Massive 'drone swarm' in and around New Jersey: UFO flap, govt tech, or mass hysteria?

Now the key question is why disclose this tech now? what is the game plan? All the elements of a psyop are present - Trump incoming, disgruntled war mongers, real UFO's etc. Many of those questions are suitably addressed in this thread.
Why disclose this tech now - nothing is really disclosed. It is creating confusion. And why, because people are part of the plan after all. Since the beginning of history it was all about controlling or manipulating people's lives and emotions. Such UFO, for example, determines the real reactions of people. Some are scared and enemy, others neutral, third start to be fascinated by it and praise it. I think it might be manifesting power, or an announcement. It's for the crowd so lets consider the crowd psychology: a tamed crowd will react differently than one that sees a mothership suddenly. Althought it seems more cinematic to me. It has never happened so openly, except in ancient times. Such overt forms of UFO encounters looked a bit like an alternative history of the world, e.g. in the X-Files.

Another data point:
A relative of someone I know reported seeing one overhead while driving, when the lights on the truck in front of her started malfunctioning and went out. Truck pulled over, and the screen on her dashboard also malfunctioned and she pulled over as well, then returned after some time. No missing time. Whether it was caused by the object or someone nearby trying to jam it, there was some strong emf going on.
Sounds like typical close encounter which gives strong support to the version that it is UFO understood in a typical way. Although people are also supposedly already using technology in drones that deactivates other drones, so as to avoid collisions or enemy attacks, and this may have an impact on ground devices. (I am leaving aside other secret technological experiments that others have reported)...
To me seems if they have came to use secret tech that is reserved for end days for control and support to 4d sts and given on a plate more or less by 4D sts shows their level of desperation. This is tech that is hidden for a reason because of control. Formal goverment is probably clueless about who and why, but if it is a secret goverment/brotherhood and even if said by some that US is when it comes to conventional race far behind this is not really "US" tech but secret goverment that uses US as a muscle, and based on what was said in some sessions about satelites causing hearthattacks, hawai lasers, 9 11 satelite tech, and many wistleblowers saying even if had to be taken with a grain of salt, etc.. but this tech was also given to them by 4D sts for a reason while Russians developed their tech on their own. And I do not think Russians also do not have something similar or countertech for thise drones because they know who they are against up and it was said in one sessions if I remember they have also reversed engineered something from fallen ufo s, and even Putin said there are many other weapons that are in development, but there surly are others that are not for public and are last resort because people would ask uncomftarble questions on both sides from where did it come and from that other ones. It is a play of cat and mouse and hide and seek what other side has.
If 4D STS controls the world, then everything that is seen in this world is an indirect result of their actions, known to be through behind-the-scenes and facade governments. Such UFOs are just a more obvious indication that we are not talking about conspiracy theories. And every power supposedly has reversed technology, although it does not always have to come from crashed spaceships. It can be, for example, that one power develops something and another takes ideas from more terrestrial technology, but it's in reference to the same source. From what we know, the Americans played a more direct role in this. And it is not without reason that they are considered the world leaders. Besides, even when you think about their services, you always have the impression of a greater swindler. I'm leaving aside the fact of bringing in Nazis after the war, whose work even contributed to the creation of pop culture, advertising, and mass media (if you look closely, they often prey on negative emotions and the reward system, something that fits well into the farm scheme we're talking about). And globalization (and thus the domination of humanity) occurs largely through the media. See that with the WTC, one message was enough for the whole world to believe it: 'Attack on America'. And this message wasn't even untrue. Such reverse technology is, for example, TikTok, which is the domain of the Chinese using the enemy's methods to their advantage. We don't always have to talk about space technology. While a smartphone is basically space technology, as if we had already forgotten. It can be used as a bitcoin miner, AI development, a spy tool, and a mouthpiece of disinformation. Or source of information, depending on the user, but everyone who takes part in the game sacrifices free will. We declare our submission and willingness to make concessions. Of course, the Nazis were also involved in some way in the occult and attempts to create a new drive for flying vehicles. The occult was also involved in pop culture. And what is being said here about aliens, Nordics ruling them and fascism was a manifestation of 4D STS. Overall, this puzzle makes sense...
 
Even with the alien hybrid or 'back-engineered' 4D tech, as you said, it is still a sort of "mixed phenomena" stuff, because the byproduct could be the thinning of the veil that allows to see things that weren't visible before. There are all kind of possibilities.
I think it's mixed phenomena. Lets think first about how this started. The first drone sighting report in New Jersey was on the 13th of November. But before that and for a while, there had been reports of 'drones' violating military base airspaces over the UK and the US, so that was already 'a thing'. They called them 'drones', but the descriptions of at least some of them were clearly orbs or bright lights, which is along the more classical UFO phenomena. There was the Manchester airport incident which involved a dark metallic orb hovering over the runway, for example. So when the drones swarmed New Jersey, at least in people's minds and in the reporting, it was somehow linked. Was that done on purpose? It's too much coincidence.

Most of the drones over New Jersey look like human tech (so they probably are), except of types way more advanced than we were used to. But not all of them - some videos also show the orb types, or what look like the classic triangle shaped UFOs. So this adds to the confusion, and perhaps that's on purpose. Then people are adding to the bag a number of other UFO sightings from all over the world, but we don't know if that is directly related or not - another coincidence?

I think there are still a number of questions unanswered and things that don't add up. One is the absolute lack of explanations from the government, which predictably results in more public interest and even hysteria. They tell all sorts of lies and narratives all the time. So why couldn't they give a rather simple explanation such as "it's a military exercise and the details are classified so we can't tell you but there's nothing to worry about"?

If this was meant as a message for Russia in response to Oreshnik, why not fly those things over Ukraine or closer to Russia and show that they couldn't be tracked or whatever 'on Russia's face' to make the message clear? Why freak out the residents of New Jersey instead?

There are other elements of wierdness that need explaining also. Apart from the frequencies, lack of heat signatures, capability of operating for several hours, etc., what about the reports of 50 drones coming out of the ocean (or 'from' the ocean, it's not clear), and following a police boat? It was also reported previously that when the FBI started to investigate, the drones would appear above the agents' houses. There's the massive numbers of drones also. Some videos show around 7 within sight simultaneaously. There was one video of a time lapse of the night sky and there were dozens of object moving every hour. Were they all satellites? They seemed way too many to me.

So yes, I too will be interested to see what the Cs say about this. :)
 
Another data point:
A relative of someone I know reported seeing one overhead while driving, when the lights on the truck in front of her started malfunctioning and went out. Truck pulled over, and the screen on her dashboard also malfunctioned and she pulled over as well, then returned after some time. No missing time. Whether it was caused by the object or someone nearby trying to jam it, there was some strong emf going on.

The thing that stands out from reports like this (and there have been several) is their similarity, on the face of it, to UFO encounters.

1) mysterious flying object with lights hovers over car

2) lights and electronic systems in car malfunction

the missing part is, as you say, missing time and abduction type experiences.

It does seem that widely available human tech may be rapidly 'catching up' with UFO tech, and at some point in the future they may be indistinguishable. Which would be a great time to introduce our high tech underground ancient 'brothers'.
 
Hmmm...

Wright-Patterson Air Force Base closed its airspace for 4 hours because of drones

In a recording of the Wright-Patterson air traffic control tower during the incident, posted on YouTube by The War Zone, a controller tells an aircraft identified as “MedFlight 8” to “use extreme caution for heavy UAS movement on the base.” UAS is an acronym for “unmanned aircraft system.”

If the drones are a military exercise, why is the Air Force reacting as if they know nothing of it? Is it for show, and if so why? Or could it be that the drones are operated by an independent, secret branch, i.e. 'secret government'?
 
If the drones are some sort of US military test, then it makes sense it's kind of a message to Russia. My issue with that though is that it's not necessarily a scary message to Russia.

I'm not necessarily bought on it being conventional testing because the attention it's receiving is just too much for the guys doing the testing to basically proceed as if the attention isn't happening. Plus the risk is a lot - I mean, IMAGINE if one of those was shot down by a normie or malfunctioned and fell in the middle of a busy street. Those are the sorts of risks these types wouldn't entertain.

So I don't know - my best guess is that the drones are either projections or undergrounders and there's some sort of hyperdimensional / underground thing in play that ensures the risk of one of these being shot down or malfunctioning is negated.
 
A problem I have with the “advanced secret drone tech“ (as opposed to secret conventional drone tech) idea from a 3D source:

- If there were substantial amounts of those drones deployed over large populated areas, why would you risk that “precious advanced drone tech“ to crash and/or get into the hands of the wrong and/or ordinary people? Would you do such a flap (if it really were that many) with such a tech? Wouldn’t the risks be too high? That’s a point that speaks more toward advanced conventional drone tech to me (if we assume that it was mainly a 3D operation).
 
