Mass Extinctions, Evolutionary Leaps, and the Virus-Information Connection

Chapter 3: The 27 million year cometary cycle​


Until the 1980’s cometary impacts as the main cause of mass extinctions was still controversial. Despite the understandable[1] scarcity of dated impact craters, the cometary induced mass extinction scenario gained a lot of traction with the discovery of a very distinct cycle punctuating most mass extinctions experienced by our planet. But before addressing this point and this mounting evidence of the cometary impacts, let’s have look at our solar system.

As everybody knows, our solar system is powered by a single star, the Sun. Well, it is assumed that ours is a single-star solar system because we see only one sun rise each morning. However, this is actually quite a peculiar configuration, since most stars astronomers have observed are part of multi-star systems (most often binary).

Based on data from NASA’s Chandra X-ray observatory, it’s estimated that over 80% of all stars may be in either binary or multiple-star systems.[2] Grazia and Milton, who studied the 60 star systems nearest to our own reached a comparable conclusion:

61% of the 60 nearest stars are components of a double (binary) or triple star system.[3]

A twin-star model for our own solar system is a tantalizing prospect, not least because it could account for many ‘anomalies’ exhibited by the single-star hypothesis. As stated by the Binary Research Institute (BRI):

elliptical orbit equations have been found to be a better predictor of precession rates than Newcomb’s formula, showing far greater accuracy over the last hundred years. Moreover, a moving solar system model appears to solve a number of solar system formation theory problems including the sun’s lack of angular momentum. For these reasons, BRI has concluded our sun is most likely part of a long cycle binary system.[4]


image37.jpg
© NASA
Sirius is a binary star. Sirius A is the brightest.
Sirius B is dimmer and so close to Sirius A that it was not sighted until 1862.


Bear in mind that the binary systems identified above are composed of stars bright enough to be detected with a telescope. This means that the percentage of binary systems may be even higher, since some systems can include ‘unlit’ stars, like so-called ‘brown dwarfs’, for example.

For plasma cosmologists, a binary system is the logical way for individual stars to cope with high electric stress, causing any given star to go through a process of fission (i.e. splitting into two or more parts).[5] When a sphere is divided into two equally-sized spheres, the total mass will remain the same (no matter disappears) but the total surface area of this pair will be about 26% larger than the area of the original single sphere.[6] This increases the total surface area exposed to the electric field and thus decreases the current density (amperes per square meter). Thus, electrically-induced fission enables stars to reduce the electric stress they are subjected to by spreading it between two or more stars.

Because of the lower level of electric stress exerted on a binary system after fission, brown dwarfs (stars exposed to a weak electric field, hence their reduced brightness) should be quite common in binary systems:

If the members of a resulting binary pair turn out to be unequal in size, the larger one will probably have the larger current density – but still lower than the original value. (This assumes that the total charge and total driving current to the original star distributes itself onto the new stars proportionally to their masses.) In this case, the smaller member of the pair might have such a low value of current density as to drop it, abruptly, to ‘brown dwarf’ or even ‘giant gas planet’ status.[7]
It’s clear that binary stars are very common, probably even more common than acknowledged in the scientific literature. So, is our Sun one more anomaly in the rather anomalous universe depicted by mainstream science? Is our Sun really single?

A significant clue that our star may in fact be part of a binary system appeared in Nature in the year 1982,[8] when paleontologists David Raup and Jack Sepkoski unveiled a cyclical pattern of mass-extinction events in the fossil record.[9] Their research revealed that over the last 250 million years, the Earth regularly experienced mass extinctions, as depicted in the chart below:


raupp 27 my cycle.jpg
© Sott.net adapted from Melottt & Bambach
27 MY periodicity of mass extinctions

In the graph above we can see, out of 19 events - circled points-, 11 - green circled points - lie on the vertical lines showing the 27-My (million year) interval.

The above strongly suggests that mass extinctions, at least a majority of them, are due to a cyclical phenomenon, but doesn’t clarify the nature of this phenomenon.

