Masculinity in crisis

Sperm counts worldwide are falling even faster than we thought

Sperm counts worldwide have halved over the past five decades, and the pace of the decline has more than doubled since the turn of the century, new research shows.

The international team behind it says the data is alarming and points to a fertility crisis threatening the survival of humanity.

Their meta-analysis looked at 223 studies based on sperm samples from over 57,000 men across 53 countries.

It shows for the first time that men in Latin America, Asia, and Africa share a similar decline in total sperm counts and concentration as previously observed in Europe, North America, and Australia.

The authors warn that the mean sperm count has now dropped dangerously close to the threshold that makes conception more difficult, meaning couples around the world may encounter problems having a baby without medical assistance.

The findings, published on Tuesday in the journal Human Reproduction Update, serve as "a canary in a coal mine," said Professor Hagai Levine, the study’s lead author from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem’s Hadassah Braun School of Public Health.

"We have a serious problem on our hands that, if not mitigated, could threaten mankind’s survival," he said in a statement.

A 50% drop in sperm counts

As part of a team also featuring Professor Shanna Swan at the Icahn School of Medicine in New York, along with researchers in Denmark, Brazil, Spain, Israel, and the USA, Levine studied sperm count trends in regions that had not been reviewed previously.

That same team had already reported in 2017 an alarming decline in sperm counts across the Western world.

In this latest study, they found that average sperm counts all around the world had fallen by over 50 per cent over the past five decades.

Data from 1973 to 2018 showed sperm counts dropped on average by 1.2 per cent per year. Data from after the year 2000 showed a decline of more than 2.6 per cent per year.

"It’s just unbelievable. I couldn’t believe it myself," Levine told Euronews Next.

The fact that these findings were confirmed across the rest of the world points to a global crisis that could be compared to climate change, according to Levine.

"As in climate change, the impact could be different in different places, but generally the phenomenon is global and should be treated as such," he added.

"It looks like a pandemic. It's everywhere. And some of the causes may stay with us for a very long time".

Falling chances of conception

The researchers say that while sperm counts are “an imperfect proxy for fertility,” they are closely linked to fertility chances.

They explain that above a threshold of 40–50 million/ml, a higher sperm count does not necessarily imply a higher probability of conception.

On the other hand, below that threshold, the probability of conception drops off rapidly as sperm count declines.

"On a population level, the drop in mean sperm count from 104 to 49 million/ml that we report here implies a substantial increase in the proportion of men with delayed time to conception,” the study’s authors wrote.

While their research did not explore the causes of this drop in sperm counts, the authors say it reflects "a global crisis related to our modern environment and lifestyle," and they point to the disrupting role of chemicals on our hormonal and reproductive systems.

They add that sperm counts are also an indicator of men's health, with low levels associated with an increased risk of chronic disease, testicular cancer, and a decreased lifespan.

The tipping point for mankind?

The findings were published on the day the global population passed the 8 billion mark, putting more pressure on the planet’s limited natural resources.

"Philosophically, maybe the decline in sperm count and infertility is somehow the way of the world to balance what's going on," Levine told Euronews Next.

"But, you know, that's just a thought. It's not a scientific thought".

He said the findings should be of concern to everyone - regardless of their opinions on how many human beings the planet needs right now.

"Sperm count is a very good measure of global health and of our future. And regardless of the number of people you think we need on Earth, you don’t want it to be determined by hazardous events rather than our own choices," Levine said.

"I think we have to monitor it very carefully at the global level, at the population level, at the local country level, and also the personal level," he added, calling on authorities to improve lifestyles and limit human exposure to manmade chemicals through better regulation.

"Sometimes there is a tipping point and the system collapses at once. It means something is happening with our ecological systems, our reproductive systems - and at some point, it’s just too much".

 
I saw that today as well and I found it to be rather curious, on several levels.

But mostly, it would be a sad reflection of the effort to get rid of strong men in humanity. It's actually kind of a depressing thought, but... also, it's interesting that this news item makes it just as the baby number 8 billion is born. Maybe also the planet knows it's reaching it's carrying capacity and it's slowing down the process?

not sure, just speculating.
 

Keep a close eye on the Dad's interaction with his son as the danger approaches.

Fwiw, the scene is from a 2014 Swedish 'dark comedy' called Force Marjeure:

 
Fwiw, the scene is from a 2014 Swedish 'dark comedy' called Force Marjeure:

I had a feeling, but I see what Iamthatis is pointing out (I think) the portrayal of the father, man, and simply a weakling and coward while mom does all the saving.
 
