Israel-Palestine War: Hamas Breaks Out of Gaza, Israel Responds With Genocide

Regarding the alleged distancing between Trump and Netanyahu: So far we have rumours and reports in that sense, which may or may not be true, but there are at least three concrete actions that do point in that direction.

  • First, Trump pulling out of his little war with the Houthis, which was clearly meant to be on behalf of Israel. They agree not to fire at each other, but nothing was said about Israel, so the Houthies are free to carry on targeting Ben Gurion airport, for example.
  • Second, the US negotiated directly with Hamas the release of the last American hostage, who was indeed freed (and chose not to see Netanyahu). With no American hostages, the US is in a position in which it could argue that they don't have a direct interest on the conflict.
  • Third, Trump is on a tour in the Middle East, and he is not making a stop on Israel.

Considering how much Israel has controlled the US historically, these are big deals. Now we are reading that Netanyahu has supposedly declared that they need to fend for themselves, that they will take over Gaza on their own and expel the Palestinians, and that they need to become independent from the US in regards to security.

The distancing sounds very good, and I do hope wholeheartedly that's the case. But there are two wildcards:

  • The first one is Trump himself, who seems to change his mind every third day, often contadicting what he said before. So, just as easily he is pushing Israel aside this week, who knows what he'll do the next one.
  • The second is of course Israel. If they calculate that they are losing control of Trump for real, they will pull out the bag of dirty tricks. That can include anything from false flags, blackmail, scandals, provocation and sabotage to assassination attempts. Interestingly, Trump is with MBS in Saudi Arabia and he refused to drink his welcome ceremonial tea. Has he been advised to be careful? I hope so:


Another interesting detail, noted but the couple from Redacted, is that just as Trump appears to be moving against Israel's designs, some Western news outlets, which normally supports Israel and oppose Trump, have published pieces critical of Israel. As far as I know, that includes The New York Times, The FInancial Times, The Economist, and the BBC with Louis Theroux's documentary 'The Settlers'. I'm not sure what that means, but it sure is interesting. Here's Redacted:

 
Another interesting detail, noted but the couple from Redacted, is that just as Trump appears to be moving against Israel's designs, some Western news outlets, which normally supports Israel and oppose Trump, have published pieces critical of Israel. As far as I know, that includes The New York Times, The FInancial Times, The Economist, and the BBC with Louis Theroux's documentary 'The Settlers'. I'm not sure what that means, but it sure is interesting.

I'd say this is the most significant detail backing the probability that Trump has let the Israel-USA 'special contract' expire. For decades, the MSM has been running cover for Israel and they all just changed course at the same time Trump is signaling that he is backing away? It reminds me when the MSM changed their tune to, "fair and balanced" reporting and explicitly did not endorse Kamala just prior to Trump being elected. At the time, this was the biggest signal to me that the winds had changed in Trump's favor of being elected.

1747180930046.png

The second is of course Israel. If they calculate that they are losing control of Trump for real, they will pull out the bag of dirty tricks. That can include anything from false flags, blackmail, scandals, provocation and sabotage to assassination attempts.

To your point though, if Trump has truly Faux Pas the Zionists, we certainly can expect the full bag of dirty tricks. Assuming it goes that way, will the masses fall for it?

But even within Trump's own party, support for Israel is showing signs of slipping. A recent poll by the Arab American Institute found that nearly half of Republican respondents agree that Trump should place greater pressure on Israel to end its occupation and allow a Palestinian state.

The poll finds that voters’ sympathy for Israel remains somewhat higher than for Palestinians. But by a significant 46% to 30% margin, American voters feel that US Middle East policy is too one-sided in favor of Israel, with 39% of Republicans agreeing and 37% disagreeing. This represents a substantial shift from 2024 when only 33% of Republicans agreed that policy was too pro-Israel against 43% who said it was not.

By a two to one margin, American voters also agree that President Trump should “apply greater pressure on Israel to end its occupation of Palestinian lands and allow Palestinians to create an independent state of their own.”  While this agree/disagree ratio largely tracks last year’s results, the major difference in this year’s findings is the substantial increase in Republicans who agree that the president should apply such pressure on Israel. In 2024, the agree/disagree split for Republicans was 37% to 40%. Now 49% agree that greater pressure should be applied as opposed to  only 29% who disagree.

When asked whether the US should always provide unrestricted aid to Israel or should restrict such aid if Israel “continues to operate in a way which puts civilian lives at risk in Gaza and Lebanon,” this year's overall results were essentially the same as last year’s. Twenty-three percent (23%) are in favor of unrestricted aid, while 53% are opposed.

