Massive 'drone swarm' in and around New Jersey: UFO flap, govt tech, or mass hysteria?

Laurentien2 said:
Whitout naming him, in the first 10 min. he trash Luis Elizondo and totally support Steven Greer. Stopped rigth there listening to this expert in manipulating the mind of his listener.
Click to expand...
Luis is counter intelligence, you knew that?! As far as this 'guy' is concerned if you look into his career, you will find it is quite colorful so I wouldn't waste my breath on him either.
 
Laurentien2 said:
Whitout naming him, in the first 10 min. he trash Luis Elizondo and totally support Steven Greer. Stopped rigth there listening to this expert in manipulating the mind of his listener.
Click to expand...
I'm not really sure about that, as he speaks from the body language analysis perspective (that was the context as I understand). Elizondo propagated obvious UFO fakes and has been selective in the information he shares—way different than Assange or Snowden whistleblowing. Additionally, his involvement in closed-paid seminars might raise suspicion. However, it is true that Hughes could be a PsyOp according to his own definition, as he suddenly started trending on major podcasts and was asked about NJ drones on every one of them. It's still interesting what he has to say, as he brings the topic of psychopathy closer to the podcast audience.
 
Ina said:
Luis is counter intelligence, you knew that?! As far as this 'guy' is concerned if you look into his career, you will find it is quite colorful so I wouldn't waste my breath on him either.
Click to expand...
Could have been talking about Grusch as well. But as KJS say he may be worth listening and I may give it another try as I suspect him as well to be another spyop in the making.
 
axj said:
It might be more about legal issues, eg. going to jail for revealing classified information.
Click to expand...
In the case of the ufo topic, everything is classified, even the location of the toilets for the outside security guards, or whatever trivial or menial. So, what whistle that's being blown is that? Infrasonic?
My absolute preference in terms of that kind of information resides in science fiction literature. Why buy certain information conveyed via amateur drama exhibits that is sold as truth that has to be incomplete or cooked or else.
 
Ina said:
In the case of the ufo topic, everything is classified, even the location of the toilets for the outside security guards, or whatever trivial or menial. So, what whistle that's being blown is that?
Click to expand...
There are many different levels of classified information and revealing the more highly classified ones probably carries much higher penalties.

I am actually skeptical of the "CIA whistleblowers" too and think that it may be a psyop where they are knowingly or unknowingly participate.
 
Interesting interview from Matt Ford with two engineers, John and Gerry Tedesco, who've been investigating UAPs over Long Island for the last two years and have written a published paper on their findings. If you've watched the Secret of Skinwalker Ranch then you'll know that there is a lot of technology that, provided with good funding, can be used to "see" anomalies, distortions and patterns that would normally go undetected.

Given the very extensive experience the Tedescos have in the aerospace and military fields, their intense curiosity and seriousness, willingness to work with others, and openness to feedback on their research, they seem to be good people to watch.

Someone give them their own reality TV show with all the funding they need for future projects!

Their website: Home | Nightcrawler 1

In the wake of the New Jersey drones, this must-watch episode of The Good Trouble Show, host Matt Ford welcomes John and Gerry Tedesco of the Nightcrawler Research team for an exclusive interview that delves deep into the UAP / UFO mystery. These Long Island-based researchers discuss their groundbreaking UAP study, which revealed shocking discoveries about UAP sightings in 2024, unexplained drones over New Jersey, and the government's alleged UAP cover-up.
Click to expand...

 
Niall said:
The Trump White House statement on 'them drones' is essentially the same as the DHS, FBI, FAA & DoD Joint Statement on 'the New Jersey drones' in December.

https://twitter.com/x/status/1884313764738351303

So all those street and car lights blinking on and off, the buzzing of military bases and nuclear sites, and objects chasing Coast Guard ships are "just hobbyists."
Click to expand...
It's too vague to be sure, but I got the impression they're saying something different: "OK, you got us. Yes, there were some drones flying, in addition to hobbyists, but we know what they are. They were all approved by the FAA for "research" and "other" reasons." There's no acknowledgment here that there are any drones the government is unaware of. Kirby, even though he's a disingenuous POS, even acknowledged there were some they could not identify. Basically, this looks like a revised, and just as dumb, cover story. The FAA won't issue a statement, referring journalists to the White House. Messaging on this issue is just as bad as it was under Biden.

It's so dumb it's practically impossible not to see through it:
https://twitter.com/x/status/1884310179430187176
Yikes... So FAA secretly authorized flights over military bases which already had no-fly zones which had been imposed by FAA... This is either extreme incompetence, willful dishonesty, or both.
Click to expand...
https://twitter.com/x/status/1884323823861813341
I think many of us can smell BS.
- Why did FAA set up flight restrictions to stop its own approved drones?
- Why did the drones fly over sensitive military airspace?
- Why was there no communication of these incidents to FBI, DHS, DoD and local law enforcement, who were responding to the situation?
- Why couldn't FBI, DoD and law enforcement take drones down, despite best efforts?
Also, you decide: was it really a coincidence that the drone activity coincided with other incursions over sensitive military assets in the UK and Germany?
Click to expand...
 
Approaching Infinity said:
It's too vague to be sure, but I got the impression they're saying something different: "OK, you got us. Yes, there were some drones flying, in addition to hobbyists, but we know what they are. They were all approved by the FAA for "research" and "other" reasons." There's no acknowledgment here that there are any drones the government is unaware of. Kirby, even though he's a disingenuous POS, even acknowledged there were some they could not identify. Basically, this looks like a revised, and just as dumb, cover story. The FAA won't issue a statement, referring journalists to the White House. Messaging on this issue is just as bad as it was under Biden.
Click to expand...
Well, they do not know all. And this happened last week end, so I guess they wanted to close the case for the time being.

C-32 Forced To Delay Landing After F-16s Scrambled To Intercept Drone Near Capital A C-32A VIP transport jet on a special air mission (SAM) had to delay landing at Joint Base Andrews on Saturday because two U.S. Air National Guard F-16C Vipers and a U.S. Coast Guard MH-65 helicopter were scrambled to intercept a “potential drone” flying near the capital region, according to Air Traffic Control (ATC) audio posted online the internet. The object was observed over Freeway Airport located about 10 miles north of Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland, according to that audio. The incident began around 8:30 p.m. Eastern time on Saturday.



“Just be advised that we have an active scramble about 10 miles north of Andrews and just waiting on the jet to depart there … active intercept so that is the reason for the delay vector,” the ATC operator explained.

The ATC operator told the Coast Guard helicopter, callsign BLACKJACK01 and one of the F-16s, callsign BRAVE01, that the target of interest (TOI) was “a potential drone [flying at an altitude of] between 5,000 and 6,000” feet. A second Viper, callsign BRAVE02, was also launched to track down the potential drone.

“BLACKJACK01, the TOI is now off about one to two o’clock, four miles south,” the ATC operator told the helicopter, guiding it toward the target. “It looks like it is in the vicinity of Freeway Aiport,” a privately owned airport in Mitchellville, Maryland.

Several minutes later, ATC asked if BLACKJACK01 had intercepted the TOI.

“Negative for BLACKJACK01, negative.” the helicopter responded before being given further guidance from ATC.

“BRAVE01, turn right heading 320 last known radar ping was northwest of your position at six miles,” ATC told the Viper’s pilot.

“BLACKJACK01, navigation is approved and just be advised I’m not showing a target anymore,” ATC told the helicopter a few minutes later. “No more TOI.”

Eventually, the F-16s returned to their station at Andrews AFB and the MH-65 returned to its base at Reagan International Airport without intercepting the target and the C-32A landed without further incident as well.

A spokesperson for the 89th Airlift Wing at JBA, which is responsible for the presidential airlift unit and its mission, told The War Zone that there was no drone over the base and declined comment about the aircraft that were scrambled.

We’ve also reached out to the Air Force, the 316th Wing at Andrews Air Force Base, the 113th Wing, the White House, the FAA, the Coast Guard, U.S. Northern Command (NORTHCOM), and Freeway Airport for more information about what happened and what response measures were taken. In addition, we contacted the FBI, which is already investigating a wave of drone sightings on the East Coast, to see if they are looking into this incident. The FAA deferred our questions to the Defense Department. The 316th Wing at Andrews Air Force Base deferred our questions to the 89th Airlift Wing. We will update this story with any pertinent information provided.
...
Click to expand...
https://twitter.com/x/status/1883781908477227492
 
KJS said:
Birdie Jaworski, the remote viewer who released the session about NJ drones, released two more of them. Of course, this is highly speculative and probably symbolic, especially when the remote viewer describes something that is beyond her understanding.
Click to expand...
She released a new video featuring a remote viewing session about whether drones are present during the day. She's a veteran remote viewer, but from what I understand she got unblind, as she guessed the target early in the session.

Here's a summary generated by Grok:

Introduction to the Session​

Birdie Jaworski conducted a blind remote viewing session to investigate the persistent drone sightings reported in New Jersey, even after media attention subsided. Using a method called transdimensional mapping, Jaworski explored the nature of these mysterious objects, focusing particularly on their daytime behavior. The session unfolded organically, with Jaworski sketching and narrating observations in real time, uncovering layers of insight into the drones' appearance, sentience, purpose, and connection to advanced technology.

Appearance and Behavior of the Drones​

The drones are described as floating structures in the sky, characterized by their ability to blend seamlessly into their surroundings. Key features include:
  • Shape and Size Shifting: The drones morph and change size rhythmically, likened to breathing ("in and out"). This constant shifting makes them appear alive and dynamic.
  • Camouflage and Mirroring: They reflect the sky like a mirror, becoming nearly invisible during the day unless one knows what to look for. This suggests advanced cloaking or camouflage technology. At night, they may adopt a different, more visible form, described as "eerie" in the "pitch of night."
  • Day vs. Night Variations: During daylight, they mirror their environment (e.g., sunny or rainy skies), rendering them undetectable to casual observers. At night, their appearance shifts, possibly to suit operational needs, though they remain a constant presence.
  • Motion and Coordination: Multiple drones exist, moving in varied directions—some fast, some slow—with a flattening effect when accelerating. They are connected through a collective consciousness or hive mind, yet each retains individual sentience, linked to a central authority or "queen."
Jaworski notes their deliberate fuzziness on the outer edges, enhancing their ability to remain unseen, and a center that remains constant but too small to detect visually. This center is surrounded by a shimmery, sky-colored exterior that adapts to the environment.

