I want to present here the latest message from Mike Quinsey’s Galactic Federation because I think it’s possible that, with the US political situation coming to a head over Iraq, we may soon see whether these communications can be much more clearly exposed at outright disinformation. There is a strong feeling all around that the current level of political tension cannot be sustained much longer and must be relieved one way or another. This could mean either the collapse of the US executive branch, a lessening of US hostilities abroad, and movement towards peace, OR a sudden rebound of public support for the White House and an escalation of bloodshed abroad, which would have to be triggered by something (probably another huge deception).
The Quinsey/Galactic Federation messages have changed in tone slightly since the beginning of 2007, actually claiming that now-observable events will mean the advent of positive changes in this very year. I tend to think that the observable events are mere pacifiers for the public and that nothing is changing in the core PTB strategy. Basically, if the US executive branch manages to explode the middle-east conflict to a new level of intensity and horror, by whatever means, then it will be hard for the Galactic Feds to explain it away. I think there is potential for a lot of people to wake up and turn away from Quinsey’s messages – but, will it be too late? Will the messages have done their part by then to keep seekers away from helping to avert tragedy?
Ag-Agria through Mike Quinsey, 2007-01-29
This paragraph added 2007-01-31 -- I just noticed "legal pressures are forcing their hand" with some alarm that didn't register before. This is, in part, what I meant about things coming to a head in the next couple of months. Only this morning did I hear an update on the Libby trial that looks like a victory for the executive branch. Judith Miller of the NYT testified and fingered Libby directly as her source for the Plame leak, without indication that the real source was any higher in rank. Miller could be telling the truth or she could be part of the plot to protect Rove and Cheney. After all, we know that her employer, the New York Times, is actually a stealth supporter of the neocon plans, while ostensibly being fair and unbiased.
2007-01-31 -- Here, I am adding some of today's Quinsey message, from Diane, which reinforces what you've just read, but also sneaks in a possible "out" for ET "intervention." Can't guess what that means just yet. It starts with what looks like damage control over the conflicting messages that come from all these channelers.
Things coming to head? It would seem that a clear "escalation" of mideast conflict, such as military engagement with Iran, would invalidate this message. We'll see.
*** END ***
The Quinsey/Galactic Federation messages have changed in tone slightly since the beginning of 2007, actually claiming that now-observable events will mean the advent of positive changes in this very year. I tend to think that the observable events are mere pacifiers for the public and that nothing is changing in the core PTB strategy. Basically, if the US executive branch manages to explode the middle-east conflict to a new level of intensity and horror, by whatever means, then it will be hard for the Galactic Feds to explain it away. I think there is potential for a lot of people to wake up and turn away from Quinsey’s messages – but, will it be too late? Will the messages have done their part by then to keep seekers away from helping to avert tragedy?
Ag-Agria through Mike Quinsey, 2007-01-29
Perhaps it is my foolish ego, but I thought I would have detected this rising consciousness from humanity. It is invisible to me, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t there. Ag-Agria says I should be able to see it, though. The last sentence’s reference to “what has been taking place" surely can’t mean the alleged “spreading of light" (that’s much too esoteric) but rather wising up to the games of politicians. I’m not even sure I can see that, exactly. Rather, I know that people’s opinions are shifting away from support of continued US aggression, but I also know that opinions are made by the media, with honesty or not, and I see the shift, almost grudging, in mainstream media. So, I'm trying to be careful not to mistake media programming for "rising consciousness."
This I doubt quite outright. As others have pointed out, the political situation in the US is coming to a head mainly over Iraq. We do see what appears to be a “breaking of ranks" with the US president by former political allies who are probably sensing public discontent and looking to save their political careers. However, we do not see much in the way of dissension among the core neocons, the “true believers" who surround the executive branch and continue their grip on incredible power – the power to truly cause havoc and heartache with their military forces. The Libby trial is the only discernable crack in that armor (please correct me if you know of others) and can serve only to hasten the coming of chaos if it goes badly for the execs. Clearly, Ag-Agria would like us to mix up the two camps – the hardcore neocons and the rank-and-file Republicans/blind patriots, etc. Ag-Agria seems to be making much of this “surface" issue of dissension over the Iraq strategy, but fails even to mention that no one can find even a Democrat in Congress that does not still tow the “support Israel to the end" line. This means support for apartheid, violation of UN resolutions, undeclared nuclear weapons, collective punishment, extrajudicial assassinations, etc. Supporters of such horrors are hardly people of “the light."
This paragraph added 2007-01-31 -- I just noticed "legal pressures are forcing their hand" with some alarm that didn't register before. This is, in part, what I meant about things coming to a head in the next couple of months. Only this morning did I hear an update on the Libby trial that looks like a victory for the executive branch. Judith Miller of the NYT testified and fingered Libby directly as her source for the Plame leak, without indication that the real source was any higher in rank. Miller could be telling the truth or she could be part of the plot to protect Rove and Cheney. After all, we know that her employer, the New York Times, is actually a stealth supporter of the neocon plans, while ostensibly being fair and unbiased.
This paragraph oozes disinformation, In my opinion. Who are these leaders who will rise up? I’ve already suggested that no known Democrats (nor Republicans) could be such. Ag-Agria says they’ll be recognized for their spiritual qualities. Presumably, Ag-Agria means positive spiritual orientation. Well, forgive me, but I have little faith in the ability of most people I know to discern such “spiritual qualities." I do not intend this to be a condescending remark towards others, but rather a recognition that history has shown how people are easily fooled by leaders over and over and over again. I can be fooled, too. Psychopaths and other manipulators cannot be recognized easily until their deeds are known. I cannot comfortably expect that a majority of earthly humanity will suddenly acquire such skills of discernment overnight. I'm also bothered by the comment about Lightworkers having "a calm way of life," which might suggest that passionate social activists are not Lightworkers!
This appears to be a promise for a burst of light resulting in sudden enlightenment for all but the most closed-minded. Never before, I believe, has knowledge come freely, bypassing our need to learn lessons individually – why should it start now? “In such a way that it will not be denied" nullifies the first sentence about now being the time to speak your truth. Ag-Agria is saying that speaking your truth is unnecessary because all will know it soon enough. In other words, keep your mouths closed.
This comes across as rather ominous to me. Does it subtly herald the authoritarianism of the New World Order? If people can indeed be convinced of the “spirituality" of the new leaders, then they might willingly allow a “one party system." Then again, the whole mixture of spirituality with political leadership and financial matters seems “off" to me.
So, the bolded sentence states that these new leaders are already in "high places." Doesn't sound so good to me, as I am unaware of a single US politician that, for example, does not staunchly, publicly support Israel -- which means support for apartheid, undeclared nukes, extrajudicial assassinations, longstanding violation of UN resolutions, immoral policies of collective punishment, etc. And we have here the clear, overt language of control, which is purely STS. Ag-Agria is confident that people will submit to new “control" backed by extraterrestrials. Well, folks, Ra and the C’s have told us that this is exactly what we have been suffering for eons: control by a dark elite backed by extraterrestrials. STO people and other entities would not “control" at all. So, if there really is some change of this nature coming, as Ag-Agria claims, then it may be a pretty big, distracting show, and no more.
Claiming that “absolute freedom" is ours goes directly against the notion that we will soon be exchanging one group of controllers for another. It also would seem to exclude freedom for oppressors. I think that “no need to impose your beliefs on another" (which is STO-esque) is NOT the same as “do not be concerned if others have a different plan."
2007-01-31 -- Here, I am adding some of today's Quinsey message, from Diane, which reinforces what you've just read, but also sneaks in a possible "out" for ET "intervention." Can't guess what that means just yet. It starts with what looks like damage control over the conflicting messages that come from all these channelers.
Things coming to head? It would seem that a clear "escalation" of mideast conflict, such as military engagement with Iran, would invalidate this message. We'll see.
*** END ***