A plurality of American voters also agree with the decisions of the International Court of Justice finding that Israel’s war in Gaza is tantamount to genocide and the International Criminal Court’s decision to issue an arrest warrant for Prime Minister Netanyahu for war crimes.
 
The first one is Trump himself, who seems to change his mind every third day, often contadicting what he said before. So, just as easily he is pushing Israel aside this week, who knows what he'll do the next one.
Yes, I feel that at times, he has a lot of lip and impotence and does what he does best, he is a real estate trader and the Jews know it...here the Jerusalem Post quotes an anonymous source that seems to confirm his new plans:
A Gulf diplomatic source, who declined to be named or disclose his position, told The Media Line, "President Donald Trump will issue a declaration regarding the State of Palestine and American recognition of it, and that there will be the establishment of a Palestinian state without the presence of Hamas."
(...) Ahmed Al-Ibrahim, a former Gulf diplomat, told The Media Line, "I don't expect it to be about Palestine. Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi and King Abdullah II of Jordan have not been invited. They are the two countries closest to Palestine, and it would be important for them to be present at any event like this."

According to Trump Homeland Security Advisory Council appointee Mark Levin in his open letter to president Trump, which I read more like a self-confessed position statement, he warns:
[It] suggests to me that you are starting to understand a vital truth: that this Israeli government is behaving in ways that threaten hard-core U.S. interests in the region. Netanyahu is not our friend (...) But this ultranationalist, messianic Israeli government is not America’s ally. Because this is the first government in Israel’s history whose priority is not peace…Its priority is the annexation of the West Bank, the expulsion of the Palestinians of Gaza and the re-establishment there of Israeli settlements.
This hurts us in other ways. As Hans Wechsel, a former senior policy adviser to U.S. Central Command, put it to me: “The more hopeless things seem for Palestinian aspirations, the less readiness there will be in the region to expand the U.S.-Arab-Israeli security integration that could have nailed down long-term advantages over Iran and China — and without requiring nearly as many U.S. military resources in the region to sustain.”

...I would like to think that some are seeing the light but I fear that all they see is a lot of profit in their accounting, whatever, what is a fact is that their reasons for changing their minds have nothing to do with the Palestinians and their freedom. ...There is still hope Hutie .?

Others who are switching to plan B seem to be Macron and the EU, after Macron and Stamler after they promised to bring troops to safeguard Blackrock's properties in Ukraine in case of a deal. They are now aligning themselves with the pro-Palestinian discourse even if Macron leaves much to be desired as a moral representative of the EU, as pointed out by Israeli finance minister Katzt who sees himself as the best man to do so:

Since March 2, Israel has closed Gaza’s main crossings, halting the flow of food, medical aid, and other humanitarian supplies. This blockade has caused a severe and unprecedented decline in living conditions, with human rights organizations and countries accusing Israel of using starvation as a weapon of war against Palestinians.
On Tuesday, the French president said he was “shaken” by the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip during an interview on the television channel TF1.
“Shameful”, he used this word to express his views on the Israeli policies during the Gaza genocide.

“It’s terrible. (…) There’s no water, there are no medicines. They can no longer evacuate the injured,” said the president, responding to the testimony of an emergency doctor who had traveled to the enclave twice.

“I say it forcefully, what the government of Benjamin Netanyahu is doing today is unacceptable,” continued Macron.

“We need the United States. President (Donald) Trump has the levers. I have had tough words with Prime Minister Netanyahu. I got angry, but they (Israel) don’t depend on us, they depend on American weapons,” he said.

French President Emmanuel Macron has called Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's Gaza measures a "disgrace." pic.twitter.com/gX1wiKYxwy
— DW News (@dwnews) May 14, 2025

Macron emphasized that he himself had visited the border between Egypt and Gaza earlier this year where he saw that “all the aid that France and other countries deliver” is “blocked by the Israelis.”
“This is an unacceptable humanitarian tragedy,” he said, adding that “it is not up to a president of the republic to say ‘this is a genocide’ but rather to historians.”

My job is to do everything I can to make it stop,” Macron also said, while raising the possibility of revisiting the European Union’s cooperation agreements with Israel. The situation is “intolerable and getting worse.”

Of course, the response of those attacked was not long in coming:
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu accused French President Emmanuel Macron on 14 May of standing with Hamas
“Macron has once again chosen to stand with a murderous terrorist organization and echo its despicable propaganda, accusing Israel of blood libels,”
Finanzas Ministry Katz said in a statement, “We remember well what happened to Jews in France when they couldn’t defend themselves. President Macron should not lecture us on morality.”
“It is expected that someone who considers himself a friend of Israel would stand by Israel in its war against the murderous terrorist organisation Hamas and the Iranian axis of evil.”
Katz also claimed the Israeli army operates “with the highest level of morality under extremely difficult and complex circumstances – certainly more than anything France has done in its past wars”.
1747252659413.png
ahh! that was a Fake and Russia was at fault.

