Killary Clinton, The Donald, or Jill Stein: The US Election

[quote author= Pashalis]Jones simply can not be that stupid to not see where the terror really comes from: Alex is pure evil and wants to get more power as well, for his grandiose violent visions.[/quote]

He really gave himself away this time. If 'revolution' and all that ever unfolds. He will be made out as their leader for sure. (Controlled opposition)


[quote author= anitasweetie]The C's say that our computers will destroy us.[/quote]

Well, its how you look at it:

[quote author= November 19, 1994 ]Q: (T) What power did these crystals gather?
A: Sun.
Q: (T) Was it necessary for them to have power gathering stations on Mars and the Moon. Did this increase their power?
A: Not necessary but it is not necessary for you to have a million dollars either. Get the correlation? Atlanteans were power hungry the way your society is money hungry.
Q: (T) Was the accumulation of this power what brought about their downfall?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Did they lose control of this power?
A: It overpowered them the same way your computers will overpower you. [/quote]

Overpower here means. We are so obsessed with our new gizmo’s and gadgets that we fail to see the things that truly matter. I believe this was elaborated on in a recent session. But I have difficulty finding it.
 
Well, its how you look at it:



Quote from: November 19, 1994

Q: (T) What power did these crystals gather?
A: Sun.
Q: (T) Was it necessary for them to have power gathering stations on Mars and the Moon. Did this increase their power?
A: Not necessary but it is not necessary for you to have a million dollars either. Get the correlation? Atlanteans were power hungry the way your society is money hungry.
Q: (T) Was the accumulation of this power what brought about their downfall?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Did they lose control of this power?
A: It overpowered them the same way your computers will overpower you.

I was thinking that it had more to do with the power of information, ie, like people believing that the earth was "flat".
 
axj said:
diligence said:
That's a good point. The media has a tried-and-true method for quieting the opposition - including any 'alternative' candidate, any alternative issue, any inconvenient truth: Just don't cover it. If it happens to be mentioned or even gain some traction, dismiss it as if it were crazy to even contemplate, or that in any case it'll all blow over in a week or so, and continue to do so because people have short memories.

Well, the Trump coverage started with the usual ridicule in the media - everyone thought it is just a joke. Then the media moved on to a more aggressive tone as his numbers started to rise. I don't know if the media could have completely ignored his campaign from the beginning and whether this constant focus on Trump - although negative - has been a deliberate way of making him popular. Maybe they wanted to build him up as some sort of 'controlled opposition'.

Another reason for a lot of reporting about Trump is that the media need advertisement income and the Trump stories, coverage, debates and so on have been pretty popular.

I can see that. I recall it seemed to have started with Maddow saying a Trump win is possible, even likely, and we should all be scared. She is sincere enough about certain things, right or wrong (or irrelevant). From there others took it seriously.

anitasweetie said:
Well there is this article from VT:

_http://www.veteranstoday.com/2016/03/24/trump-aipac/


Supposedly the real speech before his advisor rewrote it.


Drumf to me is just as evil as the rest of them.

The C's say that our computers will destroy us, this article from VT might be one of the ways to accomplish this because an article like that makes it look like he is on the side of the "conspiracy theorists" or at least that he is a "truther".
IOW that he is on someone's side, not just his own, but it will probably just confuse a lot of people...
I thought I would mention that piece is satire. Barrett disagrees with what Trump says and wants to make the point that the reality is the opposite of Trump's point of view.



More thoughts that may or may not be worth much, and maybe mimicking what people say here to a point:
It could be the power-players have found confidence that whatever Trump may decide to bring up about Libya or Russia or any issue which he feels worth opposing the mainstream perspective on, he is about as capable of getting through to the average person as Jones or, after he lost his link with his neocortex, Sheen. And I think that's true, people who are Trump supporters, and conservative too, still hold the common beliefs about all those things, and hold "rightists" in higher regard then "leftists." Trump never really went too deep on any issue, I think, and he just keeps in line with popular opinion. His supposedly anti-intervention stuff didn't touch on us loving the dictators who give us oil and hating the dictators/elected presidents who keep out U.S. corporations.

