Mass Extinctions, Evolutionary Leaps, and the Virus-Information Connection

[daddycat]

Some of the stuff was pretty mind-blowing, since it shows how critical electromagnetism is to the morphology of organisms.

"Your physiology and etheric orientation are both tied into the magnetic state of your environment."

Q: (A) Yes, but why is this reality shift related to magnetic field disturbance? What is the connection?

A: Your physiology and etheric orientation are both tied into the magnetic state of your environment.

Q: (L) Okay, you said before that the magnetic field is going to reverse...

A: Magnetic poles reverse.

Q: (L) Okay, what is the magnetic field going to do. It is going to change in some way. Is it going to increase, decrease... is this to a degree - something other than direction - amplification? (T) Will anything change in the strength of the field?

A: Let us illustrate. Now: Earth. [A circle is drawn with radiating spikes all around fairly close to the surface.] Earth after: [A circle is drawn with double radiating spikes with those in polar regions considerably longer than the others.]

Q: (T) So, it is the same, except it is larger?

A: Close.

Q: (T) Are you indicating that the magnetic field will be stronger?

A: Broader and larger.

Q: (L) What is the cross in the middle?

A: Geodirectional grid reference. You incorrectly added circle on side. Lines of magnetic field alignment should be shown as longer at poles. "Crosshairs" in illustration are for directional reference only.

Q: (T) Does this mean it will be stronger also?

A: Larger and broader.

Q: (A) People work near strong magnets much stronger than the Earth's magnetic field, yet nothing happens to them that we can see.

A: Not true. Body chemistry is altered. Is not long term or permanent exposure.

 

[Mari]

I haven´t found in this thread all the chapters in English merged into one pdf document/book, so I created one big pdf with all the chapters merged into a book.

 

[Breo]

I haven´t found in this thread all the chapters in English merged into one pdf document/book, so I created one big pdf with all the chapters merged into a book.

Thank you, Mari for this work! Added to my reading list :)

FYI, in the table of contents, from chap. 2 on, at the page links, it says: Error! Bookmark not defined.

 

[Mari]

FYI, in the table of contents, from chap. 2 on, at the page links, it says: Error! Bookmark not defined.

I know; it´s not perfect.... Those errors should be references to pages so you can click on it and go to particular page, but since all the chapters are in separate file, all is now jumbled up.
I´ll try to edit it and see if I can fix it or at least remove remove the links so there are no errors.

 

[Breo]

I know; it´s not perfect.... Those errors should be references to pages so you can click on it and go to particular page, but since all the chapters are in separate file, all is now jumbled up.
I´ll try to edit it and see if I can fix it or at least remove remove the links so there are no errors.

It was just a small reminder. It´s a great service you do and a lot of work. All who want to read it will manage anyway :)

 

[palestine]

Pierre laid down very interesting points. I am a newbie but here is something that caught my attention:

New book: Proteins, Biophotons and the Information Field

The difference in chirality leads to different biophotons emissions

New book: Proteins, Biophotons and the Information Field

The preeminence of shape over chemical composition is perfectly illustrated by the concept of chirality, also known as handedness.

New book: Proteins, Biophotons and the Information Field

According to the prevalent mechanistic paradigm, the properties of a given substances, whether a proteins, an element, or a therapeutic molecule is defined by its chemical

Pierre spots that a molecule exhibits "chirality", "handedness". He explains how this is part of the basic "information acquisition" mecanism - and wonders about this "dynamic feature". "how come that, being teh same substance, two molecules will act completely differently? This is puzzling".

I was pondering if this may be relevant in the context of Ian McGilchrist's teachings, & the right and left hemispheres.

The left would be leaned towards "utilitarianism", while the right hemisphere would be relating to non-utilitarian (I suppose that this term is used in teh context of "us in materialistic 3D", it's a bit pejorative) values - such as beauty, God, goodness and Truth.

I was wondering if molecule's chirality, as observed by Pierre, would be a match - meaning that molecules have such intrinsic quality - and even more, if the chirality Pierre observed refers to a similar "dichotomy".

 

[STARSEED]

Thanks Pierre, this is such an interesting read and I really appreciate your ability to distil what seems to be copious information down into the most salient details.

- detail

- practitioners in osteopathy,

- illustrates the point that

- the virus doesn't cause any sickness

- extent

- throwing the baby (terrain) out with the bathwater

Maybe with the group helping out with editing you will get the time to publish this one too?

I am now conflicted with the work of Dr Tom Cowan Dr Andrew Kaufman Dr Stefan Lanka and the earlier Research of Gaston Naessens. Virus .....Dead Cell Debris or maybe an exosome this research reveals that viruses have no mechanism to reproduce they are not living in any normal sense and the revelation we don't have an immune system but a detox system.
The Somatid cycle reveals much.

