Part 3 of the Goldilocks Enigma published.
Thanks Vulcan59. Much appreciated.
Part 3 of the Goldilocks Enigma published.
Others have touched on this point too. Captain obvious says that there is a (big) difference between meaning and purpose. Confusing those two adds to the confusion.I've pondered about it, mostly when I am in some sort of emotional turmoil, what is the purpose?
Yes, and it becomes even larger when you factor in Karma and past lives, the whole self generated notion becomes rather grand!I think real meaning and/or purpose is self-created and has to be self-generated. It’s an ongoing process. I think we are engineered to want a quick answer.
Have you looked into people pleasing and Not Nice! (Book) I think with more life experience one finds balance. Remember reality, society our body and the construct of 3D requires a lot from us and you said family so other people need your energy time attention.give. :) The thing is, I don't know the limit and the balance between ME and OTHERS. I'm not sure we're all on the same page about balancing ourselves and the WE. :)
That's why I feel kinda lost...
I do invest myself in MYSELF, I do invest myself in OURSELVES (in my family context, etc), but I don't know how much I should invest in others versus myself. :)
Hi guys
I was just wondering whether anyone else here struggles with the daily grind of life? I mean in terms of whether life for human beings has any meaning? The C's information (as I understand it) basically categorises us as a 3rd density farm yard animal - for the harvesting by superior alien beings, for the experimenting on, etc and this makes it hard for me to see a greater meaning to our existence.
Obviously there is undeniable beauty in this planet and I certainly don't discount it but as someone who has always yearned for a deeper meaning - or reason - for us being here, I find it increasingly difficult to ascribe a purpose to our existence.
Does anyone else struggle with this? And can anyone suggest ways in which to put this in some kind of manageable perspective?
Thank you, as always,
Owen.
I don't think that either STS or STO people would agree with what you say.The opposite of existence is nothingness or a black hole. STS beings rebelled against existence and strive to destroy themselves. That is, they commit ultimate suicide. The opposite is with STO beings who desire to exist even though their existence has no purpose
STO expands and STS contracts. STS might try to expand literally in our world, but it seems like it just spreads and multiplies darkness.Q: (Ark) What is the purpose of life?
A: Learning by organizing information bits. Expanded being.
Q: (Ark) What is the purpose of learning?
(L) Expanded being. I think that's why they added that.
(Joe) So it's a fundamental dynamic of all reality: to expand.
The opposite is with STO beings who desire to exist even though their existence has no purpose. They exist because they exist or "I am who I am".
That sounds more of a new age premise than one derived from the C's or the research here. The C's say repeatedly that all that exists is lessons. I also think the greater our lessons the more responsibility we tend to have. There seems quite a lot of purpose in that.