James M. McCanney - Plasma Discharge Comet Theory

[Arlo_usa]

I'm reasonably sure that Jean Petit is aware of Nikola Tesla's work. Perhaps you can ask him to comment about Tesla, particularly "Tesla Tower" technology in the next podcast.

Also, perhaps he could comment on another astrophysicist, James McCanney.

 

[Triangle]

Tesla / Petit

Hello,

While I worked indirectly with him in the past, Jean Pierre PETIT is the french specialist of magneto-hydro-dynamics (reverse-gravity same way as N. TESLA). He published in english language on his website www.jp-petit.com about various subjects.
One of his theory I agree too is matter/shadow matter in two universes.
He is also wellknown in France for his contacts with Ummo civilization.

 

[ark]

Tesla / Petit

You probably did not listen to our interviews with Jean-Pierre::

- Top Secret Military Projects Part 1, Part 2
- Who are the Ummites? Part 1, Part 2
- Unlimited Energy and Doomsday Scenarios - Part 1, part 2

 

[Triangle]

Tesla / Petit

Sorry!

Newbie on this site.....great that you have Jean Pierre stuff here

 

[ark]

Tesla / Petit

Sorry!

Newbie on this site.....great that you have Jean Pierre stuff here

Then, don't miss also this thread.

 

[Snowalker]

I have been a reader of Jim McCanney's site (http://www.jmccanneyscience.com/) for some years now and I have swung from being an ardent supporter to being very skepticle and back again. At this point I think he is legitimate but does not have a lot control over his need for recognition. With that said I read the following communication on his site that he claims is from a colleague who is familiar with NASA contracts.

Let's see now. Parallel programs just in case one gets behind schedule or has a failure. The U of C web site is one of the most incomplete major science project sites I have ever seen. The list of subjects not detailed would run to pages. Would love to see their budget, schedule, etc. Could not even find a link to the prime contractor's brag site. This puppy is a whopper. Bet the budget is well north of $150 million. No mention of the support facilities to be built at the South Pole or are they just going to kick out the sci teams currently in residence. No brag pages on how they overcame the engineering challenges of placing 244 tons on ice and maintaining stability. Understand there was even the manufacture of back-up components in Europe. Never saw an NSF program move this fast with such invisibility, especially for a telescope. How many telescopes of this size have ever been assembled in three months? None. Operational by South Pole fall. Know anyone at any of the support universities? Bet the data flow goes thru a three letter agency first.

McCanney then goes on to discuss how this new telescope and other land and space based telescopes are being used to find brown dwarfs near our solar system. While I don't want to appear to be buying this info completely I DO think that if the NSF is building a large scope in Antarctica then it is a significant event that should be of interest to this group. At the very least I would like to get some feedback on what people think of McCanney and to what level his information is trustworthy.

Jim

 

[dant]

Antarctic Telescopes

Hmm...

I cannot tell if this guy is credible or a COINTELPRO operative... He keeps talking
about a number of things, a telescope in Anartica to search for brown/dwarf star,
connecting tesla-tower copy in canada being blamed for the Ohio area electrical
blowout, but not HAARP (as far I can tell), and other rantings. He also has a radio
talk show. Is he a Jeff Rense copycat? Dunno.

 

[Peam]

Antarctic Telescopes

When you consider the way the earth spins, a telescope at the south pole seems to me to have a rather limited observation area of the sky, pointing towards the same direction all the year round, as opposed to a telescope...anywhere else really?

 

[Snowalker]

Antarctic Telescopes

When you consider the way the earth spins, a telescope at the south pole seems to me to have a rather limited observation area

Actually, the south (and north pole for that matter) are excellent places for a telescope due mainly to the condition of the atmosphere. The issue here is not that they want to view a particular area of the sky but rather that they are looking for BROWN DWARFS. The following link (http://spt.uchicago.edu/index.php) provides quite a bit of info on this particular instrument. This is an INFRARED scope which is designed to detect sub-luminous objects such as brown dwarfs. Space based infrared scopes such as WISE due to be launched in 2008/9, are another clue that the PTB are looking for something in the sub-luminous range. In my opinion their claims about looking at distant galaxies does not square with either the technology being used or the location of the equipment and this is why I am looking for more feedback on people like McCanney who seem to be speaking Truth.

