Jeffrey Epstein arrested: Washington-NYC pedo ring to be exposed?

Die Geschichte geht zu glatt. Epstein hatte die Aufgabe, hochkarätige Menschen erpressbar zu machen. Er wurde von hohen Stellen beschützt und bezahlt. Es gibt Verbindungen nach Israel. Ist Epstein der Domino? Wenn er fällt, fällt einer nach dem anderen? Wer interessierte sich für sein Leben, wer interessierte sich für seinen Tod?
Trump kündigte zu Beginn seiner Amtseinführung an, dass er Maßnahmen gegen Menschenhandel und Kinderpädophilie ergreifen werde. Warum? Zu diesem Zeitpunkt gab es keinen konkreten Grund für diese Aussage? Wusste er, dass alles durch diesen Domino fallen wird? Ein Hinweis für die Psychopathen?
Trump braucht Zeit, um sein Team zu bilden. Epstein wiegt sich in Sicherheit, Psychopathen sehen nur, was sie sehen wollen. Sein Spiel geht weiter. Aber vielleicht nur mit heimlicher Beobachtung, um den Domino nicht aufzuwecken. Warum wurde Eppstein plötzlich wieder zum Thema? War der richtige zeitpunkt Es war klar, dass er die Haft höchstwahrscheinlich nicht überleben würde. War der Plan, ihn nach dem ersten Selbstmordversuch in Sicherheit zu bringen? Gab es überhaupt einen Selbstmordversuch? Es gibt keinerlei Beweis. Auf einer Trage befinden sich nur Bilder. Warum gab es diese seltsamen Bilder, die Fragen aufwerfen? Könnte man den Transport geheim gehalten haben? Wolltest du mit den Bildern etwas beweisen?
Die Bilder beweisen nichts. Es gibt Möglichkeiten, jemanden in diesen Zustand zu versetzen, ohne tot zu sein. Sein Bruder hat ihn identifiziert. Das sagt nichts. Wurde er gezwungen? Ist er im Sumpf stecken geblieben? Ist das der Bruder, der Epstein beim Hausarrest belassen wollte?
Wen interessiert es, dass Epstein tot ist? Die betroffenen. Wer interessiert sich für das Leben? Trump und die Aufklärung. Er wird nicht in die Öffentlichkeit zurückkehren, aber vielleicht wird er in Guantanamo wie eine Zitrone gepresst.
Vielleicht steckt Netanjahu dahinter, der Barak zum Messer liefern will. Aber das wird ein Knieschuss sein, da viele Dominosteine mit dem Blut Israels beschmutzt sind.
Meine Gedanken....
 

Voyageur

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Die Geschichte geht zu glatt. Epstein hatte die Aufgabe, hochkarätige Menschen erpressbar zu machen. Er wurde von hohen Stellen beschützt und bezahlt. Es gibt Verbindungen nach Israel. Ist Epstein der Domino? Wenn er fällt, fällt einer nach dem anderen? Wer interessierte sich für sein Leben, wer interessierte sich für seinen Tod?
Trump kündigte zu Beginn seiner Amtseinführung an, dass er Maßnahmen gegen Menschenhandel und Kinderpädophilie ergreifen werde. Warum? Zu diesem Zeitpunkt gab es keinen konkreten Grund für diese Aussage? Wusste er, dass alles durch diesen Domino fallen wird? Ein Hinweis für die Psychopathen?
Trump braucht Zeit, um sein Team zu bilden. Epstein wiegt sich in Sicherheit, Psychopathen sehen nur, was sie sehen wollen. Sein Spiel geht weiter. Aber vielleicht nur mit heimlicher Beobachtung, um den Domino nicht aufzuwecken. Warum wurde Eppstein plötzlich wieder zum Thema? War der richtige zeitpunkt Es war klar, dass er die Haft höchstwahrscheinlich nicht überleben würde. War der Plan, ihn nach dem ersten Selbstmordversuch in Sicherheit zu bringen? Gab es überhaupt einen Selbstmordversuch? Es gibt keinerlei Beweis. Auf einer Trage befinden sich nur Bilder. Warum gab es diese seltsamen Bilder, die Fragen aufwerfen? Könnte man den Transport geheim gehalten haben? Wolltest du mit den Bildern etwas beweisen?
Die Bilder beweisen nichts. Es gibt Möglichkeiten, jemanden in diesen Zustand zu versetzen, ohne tot zu sein. Sein Bruder hat ihn identifiziert. Das sagt nichts. Wurde er gezwungen? Ist er im Sumpf stecken geblieben? Ist das der Bruder, der Epstein beim Hausarrest belassen wollte?
Wen interessiert es, dass Epstein tot ist? Die betroffenen. Wer interessiert sich für das Leben? Trump und die Aufklärung. Er wird nicht in die Öffentlichkeit zurückkehren, aber vielleicht wird er in Guantanamo wie eine Zitrone gepresst.
Vielleicht steckt Netanjahu dahinter, der Barak zum Messer liefern will. Aber das wird ein Knieschuss sein, da viele Dominosteine mit dem Blut Israels beschmutzt sind.
Meine Gedanken....
Here it is translated (if it is near correct) - if you can do this in the future for the readers here, that would be great.

