Kinsey's Pedophiles: 'Sexual Revolution' was Launched by Pedophiles in Power

[seek10]

Thank you SOTT for digging the rabbit hole of pedophilia . As if all the rivers end in Ocean, Even pedophilia saga goes back to Nazi's.

_http://www.drjudithreisman.com/archives/2007/02/on_kinseys_germ_1.html

On Kinsey's German, Nazi Pedophile Aide; The New York Times Asks: "Alfred Kinsey: Liberator or Pervert?"

The following is excerpted from my upcoming book, Kinsey's Attic: The Shocking Story of How One Man's Sexual Pathology Changed the World. Further details on Kinsey's Gestapo/Nazi "sex researcher" are found in my book, Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences.

Hundreds of articles appeared in the USA in 2004 and 2005 critiquing Kinsey's two PBSTV specials and the Fox Searchlight "Kinsey" feature. In a daring,"one time" mainstream media exposure, on October 3, 2004, The New York Times published reporter Caleb Crain's article, "Alfred Kinsey: Liberator or Pervert?" Crain was the only reporter who revealed both Kinsey's on-going collaboration with serial rapist pedophile Rex King as well as Kinsey's Gestapo/Nazi "sex expert" and pedophile collaborator, Dr. Fritz von Balluseck. Crain wrote:

Kinsey wrote to King, coaxing him to send his detailed diaries of his sexual exploits, including those with children. Jones reports that on Nov. 24, 1944, for example, Kinsey wrote, "I rejoice at everything you send, for I am then assured that that much more of your material is saved for scientific publication."....[And Reisman] alleges that Kinsey continued to correspond with King until 1954, and she points out that Kinsey also corresponded with Fritz von Balluseck, a German pedophile and former Nazi who was tried for murder.1

Years ago, I wondered how anyone could molest so many children in the USA without alerting the parents, authorities--someone! Could some of Kinsey's child sex "data" have come from World War II Nazi experiments, where parents were powerless to protect their children and where the police played a role in the crimes?2 My madcap hunch turned out to be on target. Tipped off by a draft of Kinsey, Crimes & Consequences, the Yorkshire investigators tracked down at least one of Kinsey's pedophile collaborators, a former highly placed Gestapo officer.

For some time, long-time Nazi party member, Dr. Fritz von Balluseck, mailed his on-going child abuse crimes to Kinsey. Von Balluseck's diaries appear to date from 1936 to1956, revealing Balluseck's regular correspondence with Kinsey. In fact, Kinsey sent his sympatico Nazi aide books about child sexuality--books that would have supported and encouraged the serial child predator's incestuous and pedophile crimes.

In the mid 1950s Interpol contacted the Kinsey team for help in locating a child sex killer the team had interviewed. The Kinsey Institute protected their WWII Gestapo agent (as they have always protected all their pedophiles and pederasts). They refused to give his name to Interpol under cover of shielding a possible child murderer from investigation based on "scientific" ethics.

This defense was then and is now unconscionable, criminal and self-serving. Indeed, Kinsey and his fellow WWII draft-dodging team feared public exposure for aiding and abetting a WWII Gestapo agent in his ongoing, even murderous sexual violence against children. Naturally, all of Kinsey's biographers deliberately covered up Kinsey's intense relationship with and training of his Frankfurt Gestapo aide.

This brings us to Kinsey's strange travels just before his untimely death. Kinsey's co-author and one of his many sex partners, Wardell Pomeroy, wrote that in 1955 Kinsey decided to visit Europe. After visiting "the Scandanavian countries," England, France and Italy. After "[l]eaving Italy and Sicily, Kinsey ended his tour with stops in Portugal and Spain."3

One would expect Kinsey to take one of the direct flights from Italy across the Mediterranean to Spain. However, the English investigative team that produced "Kinsey's Paedophiles" found out that Kinsey made a "brief stop" in Frankfurt--not mentioned by any of his television or print biographers. Why the circuitous route from Italy to Germany in order to reach Spain? And if he was going to go vertically first to Germany, why did he bypass the much closer and operational Stuttgart and Munich airports to land in Frankfurt?4 The Stars and Stripes report Kinsey made a "brief stop at the Frankfurt airport on his way to Barcelona." Why Frankfurt? And, how "brief" was "brief?" Was Kinsey in Frankfurt for a few hours or a few days? 5
..

 

[seek10]

feeling sick of these connections. mind control, rockefeller , cia, nazi , pedophilia, Ewen Cameron

_http://www.illuminati-news.com/alfred-kinsey1.htm

Sex Experiments of Alfred Kinsey
by Jim Keith
(Posted here by Wes Penre, May 26, 2005)


Alfred KinseyAn effective foot soldier in the subjugation of the masses was the Rockefeller-funded Alfred C. Kinsey, the co-author of the highly influential Sexual Behavior In The Human Male, and other volumes. One technique of eugenics (selective breeding) and control is the destruction of traditional morality, and Kinsey may have accomplished more in that respect than any other man this century.

Kinsey studied at the Bussey Institution at Harvard in the 1920s (at the time a hotbed of eugenics research), then moved on to teach at Indiana University, where his work in cultural deconstruction would ultimately succeed in decimating American sexual mores, help to fragment the family, and would leave the population far more vulnerable to reproductive, cultural, familial, and mind programming.

Kinsey, always portrayed in the press as a wholesome "leave it to Beaver" style family man, was "one of the scholarly eugenicists of pre-World War II", according to biographer James Jones. Kinsey recommended that a portion of the "lower classes" be sterilized to foster a more robust gene pool.

Among his intimates was Dr. Ewen Cameron, the infamous CIA-funded mind control doctor.

Another of Kinsey's influences was Dr. Herrmann Muller, one of his colleagues at Indiana University. Muller, who had begun receiving Rockefeller funding from the National Research Council in 1925, received a Guggenheim grant in 1932 to pursue his work in the genetics department of the Rockefeller-funded Kaiser Wilhelm Brain Research Institute in Berlin.


Ewen Cameron and Ernst Rudin

Muller studied under Ernst Rudin, who was to become the head of the Nazi Racial Hygiene Society. One of the benefits of Rudin's policy for the extermination of hereditary undesirables in Germany was that it provided a continual harvesting of fresh brains for the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute.


Influenced by the Great Beast

Another of Kinsey's apparent influences was the occultist Aleister Crowley, "the Great Beast," known in Aleister Crowleythe press as "the wickedest man alive." Kinsey visited Crowley's Thelema Abbey shortly before his death in 1955. Although it has not been established that Kinsey used Crowley as a research source in his books, they shared many friends and acquaintances, such as occultist film maker Kenneth Anger, American Nazi George Sylvester Viereck, and French pedophile Rene Guyon.

Anger has said, "Kinsey was obsessed with obtaining the Great Beast's (Crowley's) day-to-day sex diaries... To obtain grant monies and maintain the support of the university, Kinsey needed the excuse of research to validate his twenty-four-hours-a-day obsession with sex. However, Prok's (Kinsey's nickname) battle cry of 'Do your best and let other people react as they will' seemed a variation on Crowley's 'Do what thou wilt' maxim.

(i.e. "Do what thou wilt is the whole of the law").


Increased illicit sexual conduct

Kinsey's most effective weapon for psychological warfare on the world was his Rockefeller-funded study of American sexuality, the most famous volume being his vaunted study of "normal" sexuality, Sexual Behavior In The Human Male, published in 1948. 200,000 copies of the book were sold within the first two months of its publication.

Kinsey was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and, according to Judith A. Reisman, PhD, the author Dr. Judith Reismanof Kinsey: Crimes And Consequences, "Kinsey's quantitative research, and his numbers, were a perfect fit for Rockefeller to utilize the mass media to 'shape public attitudes and conduct.' Attitudes were changed through mass communications, which caused a rejection of chastity, self control and moral public governance, as well as increased illicit sexual conduct. 'Social management' of this sort was nothing less for Rockefeller than changing America's way of life, by among other things altering what Kinsey would call 'breeding patterns' along an evolutionary or animalistic view of human sexual conduct."

The main problem with Kinsey's "quantitative research and his numbers" is that they were radically skewed in order to achieve his purposes.

Researchers into Kinsey's methods, which purportedly catalogue normal sexuality, have noted that he loaded the ranks of his test subjects with an inordinately high number of persons imprisoned for sex deviancy, prostitutes and child molesters, criminals estimated by one researcher as providing as high as one third of his overall subjects. Kinsey entered them into his database as normal examples of the population.

Kinsey's manipulation extended to his choice of staff. His assistants in his studies were selected from young students, both male and female, who were required prior to coming on board to provide their detailed sexual histories. Another requirement was that they be filmed in explicit sexual movies, ostensibly for research, that were shot in Kinsey's attic.

Kinsey's research included observation of child sexuality, the manual and oral stimulation of childrens' genitals, and the timing of child orgasms with stopwatches. Part of Kinsey's collection of sex films included films of children in sex acts and adult-with-child sex.

According to Reisman, "The Kinsey Report claims at least '317´ pre-adolescents' were sexually experimented upon by 'older adults,' and confirmation of at least 2,035 child experimental subjects were later admitted in 1980 by [assistants] Gebhard and Pomeroy as reported in Ethical Issues in Sex Therapy."

He said 95% violate sex laws

The information that was released in the Kinsey sex studies was damning in the extreme to traditional concepts of sexuality. Kinsey reported that 95 percent of American males had violated sex laws seriously enough to put them in jail, 85 percent had experienced premarital sex, 69 percent had used prostitutes, 45 percent were adulterers, as high as 37 percent had experienced orgasm in a homosexual act, and that 17 percent had had sex with an animal. In these post-Kinsey days this information is not that shocking, in fact it is almost believable, but in 1948 it fell upon the public like a bombshell.

According to reports of the time, the Kinsey Report "shocked" and "dumbfounded" the nation. The reason was simple: Americans knew that this information did not fit their own conceptions of sexual mores and behavior.

And they were right: Kinsey's statistics were wrong, and they remain wrong.

According to researchers Scott Lively and Kevin Abrams, "Recently, several studies have shown that America is not the hotbed of promiscuity and deviancy that Kinsey's study made it appear to be, even after forty-six years of influence by that study, which was loudly trumpeted as fact by the media and much academia." One recent study by the National Opinion Research Center at the University of Chicago showed that 83% of Americans had sex with one person or did not have sex in the preceding year, with half of those polled having had only one sex partner in the previous five years.

Any sex act is now acceptable.

This does not mean, however, that the American media does not continue to portray the country as one big swingers' club. With Kinsey, American mores have been almost completely warped, to the point where almost any sexual act is now acceptable. Wife swapping, easy divorce, swinging, the depiction of sex acts in the media, homosexuality, and sadomasochism are promoted as norms.

As with most actions of the social engineers, I believe that there are a number of reason for this. One is the creation of what has been called a "sensate" society, satiated with sex, drugs and TV (the modern form of "bread and circuses"), creating a numbed electorate who will never mount a challenge to their controllers. Another reason for this is the decoupling of sex from procreation, thus making the institution of sterilization and birth control policies, including abortion, more easily introduced to the masses.

An additional purpose is the destruction of the nuclear family, opening the door for greater social intervention and manipulation.

Although it is dangerous to point out in this era of Ellen-degenerated "sexual liberation," the forces that have sought to limit our real freedoms have historically been the first wave of assault for the destruction of traditional values regarding sex. This approach was exemplified by the Nazis, for whom, according to author Pearl Buck, "Love was old-fashioned, sex was modern. it was the Nazis who restored the 'right to love' in their propaganda."

Although social engineer Alfred C. Kinsey is long-dead, his legacy lives on - and the war against sexual sanity continues today.

 

[seek10]

Though author of the following article henry makow looks like anti gay ( feels like fanatic), he has some interesting points to make regarding the influence of sexual revolution by the so called ' father of sexology' Alfred kinsey.

so the modern sex lifes are programs created by this CIA asset Alfred kinsey. funded by rockefeller based on nazi experiments. It looks this Alfred kinsey also seems to be admirer of Alister Crowley.

Now add playboy to the mix. There are some articles that says playboy owner is a strange character that bribes ambitious models to live in his mansion to carry them round clubs and have sex with him after that. but it looks he doesn't do any thing except laying on the bed.

so, the entire thing sounds like a bizarre script. Create some nut cases, and promote it as a science and sex for health etc.

_http://www.savethemales.ca/000165.html

Playboy and the (Homo) Sexual Revolution

Sponsored by the Rockefeller Foundation, Kinsey's goal was "to supplant what he saw as a narrow procreational Judeo Christian era with a promiscuous "anything goes" bi/gay pedophile paradise." ( Reisman, Crafting Gay Children: An Inquiry, p.4 He cruised Times Square looking for subjects. More than 25% of his sample were prostitutes and prison inmates including many sex offenders. Kinsey, who died prematurely of disease associated with impotence and self-mutilation (orchitis, Reisman p. 278), said 10 per cent of American men were gay when in fact only two per cent were.

Hugh Hefner said the Kinsey Report "produced a tremendous sexual awakening, largely because of media attention..." This shows how the elite orchestrates social change using media hype. (See Reisman, Kinsey, p.307)

With messianic fervor, Playboy took its gospel of sexual freedom to the American male who in the 1950's-1960's still consecrated sex for marriage. Playboy's aim, the aim of all pornographers, was to hook men on the glossy fantasy. To do this, they had to prevent them from finding true satisfaction in marriage.

In Reisman's words, "Playboy was the first national magazine to exploit college men's fears of women and family commitment. Playboy offered itself as a reliable, comforting substitute for monogamous heterosexual love." (Judith Reisman, "Soft Porn Plays Hardball," p 47)

Thus sworn enemies, Playboy and radical feminists, found common ground in hatred of the nuclear family. As a result, society now suffers from epidemics of family breakdown, pornography, impotence, child sexual abuse, sadosexual violence, teen pregnancy, a cocktail of STD's and, of course, AIDS. The birthrate has plummeted by 50% since 1960 and is barely at replacement level.

With Hugh Hefner's help, Alfred Kinsey detached sex from love and procreation. He reduced it to another physical function like urinating. Homosexual activists champion anonymous sex: a majority of gays have 10s-100s of partners each year. In less extreme form, heterosexuals have adopted this model. Recently a social columnist enviously described straight friends whose relationships have ended: "they're out partying, having the time and the sex, it seems of their lives."

In conclusion, the "sexual revolution" was really a triumph of an elite program of arrested development. The elite agenda is to redefine healthy as deviant and vice-versa and they have succeeded. In 40 short years, almost all sexual constraints have dissolved and heterosexual society is reeling. The cultural and social breakdown will only get worse unless there is a counterrevolution.

Added: more to the post.

 

[beetlemaniac]

I just watched the video on sott about Alfred Kinsey and it's pretty terrifying, the extent his fraud has permeated American culture. As Judith Reisman so correctly pointed out, he's a perfect example of a sexual psychopath. Seems worse than Freud! The video also talks about the organisation called NAMBLA which is basically a club for pedophiles or "chickenhawks". At first I found it hard to believe how open these people are about their pathology, I guess it's thanks to Kinsey.

I was reading throught some reviews on Amazon of Judith Reisman's book "Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences" and I thought this quote was particularly telling:

One of the most telling results of the Kinseyan revolution is the increase in violent sexual crime. In the 1930s in New York, an average of 108 women were murdered per year, and 6% of these cases involved suspected rape; in 1995, 4654 were murdered, and 3333 of these were raped - an increase of 55 000%.

I am still kind of shocked after reading about this psycho. It seems that the PTB have really suppressed the truth about the so called "sexual revolution" that this creep has brought about.

Here's the video:

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/246199-So-called-Father-of-the-Sexual-Revolution-Alfred-Kinsey-Children-are-orgasmic-from-birth-and-benefit-from-sex-with-adults

 

[Voyageur]

[quote author=beetlemaniac]
I just watched the video on sott about Alfred Kinsey and it's pretty terrifying, the extent his fraud has permeated American culture. As Judith Reisman so correctly pointed out, he's a perfect example of a sexual psychopath. Seems worse than Freud! The video also talks about the organisation called NAMBLA which is basically a club for pedophiles or "chickenhawks". At first I found it hard to believe how open these people are about their pathology, I guess it's thanks to Kinsey.

I was reading throught some reviews on Amazon of Judith Reisman's book "Kinsey: Crimes and Consequences" and I thought this quote was particularly telling:

One of the most telling results of the Kinseyan revolution is the increase in violent sexual crime. In the 1930s in New York, an average of 108 women were murdered per year, and 6% of these cases involved suspected rape; in 1995, 4654 were murdered, and 3333 of these were raped - an increase of 55 000%.

I am still kind of shocked after reading about this psycho. It seems that the PTB have really suppressed the truth about the so called "sexual revolution" that this creep has brought about.

Here's the video:

http://www.sott.net/articles/show/246199-So-called-Father-of-the-Sexual-Revolution-Alfred-Kinsey-Children-are-orgasmic-from-birth-and-benefit-from-sex-with-adults
[/quote]

Have read much about these things featured on SoTT and in the many books offered and threads discussing these natures here on the forum. After watching this disturbing exposé, about the so called sexual/psychological authoritarian father and the very ponerizing societal effects, the pit of my stomach was turning in acid. As a crime against humanity, against the very essence of children everywhere, Kinsey rates at the top of the list - a truly despicable sick monster. What is equally disturbing (the ponerization) is that society ate up his studies and hung on to his every word without many vocal questions for years, and if there were some from learned colleagues, this attests to the power of the authoritarians almost locking control, especially with all those fancy foundations backing him, who also share in his complicity.

 

[SeekinTruth]

Yeah, in addition to the totally sick claims about "child sexuality" in the videos on SOTT (and the overt, sadistic abuse of babies and young children cited that amounts to torture), the other mind boggling thing is how Kinsey "stacked" his survey samples with an overwhelming amount of sex offenders and other prisoners. In any sane world, these "studies" would have immediately been called out for the illegitimate crap they were with an astonishing amount of the prison population included to skew "the normal sexuality / sexual practices" of Americans.