Please, compare these two explosions, they are, I think so, similar. The plume, specially....
Niall said:Pashalis said:Just scanned through all the available camera angels of the videos I could find.
I'll list them here, in case you want to look at it closer as well:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0e5_1439474009
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=160_1439476837
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=775_1439442869
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=677_1439397581
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=dc0_1439444275
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=deLLq60lZaA
From what I can see there, it looks like following probably happened:
1: A fire is burning
2: The fire causes the first smaller explosion (no indication, like a bright flash coming from outside (like in the second explosion) is present, although it can not be ruled out)
3: It calms down again after the first big explosion
4: The second huger explosion happens after something very bright seems to enter from outside which then seems to cause the huge explosion
Where are you seeing these "bright flashes entering from outside"?
Perceval said:This video shows two massive explosions after an initial fire/explosion that isn't seen on video.
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=0e5_1439474009
Unless we're talking about 3 meteorites hitting the same place within a few minutes of each other, it suggests that there was explosives in that area that caused the two large explosions. It's still possible that a space rock started the first fire though I suppose.
(Perceval) What caused the Waco fertilizer plant explosion?
A: Information overload in the form of a small comet fragment with a massive electrical charge.
Q: (Perceval) There was a fire burning before the explosion. What caused that fire?
A: First fragment.
{Think of the fires in Scotland.}
Q: (L) I think they were being a little bit facetious about explosions being "information overloads", like a play on words?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Okay, next question: When an F5 tornado can form in a matter of minutes, what is the connection with what is going on in 4D? How does it happen? What's the mechanism?
A: Once again you must think in terms of information and electrical charge. The charge on earth is building in several ways and a tornado is an electrical phenomenon similar to ball lightning.
Q: (Andromeda) What about the gas leak explosion in Indiana? (L) Oh, yeah! (Perceval) What caused that? That's the question. It's as short as I can make it. [laughter]
A: It wasn't a gas leak!
Q: (Perceval) So, was it for example, caused by a fireball? A space rock?
A: Close.
Q: (Perceval) A micro fireball? (L) Well, I don't think that's it. I think probably it's more like a comet fragment? (Perceval) Was it a discharge from a comet fragment?
A: Air burst, but very low and highly charged.
Where are you seeing these "bright flashes entering from outside"?
RT: Judging from the pictures you've seen, what do you think could cause explosions of this size?
John Williamson: There are so many types of explosives. It could be commercial explosives, the sort that would explode as soon as there was a shock, but even a shock detonation can cause a massive explosion. It could be military explosives; it could be gas; the list is almost endless. There are many, many causes of such a violent explosion. The worry is that it was so great. It did seem to show a fire in the early stages followed by at least one explosion and possibly even then just before the very, very large detonation. That is not uncommon, but it looks very, very powerful, and when you see that kind of explosion you wonder how much injury and possibly loss of life could have occurred due to that shock.
.....
RT: Is it ever possible to be completely safe from a blast like this happening?
JW: Safety systems should work towards that. Companies, industry that specialize in using chemicals that are explosive and combustible should have the highest safety services and safety systems in place. Of course all sorts of things can cause an ignition. It could even be something as obscure as lightning, it can be friction, it can be a spark, it can be a pilot light, it can be a mechanical spark - there are all sorts of things that could cause an ignition, and you can never ever be 100 percent certain. But safety systems should limit those and make sure that chances of them happening are so minimal.
"I can tell you in my 45 year career, I have never seen anything like this. Underground storage tanks are put there to reduce the potential for fire,"
Perceval said:Yeah, the fact that the site was storing ammonium nitrate makes it a bit too coincidental to not look back at the West, Texas explosion where ammonium nitrate was also housed. Question is, if it was a meteorite fragment, highly charged, what is it that makes such things attracted to ammonium nitrate??
