still in french : _http://legrandreveil.wordpress.com/2013/09/11/le-big-bang-des-illuminatis-se-rapproche/)

As the author of the later article, he thinks that we are going to have a major false flag in the coming months. This is his analyse, not a concrete information. Based on ISON recently too much publicized than it should be, he thinks that this event may serve as trigger. A kind of "killshot" created by mankind but the cause would be attributed to Ison. (I'll add : or another comet). He also thinks that it's particulary strange that a former CIA member is talking about this subject without being arrested/bothered even when the subject concerns litterally the destruction of our world, compared to Manning emprisoned for 35y with quite less "important" information given to the public.
Then he wonders how USA government will introduce martial law on their territory without looking like a premeditated action regarding it's own population and the worlwide community. How will they justify to "fill the FEMA camp ? The sun is a perfect guilty.

So he thinks that the best solution is to break all communications, cutting the country from the rest of the world and let it "left to its own devices". (hope traduction of expression is the good one). Then it's possible for the government to (try to) do a big "cleaning". He thinks that the best method to do so is the black out, but wonders if it would be at the country level or worlwide. For this, massive solar storms can achieve it, or the use of electromagnetic weapons (a nuclear weapon used in altitude does the job). Ed Dames team would play the "solar" scenario when the government plays with EMP and accuse North Korea.

Then he makes some links with hollywood and recent series like Jericho, movie like "Red dawn" in 2012 and a new serie also about a blackout (Revolution) - regarding this last one, the scenario is even pointing the government as the guilty. And when we look back to the "predictive programming" performed by Hollywood these last years, this can be one of them.


The second article explains in detail this theory, saying that it's using the method "Ordo ab Chaos" to establish the NWO after treatment and unprecedented disorder. It talks about a brutal event, and they wait for an external event to trigger it. The author also connect to eschatology to confirms this scenario.

Almost all of these args were already discussed here, but it's a good summary and one possible scenario. I pointed one interesting deduction, the fact that this false war allows states to arm, to be ready-to-go, in alert mode.

Let's do my own summary :
- Wait for specific event and start a brutal scenario
- US blackout, maybe world blackout, accuse syria, iran, n-korea
- Wage war outside the US during blackout
- Wage war inside the US during blackout
- Maybe WW3, or limited regions global war
- Add financial crisis
- Add earthquakes or other "natural" event (or not so natural)
- Add disease and pandemics
- Add meteors (only point they better know the approximativ date, but not the populations)

==> This makes a good recipe when you want to bring chaos !


and then, still my opinion :
- They probably possess some weapons we do not imagine, why not some weapons based on producing specific wavelength which would trigger a kind of poison a lot of person have already in their bodies ? A kind of sophisticated biological weapons for mass genocide (if not already, maybe a good question to ask to the C's)
- Poisoning the air, chemical or biological weapons
- Elite will hide underground (if not since begining), If I was them (hard to achieve it btw), I would best wait to see what the nature does first, and then, eventually, add more chaos if the natural cosmic event does not well decimate the population - the reason would be because if they want their NWO, it'll be easier for them to have clean hands than not.

My final conclusion is that it's a possible scenario, but they may also wait to the last limit before real and not controlled asteroid hit the earth. I bet elites have several hideouts scattered among the globe in order to choose the best one depending where meteor will fall.

At least, my single and practical question concerning me, living in belgium is : will the cell of my house be enough, or should I dig a little bit some rooms under it ? I guess many people are wondering about the same question.
I also take this opportunity to give my 2 cents advise : buy or build your generator of agent colloidal and try to build your own "magnetic power generator" to produce your electricity (many plans and explanations on the net) - I know, many other things are important to do to prepare, but these 2 ones are among the "critic ones" to my mind in in term of preparation and it's worth it to repeat it.

Cheers

 

[loreta]

Thank you very much, Dredger!

 

[H-KQGE]

Then he makes some links with hollywood and recent series like Jericho, movie like "Red dawn" in 2012 and a new serie also about a blackout (Revolution) - regarding this last one, the scenario is even pointing the government as the guilty. And when we look back to the "predictive programming" performed by Hollywood these last years, this can be one of them.

