Krzysztof Jackowski - Polish Clairvoyant

[Karol123]

(I omitted the Polish political issues).

In some time, a great panic will come from Ukraine. In a short time, people will be afraid of something they will not see that will come from Ukraine. In some time, it will come in the air or they will tell us that it will come in the air. This will drive a lot of people to Poland from Ukraine, but also Poles from some parts of Poland will want to move. This will happen on purpose so that a large number of people will move from one place to another and if they do this, it will stay that way. On the basis of panic, they will move people and then these people will not be able or will not want to return to the places they left. Either there will be a nuclear reactor failure in Ukraine or it will be said that it may explode. In any case, it will cause panic and people will start moving. And in some areas, water will become valuable because it will not be suitable for drinking. And what will happen in Ukraine Russia will call sabotage. And Poland will be deliberately divided and that will be the first reason to divide Poland into three parts.

America is preparing a huge stock market crash. The crash will be huge. It would have already happened only Trump cannot cope with a certain group of people and one main person of finance in America. It will be a declaration of total financial and economic war in the world. One man is preventing Trump from doing so but it will happen.

 

[N1mTzo]

Either there will be a nuclear reactor failure in Ukraine or it will be said that it may explode. In any case, it will cause panic and people will start moving.

Today, the Turkish (!) newspaper Aydınlık wrote, citing secret documents from the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU), that a reactor failure occurred at the South Ukrainian Nuclear Power Plant (Mykolaiv region) "due to a violation of operating conditions." - Kiev'in nükleer örtbas skandalı... 4 günde 4 gizli belge: Avrupa misyonlarından Türkiye'ye Kiev'in istihbarat marifetleri – 3
This reactor failure was HIDDEN from the IAEA, and those who helped hide the information (SBU) were awarded medals.

P.S. The South-Ukrainian NPP uses WWER-1000 reactors, which are different from those in Chernobyl (they use RBMK-1000).

 

[PopHistorian]

Today, the Turkish (!) newspaper Aydınlık wrote

It doesn't mean the newspaper is incorrect, but Aydinlik has sort of a checkered history and extreme political bias, doesn't it? Originally a communist weekly paper, repeatedly closed down amid changes in Turkish political landscape, eventually a Workers Party publication, and recently banned for a month as punishment by a Turkish court allegedly for supporting terrorism. That could be unjust censorship or not. Don't know. Hard to sort out. No English translation of the article offered by the website.

 

[f1esk]

Putin will want to obtain consent for some strip of land and he will want to do it without any war.

This may be the Suwalki Gap.

The Suwałki Gap (Suwałki Corridor)​

The Suwałki Gap (also known as the Suwałki Corridor) is a narrow strip of land along the Poland-Lithuania border, connecting Belarus with Russia’s Kaliningrad Oblast exclave.

Geopolitical Significance​

1. Kaliningrad’s Land Link to Russia – It is the only land route between mainland Russia and Kaliningrad, running through Belarus.
2. NATO-Russia Flashpoint – Since Poland and Lithuania are NATO members, this corridor separates Belarus (a Russian ally) from Kaliningrad (a heavily militarized Russian exclave). Control over this area is critical for both NATO and Russia.
3. Vulnerability in Conflict – In a potential NATO-Russia confrontation, the Suwałki Gap could become a key battleground. If NATO blocked it, Kaliningrad would be isolated from Belarus and Russia, while a Russian takeover would threaten NATO’s Baltic states.

History & Current Situation​

• Named after the Polish town of Suwałki.
• After the USSR’s collapse and Lithuania/Poland joining NATO (1999, 2004), the corridor gained strategic importance.
• Since Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine, tensions have risen. NATO has reinforced defenses, while Russia has conducted military drills simulating a breakout from Kaliningrad.

Potential Risks​

• In a conflict, Russia might attempt to seize the corridor to secure land access to Kaliningrad.
• NATO views the area as a critical defensive line and has increased troop deployments (e.g., the US-led "Atlantic Resolve" missions).

The Suwałki Gap remains one of Europe’s most dangerous potential flashpoints, symbolizing the broader standoff between NATO and Russia.

 

[Karol123]

The recent prediction that Israel would attack ports in Yemen has come true.

The prediction from a few months ago that the Polish border with Germany would be closed has come true.

The prediction that a Polish politician would secretly talk to the opposition about the possibility of breaking up the current ruling coalition has come true.

Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Finland will start forming troops. The vision calls this a front bloc, ready but not fighting. European leaders do not want to send their troops to Ukraine, they do not want to fight. Poland is to initiate this defensive bloc.

There will be some incident on the Polish-Belarusian border.

Trump will create some kind of super NATO in addition to the general one that already exists. Only countries that are ready for sabotage, for actions that preempt a potential attack will join this NATO. These countries will include the United States, France, Great Britain and perhaps a few other countries. This super NATO will not only have a defensive but also an offensive character.

Poland will avoid a major flood in the coming days, apart from two local floods, because the Genoese low will break into three parts and this will weaken it. (Poland was to experience the flood of the century, predicted by many prophets).

This is not the end of Israel's attacks. Israel will attack the oil infrastructure of some of its neighbors, who knows, maybe in Yemen. And this will happen quickly.

Germany has been closing the border with Poland for over two years because German intelligence knows that a lot of refugees may come from Ukraine. German intelligence knows that a large number of people are planning to leave Ukraine.

 

[Karol123]

Two massive explosions will occur in the Middle East. Something strategic will be detonated by Israel. These will be two identical, powerful explosions. In addition, ships in the strait will be attacked, and an exchange of fire will occur. The window of opportunity before Israel attacks Iran again is fragile and short. Israel intends to finish off Iran and its current leader. A new war with Iran won't be a month away.

In Gdańsk, Poland, a maniac will attack, injuring or killing several to a dozen people.

In Germany, a massive brawl will break out at a concert, leaving many injured.

Before war returns to Iran, Israel will attack yet another country. Perhaps it will be Yemen, and it will be a multi-pronged attack.

Suddenly, from one day to the next, cash flow problems will arise, including withdrawing money. This problem will persist in some countries. There will be talk of a global capital liquidity crunch. Even if this situation were to calm down, we can be sure that we are very close to a serious crisis related to America, the dollar, and the euro. This will be a crash for Western countries. When this crash occurs, it will suddenly become clear that many, but not all, banks have no cash at all—as if that cash has evaporated.

 

[KJS]

When this crash occurs, it will suddenly become clear that many, but not all, banks have no cash at all—as if that cash has evaporated.

This kind of matches what remote viewers from the Future Forecasting Group saw when they tried to view XRP cryptocurrency performance. A market discontinuity - there's a halt in the XRP price chart as if no trading is being done at all.

As for Jackowski, he also said that if there are problems with cash that are dismissed as a kind of "programming error," we should be aware that something very bad is just around the corner.

So it looks like most of the things he has been saying for years—big economic crisis, a second war in the Middle East, and a large wave of migration from Ukraine and Israel—are converging now. Hopefully he's very wrong.

 

[Seato]

The next attack on Iran will be preceded by spectacular terrorist attacks in various places around the world. It will be suggested that it is Iran. There will be explosive charges in meters. This will be a wave of well-organized large terrorist attacks.

Now I do not know what specific meters he is seeing here. But over here in the UK for some time now there has been a strong campaign to roll out smart meters as much as possible. Apparently, the Government is aiming for 80% rollout across England, Wales and Scotland by the end of 2025.
They have regular ads on radio and tv promoting them promising saving of energy costs through using energy at optimal times. Though I only ever here them complained about in regular conversation.

On the surface this project is more related to monitoring and socially engineering the behavior of the population as well as impacting health via 5g. But it is troubling to think that some such systems may have been tampered with akin to the previous Israeli pager attacks. If this is indeed the case the potential for inflicting damage in the UK could be very high depending on how many devices might be compromised. Best to be aware of the possibility I suppose.

 

[Ina]

Now I do not know what specific meters he is seeing here. But over here in the UK for some time now there has been a strong campaign to roll out smart meters as much as possible. Apparently, the Government is aiming for 80% rollout across England, Wales and Scotland by the end of 2025.
They have regular ads on radio and tv promoting them promising saving of energy costs through using energy at optimal times. Though I only ever here them complained about in regular conversation.