Hier wird es übersetzt (wenn es fast korrekt ist) - wenn Sie dies in Zukunft für die Leser hier tun können, wäre das großartig.

The story goes too smoothly. Epstein had the task of making high-profile people blackmailable. He was protected by high places and paid. There are connections to Israel. Is Epstein the Domino? If he falls, one after the other? Who was interested in his life, who was interested in his death?
Trump announced at the beginning of his inauguration that he would take action against trafficking and pedophilia. Why? At this time, there was no concrete reason for this statement? Did he know that everything will fall through this domino? A hint for the psychopaths?
Trump needs time to form his team. Epstein is safe, psychopaths only see what they want to see. His game continues. But maybe only with secret observation so as not to wake up the Domino. Why did Eppstein suddenly become the topic again? The right time It was clear that he would most likely not survive the arrest. Was the plan to get him to safety after the first suicide attempt? Was there even a suicide attempt? There is no proof. On a stretcher there are only pictures. Why were there these strange pictures that raise questions? Could one have kept the transport a secret? Did you want to prove something with the pictures?
The pictures prove nothing. There are ways to put someone in this condition without being dead. His brother has identified him. That says nothing. Was he forced? Did he get stuck in the swamp? Is this the brother who wanted to leave Epstein under house arrest?
Who cares that Epstein is dead? The affected. Who cares about life? Trump and the Enlightenment. He will not return to the public, but maybe he will be squeezed like a lemon in Guantanamo.
Perhaps Netanyahu is behind it, who wants to deliver Barak to the knife. But this will be a knee shot, as many dominoes are soiled with the blood of Israel.
My thoughts....
 
Auf der "Pädo-Insel" wurden Beweise entfernt

Drohnenaufnahmen von Jeffrey Epsteins Insel zeigen, dass viele computergesteuerte Knochen aus seiner Villa entfernt wurden, bevor das FBI am Montag dort ankam.

Ein anonymer Schöpfer namens Rusty Shackleford hat über einen Monat lang Videos mit einer Drohne von Epsteins Besitz auf Little St. James angesehen.

Ein Video vom 15. Juli zeigt rechts einen Apple-Computer, ein Fernglas und eine Schachtel Taschentücher. Es sieht so aus, als gäbe es ein weißes Kabel, das möglicherweise an eine externe Festplatte am selben Schreibtisch angeschlossen ist. Was wie ein Drucker aussieht, ist ganz rechts zu sehen. Es gibt auch etwas, das aussieht wie ein Tablet, das auf der linken Seite aufgeladen wird.
31268

Das Video vom 3. August zeigt aber, dass alle Geräte weg sind:

31269


 
[QUOTE = "Voyageur, Beitrag: 813612, Mitglied: 3900"]
Hier wird es übersetzt (wenn es fast korrekt ist) - wenn Sie dies in Zukunft für die Leser hier tun können, wäre das großartig.

Hier wird es übersetzt (wenn es schnell korrekt ist) - wenn Sie dies in Zukunft für den Leser tun können, wäre das großartig.
[/ ZITAT]

Wo und wie wird es richtig übersetzt? Danke für Ihre Hilfe
 

Voyageur

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Jon Rappoport provides his third short piece.

