James M. McCanney - Plasma Discharge Comet Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter Arlo_usa
  • Start date Start date
Here is a dramatic (and recent) example of comet-solar interaction:
http://spaceweather.com/images2011/03oct11/cometandcme.gif?PHPSESSID=f7jdr4phm1tt6lk43hrjm5c016
Here is Spaceweather.com's comment:

COMET AND CME:

A comet discovered by amateur astronomers on Friday, Sept. 30th, disintegrated in spectacular fashion the very next day when it plunged into the sun. The Solar and Heliospheric Observatory recorded the comet's last hours. The end was punctuated by an unexpected explosion:

Watch the movie again. The timing of the CME so soon after the comet dove into the sun suggests a link. But what? There is no known mechanism for comets to trigger solar explosions. Before 2011 most solar physicists would have discounted the events of Oct. 1st as pure coincidence--and pure coincidence is still the most likely explanation. Earlier this year, however, the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO) watched another sungrazer disintegrate in the sun's atmosphere. On July 5, 2011, the unnamed comet appeared to interact with plasma and magnetic fields in its surroundings as it fell apart. Could a puny comet cause a magnetic instability that might propagate and blossom into a impressive CME? The question is not so crazy as it once seemed to be.

Ok, they do not talk yet about discharge phenomena, but at least the interaction is starting to be recognised.

Edit: And here is one from the 5th of July:
_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJlsp0BXBlE&feature=related
 
Yup, those comets keep diving into the sun and they keep being related to huge explosions on the sun, but the astronomers are always "surprised"!!! Because, of course, there cannot be any relationship... the comet is way too small... and the electrical theories have to be discounted because it would undo all their cherished theories...
 
In his October 20 radio-show James McCanney gives a short explanation Jupiter being a star, has low-level fusion:

Beginning at 50:02
_http://www.jmccanneyscience.com/JamesMcCanneyScienceHour_October_20_2011.mp3

Session reference: 950304
"Q: (T) An additional sun, like if Jupiter blows up? Is Jupiter an unborn sun?
A: Jupiter is already a star.
Q: (L) Why do we not perceive it as a star?
A: You are still learning. Earth is a star to be.
"
 
FWIW, James McCanney is pretty excited about the new comet C-2012 S1 (ISON), and has spent much time in his past 2 radio shows talking about it. I'll recount some of the main points here- his shows often involve a fair amount of pontificating on various topics unrelated to the hard data.

He is not certain yet due to scarcity of data, but suspects the mass of the nucleus of this comet to be significant. It is currently just beyond the orbit of Saturn and according to him its orbital path is coming into the solar system fairly well aligned with the plane of the orbits of the planets.

He says there will be electrically significant alignments between the comet and Venus, Mercury, Mars and the Sun during 2013. He is particularly excited about the close alignment the comet will have with Mars about a year from now in Oct 2013. He says the comet may well pass close enough to Mars that there could be discharge phenomena between it and the comet. Possibly significant enough to be visible from Earth, though at that time Mars will be in the morning sky, which would make otherwise visible phenomena unlikely to be seen with the eyes. He raises the possibility that this close encounter could change the orbit of Mars and/or the comet, and may also introduce elements to Mar's atmosphere.

He also notes that as it currently stands, the comet will pass close enough to the Sun, at the projected time of solar maximum, that we may see the 'horns' of the sunward spike develop on the comet late next year. But he also tempers this with a strong feeling that the path of the comet will be changed somewhat by the effects of the planets as it comes into the inner solar system.

He's set up a C-2012 S1 (ISON) sub-page on his website to collect data and observations on. If you want to brave one of his shows, the Oct 4 show has more data and less rant.
 
I've done a lot of reading on comets lately and have lost faith in McCanney being a good source for any observations or predictions. The plain fact is that comets tend to break up over time - have been witnessed to do so rather often - and do not appear to "grow" as he claims. They are certainly electrically active, but that is due to being "charged" in a different electrical environment and after enough time in the inner solar system, can discharge completely, becoming more asteroid like. Also, much of the electrical arcing that may be going on as a comet approaches can contribute to the breaking up process.
 