A problem I have with the “advanced secret drone tech“ (as opposed to secret conventional drone tech) idea from a 3D source:

- If there were substantial amounts of those drones deployed over large populated areas, why would you risk that “precious advanced drone tech“ to crash and/or get into the hands of the wrong and/or ordinary people? Would you do such a flap (if it really were that many) with such a tech? Wouldn’t the risks be too high?
I think the answer to this is yes. They wouldn't take such a risk, not unless the options were such that there was no other choice. This however would be desperate territory and there's no need for MIC to be showing this level of desperation.

The thing is, everyone knows why Russia revealed oreshnik to the world. There is no existential reason for the MIC to reveal their equivalents (if they have any). So these drones aren't operating at the same level as oreshnik from this point of view.
 
For all those here in the "it's the aliens" camp. Tell me how that plays out, in context of what the Cs have said about such a disclosure.

No can do :-), because I also don't see it as part of "disclosure" or "alien invasion", or some kind of grand "message", but as a possible flap (in some locations) or something else that we haven't considered or haven't thought about. Simply because there are plenty of examples in the past sessions when the C's gave us answers about the ufo sightings that we didn't expect. Since then we collected a decent list of all kind of possibilites, but the C's still surprise us with their answers. Which is great. :-D

It's a pity that we don't have discussions with the C's about various ufo flaps and their "cycles", and other characteristics as described by Keel, just like there are about 411 disappearances. It could potentially give us some markers about what could be perceived as a "genuine" flop, or a "man made" flop. Though using reverse engineered 4D tech definitely muddies the waters!

Not to mention the fact that there is this weird phenomenon, also described by Keel and others, when ufo can appear in the form of conventional craft that is prevelent during any given period. This is also a possibility.

I'm still open to the idea that it is, at least in part, a psyop in the sense of subtly opening the collective consciousness to accepting the idea of a large number of strange craft in the skies, or as others have suggested, an attempt to muddy the waters in anticipation of an increased "thinning of the veil" where more such anomalous lights in the sky are expected. But beyond that I don't see the benefit.

Yeah, I agree. This is actually the only reason that makes sense to me if this is an "intentional event orchestrated by aliens".

It's trully confusing and perplexing, because some of the objects do look like ufos. How this can be reconsiled with the "secret gov test" idea? That's why my main speculation that it is a combination of factors. Maybe there is a testing of tech, but since it has alien technology, maybe it also has all kind of side effects. Side effects that thin the veil or attract other genuine ufo craft.

Or maybe, like others said, it started with genuine ufo sightings around nuclear bases and expended into something that was used by the secret gov.

Those are just speculations, and it would be really awesome to get some clarity about it from the C's.

And here are couple of examples of more confusion. :-D I was curious about Scottie's remark:

Why make the drones super-silent, but then leave their bright lights flashing like crazy?

I did some search and there are all kind of example of unidentified craft with multicolored blinking lights. But here are couple of cases from relatevly recent times, but when drones weren't omnipresent yet.

First one is from UK. The news is dated 11th of September, 2012.

Multicolored UFOs Over England: Mystery Solved

On Aug. 23, a strange sight baffled locals in the English county of Leicestershire: Dozens of people reported seeing mysterious lights hovering in the sky around dusk high above open fields. The hovering lights, which were made up of at least three colors, were silent. They were too small to be any kind of aircraft or helicopters.

Local UFO enthusiasts were abuzz with speculation, but after about a week of research the group concluded that the UFO "was in fact an illuminated quadcopter model being flown at dusk in a local park by a model aircraft enthusiast," according to their website.

Graham Hall, a spokesman for the group, was quoted by the newspaper Thisisleicestershire.com as concluding, "we are reliably informed the object that caused all the fuss on this occasion was a large model quadcopter. They are relatively new but basically they're model helicopters with four small rotor supports arranged in a cross shape. …They can have bright lights attached to them and can look very strange as they hover and circle in the night sky."

Considering the current discussion, there are all kind of confusing facts. So this was apparently a drone, but it was silent? Already back in 2012, and being flown by some aircraft enthusiast? 😅

Another news item is dated 21st of October, 2016. The sighting happened in Sussex county, Delaware. Unfortunately only the picture remaines, and re video was removed.

ufo-delaware.png

A woman claims a flashing unidentified flying object jammed her video camera when she tried to record it.


YouTube user Starlings Of Light uploaded the video of the sighting. The footage shows an unusual object illuminating red, blue and green.

A circular shape of flashing lights appears to form.


Melody, who recorded the sighting on video, said the craft was chasing an orange orb that had appeared earlier.