The mystery lasted until Berkeley physicist Richard Muller discovered another significant clue 1986 when he compiled the iridium levels measured at the K/T boundary, which marked the mass extinction that occurred about 66 million years ago and matches the 27 My-cycle (3 cycles ago).

Muller checked the iridium levels in no less than 66 different locations across the whole planet. As shown on the map below, the results were unexpected: in each of those 66 different locations, Muller found abnormal levels of iridium.[10]


image39.jpg

© R. Muller
66 iridium concentration anomalies measured at the K/T boundary.

The discovery of Muller was confirmed by several researchers amongst which Frank T. Kyte and John T. Wasson who measured iridium in 149 samples of Pacific abyssal clay covering the time span 33 to 67 million years ago. They showed a prominent spike at K/T boundary (66 Mya) with an increase 200-fold compared to the background concentration[11].

What’s the big deal with iridium, you might wonder. Together with gold, platinum, osmium and rhenium, iridium is one of the ‘noble elements’ which are 10,000 times as abundant in meteoric material than in the Earth’s crust.[12] But it’s not just meteors that deliver these elements to Earth; the massive radiations emitted by supernovas can also generate large quantities of heavy elements, including iridium.

So, while iridium anomalies at the K/T boundary signal that the mass extinction about 66 million years ago was due to a cosmic event, it remained to be seen whether the culprit was a supernova or a meteor bombardment.

Initially, Luis Alvarez[13] was a proponent of the supernova theory. To prove his case he reasoned as follows: Pu-244, one of the isotopes of plutonium, isn’t naturally present in the Earth’s crust, nor in meteorites. However, it is one of the heavy elements created by supernovas. So if mass extinctions were due to supernova explosions, then we should find abnormally high levels of Pu-244 in the geological era boundary material because of its very long half-life of 80 million years. The analysis of Pu-244 concentrations in the clay sample from the E-O boundary led to the following conclusion:

There was no plutonium. A supernova had not killed the dinosaurs. These results were later published in a paper titled ‘Negative results for the Supernova hypotheses’. In this paper they [Alvarez et al.] described how the measurements showed there was no plutonium-244 present, and how this result ruled out the supernova theory[14]

If it was not a supernova, then the only possible cause was an asteroid / cometary bombardments (which we can refer to interchangeably[15]). Since then, several research teams, including University of Louisiana astronomer Dr. Daniel Whitmire and the Mellot and Bambach[16] team, have published papers confirming that meteor bombardments were indeed the cause of these cyclical mass extinction events.

Once it was established that cyclical mass extinctions were due to space rocks, another question arose: what is the main driver of these cyclical bombardments? The idea that a single asteroid or a swarm of asteroids can follow a stable 27-million-year orbit is highly unlikely.

Small celestial objects cannot remain in stable and very long orbits for hundreds of million years. As we’ve seen repeatedly in recent years, when comets approach massive celestial objects like Saturn, Jupiter or the Sun they are either destroyed, disintegrated, drastically weakened, ‘sucked in’ (hence the name ‘sun-diving comets’), or the encounter alters their orbit as they’re violently ejected back out of the inner solar system. So it is very unlikely that an asteroid swarm alone could cross the solar system, maintain a stable orbit throughout the journey, then return to the inner solar system on its next revolution and do it again and again for over 500 million years as suggested by Raupp and Sepkovsky’s research[17].

In addition such a long orbit implies that the hypothetical asteroid(s) would travel several light years away[18] from the Solar system and be subjected to the disruptive gravitational forces of local stars.


image40.jpg
© Hermitage Museum
Alfred Rethel, Nemesis

If asteroid(s) can’t follow such a stable 27-MY orbit by themselves, then something else obviously does; something large enough to maintain a stable orbit; and something that regularly sends fresh comets our way. That’s where Richard Muller came up with the idea that a solar companion – a twin Sun – followed such an orbit. Every 27 million years, on its approach towards the solar system, such a companion would disturb asteroids or comets local to its orbit, pushing and pulling them along its trajectory. Muller named this hypothetical Sun’s companion Nemesis[19] after the Greek goddess who relentlessly persecutes the excessively rich, proud and powerful.

After Muller’s ground-breaking work, several research teams, including astronomer Frank Low[20] and Thomas Chester[21], began exploring the sky to find Nemesis. This quest lasted for years but returned no positive results, so observers have yet to find still Nemesis. But as we noted earlier, some stars are not bright at all, as is the case with brown dwarfs (Dan Whitmire’s star category of choice for Nemesis[22]) and, to a lesser extent, extinct red dwarfs, which is Muller’s choice[23].

If the Sun’s companion is a brown dwarf – and if it is also orbiting in the ecliptic plane – finding it would be literally like finding a dark, invisible object surrounded by millions of bright, shining ones, a feat way more difficult than finding a needle in a haystack. This is quite an apt metaphor since up until now the technology hasn’t existed to allow us to successfully and systematically detect dark celestial bodies like brown dwarfs, as Whitmire explains:

Currently, I am searching the half billion point sources in the 2MASS database for evidence of this object. This survey covered 99% of the sky at near-infrared wavelengths of 1–2 microns. The optimum wavelength for our search is 5 microns but no such full sky survey exists, as yet.[24]

If Nemesis exists, the fact that it hasn’t been found despite years of research strongly advocates for it being a dark star.

image41.png

© Wikimedia Commons
Artistic depiction of a brown dwarf

As a side note, according to mainstream science, brown dwarfs are small stars nearing the end of their life. In standard cosmology, their ‘internal Fermi reactions’ are decreasing due to lack of fuel (hydrogen), making them progressively dimmer and dimmer. However, there are several problems with this model. For starters, brown dwarfs emit X-rays:

The orbiting x-ray telescope Chandra recently discovered a brown dwarf (spectral class M9) emitting an x-ray flare. This poses an additional problem for the advocates of the stellar fusion model. A star this cool should not be capable of x-ray flare production. How ‘gravitational collapse’ can produce x-rays remains unexplained.
‘We were shocked,’ said Dr. Robert Rutledge of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, the lead author on the discovery paper to appear in the July 20 issue of Astrophysical Journal Letters. ‘We didn’t expect to see flaring from such a lightweight object. This is really the ‘mouse that roared.’[25]
In standard astronomical models, Brown dwarfs are ‘supposed to be’ too cool and too small to maintain fusion reactions in their cores. The minimum temperature ‘should be’ three million degrees kelvin and the mass should be at least seven percent of the Sun’s mass, but some ‘brown dwarfs’ do not meet those requirements, they can’t trigger nuclear fusion although they emit X-ray radiation. [26]

But a brown dwarf presents no anomaly in electric models. It’s simply a star that is not glowing because the local electric field is too weak. From this perspective it’s not the size (and therefore the limited gravitational field) that makes a star dark, but the electric stress. If the electric stress is too low, the star (whatever its size) doesn’t glow. Thus the size and temperature range determined by mainstream science to define brown dwarfs is irrelevant.

Now, let’s go back to the main idea of this chapter: the 27-My extinction cycle and its cometary nature.

In 1982[27], Raup and Sepkoski discovered that most major extinctions coincide with a 27 million years cycle. In 1980[28], Alvarez proved that the K/T extinction that wiped out the dinosaurs 66 Mya (3 cycles ago) was due to cometary bombardments. The combination of these two pieces of evidence strongly suggests that the 27 million year cycle was, at least partly, of a cometary nature, but that’s not all.

In 2017, almost 40 years after Alvarez, Raup and Sepkoski discoveries, New York University geologist and NASA consultant Michael Rampino[29] discovered that four of the six largest known impact craters of the last 250 My are correlated with three recognized extinction events, which coincide with the 27-million year cycle:

- the Chesapeake and Popigai impact craters ca. 34 Mya coeval late Eocene extinction (2 cycles ago) confirmed by anomalous level of iridium independently detected by Kyte[30] and Alvarez [31]
- the Chicxulub impact crater ca. 66 Mya (3 cycles ago) coincident with the end Cretaceous (or K/T) extinction
- the Morokweng/Mjolnir impact crater ca. 145 Mya (6 cycles ago), Jurassic-Cretaceous extinction


correlation impact craters mass extinctions.jpg

© Rampino
Correlation between the 6 largest known impact craters and five recognized extinction events

Notice also that, as indicated in the graph above:

- the end-Permian extinction ca. 252 Mya (10 cycles ago) coincidences with marked increase in impact crater formation rate although no time matching large impact crater has been identified yet.