 
Not sure if this is the best place to put speculations like this, but Netanyahu is losing his power specifically over the 'Stand With Israel' crew in American Government and People, as well as Foreign Policy in the White House.

In order to continue doing what I suspect was always Israel's "plan" in the first place (Greater Israel, encompassing all the area in the immediate region whilst simultaneously looking like the wronged party), it has to take back this 'narrative' it won on October 7th.

I think October 7th was a false flag, but Americans seem to be easily taken in by false flags, so there is that.... and copious people have told the American People NOT to look at the $2.7 billion dollars laundered through Qatar to Hamas by Israel between 2012 and 2023, when the fact it happened became apparent.

I have three speculations as to what's going to happen next from our Overlords STS 'paradise' (representatives) on Earth, otherwise know and 'The Dog that Never Barks', Israel. They are:

1. Assassinate Bibi. Probably won't be considered that much of a priority now, because he is now out of favour with Trump.
2. Do another false flag. This time, not in your own backyard, but in someone elses. Someone who no longer is useful, has blown their cover, (thank you Candace) and has become somewhat of a nuisance. Macron, of course, fits that bill. Maybe a dirty bomb in France? You just have to blame it on the Arabs and you're all set. It's worked twice before, so why not again?
3. Both 1 and 2. At the same time. That would delay 1., because 2 requires a lot more planning.

Honestly, you couldn't make this stuff up! Well, you could. I just did, you could put something like it in a fictional novel, and probably the Mossad could too....

This is not a good scenario for anyone involved, especially if the Western World figures it out. I hope they do and see Israel as it really is - or at least the ones running it are....
 
Is all about appearances. Who is Trump supposed to be distancing himself from, Netanyahu or Israel? Or is just another appearance?

Netanyahu: Gaza Aid Scheme Offers Israel Symbolic Cover to Finish the Genocide

In order to conquer and seize Gaza, “We need to do it in a way” where the world “won’t stop us," Netanyahu says.

...
"We're going to take control of all the Gaza Strip,” Netanyahu vowed Monday in a video released by his office announcing that Israel would begin delivering “minimal humanitarian aid: food and medicine only.” Netanyahu claimed that international pressure, including from pro-Israel Republican senators and the White House, required the appearance of humanitarian intervention. "Our best friends in the world—senators I know as strong supporters of Israel—have warned that they cannot support us if images of mass starvation emerge," he said. “They come to me and say, ‘We’ll give you all the help you need to win the war… but we can’t be receiving pictures of famine,’” Netanyahu added. To continue the war of annihilation, he asserted, “We need to do it in a way that they won't stop us.”
...

“Truth be told, until the last of the hostages returns, we should also not let water into the Gaza Strip. But the reality is that if we do that, the world will force us to halt the war immediately, and to lose. It would be winning the battle, and losing the war. I'm committed to winning the war,” Smotrich declared. “We are disassembling Gaza, and leaving it as piles of rubble, with total destruction [which has] no precedent globally. And the world isn't stopping us. There are pressures. There are those who attack [us]; they are trying to [make us] stop; they are not succeeding. You know why they aren't succeeding? Because we are navigating [the campaign] responsibly and wisely, and that's how we'll continue to do [it]."

Smotrich said that the Israeli forces are initiating a campaign to force Palestinians into the south of Gaza “and from there, God willing, to third countries, as part of President Trump's plan. This is a change of the course of history—nothing less.”


In recent days, Trump has resumed promoting the threat he first floated on February 4 when Netanyahu visited him at the White House: that the U.S. would seize Gaza and create a Middle East Riviera. “I think I’d be proud to have the United States have it, take it, make it a freedom zone,” Trump said Thursday, an assertion he repeated over the weekend in an interview with FOX News. “Gaza is a nasty place. It's been that way for years. I think it should become a free zone, you know, freedom, I call it a freedom zone,” Trump told host Bret Baier.
...
The Trump administration has publicly continued to fully back Netanyahu as the Israeli army intensifies its campaign of terror bombings and forced displacement across Gaza. The White House has offered no public criticism of Netanyahu’s operation, called “Gideon’s Chariot,” aimed at seizing control of all of Gaza in what officials have described as a “conquest.”