They may think that his criticisms are as lasting and intrinsic to his ideology as Reagan's attacks against Bush and the establishment were intrinsic to his, which is to say are not really. And they may have a point given his clear lack of internal milieu (or a sphincter as some article put it), he would probably be easily influenced, in any relevant way.

Like everyone says he could be considered a convenient way to gauge popular opinion and gauge how easy it is for an alternative candidate to stir up more outright bigotry. whether he does it intentionally or not. But then they do this anyway, so Trump happens to be a useful tool.
 
I thought I would mention that piece is satire. Barrett disagrees with what Trump says and wants to make the point that the reality is the opposite of Trump's point of view.


Thank you, diligence for that information!

I'm glad to learn that it is satire, because it just didn't fit the profile.
 
bjorn said:
[quote author= anitasweetie]The C's say that our computers will destroy us.

Well, its how you look at it:

[quote author= November 19, 1994 ]Q: (T) What power did these crystals gather?
A: Sun.
Q: (T) Was it necessary for them to have power gathering stations on Mars and the Moon. Did this increase their power?
A: Not necessary but it is not necessary for you to have a million dollars either. Get the correlation? Atlanteans were power hungry the way your society is money hungry.
Q: (T) Was the accumulation of this power what brought about their downfall?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Did they lose control of this power?
A: It overpowered them the same way your computers will overpower you. [/quote]

Overpower here means. We are so obsessed with our new gizmo’s and gadgets that we fail to see the things that truly matter. I believe this was elaborated on in a recent session. But I have difficulty finding it.
[/quote]

Yes, I took it that way also. And yes, I'm pretty sure we referred to it recently.

It's just amazing how people's minds have been so corrupted and dumbed down.
 
Laura said:
bjorn said:
[quote author= anitasweetie]The C's say that our computers will destroy us.

Well, its how you look at it:

[quote author= November 19, 1994 ]Q: (T) What power did these crystals gather?
A: Sun.
Q: (T) Was it necessary for them to have power gathering stations on Mars and the Moon. Did this increase their power?
A: Not necessary but it is not necessary for you to have a million dollars either. Get the correlation? Atlanteans were power hungry the way your society is money hungry.
Q: (T) Was the accumulation of this power what brought about their downfall?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Did they lose control of this power?
A: It overpowered them the same way your computers will overpower you.

Overpower here means. We are so obsessed with our new gizmo’s and gadgets that we fail to see the things that truly matter. I believe this was elaborated on in a recent session. But I have difficulty finding it.
[/quote]

Yes, I took it that way also. And yes, I'm pretty sure we referred to it recently.

It's just amazing how people's minds have been so corrupted and dumbed down.
[/quote]
There is the psychological aspect (which can go both ways I think, depending on how technology is used), but biologically - when you consider things like blue light and non-native EMF and how it has essentially destroyed our circadian biology... it brings new meaning to the term "your computers will overpower you".
 
One of the things that I haven't been able to pin down, is if Trump entered the race for Presidency, of his own accord and selfish ego (without the blessings of the elite) or he was entered into the race (by the elite) to create a distraction away from Hillary's "You Got Mail" problem?

If he got elite backing from the beginning, maybe they misjudged his popularity? The different reports that hit the media about a possible assassination attempt, might have been a personal warning by the elites, for him to tone down his activities? Instead of being a mere distraction, he's gathering a large enough crowd and prospective votes, to make it into the White House?

Of concern, is the recent development of the protesting going in over-drive and cancelling the Chicago rally, due to security issues. It feels like the situation is being driven from the protesting stage to something much bigger. I think, the last thing we need right now, is riots in the streets, especially, if they don't really know "why" they are fighting each other? Trump has pushed a lot of buttons, in several directions (like closing the Mexican Border with a wall) as one example.

There's been recent reports that Soro's is behind the surge in protesting and the numbers involved? It seems, when ever he gets involved in something, problems multiply into disaster. Since these protests are connected to a candidate for presidency, if things got really out of hand, it might cancel the election, all together?

http://russia-insider.com/en/politics/guess-whos-funding-anti-trump-protests/ri13581

Now the Washington Times confirms the protests are not spontaneous, but are paid and organized by radical left NGO MoveOn.org, which has taken credit for causing Trump's March 11th rally in Chicago to be canceled due to security concerns over the strength of protests.