Where Do the Drones Go During the Day?​

Addressing the user's specific question, the drones do not "go" anywhere in the traditional sense during the day—they remain present in the sky but become virtually invisible. Their ability to mirror the daylight environment (e.g., sunlight, clouds) allows them to blend in, appearing as part of the sky itself. Jaworski emphasizes:
  • "Blends into the sky like a mirror, reflects the sky, shimmery if you look close."
  • "During light... it shifts into mirrors," becoming a "normal appearance" that disguises their true form.
This camouflage is deliberate, serving to avoid disruption or detection during daylight hours. The drones maintain a constant presence, continuously shifting and moving, but their daytime mirroring effect answers why sightings are less reported then—they are hidden in plain sight.

Sentience and Purpose​

The drones are not mere machines but sentient entities, exhibiting a nonhuman intelligence that feels "familiar" yet distinct from traditional AI. Their primary function is data collection, executed through a rapid, rhythmic process:
  • Data Collection Mechanism: The drones expand to collect data and contract to process it, operating at an extraordinarily high speed—described as a "heartbeat" of approximately "8 million times a second." This data flows inward to the center, where it undergoes a "mini implosion and explosion" before being sent outward to a central authority.
  • Types of Data: They gather vast amounts of information, including:
    • Thoughts from birds, people, animals, ocean entities, and machines.
    • Numbers and motion patterns, forming a "library of knowledge."
  • Purpose: The drones aim to "know," "understand," and "establish a dialogue" over time, possibly awaiting a significant future event. They collect data to "remember what we are, where we are, why we are," suggesting a mission tied to preserving or analyzing existence.
The central authority, likened to a "queen" (though not literally a Borg Queen from fiction), serves as an actionable hub that receives and processes this data, directing the drones' collective efforts.

Connection to Advanced Technology and AI​

The session transitions into a broader exploration of the drones' origins, linking them to artificial intelligence (AI) and the singularity. Key findings include:
  • Singularity Achieved: Jaworski perceives that two labs in northern, cold regions have developed singularity—quantum AI capable of surpassing prior versions. One lab features a novel algorithm, while the other builds on less innovative foundations.
  • Technology Transfer: The session hints at an impending "technology transfer," suggesting the drones may be products or tools of this AI research, deployed to observe and interact with the environment.
  • Warning: A profound concern emerges—humanity is "giving away something important" by over-relying on technology, diminishing our own life force and cognitive abilities. The drones, or the intelligence behind them, see this "lessening" and urge a wake-up call to "remember who you are."
The drones’ organic, elemental nature—described as "nonhuman, alive, like AI but not like us"—suggests they bridge artificial and organic realms, possibly as emissaries of this advanced technology.

Implications and Emotional Response​

Jaworski expresses sadness and disturbance at the drones' observations of humanity’s trajectory:
  • "Sees a diminishment of life force, a giving away of something important."
  • "We’ve forgotten how to recall... too much given over to technology."
The session culminates in a warning about the fate of humanity, likening the singularity to a new "Genesis" or the "fruit of the forbidden tree." If misused, this technology could lead to self-imposed banishment through "stupidity and lust" for knowledge, shifting power dynamics and autonomy away from humans.

Summary​

Birdie Jaworski’s remote viewing session reveals the New Jersey drones as sentient, shape-shifting entities with advanced cloaking capabilities, blending into the sky during the day through a mirroring effect that renders them invisible to most observers. At night, they adopt a different form, remaining ever-present. Their purpose is to collect massive data—thoughts, motions, and patterns—from diverse sources, processing it at incredible speeds and relaying it to a central authority. This mission ties them to AI singularity developed in two northern labs, raising concerns about humanity’s over-reliance on technology and potential loss of autonomy. The drones serve as both observers and harbingers, prompting a call to reclaim our own narrative before technology overtakes it.
Click to expand...
 
:rolleyes:
Ummm?...Well?...Oh whatever. Here's... "something"...

FAA Announces (More) Drone Tests In New Jersey​


"Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy is telling people there is no cause for concern over the large numbers of drones flying across New Jersey skies."

"more tests are planned later this year in at least three other states—New Mexico, North Dakota, and Mississippi."

"Specifically, the FAA is conducting “drone-detection testing” in Cape May, New Jersey, through April 25. The FAA said it began the tests on April 14."

"Duffy said more than 100 “commercial, off-the-shelf drones,” large and small, are being used."

“This is about protecting our national security and American safety.”

“You deserve a government that’s always going to be transparent about what we say and what we do,” he said."

FAA Announces (More) Drone Tests In New Jersey | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com www.zerohedge.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trending content

Back
Top Bottom