Perceval said:Yeah, the fact that the site was storing ammonium nitrate makes it a bit too coincidental to not look back at the West, Texas explosion where ammonium nitrate was also housed. Question is, if it was a meteorite fragment, highly charged, what is it that makes such things attracted to ammonium nitrate??
Perceval said:Yeah, the fact that the site was storing ammonium nitrate makes it a bit too coincidental to not look back at the West, Texas explosion where ammonium nitrate was also housed. Question is, if it was a meteorite fragment, highly charged, what is it that makes such things attracted to ammonium nitrate??
* The explosion happens by the mechanism of shock-to-detonation transition. The initiation happens by an explosive charge going off in the mass, by the detonation of a shell thrown into the mass, or by detonation of an explosive mixture in contact with the mass. The examples are Kriewald, Morgan (present-day Sayreville, New Jersey), Oppau, and Tessenderlo.
* The explosion results from a fire that spreads into the ammonium nitrate itself (Texas City, Brest, Oakdale PA), or from a mixture of ammonium nitrate with a combustible material during the fire (Repauno, Cherokee, Nadadores). The fire must be confined at least to a degree for successful transition from a fire to an explosion (a phenomenon known as "deflagration-to-detonation transition").Pure, compact AN is stable and very difficult to ignite, and numerous cases exist when even impure AN did not explode in a fire.
Deflagration to detonation transition (DDT) refers to a phenomenon in ignitable mixtures of a flammable gas and air (or oxygen) when a sudden transition takes place from a deflagration type of combustion to a detonation type of combustion. The effects of a detonation are usually devastating.
stellar said:Were the Perseids not in the neighbourhood of northern hemisphere at the time?
A total of seven or eight explosions rocked the Tianjin blast site Saturday, prompting armed police to evacuate residents within a three-kilometer radius. Wednesday’s double blast at a chemical warehouse killed 85 people and injured more than 700.
Fires broke out at the blast site in the Chinese port city at 11:40 a.m. local time Saturday, according to state news agency Xinhua. Seven or eight blasts from three separate locations were reportedly heard at the scene.
Following the fire, police began evacuating those within a three-kilometer radius, saying they were acting on “orders from higher authorities,” Beijing News reported.
Also, considering the devaluation of the yuan over the past couple of days, and the on-going geo-political shenanigans - could this have been a space weapon type 'warning shot'?
Considering their usual modus operandi i.e. MH17 it doesn't seem likely, they seem to prefer to try to pin the carnage on the targeted government. Besides, they can't engage both Russia and China militarily. They're crazy for sure but not that much.
Anam Cara said:Could it be therefore, that just as lightning can be the cause of ignition of outgassed methane for example (some Canadian wildfires); when exposed to sufficient heat transfer (the initial fires) ammonium nitrate undergoes molecular changes, the effect of which can attract a corresponding electrical discharge (cometary / plasma) - which is the means of detonation resulting in these highly concentrated and powerful explosions?
Pashalis said:It indeed looks like the second explosion was fueled by a bright light entering from outside...
Niall said:Anam Cara said:Could it be therefore, that just as lightning can be the cause of ignition of outgassed methane for example (some Canadian wildfires); when exposed to sufficient heat transfer (the initial fires) ammonium nitrate undergoes molecular changes, the effect of which can attract a corresponding electrical discharge (cometary / plasma) - which is the means of detonation resulting in these highly concentrated and powerful explosions?
I see where you're going in terms of things 'lining up' from above and below, but would point out that chemical plants, power plants, transformers, fuel storage facilities, and even petrol/gas stations and oil-transport trains have been blowing up left, right and center. So I don't think this is specific to ammonium nitrate/fertilizer.
Perceval said:Pashalis said:It indeed looks like the second explosion was fueled by a bright light entering from outside...
I think that's a bit of a leap. That flash, in the presence of an already massive burning fire, that appears a fraction of a second before a massive explosion, isn't conclusive evidence of anything. As ammonium nitrate or other chemcial explodes, you would expect to see a flash at the moment of detonation.