Just came across this video today, it is from 2 years ago but it was really good, and it fits in this thread I believe.

She goes on several interesting psychological topics, and she is also a really entertaining presenter.

 
I came across this short video that talks about the topic of this topic:


It seems that this topic became so popular that it even got to be aired on the CNN. Of course, the reason why they aired this guy, Scott Galloway, is because he declares himself as progressive democrat, but still, I think he makes some good arguments, minus the comments about conspiracy theories and global warming, but you can easily filter that yourselves.

Here is an interview with him, he seems like an interesting guy to listen, even though he is a progressive democrat, so he doesn't comment about the fact that his democrats are the ones which are mostly destroying the masculinity today.

 
I have been thinking about this thread in light of this and what Laura wrote about here:

(L) Now I'm not going to go through and ask specific detailed questions about everything here, but I've got this document, which I published part of yesterday on my Substack, and I'll get to the more detailed part probably in the next few days. But in general, would you say that this is a correct analysis or comparison between the ideas of Ibn al-'Arabi and the Cassiopaeans and the perennial tradition and esoteric Christianity, et cetera?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Is there anything you would like to correct?

A: Yes. Masculinity should not be compared to the STS part of the dichotomy at higher levels. STS is only a reflection for balance at 6th level, the level of the names.

Q: (L) So are you saying that actual STS, as say a choice or an option, belongs to 3rd, 4th, and possibly even 5th?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Anything else?

A: Your discourse on the topic was inspired. Be sure to make it clear the element of love is the driver. Sex without love and deep psychic connection drains energy to 4 level STS.

Q: (L) So that's 4th density?

A: Yes

Q: (L) All right. And what about the instructions for the various procedures?

A: This might be less important than the simple instructions.

Q: (L) And the simple instructions are basically... You know guys, I have a Virgo moon and a Cancer ascendant. I don't even like talking about this stuff. I just want to let you know that. But here I'm going to go and do it anyway for you guys. So, the basic instructions are just mainly retention for the man?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Over prolonged periods of time, if possible, or as prolonged as possible?

A: Yes

Q: (L) But women are encouraged to not retain, is that correct?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Why is that?

A: Woman gives creative energy to man.

Q: (L) And then the man takes that energy and goes out and creates the environment in which the woman lives. Is that it?

A: Yes basically.

Q: (L) So it doesn't really matter if you follow specific techniques. Those are there for, basically, to give people something to concentrate on?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Is it important to close the microcosmic orbit at the crucial moment?

A: Sometimes. Other times it simply happens naturally at the moment of culmination when the two become one.

Q: (L) Well, the book recommends a rather strenuous schedule. Is this schedule necessary?

A: In certain cases, yes.

Q: (L) So...

(Joe) In what cases?

(Niall) In whose cases?

A: Illness or when serious energy exchange is required. If the couple are open and sincere they can approach the practices in a spirit of playful exploration and experimentation. Find out what works individually as a couple.

Q: (L) So in other words, if you're open to experimenting and observing the results, exploring and having fun, basically... you really can't break it, is that it?

A: Yes

Q: (L) But if you can achieve some of the goals set out in the instructions, in certain respects as far as retention and so forth, those can be very beneficial?

A: Absolutely!!!

Q: (L) So... The part on healing says that "direct exchange and balancing of yin and yang 'jing', which is sexual essence [...] a man's deepest constitutional energies are yang in nature. A woman's are yin. In ordinary sex, these essences are usually lost or spent. In loving dual cultivation, they are consciously exchanged and harmonized. Deficiencies in one partner are literally replenished by the surplus of the other.” So, is that a fair and accurate statement?

A: Yes

Q: (L) Is sex as we experience it...? I mean, here's what I was thinking: The whole thing started because I was thinking about everything that exists in the universe being kind of like a word, or a sentence of the divine, being representative, a metaphor, a symbol, you know, all of those kinds of things. And if that was the case, the fact that we were male and female and sex is there and sex happens, that certainly must represent some cosmic action.

