Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 Crashes in Ukraine

@bjorn
This looks to me like a typical cottage industry tinkerer's work by someone who was bored. This isn't real, I presume.
I checked this on Apple Maps. The image is legit; the memorial is only a few kilometres from Schipol airport. The design is apparently intended as a black or green ribbon. Curious how close the design is to the Russian St. George's ribbon, used to symbolise the WWII Soviet victory over fascism:

1639559335847.png

But surely the Dutch authorities would never commission a memorial that symbolically blames Russia for a tragedy that was still undergoing investigation at the time of construction. 🙄
 
Oy! I stand corrected. :-[

I looked into this design and what you see now, appears to be the footpaths along which the memorial forest in statu nascendi has been planted. This is how it will look like when the trees are fully grown:

763


From the official website:
GREEN RIBBON
Alarmed by the original creator of the living memorial forest for MH17, Arold Jansen, the Nationaal Bossenfonds (National Forest Fund) has developed a proposal for the planting of a memorial forest to commemorate all the victims of flight MH17.
The design of the forest monument has been inspired by the form of the black memorial ribbon, which was used as a symbol in the aftermath of the crash, and is also used by Stichting Vliegramp MH17. The layout of the forest has got the form of a green ribbon, 298 trees are planted in this form, each tree representing a person on board of flight MH17. View the artist's impressions.
The ribbon is surrounded by a ring of sunflowers, which blossom during the month of July, which radiates a golden glow. The sunflowers also refer to the sunflower fields in eastern Ukraine where some parts of the plane wreckage were found.
[...]
TREE SYMBOLISM
A tree symbolizes ‘hope’ and ‘future’ in many cultures, a strong symbol. We not only want to honor the MH17 victims, but also want to create a place where everyone can keep their memories of the 298 passengers alive. Every victims life will live on metaphorically through these memorial trees.
LOCATION TREES FOR VICTIMS
On the 18th and 25th of March 2017 relatives planted the trees for their loved ones at the National Monument MH17. The first tree for the captain of Flight MH17 was planted by the Ambassador of Malaysia, Mr. H.E. Dato 'Ahmad Nazri Yusof, together with the Director of Malaysian Airlines, Mr Tan Sri Mohamad Nor Yusof, and Foreign Minister, Mr. Bert Koenders. The staff of Boomkwekerij Ebben planted the trees that were not planted by relatives. Photos of these days can be viewed on our realisation page. The overview of the trees and the names of the victims that this tree is associated with can be viewed on location trees.

So, there seems to be no apparent connection with the Russian St. George's ribbon AFAIK.
 
So, there seems to be no apparent connection with the Russian St. George's ribbon AFAIK.
Except that there are five rows of trees, and the typical St. George's ribbon has five orange and black stripes. Such a curious coincidence. 🙄
 
The MH17 trial has resumed for three days of hearing the Prosecutors Office statement of indictment.

Source (in Dutch): ad.nl/mh17/mh17-verdachten-wilden-buk-raket-die-alle-problemen-zou-oplossen-maar-staan-nu-terecht~adeca723/
(three illustrations omitted)

MH17 suspects wanted Buk missile 'that would solve all problems', but now stand trial

After more than a year and a half, the MH17 trial entered a crucial phase today. The Prosecutor's Office listed all the facts and evidence against the four defendants, in the run-up to the sentencing.

Tonny van der Mee and Cyril Rosman - Dec. 20, 2021

Just as the public prosecutor's office (OM) began in March 2020 at the start of the criminal trial by reading out the names of all 298 victims, today the prosecutor began the indictment by describing July 17, 2014, the day of the disaster.

A hot summer day when 283 passengers checked in at Schiphol Airport for Malaysia Airlines flight MH17, and thousands of miles away the four suspects were preparing for another day of violence, with a BUK missile installation as their "new asset".

On the first of three days when the prosecution is working towards the criminal charges against suspects Igor Girkin, Sergey Dubinski, Oleg Pulatov and Leonid Kharchenko, the facts and evidence of their involvement were laid out.

"We are here to do justice to the 298 victims of MH17," prosecutor Thijs Berger said in his introduction. "The occupants fell victim to a battle that tears Ukraine apart to this day. A world that makes no effort to find out the truth declares its citizens defenseless.''

