Massive 'drone swarm' in and around New Jersey: UFO flap, govt tech, or mass hysteria?

What is the governments ability to "back-fill" explanations to extraordinary events?
It's the birthday of the philosopher and poet George Santayana, born in Madrid (1863). He's best known for having coined the famous phrase: "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."

He also said, "History is a pack of lies about events that never happened told by people who weren't there."

And: "There are books in which the footnotes or comments scrawled by some reader's hand in the margin are more interesting than the text. The world is one of these books."

Copied from Garrison Keillor's "Writers Almanac."
 
It's the birthday of the philosopher and poet George Santayana, born in Madrid (1863). He's best known for having coined the famous phrase: "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
How about a warning?

At the moment it is something that is happening in the most STS area of the planet.

STS is hierarchical and the most advanced third density people may have their own plans.

So the higher density sends a message that only those to whom it is addressed will understand.

At the moment everything is hypothesis.
 
FAA release last month announcing drone exercises over a military base in NJ. It was posted in mid-Nov and run time of exercise is Nov. 25 - Dec. 26th. So expect another 10 days of "UFOs" over NJ.

View attachment 104286
This reminds me that during the 9/11 attacks, the US Military was also carrying out an exercise of sorts....Very Ominous. On the back end of this might be the nasty scorpion's sting!
 
"200GHz horn antennas forming a mesh network"... that one just stinks. First, why 200GHz transmitters that require line-of-sight? No frequency is "jam-proof" just because of the frequency itself. The idea is that you transmit a similar frequency at a higher power level, thereby drowning out the real signals. And who in their right mind would mount "horn antennas" on an aircraft that would generally need to be aerodynamic?

As I understand it, high frequencies can be super directional, basically behaving like a laser beam. The idea would be to use directional antennas to link the drones, which makes it hard to jam them (you would have to direct a hyper-focussed beam on the exact spot on the receiving antenna, which is almost impossible if the antenna is directed just to the next drone or satellite or whatever, shadowing out all other directions). Maybe I'm missing something, but this concept made sense to me when I first saw the guy mention it. But that's just one aspect of it, the other stuff you mentioned sure points to some "unknown tech" of sorts we just don't know about enough, or possibly some deep black budget sort of tech.
 
It is pacifist, but only in the sense that the aliens don't want their human cattle burnt to a nuclear crisp. It was likely a message to elites on earth that they're not the ones in control. The aliens have spent a long 'time' manipulating the cultures of this planet, especially since the industrial revolution, don't want it ruined before a particularly big harvest. So it is also a manifestation of power, warning the earth elites not to get too carried away with their warmongering.
I don't identify World War 3 with the Nuclear War. I think it's the most common imprint. Interpreting the Apocalypse, Einstein and the sticks and stones message, the Cold War... But modern conflicts show it can be a conventional war, an informational war, an economical war, etc. So pretty much usual, only using modern technology. Of course, I can be wrong and people are insane; as for the politics, Secret Service, whatever world power, I know it's not like 'it wouldn't be going to happen for granted because of humane values. In previous years, I've had a feeling that after decades and centuries of learning, including deeper messages like the one I mentioned, humanity has shown that we didn't learn anything at all, and there's intellectual and emotional regress on many levels. In fact, many people felt like they were hitting a wall globally. The past has led to the point where we are creating a new future because there is no concrete link with previous values and no predictable effects of the present. Well, these are my general thoughts. It seems to me that due to free will and a simple consequence of evolution, we should not be stuck in something like a global thermonuclear war. It would be an excessive repetition of the pattern, failure to draw conclusions, and a failure for all of humanity. And if it is true that predictions evolve (due to the development of consciousness), and in addition there are some higher interventions... Although, due to the psychopathic nature of people controlling the world...

There's also the recent session that discussed the hyperdimensional effects of nukes - they don't want earthly elites causing havoc in other densities and dimensions.
I know - Cs mentioned it's even on some National Geographic's cover. I contacted the magazine but I couldn't find the right issue...