- the Triassic-Jurassic extinction ca. 201 Mya (8 cycles ago) stratigraphic analysis reveals several evidence of cometary impact:

Diagnostic evidence of bolide impact in the stratigraphic record includes high-pressure (10–45 Gpa) mineral polymorphs, such as stishovite and coesite, and microscopic shock-deformation features in quartz, feldspar, and zircons[32]

In addition, three craters dating back to the times of this extinction (Manicouagan, Rochechouart and Saint Martin) are aligned[33] along the 22.8 N longitudes, which strongly suggest a crater chain formed by multiple successive impacts à la Shoemaker Levy.

At this point the correlation between the 27-My cycle, cometary bombardments and mass extinction is very strong.

We saw in the previous chapter that events like mass volcanism, ice ages or mass seismicity were proposed as the cause of several mass extinctions. We suggested that these events, while being a contributing factor to mass extinction, are the effects of cometary bombardments, which are, consequently, the primary triggering cause of extinctions.

This hypothesis was considerably strengthened in 2021 when Rampino[34] demonstrated that during last 260 My the last 89 major geological events, including cometary bombardments, mass volcanism, anoxia and sea level change and mass earthquakes where in sync with the 27-My cycle, as illustrated by the diagram below, which shows on the left the timing of major geological events (smoothed) while the graph on the right reveals the 27.5-My cyclicity of these major geological events as indicated by the black arrow:



rampino fourier arrow .jpg
© Rampino
Timing (left) and cyclicity (right) of the 89 major geological events over the past 260 My

At this point, what is left to examine are extinction events outside the 27 My-cycle. Several of them also reveal the tell-tale signs of cometary encounters: impact craters and/or iridium and/or tektite:

- The mid-Ordovician extinction, also known as the Ordovician Meteor Event happened ca. 467 Mya. This extinction was marked by the dramatic increase in the rate at which chondrite meteorites[35] fell to Earth, by the Charlevoix Crater[36] and by a spike in iridium[37].

The Kellwasser Event (ca. 372 Mya) part the late Devonian extinction, is coeval with the Siljan[38] and the Alamo[39] crater, a concentration in iridium 20 times greater than the average[40] and a spike in micro-tektite[41].

The Hangelberg Event (ca. 358 Mya) part the late Devonian extinction, is synchronous with the Woodleigh crater[42]

- the Carboniferous-Permian extinction ca. 307 Mya also known as the Carboniferous rainforest collapse coeval with a iridium anomaly[43]

The above strongly suggests that mass extinctions, within the 27-My cycle and without, are, in a vast majority, caused by cometary impacts. What would happen to this proportion if the research in this field was not underfunded?