I remember the US tv series "Jericho" around 6 years ago. I caught it late during season 2 i think (in UK, US shows arrive real late, up to years even, unless the popularity is sky high although, that was then & i don't know about now) & was astonished by the content as i was just becoming aware of "govermental conspiracies."
I grew hungry for more of the show toward the end of that season as it was really depicting how people might act in the event of a countrywide disaster, (as it was in the show, but it can apply to pretty much most places) & the next season threatened to expose some government - military cover up thing but they cancelled it. I read that fans of the show were convinced (some) that the network pulled it (at the peak of its power) because it was exposing too much & the writers wouldn't change the script. That sort of thing has been going on for the last 13 years, also including the excellent James Cameron "Dark Angel" that got cut when they ventured into "transgenics", (genetically modified super soldiers by elite groups, breeding them from youth & ponerizing them) interestingly it was the point of revolution & trust between the races, classes, & "freaks"/transgenics when they cut it. I referenced these since they were all to do with war & the government/military, truth seeking & reformation of humanity.

 

[shijing]

I remember the US tv series "Jericho" around 6 years ago. I caught it late during season 2 i think (in UK, US shows arrive real late, up to years even, unless the popularity is sky high although, that was then & i don't know about now) & was astonished by the content as i was just becoming aware of "govermental conspiracies."

As an aside, I really enjoyed this series. The creators don't have the whole banana (as usual), but I think they do a pretty good job of portraying a scenario where infrastructure collapses and showing various ways that people react to it. Their choice of the the perpetrators behind the initial attack which kicks everything off is probably not far off the mark either, at least in part. It's rumored that it might return next year -- we'll see.

 

[Niall]

Strange, in the course of 24 hours, the outlook has gone from world war to... world peace??

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/15/obama-rouhani-united-nations-meeting

Iran's Rouhani may meet Obama at UN after American president reaches out

An exchange of letters between Barack Obama and the Iranian president, Hassan Rouhani, has set the stage for a possible meeting between the two men at the UN next week in what would be the first face-to-face encounter between a US and Iranian leader since Iran's 1979 revolution.

Britain's foreign secretary, William Hague, is also due to meet his Iranian counterpart, Mohammad Javad Zarif, at the UN general assembly meeting in New York, adding to guarded optimism that the June election of Rouhani, a Glasgow-educated moderate, and his appointment of a largely pragmatic cabinet, has opened the door to a diplomatic solution to the 11-year international standoff over Iran's nuclear programme.

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/15/world/meast/syria-civil-war-diplomacy/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

Syrian official declares 'victory,' thanks Russia

Syrian minister declared "victory" for his country on Sunday, thanking Russia for orchestrating a chemical weapons deal to avert U.S. military action, Russia's state-run news agency RIA Novosti reported.

"We welcome these agreements. On the one hand, they will help Syrians come out of the crisis, and on the other hand, they prevented the war against Syria by having removed a pretext for those who wanted to unleash it," National Reconciliation Minister Ali Haidar was quoted as saying.

He called the deal an achievement of Russian diplomacy, and "a victory for Syria won thanks to our Russian friends," RIA Novosti reported.

 

[Carl]

Strange, in the course of 24 hours, the outlook has gone from world war to... world peace??

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/15/obama-rouhani-united-nations-meeting

Iran's Rouhani may meet Obama at UN after American president reaches out



http://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/15/world/meast/syria-civil-war-diplomacy/index.html?hpt=hp_t1

Syrian official declares 'victory,' thanks Russia

This has me kind of stumped as well. The cynical part of me thinks that this just has to be part of the plan, and that surely the world's good people have not won this battle in the information war. Or maybe they really have been outplayed here by logic and truth?
One thing's for sure, they've got to do something big to distract from the Earth changes, and soon. I wonder what it may be.

 

[luke wilson]

I am worried the 'money men' might not be all that happy about this new 'world peace' scenario.

So much hardware has been moved to not just get used. Plus Israel must be fuming. How are they to solve there problems now?

The situation is strange.

 

[sbeaudry]

I am worried the 'money men' might not be all that happy about this new 'world peace' scenario.

So much hardware has been moved to not just get used. Plus Israel must be fuming. How are they to solve there problems now?

The situation is strange.

Very strange... approval ratings at all time low and now soldiers apparently speaking out about the prospect of another war without it being any real threat to US; reason for military coup? Seems like a bit of a calm before the storm and I too wonder what kind of false-flag or other attack is headed this way, or even perhaps if they know we're going to get a cosmic hit and this is a priming technique so they'll have ready 'enemies' to blame. If that's the case, hardware won't have to be mobilized, it will already be in position???

Oh and on the subject of Jericho, it does seem like maybe they were getting a little too close to a possible scenario. I heard they have five episodes 'in the can', meaning they were shot and ready but it got abruptly cancelled. <-- Hearsay I know but fun to speculate :) it was an interesting show.

hmmm... more questions than answers from where I sit...