I think this answers your question below, maybe?
It doesn't. Laura asked about the positive nature of aliens, at the point she had thoughts they might be beneficial. I think Cs suggested her delusions. People project their empathy onto both psychopaths and aliens. What we remember from abduction is actually a hypnotic projection related to our subjective vision of the world. There was a UFO report where aliens made pancakes, but they tasted like cardboard. There was also one where dogs in dark glasses and coats were smoking Marlboro. But all this is some kind of hypnotic coating, partly reflecting reality, because this is the law of free will. (And there is no such thing as 'his aliens'!)

There's a lot more to the answer of 'what it is, and why it's happening'. It really is the question of the ages! Check out the books in the recommended readings list, and you'll find some answers.
I know it's ultimate questions, but that's really the only question we can ask. Someone considered, for example, that it was a type of Cessna. According to the official version, the Americans created new planes, just like nuclear bombs, in Area 51. Stealth could have looked like a UFO until lately, and it is an obsolete plane. I think they are actually ahead of Elon Musk and already have ground-to-space spy planes. I say this based on what planes they had right after the war and how outdated the revealed spy technology is. For example, one of the, let's call it, drones in New Jersey had a flashing light typical of airplanes, not 'UFOs'. Typical terrestrial markings. (Of course, the most likely answer is 'weather balloon.')

About STO manifestation, I don't think they intervene as part of their creed of respecting Free Will. The C's have said 4D STO will appear and help at some point, and that maybe some of them will look like Nordics, but I wouldn't count on any sort of saviours.
I thought so, too. However, the Nordics were probably portrayed as people in power. Mantises as a kind of management. Reptilians as chargers. And the Nephilim as their guard. So it's one system. Equating aliens with help is highly debatable. But, if I interpret it correctly, STS is probably about serving others by serving yourself. And STO is serving yourself through serving others. For example, GMO breeding, may in some way benefit or harm animals. Ultimately, they are treated as livestock. So that comment about the farm was a rather apt metaphor.

Also remember tht in The WAVE series was mentioned tht one of the goal for 4D STS was acumulate huge number of negative energy before WAVE arrive, but If the Humanity wiped out themself before that happen then wht? Would their plans be thwarted in any way?
I once wondered, thinking about the Earth as a farm, what dinosaurs were needed for. There were probably herbivorous and predatory dinosaurs. But in general, it seemed to me that the planet had to undergo some simple lessons and accumulate some energy before humans could appear on it. From this perspective, first water and minerals, basic biological life, are 'installed,' then more extensive ones, which 'by a miraculous coincidence' are destroyed. Suddenly, by a strange coincidence, third-density beings appear, one of which, strangely enough, genetically mixes with the other and creates people. In this way, I think the grays are our prototypes. Therefore, they look and work in a much more simplified way. We would literally be, like ancient aliens, the next version of the gray, not the other way around. Well, these are some strange conclusions and I could always be wrong. Above all, we must remember that we were supposed to be vessels for the 4D STS. Except... in fourth density? I.e., the death of people in third density would probably not matter. After all, the game is about fourth density, and what we see is happening in third density. I don't know if these plans were supposed to exist in parallel. I guess it has always been portrayed as dying in 3 to be in 4. The transition from 4 to 3 involves death, and from 3 to 4 happens rather outside the biological body. But sometimes these concepts diverge a bit. Besides, such a mass death could have consequences in terms of the development of consciousness and reincarnation...
 