For me the bottom line is that the PTB don't go to this amount of trouble to distract. I beleive they are looking for something and I beleive that something may have alot to do with the comet cluster mentioned in the C sessions.

Jim

 

[vinny]

Antarctic Telescopes

yeah, it would be very interesting to hear why they are looking for brown dwarfs, and also where they are looking!
within the general area of the current solar system, perhaps?

i get calls almost immediately from any number of long term associates who are themselves talk show hosts where i am a regular guest ... they call immediately and tip me off when certain issues rise up ... i only work with long time associates and well established talk show hosts ... i have other "indicators" that i personally watch on a daily basis ... lately all the indicators have been popping up as i always say ... like gophers popping out of gopher holes (a minnesota expression ... an expression that poor phil plaite has tried to copy ... poor phil ... what a pathetic tier III loooooser ... he has to use my name to draw people to his stupid page to try to get people to buy his stupid book) ... is it not interesting that i have been promoting my search for extra-solar system objects over my lengthy and somewhat interesting career ... and have been highly criticized as a fringe element by standard astronomers (even though i have far more physics and mathematics education than many of them combined) ... and now low and behold NASA announces that there is not one ... but possibly thousands of these unaccounted for objects floating around our very own solar system ... and they have a full fledged program headed up by the guy who just won the nobel prize ... to look for these "brown dwarf - near earth" objects ..

hmmm... there's a whole lot of personal ego crap going on there. that means this guy is seriously vulnerable to cointelpro manipulation.
still, it is interesting that he says 'brown dwarf - near earth objects'. Where did that come from exactly?

 

[Snowalker]

Antarctic Telescopes

hmmm... there's a whole lot of personal ego crap going on there. that means this guy is seriously vulnerable to cointelpro manipulation.

Exactly my concern! And yet he seems to be doing a good job of protecting himself from their influence. This means that he is either an EXTREMELY good disinfo site or he's legit. I'm having a hard time seeing anything in between.

What I want to do is take this issue out of his hands and start getting feedback from Ark and other people versed in astronomy and physics that we know AND TRUST.

 

[vinny]

Antarctic Telescopes

the important thing is to get the facts straight, by whatever means possible, and not take the lazy option of leaning on Ark who has actively discouraged any form of devoteeism, on this forum, and on the cassiopaea site.

see:

We invite the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by reading with an open, but skeptical mind . We do not encourage "devotee-ism" nor "True Belief." We do encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in all fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth. We constantly seek to validate and/or refine what we understand to be either possible or probable or both. We do this in the sincere hope that all of mankind will benefit, if not now, then at some point in one of our probable futures.

whatsit didn't provide any hyperlinks on his article, so we don't know for sure who originated the bombshell phrase 'brown dwarf - near earth objects'. that might cast some more light on what is going on here.

 

[Azur]

Calculating primes solved?

According to James McCanney, he has solved how to easily calculate any prime number. Going to have a closer look.

For those who wish to look into it: _http://www.calculateprimes.com/

 

[ark]

Calculating primes solved?

According to James McCanney, he has solved how to easily calculate any prime number. Going to have a closer look.

For those who wish to look into it: _http://www.calculateprimes.com/

There is a simple way of calculating prime numbers, known for ages - Sieve of Erasthothenes:

http://www.math.utah.edu/~pa/Eratosthenes.html

 

[dant]

Calculating primes solved?

[Might be off topic?]

This subject on primes is of interest to many researchers looking to find
that "magic bullet" algorithm that can quickly produce primes and with the least
amount of resources (memory,CPU,etc.) as possible. Finding such an algorithm
is patentable (I think), and the inventor potentially stands to reap huge financial
rewards, unless the PTB gets to it first and will "gag" the patent due to "national
security". I read about this all the time, how the government uses the patent office
for it's own benefit and usually to the detriment of the inventor. OSIT.