A protest outside Trump Tower in New York on March 23rd was organized by MoveOn.org and the "Occupy Movement." Participants were recruited using ads placed on Craigslist, and were paid $16 an hour for carrying out the protest.

MoveOn.org is funded by billionaire "liberal democracy" promoter George Soros.

[...] Soros isn't satisfied with just funding MoveOn.org. According to the New York Times he's now putting up $15 million to "mobilize Latinos and other immigrants" against Donald Trump.

In addition, via Soros Fund Management, he is providing big money for the campaign of moderate-left RINO (Republican in Name Only) candidate John Kasich, whose nomination is considered possible if Trump fails to achieve a majority of delegates and is forced into a brokered convention.
 
Keyhole said:
Laura said:
bjorn said:
[quote author= anitasweetie]The C's say that our computers will destroy us.

Well, its how you look at it:

[quote author= November 19, 1994 ]Q: (T) What power did these crystals gather?
A: Sun.
Q: (T) Was it necessary for them to have power gathering stations on Mars and the Moon. Did this increase their power?
A: Not necessary but it is not necessary for you to have a million dollars either. Get the correlation? Atlanteans were power hungry the way your society is money hungry.
Q: (T) Was the accumulation of this power what brought about their downfall?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Did they lose control of this power?
A: It overpowered them the same way your computers will overpower you.

Overpower here means. We are so obsessed with our new gizmo’s and gadgets that we fail to see the things that truly matter. I believe this was elaborated on in a recent session. But I have difficulty finding it.

Yes, I took it that way also. And yes, I'm pretty sure we referred to it recently.

It's just amazing how people's minds have been so corrupted and dumbed down.
[/quote]
There is the psychological aspect (which can go both ways I think, depending on how technology is used), but biologically - when you consider things like blue light and non-native EMF and how it has essentially destroyed our circadian biology... it brings new meaning to the term "your computers will overpower you".
[/quote]

If I would decode it... The C's said that Atlanteans have had crystals which collect the energy. We have banking system where the most money/energy is collected virtually and finances are managed through computer systems and internet.

As the majority operations are carried automatically, thanks to the systems created by people. If the computer programs will seize up, then it put civilisation into chaos.
 
[quote author= Angelburst29]Of concern, is the recent development of the protesting going in over-drive and cancelling the Chicago rally, due to security issues. It feels like the situation is being driven from the protesting stage to something much bigger. I think, the last thing we need right now, is riots in the streets, especially, if they don't really know "why" they are fighting each other? Trump has pushed a lot of buttons, in several directions (like closing the Mexican Border with a wall) as one example.[/quote]

Yes, very good points. Also the fact that Soros is funding all sides of society to set them up against each other is very telling. It seems every party is represented and corrupted. If revolution and all that ever unfolds. It would be easy for the MSM to pick out all the crazies that secretly behind the scenes work for the Elite.

If Alex Jones calls on to his followers to pick up arms and innocent people die. The Elite can finally 'justify' conspiracy thinking as a mental illness and lock those people up. The Elite not only need those tinfoil heads appear as loony. But also very dangerous. Alex Jones can give them that pretext. In order to not make past mistakes which caused the deadly 'civil war'
 
Ok, I wasn't expecting this. Maybe the Trumpster needs to start wearing a flak jacket in June?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xB88VntD3UQ
And... NOBODY can trust him! This is why some of us find him so amusing.

And to be completely 'fair', one for Hillary too, although there seems to be issues with accuracy (for astrologers, that is time of birth - it needs to be as accurate as possible).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoKmTbsbz0s

I'm aware that Robert Phoenix favors Trump, although I'm not exactly sure why and maybe he doesn't know either. I just find this kind of stuff fascinating.
 
I also thought it was good Oxajil. Theres the truth of it.

Ruth, the astrology chart on Trump was also good. I had a look at Trumps other residences besides his golden penthouse in Trump Towers. The estate in Seven Springs, NY is a home fit for British royalty. For me it said a lot for who Trump is and his elitist family background. Its a residence fit for a King.

-http://www.nydailynews.com/life-style/real-estate/donald-trump-vast-portfolio-private-homes-article-1.2305847

video of Seven Springs with Trumps son:

https://youtu.be/z6oZeEiyb_w

-
 

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom