Kirby says nothing to see here, folks, my goodness!
The -Nothing to See- did the job, suddenly my feed was filled up with drone sightings.
and, as is often the case, deny it in order to make people believe the opposite, and so create
hysteria. The video shown is of airplanes at
Laguardia Airport in NYC
Was the congressman deliberately fed the term mothership just to mess with heads? Keep people guessing, with UFO/alien associations implied?
And so MSM with the use of words, startling?, heatmap? as if it was the only report map ever made.
Startling heatmap shows just how many drones spotted in New Jersey’s Monmouth County
Monmouth County Sheriff Shaun Golden released a heatmap of reported drone sightings from just the past few days alone — covering a chunk of the central Jersey county’s nearly 700 square miles.
Brighter spots on the map denote more reporting, with the inland area around Whittier Oaks, the northern coast along the Sandy Hook Bay, and the southeastern coast off Manasquan Beach showing the highest incidents. Central Monmouth, around Freehold, also has a higher number of reports.
The Nypost article mentions, according to nj.com data, that there have been 3,000 reports across New Jersey since November 18 to date. This number comes from a FBI hearing about the drones from 2 days ago.
From what I got in very broad understanding, there is not by law any way to investigate -with the drone at hand- the origin, purpose, characteristics, etc because there is no way no grab it, shut it down etc due to lack of laws in this matter, the hearing was also about the possible danger that presents of this UAS/UAVs in border security and drug cartels.
I understand the frustration of the legislators because, as it is mentioned, years go by and there are no laws that may help them in the matter and, it is not that drones were invented yesterday.
Acording to BRAVE AI
Can Drone Be Shut Down
Based on the provided search results, here are the key points that explain why it is illegal to shut down a drone:
- Federal Law: Title 18 of the United States Code, Section 32, prohibits the destruction of any aircraft, including drones, in the special aircraft jurisdiction of the United States. Violation of this code carries a maximum prison sentence of 20 years.
- FAA Regulations: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulates drone operations under Part 107. Shooting down a drone would be considered a violation of these regulations, as it would be an unauthorized interference with an aircraft.
- Criminal Liability: Shooting down a drone could result in criminal liability, including charges of sabotage, destruction of property, or reckless endangerment.
- Legal Framework: There is currently no legal framework or authority for law enforcement or individuals to shoot down drones, except in rare circumstances where authorities may be willing to risk legal complications to preserve people or property.
- Counter-UAS Technology: Most anti-drone technology on the market, including jamming or intercepting control signals, is illegal under the Communications Act of 1934 and could put users into legal hot water.
- Local Laws: Regulations differ by locality, and it is essential to understand the specific laws and regulations in your area before attempting to shut down a drone.
It contradicts Kirby enormously because they can't be sure of something if they haven't investigated it thoroughly. Videos and testimonies are not enough. The good thing is that this part is not surprising, it only serves to note it down.
This is so bizarre, I don't no what else to say.
Hear minutes from video above, is as he says. I don't know what to worry or laugh, after all it is a circus, the alleged UAPs as drones or the passing freely of drones possibly from drug cartels or other criminal groups.
www.cbsnews.com