 

[loreta]

Very strange... approval ratings at all time low and now soldiers apparently speaking out about the prospect of another war without it being any real threat to US; reason for military coup? Seems like a bit of a calm before the storm and I too wonder what kind of false-flag or other attack is headed this way, or even perhaps if they know we're going to get a cosmic hit and this is a priming technique so they'll have ready 'enemies' to blame. If that's the case, hardware won't have to be mobilized, it will already be in position???

hmmm... more questions than answers from where I sit...

This is very strange, yes indeed and suspect. Pax is not possible with those psychopaths. And they try hard to make us forget the others atrocities that they have done, and their investments in war and sufferance. When the Second World War there was also a respite, maybe the lapse of one year or little more, when people felt that war was avoided. But that was not true. And the sick politicians new it was not true. But the population thought that their leaders where humans, that they did what is common sense, no war. False presumption. War was there, ready. It was a question of months.

 

[Olesya]

What do you think of this article? Probably true or probably disinfo?

_http://www.almanar.com.lb/english/adetails.php?eid=110043&cid=31&fromval=1&frid=31&seccatid=71&s1=1

Truth of US-Russia Confrontation

Daoud Rammal – As-Safir



Aggression was over the Moment those Two Missiles were Fired



A well informed diplomatic source told As-Safir newspaper that “the US war on Syria had started and ended the moment those two ballistic missiles were fired, leaving inconsistent information, as Israel denied and Russia confirmed, until an Israeli statement was issued indicating they were fired in the context of an Israeli-US joint drill and fell in the sea, and that they were not related to the Syrian crisis.”

The source further told the Lebanese daily that “the US forces fired these two rockets from a NATO base in Spain, and were instantly detected by the Russian radars and confronted by the Russian defense systems, so one of them exploded in the airspace and the second one diverted towards the sea.”

In this context, the source pointed out that “the statement issued by the Russian Defense Ministry, which stated the detection of two ballistic missiles fired towards the Middle East, intended to neglect two points: the first was the location from which the two rockets were fired, and the second was their downing. Why? Because the moment the full military operation was launched, Head of the Russian Intelligence Service contacted the US intelligence and informed it that “hitting Damascus means hitting Moscow, and we have removed the term “downed the two missiles” from the statement to preserve the bilateral relations and to avoid escalation. Therefore, you must immediately reconsider your policies, approaches and intentions on the Syrian crisis, as you must be certain that you cannot eliminate our presence in the Mediterranean.”

“This unannounced direct confrontation between Moscow and Washington increased the Obama Administration’s confusion and certainty that the Russian side was ready to move until the end with the Syrian cause, and that the US did not have a way out of its impasse except through a Russian initiative which would save America’s face…” he added.

From this point, the diplomatic source clarified that “in order to avoid further US confusion, and after Israel denied knowing anything about the rocket firing in its first statement, which is the truth, Washington demanded Tel Aviv to adopt the rocket firing to save its face in front of the International Community, especially since these two rockets were the beginning of the US aggression on Syria and the announcement of the beginning of military operations, after which US President Barack Obama was supposed to go to the G20 Summit in Russia to negotiate the destiny of Syrian President Bashr Al-Assad. However, he went to find a way out of the impasse he’s in.”

The source further indicated that “after the US-Russia rocket confrontation, Moscow intended to increase its number of military experts in Russia, and added to its military units and destroyers to enhance its military presence in the Mediterranean. It also set a time for announcing about its initiative on stopping the aggression on Syria after the G20 Summit, after drawing a side scene on the sidelines of the summit which was followed by two successive visits for Iranian Foreign Minister, Hussein Amir Abdul Lahyan, and Syrian Foreign Minister, Walid Al-Moallem, in which a way out was agreed on with the Russian side, and it included a Syrian announcement on approving the Russian initiative regarding putting Syrian chemical weapons under international supervision and preparing Syria for joining the non-proliferation treaty.

Finally, the source pointed out that “One of the first results of the US-Russian military confrontation was the British House of Commons’ rejection to participate in a war on Syria. This was followed by European stances, most significantly, the German stance announced by Chancellor Angela Merkel."



Translated by Sara Taha Moughnieh

Maybe, something unexpected did happen. But overall, it looks like the military exercise (Norad US- Canada-Mexico and who knows who else?) or the preparation for covering some natural calamity, as was already mentioned here, it is ongong, osit. Here is some of my thoughts.

