Is WW3 inevitable?

alkhemst said:
To clarify the cognitive dissonance part, its something like the grapes are to hard / high to grasp (comprehend), so rather the fox rationalises that the grapes are not of value etc.

I didn't say it was a cognitive dissonance per se, which also ties to rationalization as you've already mentioned, alchemist :) _http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rationalization_(psychology) Actually, from it this quote caught my attention:

In a similar way, acts of aggression will often be seen as 'reasonable, well justified, even necessary...rationalizing their self-interest in these ways'; so that, to cite 'Martin Luther King, Jr...."It seems to be a fact of life that human beings cannot continue to do wrong without eventually reaching out for some rationalization to clothe their act"'.

The same may be said of the collective scale. 'When groups commit aggression, they, too, rationalize their acts with high-sounding words...rationalizing their own self-interested desires',[22] so that, for example, 'Their own God is the right God. The other God is the strange God....Our own soldiers take care of the poor families; the enemy rapes them'.

And I can't explain to you more clearly what you want to know. I'm still thinking about it. In my post I wrote my thoughts and impressions. That's all.

And I don't think about that it was an act of direct aggression against Syria (or Russia) when missiles were supposedly fired by the US and Israel. But I have an impression that something unexpected did happen. I don't know what. Maybe, it was just timing that was unexpected. Or something else? Anyways, this incident looks like testing some of those long radar systems that are already in place. Sorry, it's not clear yet. Just thoughts, again. :)
 
The entire Syrian conflict its just big game ,
Obama playing bad cop , Putin good cop
The "good cop," Russia, positions itself as Syria’s firm ally and the only thing preventing the "bad cop," the U.S., from coming down hard on Syria. With these dynamics established, the good cop offers the solution that both cops honestly wanted in the first place. The suspect then capitulates, opting for the solution offered by the "good cop" and fearing the force promised by the "bad cop."
And now they proposing Putin's candidacy to the nobel committee.

Putin orders a massive bombing campaign against the tiny, defenseless breakaway republic of Chechnya, apparently seeing the reassertion of Russian power there as key to overall resurgence of Russia’s military and state security apparatus, his primary political objective. On August 26th, he’s forced to acknowledge the horrific consequences of the bombing. Hundreds of civilians are killed and tens of thousands are left homeless as civilian targets are attacked, very similarly to the George Bush over Iraq.
Yes he deserves a nobel peace prize just like Obama
 
Heading is quite puzzling:

_http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/09/13/the-top-ten-reasons-why-israel-should-be-bombed-back-to-the-stone-age/

...but ending(#1) is just ... surprising :huh:

:cool2:
 
Why are Saudis buying so much weapons?

It seems that they are shifting from covert means to open attack. As it is said in article linked below: "By the way, the Arabs have a saying that a Saudi never forgives an offence, just like a camel." regarding Putin's stance for Bandar's blackmail on Sochi games...

_http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/02/11/will-the-saudis-unleash-a-conventional-and-terror-war-together/

Since US are not willing to start a war - will KSA do it?

For example, the article by Ahmed Sherkawi entitled “Saudi Arabia is preparing an attack against Syria and the Hezbollah” has recently become one of the most popular articles in the Arabic Internet.

The author writes that the Saudis took an irrevocable decision to change the balance of power in the region, discard their old strategy and begin a military campaign (indirect, as it is performed through their puppets) against Syria and the Hezbollah in Lebanon.
 
Really leaving Syria alone or just dealing new cards - Bandar Bush ousted?

_http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/04/15/us-saudi-intelligence-idUSBREA3E1HT20140415

y
 
Given what I've read from seers like van rensberg about ww3; that Russia is supposed to destroy america from within, then invade Europe with terrible energy weapons (you also see evidence the seers saw overhead meteor strikes, people falling dead from gasses) only to be stopped at Germany with american weapons, (it begins after an assassination in the Balkans, the pope flees after the city of seven hills is destroyed), I found these comments made in a YT video by the Russian speaker of the parliament quite distressing..
-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALVRPV4IXik
 
Inquorate said:
Given what I've read from seers like van rensberg about ww3; that Russia is supposed to destroy america from within, then invade Europe with terrible energy weapons (you also see evidence the seers saw overhead meteor strikes, people falling dead from gasses) only to be stopped at Germany with american weapons, (it begins after an assassination in the Balkans, the pope flees after the city of seven hills is destroyed), I found these comments made in a YT video by the Russian speaker of the parliament quite distressing..
-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALVRPV4IXik

Zhirinovski may be the speaker of parliament but he is infamous for his outlandish remarks and nobody takes him seriously, even within Russia. Though I did find it interesting that he says that Russia has weapons that can destroy any country within 15 minutes. Whether true or not, who knows? In Russia, there is a joke that Zhirinovski starts saying the truth when his payments from the Kremlin stop coming. So there may be something to it.

Also, keep in mind that seers see only potential futures. The future is open and not set in stone.
 
axj said:
Inquorate said:
Given what I've read from seers like van rensberg about ww3; that Russia is supposed to destroy america from within, then invade Europe with terrible energy weapons (you also see evidence the seers saw overhead meteor strikes, people falling dead from gasses) only to be stopped at Germany with american weapons, (it begins after an assassination in the Balkans, the pope flees after the city of seven hills is destroyed), I found these comments made in a YT video by the Russian speaker of the parliament quite distressing..
-https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ALVRPV4IXik

Zhirinovski may be the speaker of parliament but he is infamous for his outlandish remarks and nobody takes him seriously, even within Russia. Though I did find it interesting that he says that Russia has weapons that can destroy any country within 15 minutes. Whether true or not, who knows? In Russia, there is a joke that Zhirinovski starts saying the truth when his payments from the Kremlin stop coming. So there may be something to it.

Also, keep in mind that seers see only potential futures. The future is open and not set in stone.

I agree with that and this guy is imo out of his mind you can also see the female moderator almost laughs him down. And about the seers who knows from where they get "their pictures" and could also be fed to stimulate further war propaganda against Russia, which isn't true at all and as it can be seen on the actions of Putin.

And why did you, Inquorate, post it two times on the forum, since this here is the appropriate place?
 
Gawan said:
I agree with that and this guy is imo out of his mind you can also see the female moderator almost laughs him down. And about the seers who knows from where they get "their pictures" and could also be fed to stimulate further war propaganda against Russia, which isn't true at all and as it can be seen on the actions of Putin.
Absolutely agree, Gawan. The latest news about Zhirinovski is that he assaulted a pregnant journalist of Russia Today on April 18, 2014. You can read about this and other incidents involving him here for example: http://en.itar-tass.com/opinions/1754 and also in the thread about the Ukraine.

Inquorate, are you reading SoTT? If not, I would certainly recommend it. I've started doing it not so long ago myself. If you read the excellent articles by Joe Quinn and others, you will realize that this "prophecy" is a disinformation and nonsense.

SoTT: http://www.sott.net/.
 
I posted it twice because I found the correct forum by chance, by checking new unread posts. I intended to delete first post but hvent had the time. I'm a stay at home dad with two kids under four.

The seers I refer to may well be disinfo. Some lived several hundred years ago. So perhaps not.

Yes they would have seen probabilities in the future that could quite well be improbable now.

Yes I read Sott, Gurdjieff, wave series, Laura's books, podcasts, Lobaczewsky..

And a crazy guy can tell the truth just as well as someone in full poses soon of their wits. Sometimes more so.
 
Back
Top Bottom