Note that Jon is speaking of Vicky Ward, and there was a video by Polly somewhere back in this thread that looked into connections (as Polly was trying to convey Ward doing some misdirecting with some of the players, such as Ghislaine Maxwell):

Jeffrey Epstein Out in the Open
Aug13 by Jon Rappoport


by Jon Rappoport
August 13, 2019


NOTE: This article concerns the reporting of Vicky Ward. I’m not automatically assuming her key point is factual, especially since it relies on an unnamed source, who is telling her about a private meeting which the source apparently did not attend. If, however, we assume the key point is accurate…

In my previous piece on Epstein, I cited two articles outside the mainstream, which make a case for Epstein acting as an agent for intelligence services—Mossad/CIA. Obviously, his work would have involved gathering blackmail evidence on powerful men, who had sex with his underage girls. The value of this evidence, to Epstein’s handlers, would be enormous as a means of controlling those men…
I realize many people aren’t satisfied unless they see something in print from a more mainstream source. So let’s try the Daily Beast (7/9/19) and writer Vicky Ward, who has had an extensive career as a reporter and editor (Vanity Fair, NY Post, HuffPost, etc.)
In her Daily Beast article, “Jeffrey Epstein’s Sick Story Played Out for Years in Plain Sight,” Ward attempts to shed light on a moment in time when a strange twist occurred in the Epstein saga. It involved Alexander Acosta.

Alexander Acosta served as Trump’s Labor Secretary from April 28, 2017, to July 19, 2019, when he resigned. In his former job, as US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, Acosta made the shocking 2007-2008 sweetheart plea deal with Epstein, canceling any effort to convict him for sex trafficking of minors, and reducing the charge to solicitation of a 14-year-old girl. Epstein pled guilty and received a mild slap on the wrist.

Vicky Ward writes: “Epstein’s name, I was told, had been raised by the Trump transition team when Alexander Acosta, the former U.S. attorney in Miami who’d infamously cut Epstein a non-prosecution plea deal back in 2007, was being interviewed for the job of labor secretary…”

“’Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?’ Acosta had been asked. Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had ‘been told’ to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. ‘I was told Epstein “belonged to intelligence” and to leave it alone,’ he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta. (The Labor Department had no comment when asked about this.)”

If all this is true, the word came down the line: Epstein had protection coming from intelligence agency players; and he, Acosta, dutifully knuckled under and made the phony plea deal with Epstein. In a blockbuster federal case for widespread sex trafficking. A case that was receiving wall to wall press coverage. But none of that mattered to Acosta, the hell with blowback, contrasted against the intelligence agency clout shielding Jeffrey Epstein.

If Vicky Ward’s source on this is correct, it’s quite possible it wasn’t just Acosta who was cowed and played ball with the higher power. The Trump transition team, who blithely accepted Acosta’s astonishing comment, also could have been following the same marching orders. The Trump team purposely chose Acosta for his new shiny job, as Labor Secretary, because they were told to reward him for his “outstanding work” in the Epstein case.

The transition team could have easily made a list of 20 people who could fill the role of Labor Secretary. But they picked out the man who gave astounding cover to Epstein.
Jon makes a point re "could have..." in regards to Acosta's now past position. Acosta took some heat at the time - deflected to powerful people in intelligence warning him off, so will have to see how things come together or don't.

On the other hand, perhaps there was some purpose to have appointed Acosta, knowing if things went south, as they were bound to do, he would have to say what he said regarding 'intelligence' - and the connection is thus made.
 

SummerLite

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
A quirky coincidence. I looked at footage of Epstein's island today and there was that mysterious, rectangular enclosure so prominently shown. Here is the video and the enclosure at 5:35. The audio is a bit annoying. Nothing more has come up about this oddity. It was discussed here on page 5.


31270

I commented that the picture on the right reminded me of an esoteric concept called "Squaring the Circle" which sent me on a search for the meaning. It had been suggested this may be a ritual site. This is what I found. I was dubious about the Da Vinci contribution, however it is the quirky coincidence I'll mention later. The interior has been bull dozed over.