[1] Searching for impact craters on Earth is not an easy task because wind, rain, earthquakes, sea-level changes, vegetation growth and urbanization tend to erase these geological features. Plus, the search for impact craters doesn't seem to be a priority for modern science, maybe due to the strong ideological resistance – uniformitarianism - against the very idea of cometary impacts and their obvious catastrophic consequences. Nonetheless, at least three databases EDEIS , Somerikko and EID list some of the impact craters found on Earth. As of 2019, there are approximately 200 confirmed impact craters and 700 probable/possible ones despite the chronic under-funding this field of research.
[2] Cruttenden, W. (2005) “Lost Star”, St. Lynn's Press p.111 ‎
[3] De Grazia, A. & Milton, E.R. (2018), ‘’Solaria Binaria’’, Metron Publications p.17
[4] Binary Research Institute Editors (2011) “Introduction to Binary Companion Theory”, Binary Research Institute.
[5] Scott, D. (2006) “The Electric Sky”, ‎Mikamar Publishing p. 157-159
[6] Scott, D. (2013) “Electric cosmology – Stellar Evolution”, Electric Cosmos.org
[7] Scott, (2006) p.158
[8] Raup, D. & Sepkoski, J. (1982), “Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record”, Science, 215- 4539, pp. 1501-1503
[9] According to calculations made by Raup & Sepkoski, the probability of a 27-MY mass extinction cycle being due to random chance is less than 1%.
[10] Muller, R. (1990) “Nemesis : The Death Star”, Arrow p.74-77
[11] Kyte FT, Wasson JT. (1986) “Accretion rate of extraterrestrial matter: iridium deposited 33 to 67 million years ago”. Science 232(4755):1225-9
[12] Muller, 1990 p.44
[13] At the time Luis Alvarez was the director of the Princeton research laboratories where Muller was conducting his research about Nemesis.
[14] Ibid., p.59
[15] Lescaudron, 2014. Chapter 18
[16] Melott A. & Bambach R., (2010) “Nemesis Reconsidered”, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society Letters 407, issue 1, pp L99–L102
[17] Raup, D. & Sepkoski, J. (1982), “Mass extinctions in the marine fossil record”, Science, 215-4539, pp. 1501-1503
[18] An asteroid of neglectable mass (several tons) relative to the Sun would have an aphelion of roughly 200.000 AU that is 3.16 light years. Such a remote aphelion would subject the asteroid to the gravitational forces of nearby stars like Proxima Centauri (4.24 light years from the Sun) or the binary stars Alpha Centauri A and B (4.35 light years from the Sun) while the gravitational forces exerted by the Sun would be virtually null.
[19] Muller, 1990, p.114
[20] (1933-2009) Astronomer who worked for the University of Arizona
Jeff Harrison, (2009) “Astronomer Frank J. Low, 1933-2009” University of Arizona
[21] Thomas Jay Chester worked for NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL)
Thomas Chester (2004) “Thomas Jay Chester's Website”
[22] D. Whitmire et al. (1984). ‘Are periodic mass extinctions driven by a distant solar companion?’, Nature 308, 713–715
[23] Muller, 1990 p.109
[24] Bruce A. (2009) “Science or Superstition”, ‎Disinformation Books p.67
[25] Scott , 2006, p. 127
[26] Ibid, p. 127-129
[27] David M. Raup, J. John Sepkoski Jr. (1982). “Mass Extinctions in the Marine Fossil Record”. Science: 1501-1503
[28] Alvarez, L.W et al. (1980). "Extraterrestrial cause for the Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction". Science. 208 (4448):
[29] Rampino, Michael R.& Caldeira, Ken. (2017). “Correlation of the largest craters, stratigraphic impact signatures, and extinction events over the past 250 Myr”. Geoscience Frontiers, 8- 6, Pages 1241-1245,
[30] Kyte FT, Wasson JT. (1986) “Accretion rate of extraterrestrial matter: iridium deposited 33 to 67 million years ago”. Science 232(4755):1225-9
[31] Alvarez, W. et al. (1982) “Iridium anomaly approximately synchronous with terminal Eocene extinctions” Science, v. 216, p. 886-888.
[32] Tanner, Lawrence et al. (2004). “Assessing the record and causes of Late Triassic extinction”. Earth-Science Reviews. 65. 103-139. 10.1016
[33] Spray, J.G et al. (1998). “Evidence for a Late Triassic multiple impact event on Earth”. Nature 392,171–173
[34] Michael R. Rampino et al. (2021). “A pulse of the Earth: A 27.5-Myr underlying cycle in coordinated geological events over the last 260 Myr”. Geoscience Frontiers
[35] Korochantseva, Ekaterina et al. (2007). "L-chondrite asteroid breakup tied to Ordovician meteorite shower by multiple isochron 40 Ar- 39 Ar dating". Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 42 (1): 113–130.
[36] Schmieder, M. et al. (2019). “In situ U–Pb analysis of shocked zircon from the Charlevoix impact structure, Québec, Canada”. Meteoritics & Planetary Science. 54(8) pp. 1808-1827.
[37] Richard Grieve (1997) “Extraterrestrial impact events: the record in the rocks and the stratigraphic column” Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology
[38] Victor Clube, Bill Napier (1982) “The Cosmic Serpent: A Catastrophist View of Earth History” Universe Books p.121
[39] Sandberg, Charles et al. (2002). “Late Devonian sea-level changes, catastrophic events, and mass extinctions”. Geological Soc Am. 356. 473–87
[40] Playford PE, et al. (1984) “Iridium anomaly in the upper devonian of the canning basin, Western australia”. Science. 226(4673):437-9
[41] Sandberg, 2002
[42] Reimold, W.U. et al. (2003), “Woodleigh impact structure, Australia: Shock petrography and geochemical studies”. Meteoritics & Planetary Science, 38: 1109-1130.
[43] Mizukami, Takuya et al. (2014). “A spike of woody plant biomarkers in the deep-sea iridium layer at the Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary”. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 412. 241–248.
 