From this article posted on May 16, 2013, here _http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/17/world/middleeast/russia-provides-syria-with-advanced-missiles.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 we read:

Russia has previously provided a version of the missiles, called Yakhonts, to Syria.

But those delivered recently are outfitted with an advanced radar that makes them more effective, according to American officials who are familiar with classified intelligence reports and would only discuss the shipment on the basis of anonymity.

“It enables the regime to deter foreign forces looking to supply the opposition from the sea, or from undertaking a more active role if a no-fly zone or shipping embargo were to be declared at some point,” said Nick Brown, editor in chief of IHS Jane’s International Defense Review. “It’s a real ship killer.”

Syria ordered the coastal defense version of the Yakhont system from Russia in 2007 and received the first batteries in early 2011, according to Jane’s. The initial order covered 72 missiles, 36 launcher vehicles, and support equipment, and the systems have been displayed in the country.

The batteries are mobile, which makes them more difficult to attack. Each consists of missiles, a three-missile launcher and a command-and-control vehicle.

The missiles are about 22 feet long, carry either a high-explosive or armor-piercing warhead, and have a range of about 180 miles, according to Jane’s.

They can be steered to a target’s general location by longer-range radars, but each missile has its own radar to help evade a ship’s defenses and home in as it approaches its target.

Two senior American officials said that the most recent shipment contained missiles with a more advanced guidance system than earlier shipments.

Russia has longstanding interests in Syria, including a naval base at the Mediterranean port of Tartus.

[...]

Russian officials have repeatedly said that in selling arms to Syria, they are merely fulfilling old contracts. But some American officials worry that the deliveries are intended to limit the United States’ options should it choose to intervene to help the rebels.

Russia, for example, previously shipped SA-17 surface-to-air missiles to Syria. Israel carried out an airstrike against trucks that were transporting the weapons near Damascus in January. Israel has not officially acknowledged the raid but has said it is prepared to intervene militarily to prevent any “game changing” weapons from being shipped to Hezbollah, the Lebanese militant group.

More recently, Israeli and American officials have urged Russia not to proceed with the sale of advanced S-300 air defense weapons. The Kremlin has yielded to American entreaties not to provide S-300s to Iran. But the denial of that sale, analysts say, has increased the pressure within Russia’s military establishment to proceed with the delivery to Syria.

I also read the information on this pro-Israeli site (sorry, in Russian) _http://www.waronline.org/analysis/p-800-onix-yaxont/ and it looks like that if it was an attack fired from the ships stationed at the sea, it would be complete madness, because radar system that is in place in place in Syria would completely decimate the US, Israel military fleet.

And then, yesterday some curious personal "coincidence' occurred. I was at the stone market and what caught my eye, was a garnet stone. I didn't even realized at thirst that it was garnet because I've never seen garnets like this before. It was almost perfectly round looking like a very big grape of brownish-dark purplish color on the outside (blue grapes?), but when I turned it, from the depths of the stone bright red color shined through, like the flame bursting from darkness. While looking at the stone I suddenly, remembered a phrase from Ivan Krylov's Fable "The Fox and the Grapes" "а кисти сочные, как яхонты горят", i.e. "and the ripe clusters of the grapes shine (burn) like yakhonts (yaxonts). "Yakhont" in Russian means jewel, and is usually translated as "ruby" or "sapphire." That is strange, osit, because ruby is not very common stone in Russia, but garnets are (garnet "гранат" also means pomegranate). So, it seems that the "yakhont" missles could be described as the "blue grapes of wrath."

And, maybe, what really happened could be best described by this verse from the fable "The Fox and the Grapes" here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fox_and_the_Grapes :

The fox who longed for grapes, beholds with pain
The tempting clusters were too high to gain;
Grieved in his heart he forced a careless smile,
And cried ,‘They’re sharp and hardly worth my while.

 

[Sol Logos]

What do you think of this article? Probably true or probably disinfo?

_http://www.almanar.com.lb/english/adetails.php?eid=110043&cid=31&fromval=1&frid=31&seccatid=71&s1=1

Truth of US-Russia Confrontation

Daoud Rammal – As-Safir



Aggression was over the Moment those Two Missiles were Fired



A well informed diplomatic source told As-Safir newspaper that “the US war on Syria had started and ended the moment those two ballistic missiles were fired, leaving inconsistent information, as Israel denied and Russia confirmed, until an Israeli statement was issued indicating they were fired in the context of an Israeli-US joint drill and fell in the sea, and that they were not related to the Syrian crisis.”

The source further told the Lebanese daily that “the US forces fired these two rockets from a NATO base in Spain, and were instantly detected by the Russian radars and confronted by the Russian defense systems, so one of them exploded in the airspace and the second one diverted towards the sea.”

In this context, the source pointed out that “the statement issued by the Russian Defense Ministry, which stated the detection of two ballistic missiles fired towards the Middle East, intended to neglect two points: the first was the location from which the two rockets were fired, and the second was their downing. Why? Because the moment the full military operation was launched, Head of the Russian Intelligence Service contacted the US intelligence and informed it that “hitting Damascus means hitting Moscow, and we have removed the term “downed the two missiles” from the statement to preserve the bilateral relations and to avoid escalation. Therefore, you must immediately reconsider your policies, approaches and intentions on the Syrian crisis, as you must be certain that you cannot eliminate our presence in the Mediterranean.”

“This unannounced direct confrontation between Moscow and Washington increased the Obama Administration’s confusion and certainty that the Russian side was ready to move until the end with the Syrian cause, and that the US did not have a way out of its impasse except through a Russian initiative which would save America’s face…” he added.

From this point, the diplomatic source clarified that “in order to avoid further US confusion, and after Israel denied knowing anything about the rocket firing in its first statement, which is the truth, Washington demanded Tel Aviv to adopt the rocket firing to save its face in front of the International Community, especially since these two rockets were the beginning of the US aggression on Syria and the announcement of the beginning of military operations, after which US President Barack Obama was supposed to go to the G20 Summit in Russia to negotiate the destiny of Syrian President Bashr Al-Assad. However, he went to find a way out of the impasse he’s in.”

The source further indicated that “after the US-Russia rocket confrontation, Moscow intended to increase its number of military experts in Russia, and added to its military units and destroyers to enhance its military presence in the Mediterranean. It also set a time for announcing about its initiative on stopping the aggression on Syria after the G20 Summit, after drawing a side scene on the sidelines of the summit which was followed by two successive visits for Iranian Foreign Minister, Hussein Amir Abdul Lahyan, and Syrian Foreign Minister, Walid Al-Moallem, in which a way out was agreed on with the Russian side, and it included a Syrian announcement on approving the Russian initiative regarding putting Syrian chemical weapons under international supervision and preparing Syria for joining the non-proliferation treaty.

Finally, the source pointed out that “One of the first results of the US-Russian military confrontation was the British House of Commons’ rejection to participate in a war on Syria. This was followed by European stances, most significantly, the German stance announced by Chancellor Angela Merkel."



Translated by Sara Taha Moughnieh

Maybe, something unexpected did happen. But overall, it looks like the military exercise (Norad US- Canada-Mexico and who knows who else?) or the preparation for covering some natural calamity, as was already mentioned here, it is ongong, osit. Here is some of my thoughts.

From this article posted on May 16, 2013, here _http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/17/world/middleeast/russia-provides-syria-with-advanced-missiles.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0 we read:

Russia has previously provided a version of the missiles, called Yakhonts, to Syria.

But those delivered recently are outfitted with an advanced radar that makes them more effective, according to American officials who are familiar with classified intelligence reports and would only discuss the shipment on the basis of anonymity.

“It enables the regime to deter foreign forces looking to supply the opposition from the sea, or from undertaking a more active role if a no-fly zone or shipping embargo were to be declared at some point,” said Nick Brown, editor in chief of IHS Jane’s International Defense Review. “It’s a real ship killer.”

Syria ordered the coastal defense version of the Yakhont system from Russia in 2007 and received the first batteries in early 2011, according to Jane’s. The initial order covered 72 missiles, 36 launcher vehicles, and support equipment, and the systems have been displayed in the country.

The batteries are mobile, which makes them more difficult to attack. Each consists of missiles, a three-missile launcher and a command-and-control vehicle.

The missiles are about 22 feet long, carry either a high-explosive or armor-piercing warhead, and have a range of about 180 miles, according to Jane’s.

They can be steered to a target’s general location by longer-range radars, but each missile has its own radar to help evade a ship’s defenses and home in as it approaches its target.

Two senior American officials said that the most recent shipment contained missiles with a more advanced guidance system than earlier shipments.

Russia has longstanding interests in Syria, including a naval base at the Mediterranean port of Tartus.

[...]

Russian officials have repeatedly said that in selling arms to Syria, they are merely fulfilling old contracts. But some American officials worry that the deliveries are intended to limit the United States’ options should it choose to intervene to help the rebels.