The prosecution explained in detail how the investigation proceeded, how the suspects came into the picture and were identified, and what their role was in the deployment of the Russian army's BUK missile, which according to the prosecution was used to shoot flight MH17 out of the sky.

A world that makes no effort to find out the truth declares its citizens defenseless
District Attorney Thijs Berger

Google Street View

In order to identify, locate and link the suspects to the shooting down of MH17, radar and satellite images, hundreds of witness statements, photographs and video footage, Google Earth, Google Street View, weather reports, transmission tower data, wiretaps, voice research and voice recognition, interviews and social media were used.

The authenticity of video images was confirmed by forensic experts from the NFI [Netherland Forensic Institute] and weather experts from KNMI [Royal Dutch Meteorological Institute], among others. ''The sources match up remarkably well,'' Berger said.

In a trial where geopolitical stakes are high and disinformation is being spread, the prosecution stressed that all evidence was evaluated "more cautiously." Certainly data from Ukraine and Russia were verified. Because, the Prosecution argues, evidence from the Russian Federation is 'not always insightful and sometimes unreliable'. Moreover, Russia intimidated witnesses.

Berger: ''The evidence was tested more stringently than we do in other cases, because of the interests of some parties.'' The suggestion that tap conversations were manipulated is rejected by the OM.

Jointly responsible

The four defendants are not the ones who pushed the button, but were responsible for bringing the BUK missile in from Russia, moving it around Ukraine and bringing it back to Russia, according to the prosecution.

Girkin, as Minister of Defense and military commander of the self-proclaimed Donetsk People's Republic (DPR), along with his right-hand man Dubinsky, gave the orders. Pulatov coordinated actions on the front lines and Kharchenko carried them out. ''They were jointly responsible for introducing the Buk-Telar used to shoot down MH17.''

According to the prosecution, the four suspects formed a "tightly-knit group of perpetrators focused on shooting down aircraft." Indeed, the pro-Russian separatists suffered heavy losses from Ukrainian airstrikes and bombing.

A BUK is our only hope
Suspect Leonid Kharchenko

Since April 2014, until the day before the disaster, the separatists had been shelling Ukrainian military helicopters and aircraft. But they needed heavier weapons to shoot down aircraft at higher altitudes. A month before the disaster, Girkin asked the leader of Russia-annexed Crimea for "sound anti-aircraft guns with trained crews."

On and shortly before July 17, Dubinsky, Pulatov and Kharchenko called about the transportation of the Buk missile. "Tonight there will be a BUK. Then all problems will be solved," Dubinsky said in one such overheard phone conversation, the day before the disaster. ''A BUK is our only hope.''

Criminal charges

Based on video footage, photographs and transmitter data, the prosecution reconstructed how the convoy containing the Buk-Telar was transported from Donetsk on the morning of July 17 to an agricultural field near Pervomaiskyi, south of the city of Snizhne. There were also Pulatov and Kharchenko.

Tomorrow the prosecution will look more closely at the downing of MH17, the origin of the Buk-Telar and the statements of the suspects. They are charged with the deliberate downing of an aircraft and the murder of 298 people. The maximum penalty for this is a life sentence. Wednesday, the criminal charges will follow. A verdict in the case will not come before the autumn of 2022.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Other coverage in Dutch:
ad.nl/mh17/om-getuigen-mh17-proces-werden-door-rusland-geintimideerd~a03904b6/
Officieren MH17-zaak beginnen aan requisitoir, strafeis woensdag verwacht
OM: verdachten zaak-MH17 gebrand op het neerhalen van vliegtuigen

In English:
Closing arguments in Dutch MH17 trial
Prosecutors begin explaining indictment at MH17 trial
MH17 trial: Court rejects Pulatov lawyers' request on secret witness
Prosecution begins closing arguments against four suspects in MH17 trial - DutchNews.nl
Prosecutors to announce MH17 sentencing demands this week
 
Last edited:
Belated report on the first day: MH17 Trial: Dutch Prosecutors Start Closing Arguments, Say Victims 'Didn't Stand A Chance'

The second day (in Dutch): ad.nl/binnenland/om-houdt-verdachten-mh17-gezamenlijk-verantwoordelijk-ze-zagen-afvuren-van-de-buk-als-hun-wapenfeit~ad327384/ (six illustrations omitted)

Prosecutor holds suspects MH17 jointly responsible: 'They saw the BUK firing as their own achievement'

MH17 trial
Although the four suspects in the MH17 trial did not press the button of the BUK missile themselves, they are guilty of complicity in the murder of the 298 occupants because of their active role in the deployment. This was stated by the Public Prosecutor's Office today in court in support of the sentencing demands tomorrow.

