Libel and Defamation Against SOTT, Cass, LKJ, QFG, etc

[Mountain Crown]

[quote author=Laura]barfitous[/quote]



Love it.

 

[Sonrisa]

Yes, it is pretty barfitous (just made that word up) but it is also rather funny and fascinating the way a one-celled critter under a microscope is fascinating.

[snip]




That's me right now after reading that really stupid pseudo-analysis!!!!

My sentiments exactly!

 

[Richs]

Looks like forces of Mordor are on the offensive on GLP, they've been rallied by very vile ork from France

<snip>
OMG

I don't call that an offensive, I call it stupidity because they have no clue what they are talking about. It's so silly it's "not even wrong."

They seem to have a hard time thinking at all, or even understanding reality: lost in a delusional, paranoid world where a pejorative spin is put on absolutely everything! Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar and what is written and posted as we have done, is exactly what it is. They can't grok that. They are fueled by some entropic energy, a sort of "meanness drive", a hatred of life and creativity and that is what fuels all their words and bizarre theories.

It might be considered to be similar to emotional thinking except it's not transitory and it always come form the same kind of emotion: the entropic meanness. This desire to hurt drives all their messages, maybe all their actions.

That's the description of a personality disorder: a pervasive pattern of thinking that affects all areas of a person's life and they can't change it.

And since it's permanent they don't even have the opportunity to step outside of their thinking and realize there is something wrong. That's the one and only reality they live in. In their "cordial mode" they wear a mask of sanity and what is really going on inside only gets activated / visible when they get scratched. They see resistance to their paranoid/pejorative world view as a confirmation of their paranoid thoughts which are constantly running in the background during their "masked" phases. And it gives them an excuse to act the way that is natural to them - viciously. They can then be themselves and relieve the stress of having to wear the mask.

It's a creepy bizarro world. It also makes me think that there are probably millions of people with these disorders that no amount of truth will ever convince - ever. What's terrible is that to learn about yourself you need a critical mass of trust in others because you can't see yourself as you really are. But when you're dominated by such a strong paranoia it's impossible to trust others. It's like a Machiaviallian curse: the very first result of the disease is to discard the only potential cure.

I would suggest that ya'll don't read over there if it upsets you. I don't though there are people on the forum who do and send me snippets now and then.

I think that is a pretty accurate analysis! I usually don't read that stuff because it is about as useful as listening to a herd of donkeys braying. Sheep, I don't mind so much... It kind of reminds me of Round Breathing!

 

[John G]

Speaking of bizzaro worlds, my statement seems to have hit an Atlantis crystal and crossed a realm border into the Uncategorized category :)

 

[Alana]

That's me right now after reading that really stupid pseudo-analysis!!!!

Well, i was curious and i spent some time reading the six last pages of their thread. I admit, this is the first time i spent some time on that forum. I found it quite educational and somewhat entertaining at the same time. I don't know, i must be in the right mood today..... These guys are soooo far from reality that they wouldn't be able to find the culprit in an actual crime, with all their brains together.

 

[Laura]

Well, i was curious and i spent some time reading the six last pages of their thread. I admit, this is the first time i spent some time on that forum. I found it quite educational and somewhat entertaining at the same time. I don't know, i must be in the right mood today..... These guys are soooo far from reality that they wouldn't be able to find the culprit in an actual crime, with all their brains together.

I know. When you know the facts, have the data to hand, what they are writing, assuming, theorizing, is just so crazy that you shake your head in amazement that people can even survive on this planet with such defective theories of mind. How do they even survive going to a supermarket with all that craziness going on in their heads? They probably imagine that there are ninjas in the cereal boxes and the stock boys are following them and the cashiers are sending signals to helicopters when they scan the items. It's pure and simple paranoid delusion! It really fits with Lobaczewski's description of the schizoidal psychopath type only on steroids. As he wrote, it was thought to be related to schizophrenia at one point and I guess we are seeing in these examples why they thought that - they twist reality so delusionally that it does seem like schizophrenia!

For those who don't have the book, here's the description of the type and the dynamic.

Schizoidia: Schizoidia, or schizoidal psychopathy, was isolated by the very first of the famous creators of modern psychiatry. From the beginning, it was treated as a lighter form of the same hereditary taint which is the cause of susceptibility to schizophrenia. However, this latter connection could neither be confirmed nor denied with the help of statistical analysis, and no biological test was then found which would have been able to solve this dilemma. For practical reasons, we shall herein discuss schizoidia with no further reference to this relationship rather motivated by tradition.

Literature provides us with descriptions of several varieties of this anomaly, whose existence can be attributed either to changes in the genetic factor or to differences in other individual characteristics of a non-pathological nature. Let us thus sketch these sub-species’ common features.

Carriers of this anomaly are hypersensitive and distrustful, but they pay little attention to the feelings of others, tend to assume extreme positions, and are eager to retaliate for minor offenses.