The Sodomite Gateway - Squaring the Circle Part 8 - The Sodomite Gateway - Squaring the Circle

The dark mystery of the alchemical expression "squaring the circle" is brought into the light of day when you identify sodomy as the key. There is no geometric or mathematical solution to it, which has already been proven. It's a metaphor. I'm not going to be delving very deeply into the vast esoteric network of nodes this touches on, but you can certainly investigate further as the Lord leads.

Those who are led astray down the dimly lit left hand path seek union with Lucifer, ultimately. This will soon enough be manifested in the mark of the Beast, but now and for a very long time the manner of joining has been cloaked in secrecy. Whenever decent folk discover what's done in secret, the gig is up. The practice of Satanic ritual abuse including murder, cannibalism, torture and sodomy is not acceptable in most cultures, and those who practice such must do so in secrecy. Why this is done, given the obvious risk involved with the potential of discovery, is because this is most simply “who they are” and “what they do.” It's the nature of the beast, the tares, the hybrid angel-human Serpent-Adam kind. This is a means of ascending into a state of communion with the demon gods and acquiring the power and enlightenment they crave, attaining gnosis and illumination. The dynamic is quite real, yet this activity will be found to be a costly trade for those who make the deal, when payment becomes due and is payable in the lake of fire.


Like I mentioned earlier about Dr. John Dee and the work of Monas Hieroglyphica concealing and revealing the sodomizer's secret, those initiated into the Luciferian bond will not tell you these things openly, but I will. Some of us need to know.

If you've been following this series you may already have been led to perceive this metaphor. The form of the rounded arch set upon columns meeting a flat base, the circle with one or more right angle corners, the circle with one or more flat sides, signaling instances of the lower-case letter "n" or capital “G”; these are examples of the occult signaling of “squaring the circle.”

They represent anal sex, sodomy, the metaphysical or spiritual means of opening the third eye that is in reality a ritual demonic invocation. Squaring the circle is the sodomic gateway ritual.

This set of images collected from recent posts includes the alchemical glyph for comparison. Combined forms of squares and circles signal the squaring of the circle, the ritual sodomy that opens the third eye.

Leonardo da Vinci appears to have been initiated into the secret rite, as the historical record suggests. He knew things. He encoded the sodomite gateway into his famous rendering of the Vitruvian Man (c. 1485).

If you see this as two images of one man, you're not perceiving what he's careful to not tell you. This pictures two men, one man behind the other in position to align the anatomy involved in the squaring of the circle. Each man is engaging both the square and circle. The man whose legs are spread would be the man actually in front of the one with his legs together. Clever, isn't it? The line marking the half-height or vertical center of the square intersects and sets a focus upon the base of the penis and the anus.

You may consider the bisecting line to be a dividing also of the above and below, calling out the Hermetic signal. This equates to the symbol of Mercury or Hermes in the Monas Hieroglyphica. You may consider the phallus pictured as the male bindu, an “anatomically correct” dot-in-circle symbol of the phallus and sun and sun god Horus.Again, like the Monas Hieroglyphica. Horus and Hermes. da Vinci didn't name the sodomizers but it may be said that their identity was confirmed when Dee brought forth the Monas about 77 years later.


A contemporary artist of the Renaissance named Michelangelo was only about 12 years old when da Vinci artfully concealed knowledge of the sodomite gateway into his drawing of the squaring of the circle known as the Vitruvian Man. Michelangelo would later artfully conceal his knowledge of another act that took place in the Garden of Eden into his craft on the ceiling of the Vatican's Sistine Chapel.

The square circle is as the Baphomet and Hermaphrodite identities, picturing the merging of the genders and the merging of angel and Adam-kind, but, most particularly, this geometrical composite is signaling the sodomite gateway, the enlightenment that is of that dark light of Lucifer. It is the illuminist secret.
Quote
So this evening I was looking at The Vigilant Citizen and came upon the 2019 cover of The Economist which is the 33rd issue!! Disclaimer: I'm not claiming the earth works on the island is this, I don't know of course, but the article and interpretation is interesting...good I think. Full article and picture: The Meaning of the Cryptic Messages on The Economist’s “The World in 2019” Cover

31271
A few quotes:
The main theme of this cover is Leonardo da Vinci because 2019 will mark the 500th anniversary of his death. As such, the art style is made to look like a da Vinci manuscript.