...
“I don’t think there’s any daylight between President Trump’s position and Prime Minister Netanyahu's position,” said Steve Witkoff, Trump’s special envoy, on Sunday in an interview with ABC News. “Everyone is concerned about the humanitarian conditions in Gaza,” he added. “We do not want to see a humanitarian crisis, and we will not allow it to occur on President Trump’s watch.”
...
As Drop Site reported on Friday, Hamas said its decision to release U.S. citizen and Israeli soldier Edan Alexander last Monday was the result of a direct commitment from Witkoff. According to Basem Naim, a member of Hamas’s political bureau, Witkoff made a direct commitment that, two days after Alexander’s release, the Trump administration would compel Israel to lift the Gaza blockade and allow humanitarian aid to immediately enter the territory. Witkoff, Naim said, also promised that Trump would make a public call for an immediate ceasefire in Gaza and for negotiations aimed at achieving a “permanent ceasefire.” Naim said the U.S. “threw [the deal] in the trash.”
...

Both Israel and the U.S. have been promoting plans to deliver aid to Gaza that would circumvent a ceasefire deal, which the United Nations and all aid groups operating in Gaza have said would be necessary in order to address the acute humanitarian crisis. Instead, the U.S. and Israel have concocted a scheme involving a newly established “non-governmental” foundation run by a former U.S. marine to take official charge of establishing zones, mostly in southern Gaza, to distribute a limited number of rations.
...
Palestinians wishing to receive aid would have to go through an Israeli security vetting process and subject themselves to checkpoints and facial recognition technology as a condition for receiving food. On Monday, Netanyahu said the sites would be located in “a sterile area controlled entirely by the IDF.”
...

The UN and over 200 non-governmental aid organizations have denounced the plan, saying it is unworkable and weaponizes aid as a tool of war. The main UN humanitarian organization operating in the Occupied Palestinian Territories said the plan was aimed at dismantling the international infrastructure built over several decades and further enforcing Israeli dominance over access to basic life sustaining food and supplies for Palestinians in Gaza.

“It contravenes fundamental humanitarian principles and appears designed to reinforce control over life-sustaining items as a pressure tactic – as part of a military strategy,” asserted the country team of the UN Humanitarian Coordinator for the Occupied Palestinian Territory on May 5. “It is dangerous, driving civilians into militarized zones to collect rations, threatening lives, including those of humanitarian workers, while further entrenching forced displacement.”

So, Five trucks of humanitarian aid enter Gaza, says Israel, ending 10-week blockade, 5 trucks for 3/4 of 1.8 million who are starving in Gaza

People in Gaza starving, sick and dying as aid blockade continues
The entire 2.1 million population of Gaza is facing prolonged food shortages, with nearly half a million people in a catastrophic situation of hunger, acute malnutrition, starvation, illness and death. This is one of the world’s worst hunger crises, unfolding in real time.
Famine has not yet been declared, but people are starving now. Three quarters of Gaza’s population are at “Emergency” or “Catastrophic” food deprivation, the worst two levels of IPC's five level scale of food insecurity and nutritional deprivation.
Since the aid blockade began on 2 March 2025, 57 children have reportedly died from the effects of malnutrition, according to the Ministry of Health. This number is likely an underestimate and is likely to increase. If the situation persists, nearly 71 000 children under the age of five are expected to be acutely malnourished over the next eleven months, according to the IPC report.

From BRAVE AI
To estimate how many people can be fed by 5 truckloads of food, we need to consider the capacity of a single truckload. According to a charity project in Oklahoma, one truckload could feed 11,200 people for one day.1 Therefore, 5 truckloads of food could potentially feed 56,000 people for one day.
Sounds like it will be just for the photo.
 
It's already well past the point where every person who claims to have a conscience should be imagining their children asking them: "what did you do during the ethnic cleansing of Gaza, did you try to stop it?"

It's just maddening. Some people probably are actually going mad because of this. Learning through suffering - but you need something positive to turn to after such painful realisations about our world. Many will be hungry for that.
 
Regarding aid trucks containing shrouds, it might be a misunderstanding, do not blame them though. In fact the bags are labelled with "fortified wheat"

The interior of that warehouse looks a lot like the interior of this one. So it looks like they are taking their time, still!!!

The reality is so twisted that Israel needs to feel pressured to get aid into Gaza, allegedly agreed to let in 93 trucks of humanitarian aid.
 
In order to conquer and seize Gaza, “We need to do it in a way” where the world “won’t stop us," Netanyahu says.
As if the IDF did not know perfectly whom they were, and where they were.

Israeli soldiers fire towards foreign diplomats in occupied West Bank
Israeli soldiers were captured on video firing towards a group of foreign diplomats on a visit to Jenin in the occupied West Bank, forcing them to run to their vehicles and flee the area. The military claims the group deviated from an “approved route” and the shots were only a “warning.

 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom