I wanted to listen to more of what Passio had to say with regards to his time as a member of the Church of Satan (CoS); whether there were any obvious red flags or ideological twists i had missed.
This is just a follow on with regards to my previous posts as to my feelings on the co linearity of his material to that found here.
So i did a quick search and found:
Satanic Evolution - Mark Passio - The Free Zone
_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_1QCSLKNP9g
my thoughts - some interesting tidbits on the workings in the dark occult but nothing too revealing of his past. Comments on physicality of psychopathy and interesting comments on balance, and magic..
Freeman interviews Mark Passio
FM: Freeman
MP: Mark Passio
Notes:
MP: “lifetime occultist, interest since young, no knowledge of astrotheology, realises upbringing and goes on path of hatred due to lies and exposure of manipulation by religion
Attempted to go opposite by going into dark occultism, left hand path, antithesis of anything with moral code, religion that worships ego (gone 'haywire'). Where his head was back then around 17 'heavily invovled' till mid 20's late 20's.
Member of COS – headed by Anton Lavey, made priest by Lavey himself, year and half before he died, also joined order of evil eye.
Having gone down this path, understood deeply psychopathic individuals and their control of society. In positions of influence.
Disconcerting that psychos in power, so wanted to look further as to why which led him to where he is, complete reversal, level of infiltration is more widespread than they imagine.
FM: Rex diablo says CoS is not dark enough
MP: many say that. It is a religion. Aquino also said is too soft, Nicholas Shrek too moved to Temple of Set (set up by Aquino).
CoS is there to seive through those who display the tendences the higher occultists are looking for.
FM: Like the baby eaters: Hilary Clinton
MP They are the true Luciferians, they are higher than satanists who can be turned into useful dupes by ptb
FM: tell us about religion
MP: religion = religare (latin) = to hold back, to tie back, to bind.. how religions have and do control, and how he uses the term to relate to the satanic ideology, rather than philosophy, as there is no love of wisdom there.
Satanism is only 5 senses, to satanists pure materialism with NO spirituality “ a fear based world view, to a satanist is the 'great abstinence' 'indulgences whether they fuel higher or lower are always to be engaged in, don't hold back' 'if it feels good do it' [what did he do?]
'Death is the end'
“Magic can only be utilized once the balancing of brain, which is what satanism represents, left brain imbalance”
Is It all about the physicality? Or should this be metaphor?
MP: “the left brain is significantly dominant, they have physical damage those who subscribe. Lending help in an idealogical capacity, and eventually identified as psychopathic to be brought up
Then he goes into the sacred feminine
FM: We call it the shakina, the shock and awe,
MP: “the law of thelema is actually, do what thou will, UNDER love”
------
As Marks videos are receiving quite a lot of attention at the moment, this short was posted on my TL, uploaded by another YouTuber.
I thought it relevant, because again, this was a point I was having trouble addressing and answering satisfactorily. And incidentally this is one of the main buffers I encounter amongst my nearest and dearest..
So for the purpose of this overview, I think Passio provides firm points to ponder.
Wiki: Solipsism (Listeni/ˈsɒlɨpsɪzəm/; from Latin solus, meaning "alone", and ipse, meaning "self")[1] is the philosophical idea that only one's own mind is sure to exist. As an epistemological position, solipsism holds that knowledge of anything outside one's own mind is unsure. The external world and other minds cannot be known, and might not exist outside the mind. As a metaphysical position, solipsism goes further to the conclusion that the world and other minds do not exist. As such it is the only epistemological position that, by its own postulate, is both irrefutable and yet indefensible in the same manner.
_http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUw5nLGQEuU
'Mark Passio destroys the extremely dangerous, illogical and irrational "New" Age ideology known as "Solipsism".'
Notes
MP:Etymology: Solis - alone or one . Pronoun ipse/ipsay - myself
It means nothing exits out of me, essentially saying i am God, my perception is the only real, no one else is real.
"your perceptions are not the truth, you have to align yourself to the truth and that Is damaging enough to the ego. A solipsist is saying the other does not exist. There is no objective reality or that others exist.
I accept we are all one, but this does not mean you/others do not exist in the physical domain. These people wanna believe they are such illusion that nothing matters/should be done to change."
"When i was Satanist at CoS and other organitsations. They have a set of sins believe it or not. Thoughts and behaviours the CoS should never engage in, but they should encourage the public to: the first is stupidity. The first satanic sin. But they want others in deep ignorance. The idea to hoard knowledge and control others.
2nd or 3rd is Solipism.
One of biggest sins, they don't want any of member believing in this nonsense. They told me personally, wait until you see the New age books we will be putting out (via dupes etc..)
We are going to pedal solipsism like you have never seen
When they [CoS] say something they do it. They act on the same page. They have the will and act in tandem/align their thoughts knowledge with their version of care - not like ours - but they care about what they are doing and they act in concert - i Don't agree and trying to stop it. I respect as enemy their unity.
"Solipsism is believing only ones mind exist, rest is unsure and so therefore no objective truth.
Nothing can be known.
Why would a solipsist ever do anything, you can't know you're going to fall off that cliff,so go ahead??
This is a new religion, ideologies, to get people to not understand it OR actually believe it.
Unbelievable that anybody could do this.
They have given up on life, because it is so difficult and can't work so they give up.
More people are becoming like this.
'New age is to supress masculine which acts to create the change, supported by the female, always both'
Solipsism is there is no objective truth so don't bother trying to find it
He refers to a course in Mircales saying it is Solipism - it is egoic and has no resemblence to truth. They are mentally ill.
*end*
So, finally, finally; his past may be murky, but he has put out a lot of useful work and can provide a very interesting perspective which reflects what we see going on in the world. I can see no obvious deception/vector. And though intangible and possibly emotional thinking; i remember how much time and patience he had for callers.
. But I also see a potential danger here that relates closely to what you say about seeking truth without a network. MP himself states the importance of being a little bit sceptic but not too rejecting and a little bit open minded without becoming naive, when you are on the path towards truth. From hearing him present, I wonder if he's still in that state of mind. To me, he seems very capable, very knowledgeable and very aware of this. In my opinion that makes him come across as a little too much "I know the truth and it's my way or the high way". I guess what I'm lacking is some degree of humility. My own experience in my search for truth is that I continue to learn new facets of truth and go deeper into what I thought was true and sometimes what seemed true at one point in time turns out to be false, when new information comes to light. To me, that's one of the main purposes of this forum - to help bring new truth to light and I think it's impossible not to have blind spots of ignorance/denial. But getting help from others will enable you to see this. I guess what I'm trying to say is that I don't think anyone can go all the way alone - either you do it through a network as we do here (lateral sharing) or you do it within a lineage of mystery school of the master/student nature (vertical sharing), although I'm not sure how much the latter is able to incorporate new information.
