Jeffrey Epstein arrested: Israeli-American pedo ring to be exposed?

[Joe]

Pam Bondi released a list of more than 300 politicians and public figures mentioned in the Epstein case

The list includes names such as Barack and Michelle Obama, Bill and Hillary Clinton, Donald Trump, Bill Gates, Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Kamala Harris, Nancy Pelosi, Prince Harry, Pope John Paul II, Robert De Niro, Woody Allen, Kim Kardashian, Bruce Springsteen, Bono, Jay-Z, Beyoncé, and many others.

Officials say the names appear in a “wide variety of contexts” — ranging from direct correspondence with Epstein or his associate Ghislaine Maxwell to mentions in documents that are not directly linked to criminal conduct.

All have been put on notice (in case any of them thought they were exempt). No doubt there's lots more who haven't been mentioned yet. It's like a version of McCarthyism: "Are you now, or have you ever been, a close friend of Jeffrey Epstein".

For reference, "McCarthyism is a political practice defined by the political repression and persecution of left-wing individuals and a campaign spreading fear of communist and Soviet influence on American institutions and of Soviet espionage in the United States during the late 1940s through the 1950s"

Let's adjust that: "Epsteinism is a political practice defined by the implied threat of exposure and prosecution of "elite" individuals and a campaign spreading fear of Israeli/Deep State influence on American political and cultural figures and institutions and of Israeli espionage in the United States during first decades of the 21st century".

 

[Cosmos]

I remember Ian Carroll recently pointing out a case in the now officially published Epstein files where he is of the opinion that a picture was quite obviously faked, likely with AI. And that you should be careful with the things that are presented there.

One wonders of course how much of what can now be found “in the files“ (that the public gets now) has at least been doctored or even faked?

 

[Beau]

That's understandable, but people are apparently too naive about how the system actually works and who controls it. It's NOT the WH. I'd say Trump has no power to release any real info or bring any elite pedos to justice, hence his insistence that it's a "Dem hoax' to distract from his awesome economic success.

If that's the case, then it is Trump/Vance who are also naive for making their promises.

 

[nortkee]

IMO, the whole thing is a psyop: reveal information that contains only hints and innuendo, nothing prosecutable, no justice. At the same time, put pressure on Trump and Co., by kind of implicating them (but no 'smoking gun'), and make his base mad at him for not "releasing the files". Generally, for those paying attention to it (which isn't many, percentage-wise), the message is, 'yes, there are extremely evil people ruling over you, and there's nothing you can do about it'.

This is definitely the sense that I get. All the cries of, "Why haven't there been arrests?!" are unfortunately easily answerable: the documents, at least the ones that have been released to the general public, contain absolutely nothing but circumstantial evidence that one must view through a conspiracy cipher (i.e. code words like "pizza" and "hot dogs") to extract meaning.

 

[Yas]

Summary: while it's possible that the worst interpretations of 'the Epstein Files' could be true, keep in mind that there's actually no hard evidence for those interpretations being true, so beware being 'stampeded' by a 'rush to revolutionary action'. If this is big enough to 'take down governments', then a likely government to fall would be Trump's, which would just so happen to make Never-Trumpers - who tried everything, including murder, to stop him from returning to office - very happy... And so, it would be unwise to rule out a 'hidden hand' at work to weaponize 'the Epstein Files' against Trump.

IMO, the whole thing is a psyop: reveal information that contains only hints and innuendo, nothing prosecutable, no justice. At the same time, put pressure on Trump and Co., by kind of implicating them (but no 'smoking gun'), and make his base mad at him for not "releasing the files". Generally, for those paying attention to it (which isn't many, percentage-wise), the message is, 'yes, there are extremely evil people ruling over you, and there's nothing you can do about it'.

I understand this take and I agree that it is important to see it in that way. But I also think that it could be a miscalculation in the sense that a lot of people are also not even bothered by Trump at all because what the files show, even if there aren't smoking guns, is much bigger than Trump.

Yes, there is a clear push towards traying to direct the anger towards Trump and his team, and Trump and his team aren't helping either with their responses. Also, yes, a lot of people are falling for that and letting themselves be lead in that direction. But still, I also see a lot of people who are seeing that whatever Trump has done isn't nearly as horrible as other things that are suggested in the files, and that ultimately, the important thing is that this is madness, and it is unacceptable. Yeah, we can't do anything about it other than take more care of our children where we can and keep exposing it, but who knows what the awareness of it can bring if we consider other means by which people affect the reality in which we live. Perhaps the awareness of it and the resistance to it (even if it is only inner resistance) by more people is something important. Perhaps we can see that battle happening in other realms, as reflection of the fact that there's inner resistance on Earth.

It may be completely unrelated, of course, but, for example, this here certainly looks like a battle of sorts:

https://twitter.com/x/status/2022385410698019163

I agree that being angry at Trump and his administration isn't the best option, but I think that being angry at all of this in general is a normal human reaction. We can't just see all this and say "meh, nothing to see here". One of the big challenges, perhaps, is to not allow that anger to be directed towards their agendas, which can be hard if we aren't aware of those agendas, so, again, I do think it is important to see that perspective too.

 

[palestine]

It may be completely unrelated, of course, but, for example, this here certainly looks like a battle of sorts:

The fear of global warming" becoming substituted with "Epstein"?!

Less "global warming", and more awareness on dark networks.

???

Is it the case? Is it ... good?

People are made to conflate who-does-it a little bit, but there has been a huge cold shower in terms of "what those celebrities do as a hobby".