To me seems if they have came to use secret tech that is reserved for end days for control and support to 4d sts and given on a plate more or less by 4D sts shows their level of desperation. This is tech that is hidden for a reason because of control. Formal goverment is probably clueless about who and why, but if it is a secret goverment/brotherhood and even if said by some that US is when it comes to conventional race far behind this is not really "US" tech but secret goverment that uses US as a muscle, and based on what was said in some sessions about satelites causing hearthattacks, hawai lasers, 9 11 satelite tech, and many wistleblowers saying even if had to be taken with a grain of salt, etc.. but this tech was also given to them by 4D sts for a reason while Russians developed their tech on their own. And I do not think Russians also do not have something similar or countertech for thise drones because they know who they are against up and it was said in one sessions if I remember they have also reversed engineered something from fallen ufo s, and even Putin said there are many other weapons that are in development, but there surly are others that are not for public and are last resort because people would ask uncomftarble questions on both sides from where did it come and from that other ones. It is a play of cat and mouse and hide and seek what other side has.
 
Another data point:
A relative of someone I know reported seeing one overhead while driving, when the lights on the truck in front of her started malfunctioning and went out. Truck pulled over, and the screen on her dashboard also malfunctioned and she pulled over as well, then returned after some time. No missing time. Whether it was caused by the object or someone nearby trying to jam it, there was some strong emf going on.
 
I think this guy has a pretty good grasp of drones, what he's missing is the secretive military research and reverse engineering of UFO tech that has been ongoing since 1947! It is very feasible that autonomous intelligent aerial vehicles have been developed that can be launched and only communicate back with the base when certain conditions are met/detected. Theoretically, these uav's do not need to be controlled and can operate with AI's very similar to self drive cars. The new tech would also allow them to move at higher speeds than normal drones and have much longer flight times. I would add that they would also be able to detect and disable "normal tech "drones flying near them.

Now the key question is why disclose this tech now? what is the game plan? All the elements of a psyop are present - Trump incoming, disgruntled war mongers, real UFO's etc. Many of those questions are suitably addressed in this thread.
 
Oreshnik was the first time I've seen anything like that in real wartime use, which is not a small thing. It's one thing to develop and test, and another to actually use the thing.

They do have other hypersonic weapons including ICBMs that they claim are "unstoppable". There was that video circulating a few years ago of the very large missile launch where it basically exploded out of the silo and was above cloud level in the blink of an eye. And Oreshnik wasn't even an officially existing missile until oops, there it is. Surprise! I suspect they have other surprises in store, but I could be wrong.

In any case, I put more stock in Russian claims of advanced tech because they've actually shown it off and it appears to work. From 'Murika I've only seen bluff and bluster so far.
Let us remember that in the case of the Avangard hypersonic system, which is the one you are surely thinking of, this is true, it is an intercontinental ballistic rocket that can use multiple charges, both nuclear and conventional, and these in turn have hypersonic capacity, Putin, like the Oreshnick back in 2018, already compared it to the impact of a meteorite.
So non-nuclear threats; but possibly similar in destruction (and of course greater range) existed before this new missile.
The Oreshnick would then respond to merely economic issues and the updating of intermediate-range systems that were already in place, while the more expensive Avangard would have been developed, unlike other hypersonic weapons, with another objective in mind:
The Avangard system is best seen as one element in an expensive Russian strategy to develop technological hedges for a security environment perhaps 20-30 years from now where the United States might deploy a cost effective missile defense system, making a percentage of Russia’s nuclear deterrent vulnerable to interception. To be clear, there is no missile defense system now, or on the horizon, able to intercept Russia’s strategic nuclear arsenal. Modern ICBMs can come with multiple reentry vehicles and numerous penetration aids or false targets, creating a complex ‘threat cloud’ that would make interception an improbable business. Nonetheless, ever since the Bush administration chose in 2002 to exit the 1972 ABM Treaty, Russian leadership has been concerned that the United States could eventually devalue the deterrence provided by Russia’s strategic nuclear forces.
However, unlike other expensive strategic projects, such as the Poseidon nuclear powered torpedo, Avangard does not contribute to a survivable second strike. Thus there are a few ways to interpret the actual purpose of this weapon. The first is as a retaliatory-meeting strike system to attack high-value targets, i.e. civilian targets with political or economic significance, which will provide some insurance for a counter value strike. The second is that it is a first strike weapon against hard to penetrate targets. Since Avangard is silo based, designed for heavier liquid fueled ICBMs, in the event of strategic attack the boosting missile would not be survivable. It must be fired either first, or in a “launch under attack” scenario, when Russia has confirmed a U.S. launch, but the missiles have not yet impacted.