Sometimes they are eccentric and odd. Their poor sense of psychological situation and reality leads them to superimpose erroneous, pejorative interpretations upon other people’s intentions.

They easily become involved in activities which are ostensibly moral, but which actually inflict damage upon themselves and others.

Their impoverished psychological worldview makes them typically pessimistic regarding human nature.

We frequently find expressions of their characteristic attitudes in their statements and writings: “Human nature is so bad that order in human society can only be maintained by a strong power created by highly qualified individuals in the name of some higher idea.” Let us call this typical expression the “schizoid declaration”.

Human nature does in fact tend to be naughty, whenever the schizoids embitter other people’s lives, that is.

When they become wrapped up in situations of serious stress, however, the schizoid’s failings cause them to collapse easily. The capacity for thought is thereupon characteristically stifled, and frequently the schizoids fall into reactive psychotic states so similar in appearance to schizophrenia that they lead to misdiagnoses.

The common factor in the varieties of this anomaly is a dull pallor of emotions and feeling for the psychological realities which is an essential factor in basic intelligence. This can be attributed to the incomplete quality of the instinctive substratum, which is working as though on sand. Low emotional pressure enables them to develop proper speculative reasoning, which is useful in non-humanistic spheres of activity. Because of their one-sidedness, they tend to consider themselves intellectually superior to “ordinary” people.

The quantitative frequency of this anomaly varies among races and nations: low among Blacks, the highest among Jews. Estimates of this frequency range from negligible up to 3 %. In Poland it may be estimated as 0.7 % of population. My observations suggest this anomaly is autosomally hereditary.

A schizoid’s ponerological activity should be evaluated in two aspects. On the small scale, such people cause their families trouble, easily turn into tools of intrigue in the hands of clever individuals, and generally do a poor job of raising the younger generation.

Their tendency to see human reality in the doctrinaire and simplistic manner they consider “proper”, transforms their frequently good intentions into bad results. However, their ponerogenic role can take on macro-social proportions if their attitude toward human reality and their tendency to invent great doctrines are put to paper and duplicated in large editions.

In spite of their typical deficits, or even an openly schizoidal declaration, their readers do not realize what the authors’ characters are like; they interpret such works in a manner corresponding to their own nature.

The minds of normal people tend toward corrective interpretation thanks to the participation of their own richer, psychological world-view. However, many readers critically reject such works with moral disgust but without being aware of the specific cause.
{...}

Another interesting question suggests itself: what kind of people are the so-called “jackals” hired as professional and mercenary killers by various groups who take to arms as a means of political struggle? They offer themselves as specialists who perform the duty as accepted; no human feelings will interfere with their planned activity. They are most certainly not normal people, but none of the deviations described herein fits this picture. As a rule, essential psychopaths are talkative and incapable of such planned activity.

Rather, we should assume this to be the product of a cross between lesser taints of various deviations. Even if we accept the statistical probability of the appearance of such crosses, taking into account the over-mentioned quantitative data, they should be extremely rare phenomena. However, mate-selection psychology produces pairings which bilaterally represent various anomalies. Carriers of two or even three lesser deviational factors should thus be more frequent.

A jackal could then be imagined as the carrier of schizoidal traits in combination with some other psychopathy, e.g. essential psychopathy or skirtoidism. More frequent instances of such crosses fill up a society’s pool of hereditary pathological ponerogenic factors.

{...}
Who plays the first crucial role in this process of the origin of pathocracy, schizoids or characteropaths? It appears to be the former; therefore, let us delineate their role first.

During stable times which are ostensibly happy, albeit marked by injury to individuals and nations, doctrinaire people believe they have found a simple solution to fix such a world. Such a historical period is always characterized by an impoverished psychological world-view, a schizoidally impoverished psychological world-view thus does not stand out during such times and is accepted as legal tender. These doctrinaire individuals characteristically manifest a certain contempt with regard to moralists then preaching the need to rediscover lost human values and to develop a richer, more appropriate psychological world-view.

Schizoid characters aim to impose their own conceptual world upon other people or social groups, using relatively controlled pathological egotism and the exceptional tenacity derived from their persistent nature. They are thus eventually able to overpower another individual’s personality, which causes the latter’s behavior to turn desperately illogical. They may also exert a similar influence upon the group of people they have joined. They are psychological loners who feel better in some human organization, wherein they become zealots for some ideology, religious bigots, materialists, or adherents of an ideology with satanic features.

If their activities consist of direct contact on a small social scale, their acquaintances easily perceive them to be eccentric, which limits their ponerogenic role. However, if they manage to hide their own personality behind the written word, their influence may poison the minds of society in a wide scale and for a long time.
{..}

In spite of the fact that the writings of schizoidal authors contain the above described deficiency, or even an openly formulated schizoidal declaration which constitutes sufficient warning to specialists, the average reader accepts them not as a view of reality warped by this anomaly, but rather as an idea to which he should assume an attitude based on his convictions and his reason. That is the first mistake.

The oversimplified pattern, devoid of psychological color and based on easily available data, exerts an intense influence upon individuals who are insufficiently critical, frequently frustrated as result of downward social adjustment, culturally neglected, or characterized by some psychological deficiencies. Others are provoked to criticism based on their healthy common sense, also they fail to grasp this essential cause of the error.

Societal interpretation of such activities is broken down into the main trifurcations, engendering divisiveness and conflict.

The first branch is the path of aversion, based on rejection of the contents of the work due to personal motivations, differing convictions, or moral revulsion. This already contains the component of a moralizing interpretation of pathological phenomena.

We can distinguish two distinctly different apperception types among those persons who accept the contents of such works: the critically-corrective and the pathological.

People whose feel for psychological reality is normal tend to incorporate chiefly the more valuable elements of the work. They trivialize the obvious errors and complement the schizoid deficiencies by means of their own richer world-view. This gives rise to a more sensible, measured, and thus creative interpretation, but is not free from the influence of the error frequently adduced above.

Pathological acceptance is manifested by individuals with diversiform deviations, whether inherited or acquired, as well as by many people bearing personality malformations or who have been injured by social injustice. That explains why this scope is wider than the circle drawn by direct action of pathological factors. This apperception often brutalizes the authors’ concepts and leads to acceptance of forceful methods and revolutionary means.

In short, what is going on over there could very easily lead to people deciding to assassinate me.

 

[SeekinTruth]

I just saw a typo in Michael Rasmussen's statement. In the last sentence in the very last paragraph:

It’s impossible for me to really describe the wealth and depth of the knowledge shared on Cassiopaea forum, so I hope seekers will ignorethe defamatory information out there, and check out the work for themselves.

There should be a space between ignore and the.

 

[SeekinTruth]

I found another typographical mistake in Katarzyna C.'s statement, first paragraph, second sentence:

I found about the work of Laura Knight-Jadczyk and Arkadiusz Jadczyk three years ago and I was immensely fascinated by it.

I think it should be: "I found out about..." but I'm not positive what was meant to be written.

 

[Niall]

Thanks SeekinTruth, they're taken care of.

 

[RedFox]

In short, what is going on over there could very easily lead to people deciding to assassinate me.

When I read what those on GLP and elsewhere wrote about you in the past, that thought crossed my mind more than once.....delusion + energiser bunny + spite/vengefulness (that comes through in spades) = not good.

 

[SeekinTruth]

I just saw a couple of typos in Arthur Wise's statement. The first one is in the last sentence of the first paragraph:

I also helps that she writes well!

It should be: "It also helps...."

The second one is in the last sentence of the third paragraph:

They LIVE what they share with others and offer ideas that literally help people to live their lives better, not in a superficial sense, but in as wise and healthy sense.

Should it be "in a wise and healthy sense?" Or "as in a wise and healthy sense."? I'm not sure which was meant.

 

[SeekinTruth]

I just noticed a few typos in Beau Christiansen's statement.

6th sentence in the 4th paragraph:

With the resounding success of that business, I and my business partners have been able to donate to Laura and the work the she does which often includes her turning around and providing financial help to others to get them on their feet like she did me.

1st sentence in the 5th paragraph:

Sadly, their are people who do want to see such a thing as a world where people help and support each other.

Should be: "who do not (or don't)


3rd sentence in the 5th paragraph:

I have seen and experienced what kind person she is and how giving she is to those who are in need.

last sentence in the last paragraph:

Her special efforts to shed light on what’s going in the world are invaluable and I am a first hand witness to the goodness she brings to the lives of others.

Should be: "what’s going on in the world...." And just a suggestion: "first-hand" with a hyphen?

 

[SeekinTruth]

I found a couple of typos in Michael Franzl's statement.

In the list:

7. Since the statements of defamers/slanderers are false (read: lies), they cannot back up their claims with direct quotations or displaying actual evidence, since that would contradict their claims and they would expose themselves. So they have to revert to cheap twisting, hearsay and sometimes outright lies — which are unfortunately believed by those who is not willing, or are too lazy, to check for themselves.

Should be: "those who are not willing,...."

8. Contrary to that, the upright person who is defending him or herself against defamers/slanderers use direct quotes and actual evidence in abundance.

Should be: "uses"

 

[SeekinTruth]

I just noticed that in the Statement of Larry Bowers, Cassiopeia is spelled in the conventional constellation spelling instead of Cassiopaea in the last sentence of the first paragraph and the first sentence of the second paragraph.

 

[Tigersoap]

Anyone seen that one yet ?

_http://www.secret-history-of-laura-knight-jadczyk.info/

o_O

It's in French, from the French guy participating on GLP, it's of course full of disinfo and slander
There is a testimonial category but it hasn't been filled out yet.

It was activated yesterday, from the date written on the different articles signed by N P (?)