She added in the video commentary that it was moving in circular motion and producing a humming noise.

Melody wasn’t sure whether it was a military helicopter chasing the orange glowing orb or it was an alien spacecraft.

From the witness’ point of view, it looks circular with blinking lights...

This one could be a drone, especially considering humming, and also because it is actually relatevely close to Dover AFB (the red dot on the pic). ;-)

1.jpg

According to the whitness, there was an anomaly with the camera, but it's not possible to know how reliable this part is.

Here's also a video of a multicolored object that supposedly was filmed 10 months ago in Charlotte, North Carolina. There is a humming background noise, and it's not clear if it is from the object or something else. If it is from the object, then it could be a helicopter or something. Not clear.

And there is another video of an object that nowadys probably will be considered a drone. But 8 years ago? Doesn't look fake, but still weird.

 
Last edited:
As I understand it, high frequencies can be super directional, basically behaving like a laser beam. The idea would be to use directional antennas to link the drones, which makes it hard to jam them (you would have to direct a hyper-focussed beam on the exact spot on the receiving antenna, which is almost impossible if the antenna is directed just to the next drone or satellite or whatever, shadowing out all other directions). Maybe I'm missing something, but this concept made sense to me when I first saw the guy mention it. But that's just one aspect of it, the other stuff you mentioned sure points to some "unknown tech" of sorts we just don't know about enough, or possibly some deep black budget sort of tech.
I read somewhere that China had or was developing a technology that worked by quantum entanglement.

The same applies to telephone technology and so on.

There would be a connection even under water and of course it would not be in any wave range.

The quantum computer is already heard as something close, so at a military level I would not be surprised if they already used a technology that does not need to emit or receive electromagnetic waves.
 
or something else that we haven't considered or haven't thought about. Simply because there are plenty of examples in the past sessions when the C's gave us answers about the ufo sightings that we didn't expect. Since then we collected a decent list of all kind of possibilites, but the C's still surprise us with their answers. Which is great. :-D

I will try to play the role of the C's and give you the unexpected answer:

A: Yes, these are US made drones, but they come from future/parallel dimension.

Now, that would explain everything! :-D
 
20 January 2017

Launched last August, China's quantum communications satellite is officially operational after four months of in-orbit testing. The Quantum Experiments at Space Scale (QUESS) satellite is the first space-based test platform for quantum communication.

How does it work?

Here's how it works: pairs of so-called quantum entangled photons will be launched from the satellite, i.e. particles of light smaller than atoms whose properties depend on each other.

These photons will contain the encryption keys needed to decode certain information. Even if the entangled photons are separated, if one is affected, its "twin" is immediately modified in the same way, no matter how far away they are from each other.
 
Just a thought, FWIW: I wonder if part of the issue isn't also "cultural", for lack of a better word. The reasons that Russia had for not advertising Oreshnik might be totally different from the reasons that the US may not be advertising these "drones". Russia doesn't show off, in general, OSIT, while the West loves doing so. So, in that sense, it's unusual that the US is sounding so ambiguous/"we don't know what this is".

But also, if this WAS a "UFO flap", the reasons at 4D don't have to be understood nor known by 3D, and our interpretation is messed up anyway, but so is the government's. I don't know if this makes any sense, but basically, different agendas, different interpretations. And we're stuck in the middle trying to figure it out, because technology is making it so that it is very difficult to distinguish real footage from fake, real news from fake, etc! Not to mention that our 3D perception can do a lot in terms of NOT reading signals correctly, especially if they are being cloaked or obscured.

I also don't get the feeling that we're near any "disclosure". If anything, it could be acclimatizing people to the idea that UFOs are real, for later use. OR, a big distraction because something else "big" is going on behind the scenes, or is about to happen?

The Cs said things would be "thrilling". I'm not sure this is it, but it does have some action-packed moments, and seems to at least have some mysterious aspects to it... ;-)
 
Last edited:
That’s a point that speaks more toward advanced conventional drone tech to me (if we assume that it was mainly a 3D operation).
But, if these are not 3D tech, but are indeed 4D, and I am not saying they are, and they are now showing up everywhere- it shows how easily they can manifest in our reality and they have no fear of their tech failing or falling into the wrong hands. As Laura said, it makes sense they would come to our reality by proxy, because of the difficulty of manifesting in our reality. Again, we are speculating, these objects are by design making us feel helpless and unable to make sense of the situation. Mission accomplished for whomever is running the show.
 
Back
Top Bottom