Avangard may be designed to give Russia’s RVSN the ability to penetrate hard targets, getting around missile defenses, and leveraging greater accuracy to take out well-hardened facilities. That said, from a nuclear warfighting standpoint, this makes Avangard a somewhat specialized, but expensive strategic nuclear weapon. Given how few of these systems Russia is likely to be able to afford, the weapon may offer some targeting advantages, but at a high price relative to the benefits. Another possibility is that this is not a system to get around future missile defenses, but a first strike system to be used specifically against missile defenses, clearing the way for the rest of Russia’s nuclear deterrent. Even if more accurate and survivable in flight, Avangard is a questionable investment when compared to the numerous road-mobile ICBM systems Russia fields today, including Topol-M and Rs-24 Yars (but then the logic for Russia’s SSBN program is also somewhat circumspect).
 
I wouldn't be too sure that Oreshnik is limited in its range. Yes, it was said that the ones used were medium range, but that doesn't preclude the existence of ICBMs with Oreshnik warheads.
Also, I understand that it would be rather easy to fit it into a submarine, and perhaps they have done that already, so range is not a problem.
 
Our theory about the NJ 'drone swarm' - in part or in total - being a test of US govt tech is now being suggested in MSM:


Note also that the official federal stance on these is still "nothing to see here folks!"

Indeed. And what about the fact that some of the objects don't look like drones, but look more like ufo, albeit not of the "classic" ufo "design", but there are sightings exactly like this in the past too. What to do with those and how to fit them into the "only secret gov test"?

Maybe the "aliens" got curious and came to watch the party. If so, then it is already a mixed phenomena. And maybe the opposite is true. The ufo flap happened, and the secret gov joined it. Either way it's a joined party. :-)

Even with the alien hybrid or 'back-engineered' 4D tech, as you said, it is still a sort of "mixed phenomena" stuff, because the byproduct could be the thinning of the veil that allows to see things that weren't visible before. There are all kind of possibilities.

In terms of silence and looking like a UFO (with little to nothing visible that is propelling it) I do think it is entirely possible that the US deepstate (if we assume that) could have rather conventional drone tech that is pretty much silent, because there are already commercial drones out there that are pretty silent: At least in theory all you would then need to do is use some of those silent propeller designs, and then simply encase either the propellers themselves or the drone itself in a wide enough casing that is only open above and below the propeller/drone? In that way you would probably not see any moving parts on the drone from the outside while it is silent; unless you are looking directly perpendicular up at the propeller from ground level to the sky? But even then, due to the speed of the propellers you might not be able to see the propellers move with your naked eye?
 
Last edited:
I wouldn't be too sure that Oreshnik is limited in its range. Yes, it was said that the ones used were medium range, but that doesn't preclude the existence of ICBMs with Oreshnik warheads.
According to Prof. Dr. Momčilo Milinović, a Serbian engineer and retired professor at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering in Belgrade, and an expert in rocket technologies, the Oreshik missile is essentially a "child" or a "smaller brother" of the RS-26 Rubezh ICBM. The primary difference between the two lies in the combination of motors, stages, and warheads. In essence, they are the same missile, with adjustments made to the number of motors and the type of warhead to modify the range or suit different target requirements.

He describes the Oreshik missile as a dangerous, precise, and highly powerful weapon. Additionally, he mentioned that there is a missile capable of intercepting the Oreshik, and the United States possesses it. While it would be very difficult to intercept the Oreshik with this missile, it is still possible. The question he poses is: Why hasn’t it been done? Were they caught by surprise?


The USA/Western Data sources say the same things about the Oreshnik missile.
The video is in Serbian Language and is very educative and interesting to watch.
 
Back
Top Bottom