On the surface this project is more related to monitoring and socially engineering the behavior of the population as well as impacting health via 5g. But it is troubling to think that some such systems may have been tampered with akin to the previous Israeli pager attacks. If this is indeed the case the potential for inflicting damage in the UK could be very high depending on how many devices might be compromised. Best to be aware of the possibility I suppose.

We have a smart meter system for electricity. The system has two units, one outside, that is contolled by Eskom (provider) which gives readings of the load in real time, can vary the supply (amperage) in real time according to general load, and obviously can cut the supply if account is in arrears. The inside unit is for the contract owner information regarding consumption and utility, and for loading prepaid electricity mainly in the case of prepaid contracts. It does have em communication with the main meter as neighbours on prepaid can plug in their indoors unit into our plug to load their electricity.

All in all, it works quite well, as for loadshedding up to stage 4 we get the amperage reduced so we can use lights and plugs and inverter based appliances, (for heavy consumers stove, geyser, kettle, hairdryer, corded powertools, lawnmower the mains trips), while people with normal meters during loadshedding up to stage 4 have their electricity cut.

True, I do not have direct knowledge or experience of the UK system however as my experience has been considerably positive, I cannot help thinking that there is a lot of urban myth that might need questioning?

 

[axj]

I cannot help thinking that there is a lot of urban myth that might need questioning?

Anything "smart" that is being pushed by governments increases not only their real-time surveillance capabilities, but also has the potential to cut you off directly if you do not comply with anything that they plan to introduce in the future.

For example, if they decide to put "CO2 consumption" limits, they can force people to comply more easily with smart meters. It could even get more extreme if public unrest increases, eg. you are found to be an "extremist" online and your electricity will be forcibly reduced, etc.

It may not be likely for something like this to happen, but the capability is there in their "tool box" with these smart meters and other "smart" stuff they are introducing.

 

[Karol123]

The plan is that first, a large percentage of people must go bankrupt. First, there will be a crash that will put the middle class and the upper class out of work. Politicians will tell these people that the world will return to pre-crisis levels in eight years, but that will be a lie because we will never return to the prosperity that once was. People will remember the prosperous times they lived in. The crash will begin with banks having problems withdrawing cash and maintaining liquidity. There is no specific date for this crash, as it has already been scheduled several times and has been postponed due to the global situation. When this difficulty in withdrawing cash from banks occurs, the crash will not happen immediately; it will take a week or several weeks. Although the crash will affect the entire world, it will mainly affect Western countries.

The closure of borders in Poland will be permanent.

Bulgaria will be safe.

Italy, Spain, Portugal, Switzerland, and Austria will be safe from the turmoil.

In 2050, cities will be privately owned, corporations will own cities. Large corporations will rule the world, not politicians. People will be subservient and fed artificial euphoria, artificial joy, artificial contentment. People will appear happy, but their happiness will be made to seem so. Most of us will be under cybernetic influence, whatever that means.

 

[Kmicic]

Hey everyone, recently a youtuber who is a friend of Mr. Jackowski, that is Mr. Ator Wozniak, recorded another video in the “one of them” series, which was already mentioned here on the forum. What's interesting is that here exceptionally One of Them praised Jackowski for his flawless reading of the “echoes of the future” but added that he lacks the context to understand this future. And I thought this might be a phenomenon of Mr. Jackowski. He may be unique in terms of reading this “echo” of what I would understand by the ‘data’ of the world with the fact that in order to read the right paths he would probably have to be a 4D STO being and yes he probably reads very well, but probably rarely “hits” the right reading point. When reading dead people his task is simpler because a) he reads a specific person b) he reads events related to a specific past event of his.

 

[Seato]

We have a smart meter system for electricity. The system has two units, one outside, that is contolled by Eskom (provider) which gives readings of the load in real time, can vary the supply (amperage) in real time according to general load, and obviously can cut the supply if account is in arrears. The inside unit is for the contract owner information regarding consumption and utility, and for loading prepaid electricity mainly in the case of prepaid contracts. It does have em communication with the main meter as neighbours on prepaid can plug in their indoors unit into our plug to load their electricity.

All in all, it works quite well, as for loadshedding up to stage 4 we get the amperage reduced so we can use lights and plugs and inverter based appliances, (for heavy consumers stove, geyser, kettle, hairdryer, corded powertools, lawnmower the mains trips), while people with normal meters during loadshedding up to stage 4 have their electricity cut.

True, I do not have direct knowledge or experience of the UK system however as my experience has been considerably positive, I cannot help thinking that there is a lot of urban myth that might need questioning?

I suspect our difference in experiences of smart meters may be related to the different states of the electrical grids and infrastructure within our respective countries.

Here in the UK blackouts are fairly rare, depending somewhat on location and in most instances only lasting hours at the most. Energy companies cannot cut off your supply easily. Regulations mean that typically the energy supply can only be cut off 28 days after failing to pay the bill. Even this is not easy for companies to carry out legally due to various consumer protections and they may need to resort to court measures. Because of this failure to pay is more likely to result in the company setting you up with some specialised debt collection scheme than actual loss of your energy access.

I can imagine in nations with less developed energy grids where energy is less abundant and thus necessitates greater control measures, that smart meters helping conserve energy use could genuinely prove much more beneficial to consumers than other meter technology.

Many people in the UK however, were lured into the smart meter program by the financial incentives or outright bullied by their supplier. Due to the aforementioned consumer protections still currently active their actual legal power to carry out any threats is heavily constrained; but they don’t tell you that. As the smart meter households have become the majority the financial incentives have diminished. This combined with rising energy costs due to the Ukraine conflict and reliance on green energy programs have left people wondering what was the point? Many being in almost the same position they started in or worse except now being pressured by the meters information to spend energy ‘wisely’.

In a similar way electric cars were promoted by financial incentives but now are shifting towards just banning sales of non-electric cars. Though resistance to the Government is far stronger on this issue with current plans are to officially implement the policies pushed to 2030-2035.

It is my personal observation that those who felt bullied into accepting smart meters are particularly resentful especially since many of these devices here are plagued with problems. Note that one of the points used to sell the meters was the ability for the supplier to easily know your usage and thus streamline payment processes. So, it can make people very angry when the device malfunctions in such a way that it not longer transmits the data to the supplier and they have to ask you to check it manually.

Combined with developing issues with the energy grid due to an increasing dependence on green energy it leads to the view by some UK commentators (The Lotus Eaters, YouTube channel being an example) that the UK when it comes to energy and other issues is going backwards rather than forwards. In that respect I find it interesting that it appears smart meters may provide the most benefit in a future where energy supplies are no longer reliable within the UK. I suppose that’s the plan.

I would just make one further comment on the possibility of these devices being compromised that I don’t mean to fear monger. Given the details on the factory behind the previous pager attack if any meter devices are indeed compromised it is probably only an extremely small percentage and probably traceable to a specific manufacturer and perhaps factory. But awareness protects.

One more thought on sabotage does come to mind with all this concern over cyberattacks that smart meters may perhaps be vulnerable to such methods.

 

[Ina]

I suspect our difference in experiences of smart meters may be related to the different states of the electrical grids and infrastructure within our respective countries.

Here in the UK blackouts are fairly rare, depending somewhat on location and in most instances only lasting hours at the most. Energy companies cannot cut off your supply easily. Regulations mean that typically the energy supply can only be cut off 28 days after failing to pay the bill. Even this is not easy for companies to carry out legally due to various consumer protections and they may need to resort to court measures. Because of this failure to pay is more likely to result in the company setting you up with some specialised debt collection scheme than actual loss of your energy access.

I can imagine in nations with less developed energy grids where energy is less abundant and thus necessitates greater control measures, that smart meters helping conserve energy use could genuinely prove much more beneficial to consumers than other meter technology.