The first detail that one might notice is the mirror writing. Why is everything written backward? Well, da Vinci often wrote in mirror writing and the reason he did that remains a mystery. Some claim that he did not want to smudge ink while he was writing; others believe that he did not want other people to steal his ideas. Those who have researched Vinci’s occult leanings believe that his backward writing might have something to do with him attempting to conceal esoteric knowledge. In his day, those who accused da Vinci of being a heretic even called his mirror script “writings of the devil”. In occult circles, mirror writing is often associated with Satanism and black magic, based on the reversal of symbols.

The Vitruvian Man
At the center of the cover is the Vitruvian Man, da Vinci’s famous sketch depicting a man stretched out inside a circle and a square. It is said to be a representation of “the perfect man”. Da Vinci’s sketch was based on the works of Vitruvius, a Roman architect who was considered to be the “First Grand Master” of Freemasonry. Appropriately enough, the Vitruvian Man visually depicts the ultimate goal of Freemasonry: Squaring the circle.

The stork flying
above the mans head. There’s a barcode on the bag carrying a baby.
This might be a reference to “designer babies”, a controversial practice that should gain momentum in 2019.
The second meaning of this image could be child trafficking. Barcodes are placed on products to track inventory and to complete transactions. Child trafficking is about treating human as products to be sold. It’s a pretty effective (and disturbing) way of symbolizing child trafficking.

31272


Ok! Thats my quirky coincidence.
 
Last edited:

1peacelover

Jedi Master
Another interesting story. A bit of a long read, however very eyeopening even to me.

Bill Clinton, Clinton Foundation, TRAFFICKING Jeffrey Epstein’s St. Thomas Network, Comms, And An Elite School

"So why is former U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder indicated on this diagram? Holder was involved with big investigations into a financial criminal ring that went all the way up through legislatures, telecommunications companies, and the governor himself in the U.S. Virgin Islands. This corruption scandal dragged on for years, and it is alleged that Holder himself had put the brakes on it. The full story and the players involved is documented below."

 
Corbett Report on Epstein's death, posted today. So far I've just skimmed it, he doesn't seem to come to hard conclusions but points to the suicided and evidence cover-up hypothesis. Analysis begins around 8min.

 

Mark7

Jedi Council Member
FOTCM Member
Interestingly, I just came across the following video below after I've tried to find what Tucker Carlson has to say about all of this yesterday evening out of curiosity. What I noticed yesterday to my surprise was that I couldn't find anything! So I went to FOX itself on youtube and searched all the latest videos and was even more surprised that I couldn't find any videos from Carlson in the last days. Which is unusual. So I got suspicious and kind of thought, was he suspended or something, because he wanted to say something at FOX that would be to much for them? But then I forgot about it and now I' coming across this video:


Could it be that Carlson was suspended and taken into another "vacation" because of what he said or wanted to say? The guy in the video seems to suggest that his latest comments about "white supremacy doesn't exist" were too much for FOX news and that's why. Or maybe because of what he wanted to say about the Epstein case? Tucker Carlson's last post on twitter was on 8. August as the guy above mentions in the video. It is this one:


All speculation at this point though...
Just waiting for the MSM to try to link this Epstein stuff to 'White Supremacist Terrorism".
 

SummerLite

The Living Force
FOTCM Member
Actually, it just looks like someone had in mind to create a formal garden with a fountain in the center.
:-D I didn't think of that! LOL! I hope thats the explanation which is not so sinister by any means. Good to get your take Laura. Hmm...if it was set up to be a garden, why plow the whole thing up, changing plans perhaps? And what about the tennis court photo? Was it a tennis court at one time or Google maps covering something up which they do for strategic places? I don't expect an answer to any of these questions but who knows, maybe something more will come up on it.
 