Russia, for example, previously shipped SA-17 surface-to-air missiles to Syria. Israel carried out an airstrike against trucks that were transporting the weapons near Damascus in January. Israel has not officially acknowledged the raid but has said it is prepared to intervene militarily to prevent any “game changing” weapons from being shipped to Hezbollah, the Lebanese militant group.

More recently, Israeli and American officials have urged Russia not to proceed with the sale of advanced S-300 air defense weapons. The Kremlin has yielded to American entreaties not to provide S-300s to Iran. But the denial of that sale, analysts say, has increased the pressure within Russia’s military establishment to proceed with the delivery to Syria.

I also read the information on this pro-Israeli site (sorry, in Russian) _http://www.waronline.org/analysis/p-800-onix-yaxont/ and it looks like that if it was an attack fired from the ships stationed at the sea, it would be complete madness, because radar system that is in place in place in Syria would completely decimate the US, Israel military fleet.

And then, yesterday some curious personal "coincidence' occurred. I was at the stone market and what caught my eye, was a garnet stone. I didn't even realized at thirst that it was garnet because I've never seen garnets like this before. It was almost perfectly round looking like a very big grape of brownish-dark purplish color on the outside (blue grapes?), but when I turned it, from the depths of the stone bright red color shined through, like the flame bursting from darkness. While looking at the stone I suddenly, remembered a phrase from Ivan Krylov's Fable "The Fox and the Grapes" "а кисти сочные, как яхонты горят", i.e. "and the ripe clusters of the grapes shine (burn) like yakhonts (yaxonts). "Yakhont" in Russian means jewel, and is usually translated as "ruby" or "sapphire." That is strange, osit, because ruby is not very common stone in Russia, but garnets are (garnet "гранат" also means pomegranate). So, it seems that the "yakhont" missles could be described as the "blue grapes of wrath."

And, maybe, what really happened could be best described by this verse from the fable "The Fox and the Grapes" here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Fox_and_the_Grapes :

The fox who longed for grapes, beholds with pain
The tempting clusters were too high to gain;
Grieved in his heart he forced a careless smile,
And cried ,‘They’re sharp and hardly worth my while.

That fable describes cognitive dissonance. I quickly read through the coincidence, I personally don't get the link though, would you be able to clarify what you mean? Thanks!

 

[Sol Logos]

To clarify the cognitive dissonance part, its something like the grapes are to hard / high to grasp (comprehend), so rather the fox rationalises that the grapes are not of value etc.

 

[Niall]

What do you think of this article? Probably true or probably disinfo?

_http://www.almanar.com.lb/english/adetails.php?eid=110043&cid=31&fromval=1&frid=31&seccatid=71&s1=1

Truth of US-Russia Confrontation

Daoud Rammal – As-Safir

<snip>

Finally, the source pointed out that “One of the first results of the US-Russian military confrontation was the British House of Commons’ rejection to participate in a war on Syria. This was followed by European stances, most significantly, the German stance announced by Chancellor Angela Merkel."

IF that scenario - the US lobbing missiles towards Damascus and the Russians shooting them down - hinges on the above sequence of events, then it doesn't seem likely because the House of Commons vote came before the missiles were fired:

http://www.sott.net/article/265623-Breaking-UK-MPs-vote-against-Syria-action

http://www.sott.net/article/265794-Russian-radars-detect-launch-of-two-ballistic-missiles-from-Mediterranean-Sea-Israel-first-denies-knowledge-then-claims-responsibility-for-test-launch-from-fighter-jet

 

[Joe]

What do you think of this article? Probably true or probably disinfo?

_http://www.almanar.com.lb/english/adetails.php?eid=110043&cid=31&fromval=1&frid=31&seccatid=71&s1=1

Truth of US-Russia Confrontation

Daoud Rammal – As-Safir

Aggression was over the Moment those Two Missiles were Fired

A well informed diplomatic source told As-Safir newspaper that “the US war on Syria had started and ended the moment those two ballistic missiles were fired, leaving inconsistent information, as Israel denied and Russia confirmed, until an Israeli statement was issued indicating they were fired in the context of an Israeli-US joint drill and fell in the sea, and that they were not related to the Syrian crisis.”

The source further told the Lebanese daily that “the US forces fired these two rockets from a NATO base in Spain, and were instantly detected by the Russian radars and confronted by the Russian defense systems, so one of them exploded in the airspace and the second one diverted towards the sea.”

This sounds like a Lebanese "Sorcha Faal".