Tonny van der Mee 21-12-21, 16:12

On the second day of the indictment, the prosecution listed all the facts and evidence against the defendants Igor Girkin, Sergei Dubinsky, Oleg Pulatov and Leonid Khartshenko.

The prosecution reconstructed once again how the Buk-Telar missile system in question was driven from Russia to the self-proclaimed People's Republic of Donetsk (DNR) on the night of July 16-17, and then to an agricultural field near Pervomaiski, south of the city of Snizhne, on the morning of the air disaster.

Based on satellite images and eyewitnesses, the prosecution concludes that the BUK missile was fired from that field at flight MH17, which at the time was 34 kilometers away at an altitude of 10 kilometers towards Kuala Lumpur with 298 occupants.

Smoke trail


Witnesses saw the firing of the missile and the vertical smoke trail, heard explosions "so loud that their windows vibrated" half a minute later, and then saw "pieces of aircraft fall down in a fanned-out way. Based on expert image analyses, the Justice Department linked the smoke trail to the firing location at Pervomajski.

Although the BUK installation was rushed away, the traces remained clearly visible on satellite images: a black spot in the field that had caught fire when it was launched.

The Prosecution showed how the separatists then reacted. At 4:21 p.m., one minute after MH17 disappeared from radar, the first reports appeared on social media about the shooting down of a plane. The separatists proudly told that they had shot down a Ukrainian fighter plane (Sushka).

Children's toys

Witness M58, who was at the firing site, according to the prosecution, tearfully recounted in his interrogation how euphoria turned to bewilderment after rebels visited the disaster site. ,,We were very happy, because they said to us that a military transport plane had been hit. That's what everyone said. After an hour, they returned. They looked gloomy. They said, 'It's not a military plane. There are children's toys all around'."

As more and more reports trickled in worldwide that a passenger plane had crashed in eastern Ukraine, there was initial confusion among the suspects. They thought it was about two different planes, tap conversations between the suspects in the hours after the disaster show.

''From that moment on, suspects spring into action and their conversations change color,'' argues prosecutor Manon Ridderbeks. First they talked excitedly about a military plane that was shot down. When it turns out that a passenger plane was downed, the story changes.''

Entire world


Garrison commander Khartshenko claimed in talks with his superiors that the separatists had shot down a Ukrainian fighter plane, which "one minute before" would have shot down a "Chinese passenger plane." ''The whole world will be talking about it,'' Pulatov said in a conversation. Girkin, military commander, doubted that reading: ''Honestly, I don't believe much of it.''

The prosecution rejects that scenario. ''Neither Russian nor Ukrainian primary radar images contain the registration of a military aircraft in the vicinity of flight MH17,'' says prosecutor Ridderbeks. ''No one has ever found wreckage from a plane other than MH17.''

At the DNR headquarters in Donetsk, Girkin ordered the BUK installation to be removed as soon as possible. There was frequent telephone contact about this between suspects. The removal was chaotic: the crew of the BUK installation was nowhere to be found, and the people who supervised the transport could not be reached. Finally, in the night of 17 to 18 July, the flatbed truck with the Buk-Telar crossed the border at the border town of Severny into Russia.

Fragment particles


According to the prosecution, there is a "considerable amount of evidence" that MH17 was shot out of the sky by a BUK missile. This is evidenced by the 370 metal fragment particles found in wreckage, flight documents and bodies of victims. These can be traced to the warhead of a BUK missile, according to the Justice Department. ,,There is only one conclusion: MH17 was brought down with a BUK missile. Traces pointing to another weapon were not found.''

Moreover, according to the justice department, it is certain that the Buk-Telar came from 53rd anti-aircraft brigade in the Russian city of Kursk.

On the role and responsibility of the four suspects, the judiciary is clear. Girkin, Dubinsky, Pulatov and Khartshenko formed a "tightly-knit perpetrator group within the Donetsk People's Republic, focused on violent crimes against Ukrainian aircraft" since May 2014.

Although they denied any involvement in interviews and statements, they spoke affectionately among themselves about "our BUK" or - in code words - the "box" and "toy." ''They considered the Buk-Telar to be their weapon and the rocket they fired to be their achievement,'' says prosecutor Thijs Berger.

Steering role

Even though the four suspects were not physically present when the BUK missile was fired at flight MH17, they are still responsible in a legal sense, according to the judiciary, because of their "directing military role." "That they didn't push the button themselves is legally irrelevant," says prosecutor Berger.

"Someone who causes another person to commit a crime can also be convicted as the perpetrator of that crime. These four defendants used the Buk-Telar as their own instrument to shoot down an aircraft. They worked together intensively, there was a clear division of labor between them, and all the defendants had an active and essential role in the preparation and handling of the crime. Therefore, they are jointly responsible.''

Tomorrow, the prosecutor's office will present the punishment demands. The four suspects are charged with the deliberate downing of a plane and the murder of 298 people. Berger: "Whoever organizes a crime, facilitates it, actively contributes to it and excitedly discusses it afterwards is criminally responsible for that crime."

The maximum penalty for this is a life sentence. A verdict is not expected until the autumn of 2022.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Other coverage in Dutch: OM: MH17 'onmiskenbaar' neergehaald door BUK-raket

In English: MH17 prosecution: suspects guilty even if they didn't 'press the button' - DutchNews.nl
 
Source (among similar others): Life terms sought in Dutch MH17 trial

December 23 2021 - 4:13AM

Life terms sought in Dutch MH17 trial

Stephanie van den Berg

Dutch prosecutors have demanded life sentences for three Russians and a Ukrainian charged with murder over the shooting down of a passenger jet over Ukraine in 2014.

They said the defendants, who are all at large, helped supply a missile system that Russian-backed separatists used to fire a rocket at Malaysia Airlines flight MH17. All 298 people on board were killed.

Prosecutor Manon Ridderbeks demanded life terms for all four, named as Igor Girkin, Sergey Dubinsky, Oleg Pulatov and Leonid Kharchenko.

Most of the victims were Dutch nationals. The Dutch government holds Russia responsible. Authorities in Moscow deny involvement.

Outside the courtroom on Wednesday Piet Ploeg, who lost his brother, nephew and sister-in-law in the crash, said he had waited a long time to hear the prosecution makes its recommendation.

"It's a relief that the prosecutors demanded the maximum sentence," he told reporters.

Even if the four men were never jailed, "it is just as important that the world knows who was responsible," he said.

After years of collecting evidence, an international team of investigators concluded in May 2018 that the launcher used to shoot down the aircraft, which was en route from Amsterdam to Kuala Lumpur, belonged to Russia's 53rd Anti-Aircraft Missile Brigade.

Prosecutors said on Wednesday the defendants were linked to Russian-backed rebels in eastern Ukraine and played significant roles in the events that led to the downing of the jet.

Russians Pulatov, Dubinsky and Girkin and Ukrainian Kharchenko have all denied involvement. On Wednesday Dubinsky told Dutch broadcaster RTL that the hefty sentencing demands were "totally predictable".

"Our guilt has already been determined," he was quoted as saying.

Lawyers for another suspect, Pulatov, said he followed the prosecution closing arguments via the court's live stream but did not give his reaction.

Relying on satellite images, social media posts and intercepted phone calls, prosecutors say the four men worked together to get a Buk missile system from Russia into eastern Ukraine to reinforce separatists.

"By shooting down MH17 with a Buk ...the defendants used devastating violence. They planned this violence beforehand and they organized it in close cooperation," prosecutor Thijs Berger said.

In recordings played to the court earlier in the week, men identified by the prosecution as the suspects could be heard discussing moving "our Buk" to a field from where flight MH17 was attacked.

They then celebrated the success of "our boys" when they brought down what they mistakenly thought was a Ukrainian military plane. The target turned out to be MH17.

Prosecutors said they were also trying to identify the people who fired the missile and the Russian officials who sent the Buk to Eastern Ukraine.

The trial of the four suspects started 20 months ago. Only Pulatov has sent lawyers to represent him while the others have not cooperated with the court and are being tried in absentia.

Closing arguments from Pulatov's lawyers are expected in March and a verdict by the end of 2022.

Australian Associated Press

Other coverage:
Prosecutors seek life imprisonment for MH17 suspects
Prosecutors demand life for men accused of downing MH17 - DutchNews.nl

Coverage in Dutch:
Openbaar Ministerie eist levenslang tegen alle verdachten voor neerhalen MH17
Openbaar Ministerie eist levenslang tegen vier verdachten neerhalen MH17
OM eist vier keer levenslang in MH17-proces
geenstijl.nl/5162708/om-eist-levenslang-tegen-verantwoordelijken-mh17/
ad.nl/binnenland/om-eist-levenslang-tegen-verdachten-mh17-voor-moord-op-298-inzittenden~a8708466/?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fmyprivacy.dpgmedia.nl%2F

Nabestaanden MH17-ramp blij met eis, advocaten kritisch
MH17-verdachte Doebinski reageert op levenslange eis: 'Onze schuld stond al vast'
 
UPDATE on post #1,262 (July 24, 2021).

Source: Netherlands won’t deport Russian informants in MH17 investigation
Thursday, December 23, 2021 - 10:30

Netherlands won’t deport Russian informants in MH17 investigation


The Netherlands won't deport a Russian couple who gave the judiciary information about the downing of flight MH17, the Volkskrant reports (in Dutch). The couple had exhausted all legal remedies in the Netherlands after three failed asylum applications, but the IND recently granted them asylum after all, according to the newspaper.

In July 2014, the woman accidentally overheard information about who was involved in firing the BUK missile that brought down flight MH17 in eastern Ukraine earlier that same month. Knowing that information brought her and her boyfriend into trouble. They were threatened and assaulted by Russian security agents, according to the newspaper.

They eventually fled to the Netherlands, where they applied for asylum and cooperated with the judiciary in the MH17 investigation.

In the summer, their third asylum application was rejected. The Volkskrant reported (in Dutch) that the Netherlands would deport two people who gave important information in the major investigation. Several Dutch intelligence sources then criticized the immigration and naturalization service IND's conduct and raised concerns about what would happen to the couple if they were sent back to Russia. This prompted the IND to reassess their final application, and they were granted refugee status.

Malaysia Airlines flight MH17 was shot down over eastern Ukraine on 17 July 2014, killing all 298 people on board, including 196 Dutch. The trial against the first four men suspected of involvement in this attack is currently happening in the Netherlands. On Wednesday, the Public Prosecution demanded life in prison against rebel leader Igor Girkin, his right-hand man Sergei Dubinsky, his assistant Oleg Pulatov and garrison commander Leonid Khartshenko.
 
Source (Dutch only): Nederland tegenover Rusland op eerste zitting MH17 bij Europees hof

NOS News - Domestic -Foreign - today, 05:00 AM
Netherlands to face Russia at first MH17 hearing at European court

Mattijs van de Wiel - reporter

7.5 years after the disaster of flight MH17, the Netherlands and Russia face each other for the first time in a courtroom this morning. The Netherlands accuses Russia of violating the European Human Rights Convention with its part in the downing of the plane. All 298 people on board died in the disaster, including 196 Dutch citizens.

The trial at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg is separate from the criminal case in the Netherlands. There, four men are on trial for firing the Buk missile. The case at the European Court is as yet the only case in which Russia is being called to account by the Netherlands. As a member state of the Council of Europe, Russia recognizes this court in Strasbourg and its rulings.

"Russia sees the criminal case in the Netherlands as a political game against Moscow, and does not recognize it," said Hans de Borst, who lost his daughter Elsemiek in the disaster. He has traveled to Strasbourg to attend the hearing. "That's why this is a very important moment. Because here Russia is addressed. Russia arranged the Buk, Russia arranged the crew. We are still trying in multiple ways to get the truth and justice."

Most cases at the European court are brought by citizens against their government. For one member state to sue another is exceptional. The Netherlands has only brought another country to the court three times before.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Court is separate from EU, Russia is affiliated

The European Court of Human Rights, founded in 1959, is part of the Council of Europe. It has 47 member countries, including Russia. It is separate from the European Union. The court can be approached, among other things, by citizens for violations of the European Convention on Human Rights. The court has only ruled sixteen times in a case between two states. Eleven interstate cases are still pending, including six against Russia.
---------------------------------------------------------------

Today the seventeen judges of the grand chamber will hear the arguments of both sides, and will be able to ask questions. The main question the court must answer is whether Russia had control over the area in eastern Ukraine where the Buk missile that brought down MH17 was fired.

Russia denies involvement and will argue that it cannot be held accountable because it is not Russian territory. The Netherlands must prove that the Russians were in control of the area.

First relatives, then the state

The case in Strasbourg was initially brought by relatives of the occupants of MH17. The Dutch state joined them and also filed a complaint on behalf of the state.

On behalf of the next of kin, Piet Ploeg of the Stichting Vliegramp MH17 will address the court this morning. "It cannot be that Russia gets away with it, while it played an important role," says Ploeg. "It's very important that independent judges speak out on this. Also for the future, that such a disaster cannot happen again."

---------------------------------------------------------------
Jointly with Ukraine case
Ukraine also filed two cases against Russia for, among other things, Russia's interference in the east of the country in 2014. The European Court decided to hear the cases of the Netherlands and Ukraine together. Today's hearing comes at a sensitive time, as tensions between Russia and NATO over Ukraine are running high.
--------------------------------------------------------------

The court must now first determine whether it can hear the case. Then comes the question of whether Russia indeed violated the European Human Rights Convention. According to the Netherlands, several articles of the treaty have been violated.

The most important is Article 2, the right to life. According to the Netherlands, Russia was involved in the downing of MH17 and did not ensure that the crash was prevented. Furthermore, Russia is blamed for not investigating the disaster properly and that because of this, and Russian disinformation, next of kin continue to suffer the consequences of the disaster.

Compensation

The European Court of Human Rights can order Russia to pay compensation to surviving relatives. It does not usually impose sanctions on other states. For the Netherlands, the goal of the trial is for these authoritative judges to establish what role Russia played in the downing of MH17 and that Russia violated the human rights treaty.

Seventeen judges will consider the case of the Netherlands against Russia. One of them is Russian. An indicted country is always allowed to provide its own judge, but the judge has no right of veto. Today's hearing was originally scheduled for November 2021. This did not happen because the Russian judge at the time withdrew from the session shortly beforehand without giving any reason. Earlier, Russia had unsuccessfully asked for a postponement because of the coronation measures.

Proceedings at the European Court of Human Rights can take years.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)


Source (Dutch only): Nederland bij mensenrechtenhof: Rusland was de baas in MH17-gebied

NOS News - Domestic -Foreign - today, 13:28
Netherlands at human rights court: Russia was in charge in MH17 area

At the time of the MH17 disaster in 2014, Russia had de facto control over the area in eastern Ukraine where the plane was brought down. Therefore, the European Court of Human Rights should hear the case brought by the Netherlands against Russia. The Netherlands argued this during the hearing of the case at the court in Strasbourg.

In addition, according to the Netherlands, on the basis of the evidence gathered, no other conclusion is possible than that the firing installation of the Buk missile used to bring down MH17 was operated by Russian specialists.

Babette Koopman, as the Dutch delegate to the court, spoke for the Netherlands. She went on to say that the pro-Russian separatists in eastern Ukraine could only maintain control of the area in the so-called People's Republic of Donetsk with Russia's help. "Without Russia, there would be no People's Republic of Donetsk," Koopman said. So the area was in fact under the control of Russia.

Russia: not responsible

Russia denied this in its own plea. Russian deputy to the court, Mikhail Vinogradov, stressed that the MH17 was brought down over Ukraine, and thus the air disaster was not within Russia's jurisdiction. "We cannot be held responsible for what happened outside our territory," he said, after which he asked the judges to dismiss the case for that reason.

He did stress that he found the air disaster dramatic and sympathized with the bereaved families. "But the story is not true and is full of inaccuracies and imputations."

Ukraine also took the floor in the hearing. That country spoke, among other things, about the current tension in the area. The human rights court decided to merge the two cases that Ukraine brought against Russia about, among other things, Russian interference in eastern Ukraine with the Dutch case.

'Survivors feel like pawns in geopolitical game'

Survivor Piet Ploeg was given a few minutes to speak. He said that more than seven years later the surviving relatives are still suffering and that this is exacerbated by "the attitude of Russia". He was referring to the distribution of disinformation, among other things. According to Ploeg, surviving relatives feel powerless "like a pawn in a geopolitical game.

In advance Minister Hoekstra (Foreign Affairs) called the hearing "an important step in the pursuit of justice for the victims and their families". Indeed, with the case, the Netherlands is for the first time bringing Russia's part in the MH17 disaster before an international court.

Survivor Anton Kotte of the Stichting Vliegramp MH17 felt tension before the start of the hearing for that reason. "For the first time we are confronted with the Russians, we are together in the same courtroom," he said. In front of the building in Strasbourg early this morning, relatives of MH17 victims already stood with a banner calling for "answers and responsibility." All 298 occupants died in the disaster, including 196 Dutch nationals.

The seventeen judges today addressed only the question of whether the court can hear the case, which therefore centers on whether Russia had control over the area in eastern Ukraine where the Buk missile was fired that brought down the MH17. Then comes the question of whether Russia indeed violated the European Human Rights Convention. Such proceedings can take years. It is not clear when the judges will deliver their verdict on the admissibility of the case.

Separate from criminal case

The European Court of Human Rights may order Russia to pay compensation to relatives. As a member state of the Council of Europe, Russia recognizes the Strasbourg court and its rulings.

The trial at the European Court of Human Rights is separate from the criminal case in the Netherlands. There, four men are on trial for firing the Buk missile.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Other coverage in Dutch:
Nederland en Rusland twisten over gezag Moskou in MH17-gebied
MH17-zaak in het geding: was Rusland de baas in Oost-Oekraïne?
 
Last edited:
Source (Dutch only): ad.nl/mh17/advocaten-mh17-verdachte-oorlog-oekraine-niet-van-invloed-op-proces~a326ff25/?referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fmyprivacy.dpgmedia.nl%2F

Lawyers MH17 suspect: War Ukraine not affecting trial

The war in Ukraine has no impact on the defense of Russian MH17 suspect Oleg Pulatov. His lawyers Boudewijn van Eijck and Sabine ten Doesschate have announced this. "It is necessary, especially in times like these, that the principles of a democratic state under the rule of law are upheld."

Interior Editor - March 2, 2022 - 16:38

Pulatov and his three co-defendants Igor Girkin, Sergei Dubinsky and Leonid Khartshenko have been required to serve life sentences. Starting Monday, Pulatov's lawyers will take the stand for the plea bargain. The Russian denies involvement. He is the only defendant to be represented in court; the other three did not respond to calls.

"We have thought long and hard about whether the terrible war in Ukraine should affect our actions as lawyers for a Russian citizen," his lawyers said. "We cannot, must not and will not bow to the violations of rule of law principles elsewhere in the world. Not even when, as now, it will be difficult to do so. It is the task of a criminal lawyer to assist a suspect and to remain doing so at the next hearing and thus contribute to maintaining our rule of law. We will therefore continue to do exactly that."

Executive commander

According to the prosecution, Pulatov was one of the executive commanders in the field when flight MH17 was shot down by a Russian Buk missile over eastern Ukraine on July 17, 2014. Pulatov coordinated all troop movements and was commander of an anti-aircraft unit.

The Malaysia Airlines plane disaster killed all 298 occupants, including 196 Dutch nationals. It is not known exactly why the plane, which was en route from Schiphol Airport to the Malaysian capital Kuala Lumpur, was brought down. The most likely scenario is that the pro-Russian separatists did not realize it was a passenger flight.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
 
According to the prosecution, Pulatov was one of the executive commanders in the field when flight MH17 was shot down by a Russian Buk missile over eastern Ukraine on July 17, 2014. Pulatov coordinated all troop movements and was commander of an anti-aircraft unit.