Many people in the UK however, were lured into the smart meter program by the financial incentives or outright bullied by their supplier. Due to the aforementioned consumer protections still currently active their actual legal power to carry out any threats is heavily constrained; but they don’t tell you that. As the smart meter households have become the majority the financial incentives have diminished. This combined with rising energy costs due to the Ukraine conflict and reliance on green energy programs have left people wondering what was the point? Many being in almost the same position they started in or worse except now being pressured by the meters information to spend energy ‘wisely’.

In a similar way electric cars were promoted by financial incentives but now are shifting towards just banning sales of non-electric cars. Though resistance to the Government is far stronger on this issue with current plans are to officially implement the policies pushed to 2030-2035.

It is my personal observation that those who felt bullied into accepting smart meters are particularly resentful especially since many of these devices here are plagued with problems. Note that one of the points used to sell the meters was the ability for the supplier to easily know your usage and thus streamline payment processes. So, it can make people very angry when the device malfunctions in such a way that it not longer transmits the data to the supplier and they have to ask you to check it manually.

Combined with developing issues with the energy grid due to an increasing dependence on green energy it leads to the view by some UK commentators (The Lotus Eaters, YouTube channel being an example) that the UK when it comes to energy and other issues is going backwards rather than forwards. In that respect I find it interesting that it appears smart meters may provide the most benefit in a future where energy supplies are no longer reliable within the UK. I suppose that’s the plan.

I would just make one further comment on the possibility of these devices being compromised that I don’t mean to fear monger. Given the details on the factory behind the previous pager attack if any meter devices are indeed compromised it is probably only an extremely small percentage and probably traceable to a specific manufacturer and perhaps factory. But awareness protects.

One more thought on sabotage does come to mind with all this concern over cyberattacks that smart meters may perhaps be vulnerable to such methods.

If anyone is wondering why this discussion about smart meters is being pursued on a thread of Predictions and Prophecies, IMHO, anyone with a glimpse of awareness into a perceived coercive end result can use it as possible fait accompli and take constructive protective measures beforehand.

If I understand correctly, the generation and transmission aspects are separate, private or semi-private and heavily localized. Also the billing is done via the transmission. Here the situation is completely opposite. In our case, we are direct clients of the national producer (generation and transmission). Good or bad, it is infinitely more simple and more complicated in the same time. For instance if we want to put PV panels we need to get a small producer license. So, in the sun country, we are stuck in regulatory framework, proprietary for each municipality dictated by local govt. politics in conjunction with the big producers which are centrally (nationally) regulated. I believe UK is going on a national central green energy regulatory initiative path as well?

I have been looking for solar solutions for the past 20 years and I was beyond impressed in 2004 learning about solar rooftiles and smart meters in UK that allow electricity to be fed back into the grid. How viable is that currently? Is it easy, for a house, to install PVs and have a dual / hybrid system? That would imply the installation of an inverter that cleans (stabilizes) the frequency and runs the supply.

When in the Wild West of electricity we need to aim and shoot efficiently.

 

[Seato]

The UK government has been strongly pursuing a green agenda for some time now. Last year 2024 supposedly 40-50% of the UK’s energy needs were provided by renewables. The discrepancy in the figures appears to be connected to some counting nuclear energy contribution amongst renewables as others do not. Wind power makes up the main green contributor at around 29%; both sea and land based.

Solar panels are perhaps the most positively perceived of renewables providing direct benefits to the owner. Excess power can be sold back to the grid or exchanged with energy suppliers for credit that can be swapped for electricity again at more opportune times such as during winter. The site Greenmatch claims you can potentially get between £80-170 a year selling solar back to the UK grid.

Selling Solar Electricity Back to The Grid: July 2025 Guide

I see quite a few properties with solar panels as I go about though they are still fairly uncommon and far from a majority. The government has this year 2025 set up a scheme aiming for newly built homes to require solar panels by 2027. Many housing projects are underway driven by the population demands from mass migration. I will keep my eyes open on some of the newer housing estates, but my immediate recollection is that whilst solar panels are more likely to be seen on newer properties, they are still not the majority at least for those built in 2024 and earlier. More homes of course require more energy pushing up demand further.
Unfortunately, solar panels are dependent on sunlight and though climate change has been providing us with more intense summers recently, in general the UK is not known for being sunny at least when it comes to European countries. Only approximately 5% of the UK’s energy comes from solar power. Complaining about the weather is somewhat of a pastime in Britain.

