Anam Cara said:Niall said:Anam Cara said:Could it be therefore, that just as lightning can be the cause of ignition of outgassed methane for example (some Canadian wildfires); when exposed to sufficient heat transfer (the initial fires) ammonium nitrate undergoes molecular changes, the effect of which can attract a corresponding electrical discharge (cometary / plasma) - which is the means of detonation resulting in these highly concentrated and powerful explosions?
I see where you're going in terms of things 'lining up' from above and below, but would point out that chemical plants, power plants, transformers, fuel storage facilities, and even petrol/gas stations and oil-transport trains have been blowing up left, right and center. So I don't think this is specific to ammonium nitrate/fertilizer.
I agree. The main point I was trying to make is that of all these various facilities blowing up - some (as the ammonium nitrate/fertilizer incidents) may be much more 'intense' with reverse polarity electrical discharges (detonation) compared with other types of explosions / fires with 'less intense' means of ignition, like lightning or conventional fire (deflagration).
What I am trying to determine is whether there are specific characteristics / qualities of 'attraction', whereby we can differentiate between what may be two different atmospheric based electrical sources of ignition.
Yesterday, I was reading/searching/getting lost, about that kind of path, but since I am way too far ignorant about such terms, concepts, technical information, knowledge etc, did not reach to any conclusive,
Either way was interesting to know about rare earth elements/metals; more about neodymium because it is used in magnetos to find micrometeorites and, China is the dominant producer of rare earth metals. Ended up reading articles like this : Distribution of rare earth elements in sewage-irrigated soil profiles in Tianjin, China,or this one: China Rare Earth: WTO Trouble Triggers Environmental Cleanup