I suppose they are still determined to scapegoat someone to cover up what really happened and Pulatov is still one of their chosen Russian victims.

There was no Russian Buk missile involved but there was a bomb aboard and the plane cockpit was fired upon by another jet?

The "truth is out there" or perhaps in the following session:

Session 23 August 2014:
Perceval) I have a question. Was the cockpit of MH17 shot at by a jet?

A: Yes.


Q: (Perceval) Was the point of that to kind of take out the pilots so that they couldn't communicate or whatever, and then the bomb in the plane would go off afterwards?

A: Yes.


Q: (Perceval) Fair enough. It figures.

I can take "Yes" for an answer.
 
Today, the MH17 trial has resumed its hearings to give the defense lawyers 12 days to state their pleading. Most of today's articles contain only an announcement of the resumption with a flash back overview of how things stand up until now.

Source (Dutch only): Verdediging MH17-proces zaait twijfel over herkomst raket

NOS News - Domestic - today, 17:08
Defense MH17 trial: not sure plane was hit by Buk missile

The defense in the MH17 trial aims to prove in the coming weeks that the passenger plane was not shot down by a Russian missile in 2014, but perhaps by a Ukrainian one.

"We will explain step by step why we deviate from public opinion," lawyer Boudewijn van Eijck announced today in court at Schiphol Airport. Together with a colleague, he is representing the only defendant in the trial: the Russian Oleg Pulatov. They are pleading for acquittal.

Today the lawyers started their plea after the Public Prosecutor's Office demanded life sentences in December against the four men held responsible for the downing of flight MH17. All 298 occupants were killed in the disaster.

The lawyers spoke out emphatically against the recent violence in Ukraine at the start of the session day. "What we put forward is separate from the current developments in Ukraine and would not be different than if our client had been a Dutchman," Van Eijck said.

According to the lawyers, there is a lot to be criticized about the conclusions of the international investigation team. It states that the MH17 was shot out of the sky with a Russian Buk missile from a field in eastern Ukraine. That area was controlled by pro-Russian separatists even then.

The investigation team shared its findings with the outside world several times since 2015. "Thus, the OM's scenario nestled early in global public opinion," says Van Eijck. According to him, other possible scenarios were thereby unfairly pushed into the background.

The Dutch government openly supported the conclusions of the investigation team and held Russia responsible for the disaster. The former Chief Public Prosecutor was awarded a medal because his team had "rounded up the evidence" in the MH17 case. Van Eijck: "All of that puts enormous pressure on the outcomes."

No monopoly on the truth

The Dutch Safety Board (OVV) also concluded that flight MH17 was shot down with a Buk missile. "But even the OVV does not have a monopoly on the truth," said lawyer Van Eijck.

According to him, it is far from certain that it was a Russian Buk that brought down the plane in the summer of 2014. "Valuable information from the manufacturer of these missiles has been brushed aside." In addition, forensic investigation at the crime scene was impossible.

"We will argue that missiles other than the Buk cannot be excluded," Van Eijck said. "And if it was a Buk anyway, it was an old model that only Ukraine had access to."

The defense also has doubts about where the missile was allegedly fired. "We have a legal sense of unease that we still do not know exactly what happened. We think there are more relevant facts, circumstances and events surrounding this disaster that we do not know about."

The attorneys will have eleven days of hearings. The court will rule at the end of the year.

--------------------------------------------------------------
Oleg Pulatov is one of the four defendants in the MH17 trial. He held a senior position in the intelligence service of the pro-Russian rebels. The prosecution suspects him, like the other suspects, of the downing of MH17 and murder or manslaughter of all 298 occupants.

Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)

Other coverage in Dutch:
Rechtbank MH17-zaak: 'Wij leven mee met bevolking Oekraïne', proces gaat door
Impact oorlog Oekraïne op MH17-nabestaanden: 'Je vecht tegen dezelfde vijand'
Ook in het MH17-proces wordt er stilgestaan bij de oorlog in Oekraïne
Rechtbank staat tijdens MH17-proces stil bij oorlog in Oekraïne

Coverage in English:
12 days of defence hearings start in MH17 trial - DutchNews.nl
Lawyers of MH17 suspect to argue for acquittal
 
Back
Top Bottom