I have listened to Mccanneys radio shows since the discovery of ISON late september and I think that what he`s got to say about it is interesting;
he is excpecting a real "show" in the heavens from october onwards.

When listening to him I get the sense that he knows what he is talking about but that he has got some issues regards to narcissism; he had to retract one of his orbital calculations from one week to the other, after doing so he said: "I guess i am human after all".

Another thing is his constant rants about all and everything but himself; he even mentioned sott.net as a source of disinformation, misusing his name and research.

Still I consider his information as very interesting, guess we`ll see next year..
FWIW
Birk
 
Even mainstream sources are expecting a historical show next October so that's pretty much already in the books. I think it's going to be quite extraordinary, actually, from the data thus far. I think McCanney just fell off his rocker somewhere along the way, which, while unfortunate isn't that unusual.
 
He claims in this video that he worked with scientists of the University of Novosibirsk during the 90s, the same scientists that studied Tunguska. McCanney said that the scientists liked his theory because it explained a lot of anomalies that they observed. He reports that there were testimonials of people claiming that days before the Tunguska event, the night sky was lighting up right until the event. McCanney claims it was the cometary tail that people were witnessing at night, which discharged like an atomic bomb.

 
James McCanney: A Visionary in Science, Technology, and Archaeology
James McCanney is a multifaceted scientist, inventor, educator, and amateur archaeologist whose innovative work spans astrophysics, mathematics, telecommunications, renewable energy, water purification, and archaeology. His bold ideas, particularly his theories on the Nazca Lines in Peru, have challenged conventional thinking and inspired exploration across disciplines.
Breakthrough Discoveries
McCanney’s "Plasma Discharge Comet Model" links solar wind to weather and planetary interactions. He challenged the Big Bang Theory and the "dirty snowball" comet model, views later aligned with NASA’s findings. In mathematics, he pioneered prime number calculations, connecting them to Quantum Mechanics. His "Generator Functions" solve complex scientific problems. With 10 peer-reviewed papers, his expertise spans physics, telecommunications, archaeology, and more.
Telecommunications and Encryption Expertise
McCanney spent 25 years as a principal engineer in the telecommunications industry, specializing in computer security, encryption, and telecommunications protocols. His work includes developing secure communication systems, notably through his patented electronic memory key and his book Breaking RSA Codes for Fun and Profit (2014), which explores encryption vulnerabilities.
Nazca Lines and Fractal Antenna Theory
As an amateur archaeologist, McCanney proposed a provocative theory about the Nazca Lines in Peru, suggesting they are large-scale fractal antenna arrays built by an advanced, pre-Inca civilization. In his paper, Nazca Palpa Lines - The Mystery Solved (2016), he argues these geoglyphs, located in the Palpa desert valley, resemble modern fractal antennas used in cell phones, hinting at sophisticated ancient technology. This theory challenges mainstream views, which link the lines to ritualistic or astronomical purposes, and has sparked debate about the technological capabilities of ancient cultures.
Inventions
McCanney patented the JMCC WING® Generator, a wind-energy system for producing green hydrogen, water, and electricity. He holds patents for scalable wind energy systems and an electronic memory key. He also introduced carbon fiber archery bows and Middle Ages-inspired archery equipment. Through JMCC Water Filters (2005–2017), he developed advanced water purification systems.
Awards
McCanney was named Scientist of the Year by Marquis Who’s Who, inducted into their Biographical Registry, and was a finalist in the Water Abundance XPRIZE.
Projects and Outreach
McCanney founded JMCC Water Filters and four Wyoming LLCs to advance his wind energy, hydrogen, and electric generation technologies. He created educational materials, including CDs, DVDs, and lectures, to inspire scientific thinking. He manages websites like jmccwing.com and authored 14 books, including Calculate Primes (2007). For 24 years, he hosted "The James McCanney Science Hour" radio show and now hosts the TV show "Master of Science." He taught at Cornell, spoke at major conferences, and appeared on international media.
James McCanney’s diverse contributions, from telecommunications to his intriguing archaeological theories about the Nazca Lines, continue to inspire innovation and curiosity across fields.
 
