Massive 'drone swarm' in and around New Jersey: UFO flap, govt tech, or mass hysteria?

This one is an orb sighting in Georgia. Video posted on the 17th Dec. At first it looks like a star behind some branches but the poster claims there were no branches. It also morphs a fair bit before disappearing.


View attachment 104424View attachment 104425

He did do an update when people claimed it was an out of focus star.


I did do a search for "out of focus stars" and found this video for reference.


Come on. That video simply doesn't make sense to me. As he is focusing, you can already in the beginning see that the focus is NEVER in focus - so you do get a big blob or "orb" instead.

Which you automatically do when the optics are not in exact alignment / focus on an object...
 
Recent worldwide UFO sightings. Green = recent. Lots of recent sightings in the US, UK, Germany, some in Eastern Europe, and some in Israel. France and Spain have considerably fewer reports, the sightings forming almost a border around France. Sightings seem to be increasing even more in the US. They are talking about shooting them down now I believe.

 
And they think drones are not dangerous, less dangerous than UFO. I think that Obama the good guy sent many drones that killed many people? I am not sure about that.
I guess all who are not paying attention will think that drones are benign and not think at all about the drones being used against Russia by our proxy, Ukraine:

1734802862634.png

 
I guess all who are not paying attention will think that drones are benign and not think at all about the drones being used against Russia by our proxy, Ukraine:

View attachment 104433

I think that those who are somehow reassured that drones are not so dangerous is because they see it as a toy and drones have been shown as a “hobby” accessible to all. Obviously they do not think about the deadly drones launched from Ukraine nor have they read 1984 by G. Orwell where the presence of drones is super important and where they often go to poor neighborhoods to launch bombs or missiles and kill. And as 1984 is an instruction manual, above all, everything is possible with the presence of these gentle drones currently in the skies...
 
the drones being used against Russia by our proxy, Ukraine:
And yes, these drones are being shot down or otherwise downed - from the previously referenced article:

In a separate message later in the day, military officials reported that the "Kiev regime" had deployed three waves of fixed-wing drones, targeting Kazan's civilian infrastructure. According to the ministry, Russian air defenses shot down three of the incoming UAVs, and that three more were downed with the help of electronic warfare systems.

So if our military is refraining from taking down the drones flying over NJ and other states, it's not because they can't, IMO. The logical theories that have been made in this thread adequately explain why that is.
 
Probably so. Although I personally have a hard time understanding what kind of “tech“ could in some instances, even through great distances, see or even “read the minds“ of an observer and SEEMINGLY interact with what the observer sees or thinks. Which seems to be what some UFO type things can do. For example, sometimes there might be more then one observer looking and/or thinking about the UFO at quite some distance and at totally different locations. Yet the UFO seemingly can interact with the various observers at the same time. Also, sometimes an observer might be very well hidden from the UFO, yet the UFO still seems to be able to interact with the observer. If a more or less ordinary drone can do that, one might assume that it can somehow detect human eyes looking at it at greater distances. Maybe that is how? Or it interacts with a cellphone that is recording what the observer says and its location? Or, more fancy, the UFO or drone can interact with the consciousness of the observer?


On my experience so far, they are instantly telepathically aware. Or they saw me running a sort distance and guessed they were going to be on camera. Drones? No experience of any sort with these.

Two Septembers in a row I was out in the garden, saw a large cigar shaped opalescent craft, completelly silent, moving slowly to the East at about 5000 feet just a few degrees south of our house. Easily visible. I used to track craft on an aviation site to see where chemtrails or whatever they were, were coming from - it was usual Korean Airlines or Air Canada leaving the long-lasting trails, being at altitudes above 3000 ft to 4000 ft. That's how I estimated its altitude from looking at planes at different altitudes.

The second year in September I saw the same type of craft silently, slowly gliding to the east. When I noticed it, again from the garden, and ran for the house, it was gone when I got outside to photograph it. No windows visible on the craft, I guess they/it could have seen me from the air, suddenly a running human heading to a building, but their view of where I was running would be about 7 seconds till I was behind the house. It seems more logical to me that it was awareness.

In a video I saw years ago, John Vivanco, an excellent remote viewer, said if you remote view aliens they are apt to come see you. In his experience they knew immediately if they were being viewed. He told of other incidents of when they did come see him and his RV business partner, even physically - a Tall Grey Dude.

For What It's Worth, Vivanco's book, published 2016, 'The Time Before the Secret Words' is interesting to read. A quote from the book intro on the topic here: "One moment you’re working on predicting markets for a hedge fund, the next, you’re an inadvertent contact point to an alien species asking you for help." The alien species was a type of firefly that had a relative species in trouble on earth. Vivanco and his partner undertook to help the earth species survive in its remote habitat.

https://www.amazon.ca/Time-Before-Secret-Words-Strangeness/dp/0997825804
 
The other day I was thinking that whether it's intentional or not, the whole 'disclosure movement' has taken a serious blow, given that almost anything that previously would have been classified as an UFO/UAP, is now labeled as a drone.
I wonder if there is maybe some conflict between a faction that wants continued secrecy and a faction that wants to go ahead with some kind of "alien psyop" like Project Bluebeam.

Muddying the waters to make it look like all UFOs are drones would benefit the secrecy faction, while the "alien psyop" faction probably wants gradual, limited and highly controlled disclosure.

Though if they go with the undergrounders disclosure ("our advanced brothers have come to help us"), then maybe "alien disclosure" is not even necessary if the undergrounders look more or less human.
 
Last edited:
This guy does pretty good analyses of UFO videos. He's in NJ and took these videos himself:



Watch this one for the entertaining live commentary:


Space laser - doesn't seem to be lens flare, as the light disappears behind the trees:

That looks more to me like someone pointing a laser from the ground at the drone. You can see the laser miss the drone several times, and when it hits the drone, the beam above the drone becomes much less intense, and you also see a reflected beam from the drone towards the camera (roughly).
 
Adding a bit of a humorous break here, but from what I’ve seen and heard, the few drone sightings that have happened out here on the Wild West Coast of Vancouver Island seem to be taken care of by either locals, or the resident flying wildlife!
Oh, and take note, Glass beer bottles are way more effective than cans, just sayin’.
123B7F02-9AB4-4D9E-9B84-55F40E4C6A6A.jpeg
DD814CBE-EAC7-4BB2-8130-9B14B3E89039.jpeg
42FC5C5F-DFDA-4E56-927D-68F6F90AD93F.jpeg

Yes, these are stock photos I pulled from from the Internet, I couldn’t resist.
😂😉
 
Timothy Alberino gives a very reasonable take on the mystery drones here:


One option he presents is a genuine UFO flap, with govt/mil response to confuse the signal, and intercept and surveil that UAP drones/orbs. (Go to around the 30:00 mark.) However, he's currently leaning more in the direction of his other two options: foreign, or domestic response to some threat. I think he's wrong about that, but he presented the third option well.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom