Mass Extinctions, Evolutionary Leaps, and the Virus-Information Connection

[daddycat]

Some of the stuff was pretty mind-blowing, since it shows how critical electromagnetism is to the morphology of organisms.

"Your physiology and etheric orientation are both tied into the magnetic state of your environment."

Q: (A) Yes, but why is this reality shift related to magnetic field disturbance? What is the connection?

A: Your physiology and etheric orientation are both tied into the magnetic state of your environment.

Q: (L) Okay, you said before that the magnetic field is going to reverse...

A: Magnetic poles reverse.

Q: (L) Okay, what is the magnetic field going to do. It is going to change in some way. Is it going to increase, decrease... is this to a degree - something other than direction - amplification? (T) Will anything change in the strength of the field?

A: Let us illustrate. Now: Earth. [A circle is drawn with radiating spikes all around fairly close to the surface.] Earth after: [A circle is drawn with double radiating spikes with those in polar regions considerably longer than the others.]

Q: (T) So, it is the same, except it is larger?

A: Close.

Q: (T) Are you indicating that the magnetic field will be stronger?

A: Broader and larger.

Q: (L) What is the cross in the middle?

A: Geodirectional grid reference. You incorrectly added circle on side. Lines of magnetic field alignment should be shown as longer at poles. "Crosshairs" in illustration are for directional reference only.

Q: (T) Does this mean it will be stronger also?

A: Larger and broader.

Q: (A) People work near strong magnets much stronger than the Earth's magnetic field, yet nothing happens to them that we can see.

A: Not true. Body chemistry is altered. Is not long term or permanent exposure.

 

[Mari]

I haven´t found in this thread all the chapters in English merged into one pdf document/book, so I created one big pdf with all the chapters merged into a book.

 

[Breo]

I haven´t found in this thread all the chapters in English merged into one pdf document/book, so I created one big pdf with all the chapters merged into a book.

Thank you, Mari for this work! Added to my reading list :)

FYI, in the table of contents, from chap. 2 on, at the page links, it says: Error! Bookmark not defined.

 

[Mari]

FYI, in the table of contents, from chap. 2 on, at the page links, it says: Error! Bookmark not defined.

I know; it´s not perfect.... Those errors should be references to pages so you can click on it and go to particular page, but since all the chapters are in separate file, all is now jumbled up.
I´ll try to edit it and see if I can fix it or at least remove remove the links so there are no errors.

 

[Breo]

I know; it´s not perfect.... Those errors should be references to pages so you can click on it and go to particular page, but since all the chapters are in separate file, all is now jumbled up.
I´ll try to edit it and see if I can fix it or at least remove remove the links so there are no errors.

It was just a small reminder. It´s a great service you do and a lot of work. All who want to read it will manage anyway :)

 

[palestine]

Pierre laid down very interesting points. I am a newbie but here is something that caught my attention:

New book: Proteins, Biophotons and the Information Field

The difference in chirality leads to different biophotons emissions

New book: Proteins, Biophotons and the Information Field

The preeminence of shape over chemical composition is perfectly illustrated by the concept of chirality, also known as handedness.

New book: Proteins, Biophotons and the Information Field

According to the prevalent mechanistic paradigm, the properties of a given substances, whether a proteins, an element, or a therapeutic molecule is defined by its chemical

Pierre spots that a molecule exhibits "chirality", "handedness". He explains how this is part of the basic "information acquisition" mecanism - and wonders about this "dynamic feature". "how come that, being teh same substance, two molecules will act completely differently? This is puzzling".

I was pondering if this may be relevant in the context of Ian McGilchrist's teachings, & the right and left hemispheres.

The left would be leaned towards "utilitarianism", while the right hemisphere would be relating to non-utilitarian (I suppose that this term is used in teh context of "us in materialistic 3D", it's a bit pejorative) values - such as beauty, God, goodness and Truth.

I was wondering if molecule's chirality, as observed by Pierre, would be a match - meaning that molecules have such intrinsic quality - and even more, if the chirality Pierre observed refers to a similar "dichotomy".

 

[STARSEED]

Thanks Pierre, this is such an interesting read and I really appreciate your ability to distil what seems to be copious information down into the most salient details.

- detail

- practitioners in osteopathy,

- illustrates the point that

- the virus doesn't cause any sickness

- extent

- throwing the baby (terrain) out with the bathwater

Maybe with the group helping out with editing you will get the time to publish this one too?

I am now conflicted with the work of Dr Tom Cowan Dr Andrew Kaufman Dr Stefan Lanka and the earlier Research of Gaston Naessens. Virus .....Dead Cell Debris or maybe an exosome this research reveals that viruses have no mechanism to reproduce they are not living in any normal sense and the revelation we don't have an immune system but a detox system.
The Somatid cycle reveals much.

 

[Jones]

I am now conflicted with the work of Dr Tom Cowan Dr Andrew Kaufman Dr Stefan Lanka and the earlier Research of Gaston Naessens. Virus .....Dead Cell Debris or maybe an exosome this research reveals that viruses have no mechanism to reproduce they are not living in any normal sense and the revelation we don't have an immune system but a detox system.
The Somatid cycle reveals much.

Hi Starseed, the works that you mention were discussed in the following thread. Perhaps reading that will help sort out your conflict on the ideas presented.

Thread 'Germ Theory vs Terrain Theory / Pleomorphism / Béchamp, Rife, Naessens, Reich'

Jun 10, 2020

In simple terms, the Germ Theory states that disease comes from germs. The Terrain Theory states that germs are the result of a disease, not the cause.

The creature credited with giving us the germ theory is Louis Pasteur (1822-1895). He mainly stole ideas from others, and his real contribution was perverting those ideas and coming up with a result that has caused untold damage since. The germ theory is largely responsible for the barbaric idea of vaccination, for Big Pharma, and generally for people being a lot sicker than they need to.

A fascinating part of our hidden...

• Mandatory Intellectomy
• Replies: 261
• Forum: Outer Space and "Inner Space" Sciences

• 
•