This SOTT Focus, published 14 years ago, summarizes McCanney's arguments.


The references Pierre used in his book "Earth Changes and the Human-Cosmic Connection" are clearer.:

brave_screenshot.png
brave_screenshot2.png
Some quote from the Cs:


Q: (L) Well, I wanted to ask some questions about Earth Changes. I’ve got this book here “Planet X, Comets and Earth Changes by James McCanney. He’s on about what he calls the “Plasma Discharge Comet Theory” which is that comets are basically asteroid type bodies that enter the Solar system, the Solar System being a capacitor, and when they enter the solar system, they discharge the capacitor and that’s what causes the comet effects: the glow, the illumination, the tail and so on. He says that basically comets are just planets in formation, that there are really big ones that have accumulated a lot of mass or have a lot of mass. You know, they go through the Solar System and keep attracting more and more stuff, and more and more stuff and eventually precipitate into orbit and become planets. He basically said that that’s how the planets of the Solar System got here with the exception of Jupiter and Saturn. They kind of formed at the same time as the sun. All the other planets were acquired. Is he on to something with this? Is this anywhere near accurate?

A: He is on the right the track; but there are other phenomena that are not explained in his model.

Q: And what other phenomena might that be?

A: Clube is correct to some extent about the breakup of a giant comet. One theory does not exclude the other.

Q: (L) Ok, now I’ve got this other book here “Lost Star of Myth and Time” – and his theory is about a companion star and the fact that the earth or the solar system is rotating around a common center of gravity, in tandem with this companion star. It is said that it is this orbit that creates the precession of the zodiac. He says that the precession is not a big wobble that the earth goes through, as it proceeds in a fairly direct course through the galaxy, but rather that it is this rotation around this common center of gravity with the companion star that produces the effect of precession. Now, is he on to something with his theory also about the precession of the zodiac?

A: Absolutely!

Q: (L) OK, He points out some interesting effects in here. First of all, he mentioned recording the speed of the Earth’s rotation. They had a fixed telescope with crosshairs and they had a clock that was connected to some kind of super time clock that was extreme accurate, and they were recording exactly how long it took the Earth to rotate in respect of Sirius, Sirius being a fixed point. These researchers discovered that during the period of time, when Sirius B (Sirius’s companion, which is a dwarf), eclipsed Sirius A; it actually slowed the rotation of the Earth. Now, this is what their measurements showed. Something like 50 arc seconds. The slowing began a week before the eclipse, then after the eclipse the Earth actually sped up. By 50 arc seconds. So, there are two weeks of effects on the rotation of the Earth, caused by the eclipsing of Sirius A caused by its companion Sirius B as I remember, though I may have missed the exact time period. Now, the conclusion that he drew from this is that we are affected by being gravitationally connected to Sirius somehow. Anyhow, the conclusion that he draws is…- and he also points out that it seems that Sirius is heading in our direction; we are getting closer to Sirius - so, he theorizes that Sirius is our companion star. Is he correct about that?

A: Not Sol’s companion; but look in that direction for clues to your own little brother.

Q: (L) Is it true as he speculates that when the Solar System approaches this companion of ours, that it will have a psychic effect?

A: Yes. You are already feeling its approach.

Q: (L) Well, that’s one thing that this guy James Mccanney said. He said that this last solar cycle – the maximum - was so long, so intense that it was evidence that something really big, had entered the solar capacitor. It was discharging the sun. And, if that’s the case, there’s probably a current flow and that means that it’s possible that at some point the Earth and maybe the moon and several other astronomical bodies, will line up along the line of this flow that’s going on between the Sun and its companion. And if that’s the case, could that be a little problematical?

A: Oh indeed! Yes, it is happening already. Do you not see the evidence all around the globe?

Q: (L) Well, on that point, McCanney says that when the Earth gets into this kind of situation where there’s a discharge thing going on, between the sun and another body and the earth gets involved in it, that the earth itself becomes comet like during that time and it begins also to attract what he calls pollution events. It starts picking up all kinds of dust and stuff from outer space – and even the water volume on the planet gets increased because of this precipitating, because the planet’s picking stuff up from space. It’s growing from accumulating stuff, from acquiring stuff. And if that’s the case, we could be attracting dust loading in the upper atmosphere-regardless of whether or not we pass through cometary dust clouds. All these things that we’ve been noticing going on in the upper atmosphere – strange clouds, long-lasting contrails, extreme cooling - could be exactly as he described. There could also be atmospheric effects of these electric sheets, because he says that there are different kinds of ways of currents and layers of currents. He’s got like a five layer model of how the electromagnetic field of the planet goes, and he says that it’s the cause of El Niño, it’s the cause of Earthquakes, volcanoes , storms, changing of the Jet Stream, and just a whole host of things: it’s all electrical phenomena. He says that the electricity from the sun creates and drives hurricanes and that it is not the temperature of the water. Because he said that if it had to do with the temperatures of the water, one hurricane comes along, sucks all the heat out – then it would be impossible for another hurricane to form for a period of time. And yet you see very often, hurricane after hurricane. So, is he on to something with this theory?

A: Oh you bet!

Q: (Ark) Is the axis of the Solar System Wobbling?

A: Not enough to make a difference. But the Galaxy is!

(Discussion about the Galaxy and Solar System)

Q: (Ark) That means that the companion star is in the ecliptic plane?

A: Yes. Part of the capacitor.

(L) I want to know why people thought that the sun came over the horizon two days earlier in Greenland than it has in years past?

A: Change in atmospheric density and temperature plus dust loading. But be aware that the planet's spin and orbit are being modified.

Q: (L) When you say, "being modified", modified by what?

A: Approach of companion.

Q: (L) Is that what is leading to all of the... it seems like there is a whole lot of electrical phenomenon. Ya know, they keep trying to blame it on the sun is doing this, the sun is doing that. But the thing is that the sun is not really that active considering that we are moving into a solar maximum. Compared to previous solar maximums?! They make a big deal about small clusters, small sunspots, as though it's some kind of crazy or unusual thing. They're really, relatively speaking, small and insignificant compared to past sun cycles. And I remember quite a few sun cycles. But something definitely seems to be making a current flow in the solar system. Is that what we're looking at here, this approach of the companion? Is that the cause?

A: Yes.

Q: (Ark) Why astronomers are not perceiving this changes of planetary orbits?

A: McCanney has a good explanation. Similar to the reasons for the "accidental" evolution meme in other branches of science.

Q: (L) And that reason is?

A: Necessity of control or the illusion of same. Slow and steady doncha know?!?

Q: (L) So in other words, the inability to open their minds to the electrical nature of the universe is tied in to the older cosmologies where everything was at least... (Ark) No, but I was asking why astronomers were not seeing these changes. And there was no answer to this question. (Burma Jones) I think the idea was that McCanney's explanation was that NASA hides it. (Ark) But it's not just NASA. There are probably thousands of observatories. Amateur astronomers. (L) That's not how you asked your question. You says why can't they... (Ark) No, I didn't say "can't". I said why astronomers are not seeing this changes. (L) Well, that's not the same as asking... (Burma Jones) Well, amateur astronomers must have seen this. (Ark) Somebody must have seen it, and there are thousands of amateurs. (L) Well, that's not the way I understood your question. I understood that you were asking why... (Ark) Okay, so let me ask a further question: Why thousands of astronomers, professionals and amateurs, are not seeing the planetary orbits changing?

A: These changes are miniscule but significant nonetheless. The instruments that are capable of measuring are tightly controlled.
 
(L) Well, on that point, McCanney says that when the Earth gets into this kind of situation where there’s a discharge thing going on, between the sun and another body and the earth gets involved in it, that the earth itself becomes comet like during that time and it begins also to attract what he calls pollution events. It starts picking up all kinds of dust and stuff from outer space – and even the water volume on the planet gets increased because of this precipitating, because the planet’s picking stuff up from space. It’s growing from accumulating stuff, from acquiring stuff. And if that’s the case, we could be attracting dust loading in the upper atmosphere-regardless of whether or not we pass through cometary dust clouds.

This could explain why all ancient cities are underground. Perhaps our planet grows quickly during those major cosmic events and buries the cities.
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom