gerryduffett
A Disturbance in the Force
WILSON LAW CENTER LLC
Jonathan O. Wilson,
Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 1102
Morrison, Colorado 80465
March 31, 2008
Sen. Patrick Leahy
433 Russell Senate Office Bldg
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Senator:
I represent
Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance,
an organization with several hundred members
around the country and internationally
who have reason to believe they are targeted with various non-lethal weapons.
These targeted individuals suffer physical and psychological symptoms as a result of the remote manipulation.
We seek your office's assistance
......in initiating "hearings"
and a
......"fact-finding congressional inquiry"
into the government agencies and/or private companies that are targeting citizens.
Many citizens are desperate to be freed from the disturbing, intrusive and oppressive targeting.
Evidence supports the conclusion that weapons exist that could be used against individuals,
based on U.S. Patent and Trademark Office filings,
public releases by agencies,
and other technologies that indicate the level of technological sophistication.
The weapons are believed to be based on
electromagnetism, microwaves, sonic waves, lasers and other types of directed energy,
and were characterized as "psychotronic"
in Rep. Dennis Kucinich's draft of
House Resolution 2977,
the Space Preservation Act of 2001.
Furthermore, it is undeniable that government agencies have tested citizens without permission in the past;
for example,
the CIA's "human experimentation" discussed in
Orlikow v. U.S., 682 F.Supp. 77 (D.D.C. 1988),
secretly administered lysergic acid diethylamide discussed in
United States v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669 (1987),
and military chemical experimentation as discussed in
Congressional Committee Report 103-97,
103d Congress, 2d Session, S. Prt. 103-97 (Dec. 8, 1994).
Lastly, the sheer numbers of people complaining of being targeted,
including people with post-graduate degrees
and a lifetime of achievements,
and the similarities in symptoms tend to outweigh a
"dismissive response" based on charges of anecdotal evidence or "group paranoia."
Several plaintiffs or groups of plaintiffs have filed suits in the past levying similar charges of directed weaponry, but,
to my knowledge,
all have been dismissed due to "immunity" and "state secret defenses,"
and the lack of evidence of a direct link to agencies or companies.
It is difficult to legally prove targeting by psychotronic weapons
when the perpetrators operate from remote,
unseen locations and therefore the targeting can be dismissed as delusional.
Given the wide scope of alleged targeting,
there is a certain risk of sounding too "conspiratorial",
however, common denominators such as physical symptoms and medical reports, surveillance scenarios, harassment techniques, and more can be readily established.
Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance
will gladly provide your office,
and any legislator and investigator,
reports from targeted individuals documenting instances of targeting, medical documentation, and recordings.
This firm will provide research and investigation results upon request as well.
We will diligently work with anyone willing to help.
Please carefully consider convening hearings and an inquiry
and collaborating with other legislators in an effort to
......uncover and stop this inhumane practice.
Very truly yours,
Jonathan Wilson
Attorney for
Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance
_http://www.freedomfchs.com
Jonathan O. Wilson,
Attorney at Law
P.O. Box 1102
Morrison, Colorado 80465
March 31, 2008
Sen. Patrick Leahy
433 Russell Senate Office Bldg
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Senator:
I represent
Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance,
an organization with several hundred members
around the country and internationally
who have reason to believe they are targeted with various non-lethal weapons.
These targeted individuals suffer physical and psychological symptoms as a result of the remote manipulation.
We seek your office's assistance
......in initiating "hearings"
and a
......"fact-finding congressional inquiry"
into the government agencies and/or private companies that are targeting citizens.
Many citizens are desperate to be freed from the disturbing, intrusive and oppressive targeting.
Evidence supports the conclusion that weapons exist that could be used against individuals,
based on U.S. Patent and Trademark Office filings,
public releases by agencies,
and other technologies that indicate the level of technological sophistication.
The weapons are believed to be based on
electromagnetism, microwaves, sonic waves, lasers and other types of directed energy,
and were characterized as "psychotronic"
in Rep. Dennis Kucinich's draft of
House Resolution 2977,
the Space Preservation Act of 2001.
Furthermore, it is undeniable that government agencies have tested citizens without permission in the past;
for example,
the CIA's "human experimentation" discussed in
Orlikow v. U.S., 682 F.Supp. 77 (D.D.C. 1988),
secretly administered lysergic acid diethylamide discussed in
United States v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669 (1987),
and military chemical experimentation as discussed in
Congressional Committee Report 103-97,
103d Congress, 2d Session, S. Prt. 103-97 (Dec. 8, 1994).
Lastly, the sheer numbers of people complaining of being targeted,
including people with post-graduate degrees
and a lifetime of achievements,
and the similarities in symptoms tend to outweigh a
"dismissive response" based on charges of anecdotal evidence or "group paranoia."
Several plaintiffs or groups of plaintiffs have filed suits in the past levying similar charges of directed weaponry, but,
to my knowledge,
all have been dismissed due to "immunity" and "state secret defenses,"
and the lack of evidence of a direct link to agencies or companies.
It is difficult to legally prove targeting by psychotronic weapons
when the perpetrators operate from remote,
unseen locations and therefore the targeting can be dismissed as delusional.
Given the wide scope of alleged targeting,
there is a certain risk of sounding too "conspiratorial",
however, common denominators such as physical symptoms and medical reports, surveillance scenarios, harassment techniques, and more can be readily established.
Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance
will gladly provide your office,
and any legislator and investigator,
reports from targeted individuals documenting instances of targeting, medical documentation, and recordings.
This firm will provide research and investigation results upon request as well.
We will diligently work with anyone willing to help.
Please carefully consider convening hearings and an inquiry
and collaborating with other legislators in an effort to
......uncover and stop this inhumane practice.
Very truly yours,
Jonathan Wilson
Attorney for
Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance
_http://www.freedomfchs.com