Attachments

  • nemesis.jpg
    nemesis.jpg
    65.4 KB · Views: 18
  • rampino geological events.jpg
    rampino geological events.jpg
    94.5 KB · Views: 14
  • rampino geological events.jpg
    rampino geological events.jpg
    94.5 KB · Views: 291
  • rampino fourier.jpg
    rampino fourier.jpg
    64.3 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:
Hi Pierre, just a thought but if you've decided to release the book electronically instead of printing it (a real shame as I prefer printed books, and would absolutely have purchased it as soon as published), it might be a good idea to release a PDF version. Otherwise it gets lost in a series of forum threads ... and it is in any case difficult to read book-length material on a screen, at least for me but I know many others have the same problem.
Good idea. Here are the 3 first chapters in PDF format.
 

Attachments

  • Chapter 1 Mass Extinctions.pdf
    814.5 KB · Views: 104
  • Chapter 2 Causes of Mass Extinctions.pdf
    533.5 KB · Views: 83
  • Chapter 3 The 27 million year cometary cycle.pdf
    889.8 KB · Views: 87
Merci infiniment Pierre, grace à vos publications, je peux lire vos chapitres en Français et les copier dans mon ordinateur mais les PDF sont en Anglais et là je ne peux pas les traduire...

Thank you very much Pierre, thanks to your publications, I can read your chapters in French and copy them in my computer but the PDFs are in English and there I can't translate them...
 
Excellent @Pierre, cant wait for the next chapters. Have finished reading your latest book too and mind blown at seeing where all the Martian water went and the deep dive into Venus’ seven passes. These books should be made mandatory at school because they explain everything so clearly. This area needs more researchers like you and proper funding for travelling and studying strata plus a few private satellites.
 
Merci infiniment Pierre, grace à vos publications, je peux lire vos chapitres en Français et les copier dans mon ordinateur mais les PDF sont en Anglais et là je ne peux pas les traduire...

Thank you very much Pierre, thanks to your publications, I can read your chapters in French and copy them in my computer but the PDFs are in English and there I can't translate them...
You can do it too, @PERLOU: You just have to copy-paste in a translation programme the text from the Pdf files as it can be selected the same way you select text from here or elsewhere.

Tu peux le faire aussi, Perlou : il te suffit de copier-coller dans un programme de traduction le texte des fichiers Pdf puisqu'il peut être sélectionné de la même manière que tu sélectionnes du texte ici ou ailleurs.

Thank you very much @Pierre for sharing here with us your terrific researchs. :hug2:
 
- the Chesapeake and Popigai impact craters ca. 34 Mya coeval late Eocene extinction (2 cycles ago) confirmed by anomalous level of iridium independently detested by Kyte[30] et Alarvez [31]
Thanks Pierre for sharing your book, what an amazing walk accross time you take us.

In the line above, I have highlited the word detested but assume that you mean detected.
 
Sarlett, merci pour l'info mais pourrais-tu donner un lien vers ce traducteur car Deepl ne traduit pas d'aussi long texte...

Scarlett, thanks for the info but could you give a link to this translator because Deepl does not translate such a long text...
 
Sarlett, merci pour l'info mais pourrais-tu donner un lien vers ce traducteur car Deepl ne traduit pas d'aussi long texte...