I mean, as above, so below. And clearly that means that we probably ought to examine the case, and discover what we can about it that is of a positive nature, or at least understand it. So that was my thinking behind it. And so, that's kind of why I was curious about it and why I was looking into it. And that being the case, is it that love is kind of like the glue that holds...? I mean, it talks about love from the divine, the love of the divine, for the divine. "I was a treasure and I loved to be known", as al-'Arabi said. And the C's, at one point, when talking about chakras, said that something was a sexual center, and it was connected to seventh density in the aspect of "thou I love", or something like that. I don't remember exactly what the terminology was, but it's like love is kind of like... Is it like the glue, or the motivation?

A: Both in a sense, but more the motivation.

Q: (L) So love is what motivates creation, in a sense.

A: Yes

Q: (L) Boy, that was fast! All right. Does anybody have any questions about that, that they want to ask?

(Ellipse) I would like to ask if for a man, there is no risk of building too much energy when there is retention. If there's a risk of having, or building up too much energy.

(L) In other words, you're worried that you'll wait too long and you'll explode. [laughter]

(Joe) I think he's talking about retention, that if there is energy inflow, that there will be too much energy. I suppose that if it's not used, then maybe.

A: When the moment for release comes, it should be obvious. The ancients made observations and established rule of thumb guidelines that can be followed.

Q: (L) So, I'll put it all together and make it available. But there are, like I said, there are a couple of books you can buy that have this material. They don't put so much focus on the love part, which the Cs apparently consider to be very important. They're mostly into practical aspects, or whatever. But there are a couple of books that I think are reliable. So, I'll make that available very shortly. But in the meantime, I guess from what the C's have said, people can, if they know the principle, you know, retention for the man, but not for the woman... or not normally for the woman. Under some circumstances, apparently it might be advisable, but not usually. And prolonged encounters, and prolific encounters. Because that makes it even harder. I mean, because if you have a period of time, obviously if you don't do anything for that period of time, you're not really challenging yourself. Because I think that... I don't know if you guys realize how hard it is to retain for any great period of time, and I'm really thankful that the burden is put upon the men. [laughter]

(T.C.) Can I ask a question?

(L) Yes.

(T.C.) It's semi-related, but it's in the same ballpark. About single men: It's just a general question, but what is going to be more beneficial for their long-term health, retention or release/relief?

(L) I didn't read about that in the book, yet. Of course, I haven't read all of the books yet.

(T.C.) So they may cover that in your books as well.

(L) Yeah, that may be covered, but I haven't come across anything about it. I guess we can just ask...

A: Depends on the man.

Q: (L) So it would almost have to be an individual answer. Yeah, because I don't know how you'd be balancing your yin energy if you don't have a female partner. And autonomous activity might... Maybe, here's what I think: I think if a man is single, he should not worry so much about retention, because he's not getting any yin balancing anyway, and he should just try to restrict himself to as often as needed. Is that close enough?

A: Yes

Q: (L) So any other questions? Come now, come on. Everything you wanted to know, it's right here. Just... No?

(Approaching Infinity) I’ve got a question.

(L) Yes?

(Approaching Infinity) So in some of the texts that I've read on like Taoist Alchemy, but also in things like Gurdjieff, there's an emphasis placed on the visualization that goes along with something like retention. So visualizing energy, like moving from the groin area up into the mind. Are those types of visualizations beneficial or necessary?

A: Beneficial, but not always necessary.

I was reminded of a video I had watched a while ago that I never posted here ( I think), but in terms of masculinity, and in the context of the above, I began to think of it in an entirely different way, or perhaps a more complete way. Aragorn, is seen as one of the best depictions of masculinity in popular culture, the right amount of discipline that honed in skill, which he uses to protect by using violence in a righteous manner, this has been probably discussed quite a bit, but on this video, they discuss a scene deleted from the movies, that made it to the book, about Aragorn's healing abilities.

And it struck me that it's perhaps connected to the Tao of Love and Sex, from what I have gathered so far, it's not that one should refuse or close oneself from the joys of sexual encounters, but making it exclusively about the joy and pleasure turns its healing potential upside down and it becomes draining, as the C's pointed out.

So, it's not sex for pleasure's sake, it's enjoy the pleasure of the true purpose of the connection. Both are pleasant but the orientation of the act is what determines its fruits. Aragorn didn't seek power for power's sake, he did however wield his power for a selfless purpose. Power was always part of the equation, only in a different location, so to speak.

Put another way, properly developing the right traits for the right purpose, is the best way to ensure the adequate expression of masculinity, and in a loving relationship, is perhaps the only way to ensure that one's loving can have healing effects instead of draining ones.

Anyway, here's the video


 
Back
Top Bottom