Krzysztof Jackowski - Polish Clairvoyant

[seiw83]

Drama is already played. Some arę An actors somę arę just an audience. Most importan is what you can learn and maybe you can play better than Last time. Fun to learn. Jackowski is good at reading people. It is not predicting future. He see what CS told already.

 

[trss]

A powerful earthquake will strike in Asia, perhaps in Mongolia. It will be one of the largest earthquakes in history.

Earthquake in Philippines 6.9 and Indonesia 6.0

 

[Puma]

Earthquake in Philippines 6.9 and Indonesia 6.0

The earthquake in the Philippines is hardly one of the largest in history.

 

[N1mTzo]

The earthquake in the Philippines is hardly one of the largest in history.

Nevertheless, there are already 70 dead in the Philippines - Землетрясение на Филиппинах не затронуло курортные зоны

For comparison, the recent powerful earthquake in Kamchatka, measuring 9.0 on the Richter scale (and hundreds of aftershocks measuring 5.0-6.0 on the Richter scale over two months), resulted in 0 deaths.

PS: Regarding the Philippines, back in January 2025, Russian astrologer Svetlana Dragan said that "the Philippines could cease to exist in March; the territory could be submerged." She was wrong about the timing, but this may not be the last major earthquake in the Philippines this year.

 

[Puma]

For comparison, the recent powerful earthquake in Kamchatka, measuring 9.0 on the Richter scale (and hundreds of aftershocks measuring 5.0-6.0 on the Richter scale over two months), resulted in 0 deaths.

You cannot compare Kamchatka with the Philippines. The Philippines has densely populated coastal areas and relatively vulnerable infrastructure. In contrast, the affected area in Kamchatka is remote or has a low population density, which reduces direct exposure. The Kamchatka earthquake was a megathrust earthquake, which usually has great destructive potential, but since it was offshore, part of the movement dissipated into the sea. In the Philippines, although of lesser magnitude, the earthquake was shallow near the inhabited area, causing strong shaking in vulnerable structures.

In any case, the 7.7 magnitude earthquake that struck Myanmar (Burma) on March 28, 2025, was more destructive, leaving at least 1,644 dead, and even Jackowski, who is more experienced in geopolitical matters, did not see it coming.​

 

[N1mTzo]

You cannot compare Kamchatka with the Philippines. The Philippines has densely populated coastal areas and relatively vulnerable infrastructure. In contrast, the affected area in Kamchatka is remote or has a low population density, which reduces direct exposure. The Kamchatka earthquake was a megathrust earthquake, which usually has great destructive potential, but since it was offshore, part of the movement dissipated into the sea.

Bro, the Kamchatka earthquake on July 30, 2025, occurred near the most populated area in the region, home to over 160,000 people (and that's just Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky; there are other cities nearby).

Spoiler

The only reason no one was injured is because the region is seismically active, and the Soviet Union initially built housing there that could withstand magnitude 9. And it held, there were no casualties.

I cited Kamchatka merely as an example of your remark that the Philippines, with its dozens of fatalities, wasn't a large enough earthquake, in your opinion. Many people died in the Philippines.
So what's a large earthquake? 100,000 fatalities or a 10 on the Richter scale? What are your criteria? Personal perception?
I see that in this thread, you constantly attack Krzysztof, trying to belittle him (either he's not accurate enough, or he's wrong, etc.). Why are you doing this? If you don't like Jackowski, you can just ignore this thread and not write anything.
I like this guy Krzysztof; even if he's wrong sometimes, he says things that could have happened in this reality (but happened in another reality). And I'm not criticizing, I'm just reading and listening. Sometimes it's just useful to read what he thinks, without questioning the accuracy of the forecast itself.