 

[Jones]

I am now conflicted with the work of Dr Tom Cowan Dr Andrew Kaufman Dr Stefan Lanka and the earlier Research of Gaston Naessens. Virus .....Dead Cell Debris or maybe an exosome this research reveals that viruses have no mechanism to reproduce they are not living in any normal sense and the revelation we don't have an immune system but a detox system.
The Somatid cycle reveals much.

Hi Starseed, the works that you mention were discussed in the following thread. Perhaps reading that will help sort out your conflict on the ideas presented.

Thread 'Germ Theory vs Terrain Theory / Pleomorphism / Béchamp, Rife, Naessens, Reich'

Jun 10, 2020

In simple terms, the Germ Theory states that disease comes from germs. The Terrain Theory states that germs are the result of a disease, not the cause.

The creature credited with giving us the germ theory is Louis Pasteur (1822-1895). He mainly stole ideas from others, and his real contribution was perverting those ideas and coming up with a result that has caused untold damage since. The germ theory is largely responsible for the barbaric idea of vaccination, for Big Pharma, and generally for people being a lot sicker than they need to.

A fascinating part of our hidden...

• Mandatory Intellectomy
• Replies: 265
• Forum: Outer Space and "Inner Space" Sciences

• 
• 

 

[palestine]

I sometimes come across posts describing a translation from 4D to 3D—and it has to do with the perception of a phenomenon whose origin lies beyond 3D.

For example: we sometimes read, "This is how we perceive X or Y." Aliens, types of aliens, etc. "This is how you perceive their essence"—as the C's would say.

In the light of this thread, I would observe comets in a similar way.

Must first sum up Pierre's framework:

He demonstrates a bidirectional mechanism, from the human to the Information Field, which I would schematize as follows:

[Human]
> emission of biophotons from its proteins
> connection to the Information Field
[Information Field]
> feedback
> sending of "data" back to the human
> alterations of matter at the individual level
[Human]

The process is dynamic because the Information Field can change the data it sends at any time. The Information Field's nature is unknown to me, but I suspect it to be closer to 7D than a strict 4th D entity.

Any way, it is in this feedback context that comets appear, as agents of change. They not only have an impact on Earth, but they also carry viruses (the plague outbreaks seem to fall under this category).

For several years, I've been observing comets and their study here on the forum, but it's always been from a rather 3D perspective. A comet appears, hits Earth, and so on.

I was thinking that from the perspective of "translating 4D into a 3D understanding," comets would be manifestations of the Information Field.

From there on, there would be all sorts of possibilities for a different description of the source (the Information Field) and the agent (the comet), if we get a bit out of the 3D perspective.

Until now, I've been picturing "agents of change," "a meteor," of different colors, streaking across the sky and destroying.

I wonder if considering them based on their original density would allow for the development of an even more objective model. In this model, "a comet" becomes a pure manifestation of will on the part of the Information Field—a direct transmission of data intended to change various specific things.

A comet would be pure "data" rather than an agent of impact/explosion Well - it still is, but I was wondering about the idea. I am sure that many members already made this link, I just figured that out right now.

A basic conclusion would be the discarding of all things negative/pejorative, about comets. The consideration of a comet as "data" seems relevant, too: I think that a scientific mind can appreciate the difference, and its potential for various very interesting studies.

The gap is huge: for instance, the Black Death would slide, from medieval rodents, to a positive & common human mechanism. This is not few. It's at man that the plague originates - and the comet sends the plague - all of it being a basic function of man in the Universe (anthropocosmos connection).

Pierre describes a mechanism involving proteins and biophotons, as the connection to the Information Field. The C's have been mentioning that the glands, in humans, were the bridges between 3D and higher densities. I would be wondering if those participate, too, in the process!

 

[palestine]

Sorry, I don't always manage to fully develop my ideas—and the summary of my post, which I would have included towards the end, would be:

"If the origin of comets is the Information Field, which operates at a different density than 3D, an objective / fruitful approach might consist of studying the properties at this density of existence."

 

[axj]

If the origin of comets is the Information Field, which operates at a different density than 3D, an objective / fruitful approach might consist of studying the properties at this density of existence.

Ultimately, everything in every density seems to 'originate' in the information field or consciousness. The C's also did not say that all comets originate in 4D, only that some can.

 

[Wandering Star]

The C's also did not say that all comets originate in 4D, only that some can.

April 23rd 2022


A: Meteoric object breaching realm barrier.

Q: (Andromeda) That was my first guess.

(Pierre) Yeah, me too. We agreed on that. Breaching the realm barrier...

(Niall) The meteor wasn't coming through space. It merged...

(Andromeda) It came through a portal, pretty much.

(Niall) Was it a merging of...

(Pierre) From 4D?

A: Every object entering your realm does not have to come from 4D. Refer back to Ark's questions about dimensions. Also consider what has been said about window fallers and Flight 19.