Installation of PV systems upon the roof of property is relatively straightforward and domestic models do not normally require planning permission here. Level of benefits to the user is often dependent on roof size and what direction the house faces. I guess it’s to be expected that the PTB make it easiest to install PV panels where they are least useful and make them harder to install in parts of the world where they would be most useful.

Solar and wind is increasingly recognised as unreliable here, even war criminal Tony Blair recently admitted that the public was being asked to make "financial sacrifices and changes in lifestyle" that would have "minimal" effect on global emissions. Wind turbines are troublesome to repair or dispose of when they break down. Worse being that wind turbines are useless when the wind is too low or too high, requiring a goldilocks zone of wind.

This gets worse as the energy grids in the UK and across Europe are not even able to properly handle the energy from these renewable systems. The increasingly electrification of energy is bottlenecking grids so even a lot of the energy that is gathered via renewables cannot be utilized. In fact, in researching this further I heard that wind companies in the UK are financially compensated when there is either to much wind, not enough demand for energy or both.
To my surprise I found a BBC (normally very pro green agenda) article covering this issue. The UK energy grid originally designed for gas and coal struggles to handle renewables. The poor state of the grid combined with unreliability of renewables leads to ballooning energy costs.

The huge sums energy firms get to not provide power
It is 1am on 3 June. A near gale force wind is blasting into Scotland. Great weather for the Moray East and West offshore wind farms, you would have thought.

The two farms are 13 miles off the north-east coast of Scotland and include some of the biggest wind turbines in the UK, at 257m high. With winds like that they should be operating at maximum capacity, generating what the developer, Ocean Winds, claims is enough power to meet the electricity needs of well over a million homes.

Except they are not.

That's because if you thought that once an electricity generator - whether it be a wind farm or a gas-powered plant - was connected to the national grid it could seamlessly send its electricity wherever it was needed in the country, you'd be wrong.

The electricity grid was built to deliver power generated by coal and gas plants near the country's major cities and towns, and doesn't always have sufficient capacity in the wires that carry electricity around the country to get the new renewable electricity generated way out in the wild seas and rural areas.

And this has major consequences.

Ocean Winds was paid to turn down the output of its wind farms in the Moray Firth
The way the system currently works means a company like Ocean Winds gets what are effectively compensation payments if the system can't take the power its wind turbines are generating and it has to turn down its output.

It means Ocean winds was paid £72,000 not to generate power from its wind farms in the Moray Firth during a half-hour period on 3 June because the system was overloaded - one of a number of occasions output was restricted that day.

At the same time, 44 miles (70km) east of London, the Grain gas-fired power station on the Thames Estuary was paid £43,000 to provide more electricity.

Payments like that happen virtually every day. Seagreen, Scotland's largest wind farm, was paid £65 million last year to restrict its output 71% of the time, according to analysis by Octopus Energy.

Balancing the grid in this way has already cost the country more than £500 million this year alone, the company's analysis shows. The total could reach almost £8bn a year by 2030, warns the National Electricity System Operator (NESO), the body in charge of the electricity network.

It's pushing up all our energy bills and calling into question the government's promise that net zero would end up delivering cheaper electricity.

Now, the government is considering a radical solution: instead of one big, national electricity market, there'll be a number of smaller regional markets, with the government gambling that this could make the system more efficient and deliver cheaper bills.

But in reality, it's not guaranteed that anyone will get cheaper bills. And even if some people do, many others elsewhere in the country could end up paying more.

The proposals have sparked such bitter debate that one senior energy industry executive called it "the most vicious policy fight" he has ever known. He has, he says, "lost friends" over it.

Meanwhile, political opponents who claim net zero is an expensive dead end are only too ready to pounce.

It is reported that the Prime Minister has asked to review the details of what some newspapers are calling a "postcode pricing" plan. So is the government really ready to risk the most radical shake-up of the UK electricity market since privatization 35 years ago? And what will it really mean for our bills?