Scarlett, thanks for the info but could you give a link to this translator because Deepl does not translate such a long text...
Why do you want to put the whole text at once? You could do it step by step, paragraph by paragraph. And you may even copy-paste the step by step French translation from Deepl in a Word document, adding new chapters on it each time another new one is shared. That way, you can read it again when you want to do so. Just an idea/suggestion.

Pourquoi veux-tu mettre tout le texte d'un coup ? Tu pourrais le faire étape par étape, paragraphe par paragraphe. Et tu pourrais même copier-coller la traduction française de Deepl, étape par étape, dans un document Word, en y ajoutant de nouveaux chapitres chaque fois qu'un nouveau est partagé. Ainsi, tu peux le relire quand tu veux. C'est juste une idée/suggestion.
 
OUI bien sur mais dans l'état de fatigue où je suis actuellement j'avoue et j'en rends Grâce à Pierre le copier/cpller est plus facile pour moi en Français...

YES of course but in the state of tiredness where I am currently I admit and I give thanks to Pierre the copy/cpller is easier for me in French...
 
Pierre, je ne comprends pas ce que vous voulez dire, je sais lire le français mais je ne comprends pas l'anglais.
OUI, je copie et colle sur mon ordinateur directement du forum qui est traduit en français par GOOGLE...
Ai je compris ce que vous vouliez dire ?

Pierre, I don't understand what you mean, I can read French but I don't understand English.
YES, I copy and paste on my computer directly from the forum which is translated into French by GOOGLE...
Did I understand what you meant?
 
Sarlett, merci pour l'info mais pourrais-tu donner un lien vers ce traducteur car Deepl ne traduit pas d'aussi long texte...

Scarlett, thanks for the info but could you give a link to this translator because Deepl does not translate such a long text...
Perlou, j'utilise Google traduction dans ce cas, que vous pouvez trouver dans les extensions de votre navigateur. Pour Firefox cette extension s'intitule " Traduire les pages web" téléchargeable gratuitement et qui une fois appliquée traduit tout site web ou documents.
 
Part 1 : comets and mass extinction 13

Mass extinctions 14
Causes of mass extinction 16
The 27 million year cometary cycle 22
Other cometary induced mass extinctions 32

Part II : Life explosion 36

Saltarism vs Darwinism 37
Peculiar life forms around cometary impacts 39
The K/T boundary 43
The cambrian life explosion 45
Other life explosion 46
Beyond the mechanical action of cometary event 49

Part III: Viruses are the drivers of life 54

Anteriority of viruses 55
Pervasiveness of virus 57
Beneficial viruses 58

Part IV: Viruses and meteorites 62

Comet and plagues, an historical perspective 63
Meteorites carrying micro organism 65
Upper atmosphere microorganism 70
Electro Magnetic pulses 72

Part V: The information Field 77

Information theory & consciousness 78

The Field 84
Collective resonance 94

Part VI: Information field, viruses and protein 99

DNA as antennas 100
Proteins as tuners 102
DNA and proteins connect us to the Information Field 106
Fractals 108
From geometric shape to electromagnetic signature 112
The interesting case of homeopathy 116

Part VII: 6th extinction and coronavirus 120

The ongoing 6th extinction 121
Authorities and Life 123
Authorities and Control 126
Dumbing Down the Population 128
The Mind-Altering Virus 130
Man-Made Viruses 131
Man-Made SARS-CoV-2 132
Engineered for What Purpose? 135
Fort Detrick And Viruses 137
Fort Detrick and Mind Control 140
Made in China or Made in the USA? 142
From an Obedience Vaccine to a Mutated Disobedience Virus? 146
Covid vaccine 152

Conclusion 157

As you can see, Part I et II deal with mass extinctions and the subsequent evolutionary leaps. It shows that cometary events are the main cause of mass extinctions and that, soon after, more complex life forms seems to appear out of nowhere.

Part III and IV show that new viruses introduced by cometary events participate to remove obsolete life-forms and introduce the genetic material code enabling the evolutionary leap of the "spared" life forms.