Pashalis

Ambassador
Ambassador
FOTCM Member
Today is August 13th - two days after the "reported" death of Epstein. In less then 48 hours, a guy by the name of Ryan already pegs the incident as "the killing of Epstein"? Speculation without hard evidence and proper verification ... is still speculation! Ryan may have connected some dots along the way and gathered supporting evidence but what data and resources were used to come to the final conclusion that Epstein "was killed"? And by whom?
Most people I would think who look at this case, including those that (justifiably) think that there is a good likelihood that this wasn't really a suicide, "peg the incident as the killing of Epstein" and not a "hoax". So I think getting conspiracy minded about Ryan and others who think that it is pretty likely that he was indeed killed and not "shipped off", might not be all that fruitful, if that is what you are hinting at above. It is also interesting to observe that engaging in this "hoax" stuff forces people, as logical consequence of embracing it uncritically, to get conspiracy minded about important information and people who uncover interesting stuff, because if you tend to believe it was a "hoax", anyone who approaches it from the killing angle is potentially "part of the conspiracy" and must be "suspicious". That's just one reason I'm rather reluctant to fuel and engage this type of reasoning. In pretty much all cases in recent history of "hoax" theories, the end result was that people were distracted and didn't follow up on much more plausible and incriminating material.

Speculation without hard evidence and proper verification ... is still speculation! Ryan may have connected some dots along the way and gathered supporting evidence but what data and resources were used to come to the final conclusion that Epstein "was killed"? And by whom?
Of course a lot of it is speculation. It is in the very nature of what happened that quite some things must be based on speculation at this point, although you can speculate in different ways and with different assumptions, data and probabilities as the foundation. A Sherlock homes type of investigation always includes speculation based on logic, common sense, the available information and plausibility. In this case, it is mostly common sense and plausibility in addition with the info we have about his very high level connections, that the idea of him being killed and silenced is (IMO much) more likely than a "hoax" theory, which creates other rather inconvenient and dangerous problems (for the official story and the perpetrators), as others have pointed out in the threat already. I see no reason to believe that they wouldn't just kill Epstein. In fact, I would be surprised if they wouldn't have done that and instead "shipped him off" or "replaced his body".


How is the story "specific" ... when the official story line leaves out little details like "what was used to hang himself with and how"?
What I mean with "pretty specific" is that they didn't just say "he killed himself" but made it specific by saying it was "hanging" which requires certain conditions and materials and evidence on the body.

"rather stupid distractions" ... Isn't it more beneficial, at this beginning stage of the Epstein investigation - to gather as much information and collaborating evidence, as possible, instead of quickly labeling something - as a stupid distraction?

Conspiracy theory's use to be considered "stupid distractions" until some of them turned out to contain factual information?
I must apologize, Ryan only said the "hoax" theories are most likely distractions and I'm the one who included "rather stupid" before it. That's just my opinion at this point though. By the way, "the evidence" I've seen so far for this hoax theory is not convincing at all to me, to put it mildly, and reminds me strongly of other "evidence" that was presented time and time again in recent years about "hoaxed killings" in mass shootings and so forth, that was pretty much always based on flimsy pictures and comparisons based on rather elaborate and simple-minded assumptions that are quite "out there".

Another question to ask in such a case is what plausibility any given theory has, and so far I see not really any plausible reason why they would engage in such a "hoax", while on the other hand, I see many plausible reasons for him being killed. So I'm inclined to approach it from this angle. Also, this hoax theory again proofs to be a good way to distract people from the main meat of the case and also in labeling all conspiracies as crazy. I agree with what Seppo Ilmarinen and Navigator have pointed out about it as well:


Yep, this 'body double theory' seems to be quite popular opinion and it reminds little bit those actors stories during mass shootings - and if this is someone's first intuition they express about what happened, most people will probably see them as some crazy conspiracy theorists.

I'm not saying it's totally out of realm of possibility but extraordinary claims would need extraordinary proof. In this case people are just comparing Epstein's dead features to when he was alive, and conclude it's not same person, in a similar way like with those "actors".

I mean, at this point Epstein is absolutely no use for the elites. He can't anymore continue doing what his job was - to arrange and record compromising information about other powerful people and share this with his handlers. Every day Epstein was alive meant only the possibility for his pedophile network to get more exposed. Why would they risk smuggling him out alive only to kill somewhere else?
Another is the risk factor involving having him alive, to hide him - even with plastic surgeries or gender reassignment procedures - would prove difficult compared to the option of having him killed. It seems simpler and plausible enough.
 
Top Bottom