"Last Will. & Testament" (Shakespeare authorship debate documentary)

Mal7

Dagobah Resident
“Last Will. & Testament: The Truth Behind Shakespeare Could Rewrite History”. (2012). Directed by Lisa Wilson and Laura Wilson.

This is a documentary about the Shakespeare Authorship question, i.e. whether the man named William Shakspere from Stratford-on-Avon wrote the works of William Shakespeare.

I thought the first 35 minutes were an excellent introduction to this question. It quotes from some of the historical personages who have doubted that the Stratford man was the writer, such as Mark Twain, Charlie Chaplin, & Henry James. It also features current doubters of the “orthodox” version like actor Sir Derek Jacobi and researcher Diana Price.

After the first 35 minutes, the documentary began arguing for one particular alternative candidate, the Earl of Oxford, who I don’t think is the right solution. But nevertheless the remaining part of the documentary did still cover some important topics like the extent of Shakespeare the writer’s knowledge of Italy, and the Essex rebellion.

It seems to me that mainstream academia on this issue is very much lacking in good research practice, and has to resort to trying to ridicule or accuse of insanity the people who think the Stratford man did not write the works, while side-stepping the arguments and historical supporting evidence of the unorthodox researchers. (George Greenwood's 1908 book The Shakespeare Problem Restated shows how little has changed in a century in this regard.)

There is also a recently published book on this subject that I think is very good:

Shakespeare Beyond Doubt? Exposing an Industry in Denial edited by John M. Shahan and Alexander Waugh. (Tamarac, FL. : Lumina Press, 2013).

The book is a response to an orthodox book with a similar title, but without the question mark: Shakespeare Beyond Doubt: Evidence, Argument, Controversy edited by Paul Edmondson and Stanley Wells. Stanley Wells also appears in the documentary, along with another Shakespearian scholar Jonathan Bate. These two represent the orthodox position. Stanley Wells is one of the leading contemporary Shakespearian academics, who co-edited an Oxford University Press edition of Shakespeare's Complete Works. Wells is also the president of the Shakespeare Birthplace Trust, associated with Stratford-upon-Avon (and its multi-million dollar tourist industry :) .)

I am not sure if I should write at too much length about the topic of the Shakespeare authorship question, as it is possibly too far outside the research interests of the forum?
 
I am not sure if I should write at too much length about the topic of the Shakespeare authorship question, as it is possibly too far outside the research interests of the forum?

Hi Mal7,

Your post is about right when the question of 'too much' comes into play. I'm aware of the problem --or the controversy if you will-- for decades but it's too far outside my usual scope to be able to be kept 'au courant' so to speak. Thus I'm pleasantly surprised to be informed on occasion when something remarkable or noteworthy has come to pass.

Thank you very much for your effort to keep us informed. I appreciate it wholeheartedly. But that's just me... ;)
 
Yes I think the topic could fill a forum of its own, and if explored here it could end up attracting people to this forum for the wrong reasons.

One interesting fairly recent (2007) development is what is called the "Declaration of Reasonable Doubt about the Identity of William Shakespeare", which is a declaration (not a petition, since it not addressed to anyone) which people can sign online, and view the list of other signers online. Rather than doggedly promoting one particular alternative candidate as the true author, the declaration aims merely to legitimize the idea that the question of the writer's identity is a legitimate one and worthy of serious consideration. This is their website here:

_https://doubtaboutwill.org/

The topic seems to be increasing popular over the last decade. "Orthodox" Shakespearians like Stanley Wells have been increasingly trying to defend their position in print and on websites, but without really engaging with the key arguments of the anti-Stratfordians. Hence as was noted in the documentary, it looks like any progress on exploring the issue will come not from within the mainstream of English Literature academia, but from the interested public, interested amateur researchers, and people working in other fields.
 
Back
Top Bottom