Part V and VI show how the virus-enhanced DNA of life forms and the proteins coded by this DNA act as receivers tuned onto the information field. The properties of a substance are not defined by its composition but its geometry. The connection between proteins/DNA and the information field are geometric and electromagnetic. The fractal nature of DNA, viruses, proteins and the background ELF electromagnetic field reinforces the connection between life forms and any given "area" of the information field.

Part VII address the coronavirus story, an unstable Fort Detrick obedience virus that mutated in a disobedience virus (SARS-COV-2) for which obedience RNA vaccines had to be imposed. The weakening of the population immune system through fear, stress, no herd immunity and the deleterious RNA vaccines makes us highly vulnerable to a real epidemics (a new virus from space and/or a recombination between RNA vaccine sequences and viruses like the Black Death already contained in our DNA). From this perspective the 6th extinction might very well be man-made but not for the usually invoked reason: global warming. However, like during the preceding mass extinctions, the new viruses that remove obsolete life-forms might provide the genetic material for the survivors to experience an evolutionary leap.

Short of time, still I’ve glanced the interesting chapter 3 posted here. It seems a nice book. Also, its style of writing is clear and accessible to most world readers; congratulations.

Very likely I should read more before asking, even so, why is counted the current extinction as “6th”? Considering a 27my-cycle for great mass-extinctions, where/when is the starting-point? I would chance it as 250 mya! though I’ve noticed the mentioned earlier extinctions as well.

Furthermore, as written, the connection of mass extinctions with the brown companion and then the latter causing meteor rain turned up a pretty much ground-worked case. Yet —again, perhaps I need to read the rest of the book, or this is not the focus of the book— what is the relation of these extinctions with earth-changes? And —though I noticed the mentioned “virus changer” as something introduced under these “rains”— interconnected with earth-changes can we see also the human psychic (synchronically?) merged with cosmic events (cycles, etc.)?!!
July 4th 2020 Session

(Pierre) If negative emotions are about to be amplified, knowing how much anger there is right now on the planet, I'm wondering what it will lead to? I think there's a lot of anger and frustration.

(L) Well, remember what happens. If you can't create without, you create within. There's going to be Earth changes. The Cs said the human cycle mirrors the cycle of cosmic catastrophe. As above, so below. The crazier they get on the planet, the crazier the cosmic events become. It's a feedback loop.

So, above is recalled the transcripts, and the nature of the 3D reality is synthetized very well. That is to say, it’s not only that outer cosmic events provoke earth-changes… actually the —collective?— human mind also can provoke earth-changes. And “earth-changes” go until what distance? How is defined our earth-kingdom? This needs contemplation, but I’m also pinpointing another aspect that I’ll comment more in the next post.​
 
Let’s wonder for a moment that cyclic 27my extinctions are also related to the human mind. Well, mankind has a lame main-stream history at maximum limited to the Holocene (last 10,000 years), but with humanoid fossils spanning the Quaternary —last 2 million years— and a few findings within the last parts of the Cenozoic. So? Well, maybe not properly “human” but maybe some “proto-human” mind acting from some density is linked to the realm of earth events. For example, in the transcripts at some point Laura asked if humans lived in the time of dinosaurs. Surprisingly the C’s answered “Yes” though under a transitional period that “soon” vanished. So, why could not the “mind” be related to all the extinctions of eons ago?!! Another “odd” question: The “brown-twin” does seem the cause of comet rain, but what did cause the “brown-twin”? Maybe it helps if recalled that out of the 3rd density “time is meaningless”?!!

Moreover, with regard to the tectonic changes (during these cosmic events of extinctions?!!), they seem important —IMOP— because such changes likely should be registered somehow also in the memories of the timeless soul, and these in turn could reflect in dreams and ancient records —oral and in writings— from around the world even if humankind wasn’t physically present during those events. Thus, events of Pangaea or Gondwana may be available via myths and old songs. Notice that the C’s said that, after this “present,” earth will be different in terms of continental lands. So, in a certain way we could be “re-living” a paleo-myth right now.

6 February 2016 Session

A: We once mentioned worldwide simultaneous eruptions. Not just that, but also the cyclic heating within the Earth and release of gases that propel continental drift. When the present period of change terminates, much of your world will be unrecognizable.
 
Back
Top Bottom